Catholicism portal Philosophy

v t e

is a method of critical thought which dominated teaching by the academics ("scholastics", or "schoolmen") of medieval universities in Europe from about 1100 to 1700, and a program of employing that method in articulating and defending dogma in an increasingly pluralistic context. It originated as an outgrowth of and a departure from Christian monastic schools at the earliest European universities.[1] The first institutions in the West to be considered universities were established in Italy, France, Spain, and England in the late 11th and 12th centuries for the study of arts, law, medicine, and theology,[2] such as Schola Medica Salernitana, the University
of Bologna, and the University
of Paris. It is difficult to define the date at which they became true universities, although the lists of studia generalia for higher education in Europe are a useful guide, held by the Catholic Church
Catholic Church
and its various religious orders. Scholasticism
is not so much a philosophy or a theology as a method of learning, as it places a strong emphasis on dialectical reasoning to extend knowledge by inference and to resolve contradictions. The scholastic thought is also known for rigorous conceptual analysis and the careful drawing of distinctions. In the classroom and in writing, it often takes the form of explicit disputation; a topic drawn from the tradition is broached in the form of a question, opponents' responses are given, a counterproposal is argued and opponents' arguments rebutted. Because of its emphasis on rigorous dialectical method, scholasticism was eventually applied to many other fields of study. As a program, scholasticism began as an attempt at harmonization on the part of medieval Christian thinkers, to harmonize the various authorities of their own tradition, and to reconcile Christian theology with classical and late antiquity philosophy, especially that of Aristotle
but also of Neoplatonism.[3] (See also Christian apologetics.) Some of the main figures of scholasticism include Anselm of Canterbury, Peter Abelard, Alexander of Hales, Albertus Magnus, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham, Bonaventure, and Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas's masterwork Summa Theologica
Summa Theologica
is considered to be the pinnacle of scholastic, medieval, and Christian philosophy;[4] it began while Aquinas was regent master at the studium provinciale of Santa Sabina in Rome, the forerunner of the Pontifical University
of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Angelicum. Important work in the scholastic tradition has been carried on well past Aquinas's time, for instance by Francisco Suárez and Luis de Molina, and also among Lutheran and Reformed thinkers.


1 Etymology 2 History

2.1 Early Scholasticism 2.2 High Scholasticism 2.3 Spanish Scholasticism 2.4 Late Scholasticism 2.5 Lutheran Scholasticism 2.6 Reformed Scholasticism 2.7 Neo-Scholasticism 2.8 Thomistic Scholasticism 2.9 Analytical Scholasticism

3 Scholastic method 4 Scholastic instruction 5 See also 6 References 7 Primary sources 8 Secondary sources 9 Further reading 10 External links

Etymology[edit] The terms "scholastic" and "scholasticism" derive from the Latin
word scholasticus, the Latinized form of the Greek σχολαστικός (scholastikos), an adjective derived from σχολή (scholē), "school".[5] Scholasticus means "of or pertaining to schools". The "scholastics" were, roughly, "schoolmen". History[edit] Forerunners (and later companions) of Christian scholasticism were Islamic Ilm al-Kalām, literally "science of discourse",[6] and Jewish philosophy, especially Jewish Kalam.[7] Early Scholasticism[edit] The first significant renewal of learning in the West came with the Carolingian Renaissance
Carolingian Renaissance
of the Early Middle Ages. Charlemagne, advised by Peter of Pisa and Alcuin of York, attracted the scholars of England and Ireland. By decree in AD 787, he established schools in every abbey in his empire. These schools, from which the name scholasticism is derived, became centers of medieval learning. During this period, knowledge of Ancient Greek
Ancient Greek
had vanished in the West except in Ireland, where its teaching and use was widely dispersed in the monastic schools.[8] Irish scholars had a considerable presence in the Frankish court, where they were renowned for their learning.[9] Among them was Johannes Scotus Eriugena, (815–877) one of the founders of scholasticism.[10] Eriugena was the most significant Irish intellectual of the early monastic period and an outstanding philosopher in terms of originality.[9] He had considerable familiarity with the Greek language and translated many works into Latin, affording access to the Cappadocian Fathers
Cappadocian Fathers
and the Greek theological tradition.[9] The other three founders of scholasticism were the 11th-century scholars Peter Abelard, Archbishop Lanfranc of Canterbury
Lanfranc of Canterbury
and Archbishop Anselm of Canterbury.[10] This period saw the beginning of the 'rediscovery' of many Greek works which had been lost to the Latin
West. As early as the 10th century, scholars in Spain had begun to gather translated texts and, in the latter half of that century, began transmitting them to the rest of Europe.[11] After a successful burst of Reconquista
in the 12th century, Spain opened even further for Christian scholars, who were now able to work in 'friendly' religious territory.[12][full citation needed] As these Europeans encountered Islamic philosophy, they opened a wealth of Arab knowledge of mathematics and astronomy.[13][full citation needed] Scholars such as Adelard of Bath
Adelard of Bath
traveled to Spain and Sicily, translating works on astronomy and mathematics, including the first complete translation of Euclid's Elements
Euclid's Elements
into Latin.[14] At the same time, Anselm of Laon
Anselm of Laon
systematized the production of the gloss on Scripture, followed by the rise to prominence of dialectic (the middle subject of the medieval trivium) in the work of Abelard. Peter Lombard
Peter Lombard
produced a collection of Sentences, or opinions of the Church Fathers and other authorities[15] High Scholasticism[edit] The 13th and early 14th centuries are generally seen as the high period of scholasticism. The early 13th century witnessed the culmination of the recovery of Greek philosophy. Schools of translation grew up in Italy and Sicily, and eventually in the rest of Europe. Powerful Norman kings gathered men of knowledge from Italy and other areas into their courts as a sign of their prestige.[16] William of Moerbeke's translations and editions of Greek philosophical texts in the middle half of the thirteenth century helped form a clearer picture of Greek philosophy, particularly of Aristotle, than was given by the Arabic versions on which they had previously relied, and which had distorted or obscured the relation between Platonic and Aristotelian systems of philosophy.[17][full citation needed] His work formed the basis of the major commentaries that followed. Universities developed in the large cities of Europe during this period, and rival clerical orders within the church began to battle for political and intellectual control over these centers of educational life. The two main orders founded in this period were the Franciscans
and the Dominicans. The Franciscans
were founded by Francis of Assisi
Francis of Assisi
in 1209. Their leader in the middle of the century was Bonaventure, a traditionalist who defended the theology of Augustine and the philosophy of Plato, incorporating only a little of Aristotle
in with the more neoplatonist elements. Following Anselm, Bonaventure
supposed that reason can only discover truth when philosophy is illuminated by religious faith.[citation needed] Other important Franciscan scholastics were Duns Scotus, Peter Auriol
Peter Auriol
and William of Ockham. By contrast, the Dominican order, a teaching order founded by St Dominic in 1215, to propagate and defend Christian doctrine, placed more emphasis on the use of reason and made extensive use of the new Aristotelian sources derived from the East and Moorish Spain. The great representatives of Dominican thinking in this period were Albertus Magnus
Albertus Magnus
and (especially) Thomas Aquinas, whose artful synthesis of Greek rationalism and Christian doctrine eventually came to define Catholic philosophy. Aquinas placed more emphasis on reason and argumentation, and was one of the first to use the new translation of Aristotle's metaphysical and epistemological writing. This was a significant departure from the Neoplatonic and Augustinian thinking that had dominated much of early scholasticism. Aquinas showed how it was possible to incorporate much of the philosophy of Aristotle without falling into the errors of the Commentator, Averroes.[citation needed] Spanish Scholasticism[edit] Main article: School
of Salamanca Late Scholasticism[edit] Main article: Second scholasticism Lutheran Scholasticism[edit] Main article: Lutheran scholasticism Reformed Scholasticism[edit] Main article: Reformed scholasticism Following the Reformation, Calvinists
largely adopted the scholastic method of theology, while differing regarding sources of authority and content of theology. Neo-Scholasticism[edit] Main article: Neo-scholasticism The revival and development from the second half of the 19th century of medieval scholastic philosophy is sometimes called neo-Thomism. Thomistic Scholasticism[edit] As J. A. Weisheipl O.P. emphasizes, within the Dominican Order Thomistic scholasticism has been continuous since the time of Aquinas: " Thomism
was always alive in the Dominican Order, small as it was after the ravages of the Reformation, the French Revolution, and the Napoleonic occupation. Repeated legislation of the General Chapters, beginning after the death of St. Thomas, as well as the Constitutions of the Order, required all Dominicans to teach the doctrine of St. Thomas both in philosophy and in theology."[18] Thomistic scholasticism or scholastic Thomism
identifies with the philosophical and theological tradition stretching back to the time of St. Thomas. It focuses not only on exegesis of the historical Aquinas but also on the articulation of a rigorous system of orthodox Thomism to be used as an instrument of critique of contemporary thought. Due to its suspicion of attempts to harmonize Aquinas with non-Thomistic categories and assumptions, Scholastic Thomism
has sometimes been called "Strict Observance Thomism".[19] A discussion of recent and current Thomistic scholasticism can be found in La Metafisica di san Tommaso d'Aquino e i suoi interpreti (2002) by Battista Mondin (it), which includes such figures as Sofia Vanni Rovighi (1908–1990),[20] Cornelio Fabro (1911–1995), Carlo Giacon (1900–1984),[21] Tomas Tyn O.P. (1950–1990), Abelardo Lobato O.P. (1925–2012), Leo Elders[22] (1926– ) and Giovanni Ventimiglia (1964– ) among others. Fabro in particular emphasizes Aquinas' originality, especially with respect to the actus essendi or act of existence of finite beings by participating in being itself. Other scholars such as those involved with the "Progetto Tommaso"[23] seek to establish an objective and universal reading of Aquinas' texts.[24] Thomistic scholasticism in the English speaking world went into decline in the 1970s when the Thomistic revival that had been spearheaded by Jacques Maritain, Étienne Gilson, and others, diminished in influence. Partly, this was because this branch of Thomism
had become a quest to understand the historical Aquinas after the Second Vatican Council. Still, those who had learned Scholastic philosophy continued to have unresolved questions about how the insights of the medieval synthesis could be applied to contemporary problems. This conversation departed from the academic environment and entered internet discussion groups such as Aquinas,[25] Christian Philosophy,[26] and Thomism,[27] and websites such as Open Philosophy,[28] where it continues today. Analytical Scholasticism[edit] A renewed interest in the "scholastic" way of doing philosophy has recently awoken in the confines of the analytic philosophy. Attempts emerged to combine elements of scholastic and analytic methodology in pursuit of a contemporary philosophical synthesis. Proponents of various incarnations of this approach include Anthony Kenny, Peter King, Thomas Williams or David Oderberg. Analytical Thomism
can be seen as a pioneer part of this movement. Scholastic method[edit] Cornelius O'Boyle explained that Scholasticism
focuses on how to acquire knowledge and how to communicate effectively so that it may be acquired by others. It was thought that the best way to achieve this was by replicating the discovery process (modus inveniendi).[29] The scholasticists would choose a book by a renowned scholar, auctor (author), as a subject for investigation. By reading it thoroughly and critically, the disciples learned to appreciate the theories of the author. Other documents related to the book would be referenced, such as Church councils, papal letters and anything else written on the subject, be it ancient or contemporary. The points of disagreement and contention between multiple sources would be written down in individual sentences or snippets of text, known as sententiae. Once the sources and points of disagreement had been laid out through a series of dialectics, the two sides of an argument would be made whole so that they would be found to be in agreement and not contradictory. (Of course, sometimes opinions would be totally rejected, or new positions proposed.) This was done in two ways. The first was through philological analysis. Words were examined and argued to have multiple meanings. It was also considered that the auctor might have intended a certain word to mean something different. Ambiguity
could be used to find common ground between two otherwise contradictory statements. The second was through logical analysis, which relied on the rules of formal logic – as they were known at the time – to show that contradictions did not exist but were subjective to the reader. Scholastic instruction[edit] Scholastic instruction consisted of several elements. The first was the lectio: a teacher would read an authoritative text followed by a commentary, but no questions were permitted. This was followed by the meditatio (meditation or reflection) in which students reflected on and appropriated the text. Finally, in the quaestio students could ask questions (quaestiones) that might have occurred to them during meditatio. Eventually the discussion of questiones became a method of inquiry apart from the lectio and independent of authoritative texts. Disputationes were arranged to resolve controversial quaestiones.[30] Questions to be disputed were ordinarily announced beforehand,[citation needed] but students could propose a question to the teacher unannounced – disputationes de quodlibet. In this case, the teacher responded and the students rebutted;[31] on the following day the teacher, having used notes taken during the disputation, summarised all arguments and presented his final position, riposting all rebuttals.[citation needed] The quaestio method of reasoning was initially used especially when two authoritative texts seemed to contradict one another. Two contradictory propositions would be considered in the form of an either/or question, and each part of the question would have to be approved (sic) or denied (non). Arguments for the position taken would be presented in turn, followed by arguments against the position, and finally the arguments against would be refuted. This method forced scholars to consider opposing viewpoints and defend their own arguments against them.[32] See also[edit]

Actus primus Allegory in the Middle Ages Aristotelianism History of science in the Middle Ages List of scholastic philosophers Medieval philosophy Nominalism Pardes (Jewish exegesis) Renaissance of the 12th century Scotism


^ See Steven P. Marone, " Medieval philosophy
Medieval philosophy
in context" in A. S. McGrade, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2003). On the difference between scholastic and medieval monastic postures towards learning, see Jean Leclercq, The Love of Learning and the Desire for God (New York: Fordham University
Press, 1970) esp. 89; 238ff. ^ de Ridder-Symoens 1992, pp. 47–55 ^ Particularly through Pseudo-Dionysius, Augustine, and Boethius, and through the influence of Plotinus and Proclus on Muslim philosophers. In the case of Aquinas, for instance, see Jan Aertsen, "Aquinas' philosophy in its historical setting" in The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas, ed. Norman Kretzmann and Eleonore Stump (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1993). Jean Leclerq, The Love of Learning and the Desire for God (New York: Fordham University
Press, 1970). ^ Gilson, Etienne (1991). The Spirit of Medieval Philosophy
(Gifford Lectures 1933–35). Notre Dame, IN: University
of Notre Dame Press. p. 490. ISBN 978-0-268-01740-8.  ^ "school".  "scholastic". Online Etymology Dictionary.  σχολή, σχολαστικός. Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert; A Greek–English Lexicon at the Perseus Project. ^ Winter, Tim J. "Introduction." Introduction. The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2008. 4–5. Print. ^ Madeleine Pelner Cosman, Linda Gale Jones, Handbook to Life in the Medieval World, p 391. ISBN 1438109075 ^ MacManus, p 215 ^ a b c "John Scottus Eriugena". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. 2004-10-17. Retrieved 2008-07-21.  ^ a b Toman 2007, p. 10: " Abelard
himself was ... together with John Scotus Erigena (9th century), and Lanfranc
and Anselm of Canterbury (both 11th century), one of the founders of scholasticism." ^ Lindberg 1978, pp. 60–61. ^ Lindberg 1978; Palencia. ^ Watt ^ Clagett 1982, p. 356. ^ Hoffecker, Andrew. "Peter Lombard, Master of the Sentences". Ligonier Ministries.  ^ Lindberg 1978, pp. 70–72. ^ Fryde ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2013-09-27. Retrieved 2013-08-21.  "The Revival of Thomism: An Historical Survey, " James Weisheipl, 1962. ^ Accessed 5 September 2013 ^ Accessed 17 August 2013 ^ Accessed 9 April 2013 ^ Leo Elders Accessed 30 August 2013 ^ Accessed 5 Sept. 2013 ^ See Raffaele Rizzello's "Il Progetto Tommaso," in Vita quaerens intellectum, eds. Giacomo Grasso, O.P. and Stefano Serafini, Millennium Romae, Rome 1999, pp. 157–161. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2013-09-28. Retrieved 2013-09-25.  Accessed 5 Sept. 2013 ^ ^ ^ ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2011-09-26. Retrieved 2009-07-10.  ^ Cornelius, O'Boyle (1998). The art of medicine: medical teaching at the University
of Paris, 1250–1400. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 9789004111240. OCLC 39655867.  ^ van Asselt 2011, p. 59. ^ van Asselt 2011, p. 60. ^ van Asselt 2011, pp. 61–62.

Primary sources[edit]

Hyman, J.; Walsh, J. J., eds. (1973). Philosophy
in the Middle Ages. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. ISBN 0-915144-05-0.  Schoedinger, Andrew B., ed. (1996). Readings in Medieval Philosophy. New York: Oxford University
Press. ISBN 0-19-509293-7. 

Secondary sources[edit]

van Asselt, Willem J. (2011). Inleiding in de Gereformeerde Scholastiek [Introduction to Reformed Scholasticism] (in Dutch). With contributions by T. Theo J. Pleizier, Pieter L. Rouwendal, and Maarten Wisse; Translated by Albert Gootjes. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Reformation Heritage Books. ISBN 978-1-60178-121-5.  Clagett, Marshall (1982). "William of Moerbeke: Translator of Archimedes". Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 126 (5): 356–366. JSTOR 986212.  Fryde, E., The Early Palaeologan Renaissance, Brill 2000. Gallatin, Harlie Kay (2001). "Medieval Intellectual Life and Christianity". Archived from the original on 2009-02-01.  Gracia, J. G. and Noone, T. B., eds., (2003) A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. London: Blackwell, ISBN 0-631-21672-3 McGrade, A. S., ed., (2003) The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. Lindberg, David C. (1978). Science in the Middle Ages. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-48232-4.  Maurer, Armand A. (1982). Medieval Philosophy
(2nd ed.). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. ISBN 0-88844-704-3.  Toman, Rolf (2007). The Art of Gothic: Architecture, Sculpture, Painting. photography by Achim Bednorz. Tandem Verlag GmbH. ISBN 978-3-8331-4676-3. 

Further reading[edit]

Trueman, Carl R. and R. Scott Clark, jt. eds. (1999). Protestant Scholasticism: Essays in Reassessment. Carlisle, Eng.: Paternoster Press. ISBN 0-85364-853-0

External links[edit]

Scholasticon by Jacob Schmutz Medieval Philosophy
Electronic Resources "Scholasticism". In Encyclopædia Britannica
Encyclopædia Britannica
Online. Scholasticism
Joseph Rickaby, (1908), 121 pp. (also at googlebooks) Scholasticism
in The Catholic Encyclopedia Yahoo! directory category: Scholasticism The genius of the scholastics and the orbit of Aristotle, article by James Franklin on the influence of scholasticism on later thought Medieval Philosophy, Universities and the Church by James Hannam (in German) ALCUIN – Regensburger Infothek der Scholastik – Huge database with information on biography, text chronology, editions.

Links to related articles

v t e



Peripatetic school Physics Biology Ethics Logic Theology (unmoved mover)

Ideas and interests

Correspondence theory of truth Hexis Virtue ethics (golden mean) Four causes Telos Phronesis Eudaimonia Arete Temporal finitism Antiperistasis Philosophy
of nature (sublunary sphere) Potentiality and actuality Universals (substantial form) Hylomorphism Mimesis Catharsis Substance (hypokeimenon, ousia, transcendentals) Essence–accident Category of being Minima naturalia Magnanimity Sensus communis Rational animal Genus–differentia Mythos

Corpus Aristotelicum

Physics Organon Nicomachean Ethics Politics Metaphysics On the Soul Rhetoric Poetics


Alexander the Great Theophrastus Avicenna Averroes Maimonides Thomas Aquinas Mortimer Adler Alasdair MacIntyre Martha Nussbaum

Related topics

Platonism Commentaries on Aristotle Recovery of Aristotle Scholasticism Conimbricenses Pseudo-Aristotle Views on women Aristotle's wheel paradox Aristotle's razor


v t e


Outline History


Argumentation theory Axiology Critical thinking Logic
in computer science Mathematical logic Metalogic Metamathematics Non-classical logic Philosophical logic Philosophy
of logic Set theory


Abduction Analytic and synthetic propositions Antinomy A priori and a posteriori Deduction Definition Description Induction Inference Logical form Logical consequence Logical truth Name Necessity and sufficiency Meaning Paradox Possible world Presupposition Probability Reason Reference Semantics Statement Strict implication Substitution Syntax Truth Validity



Mathematical logic Boolean algebra Set theory


Logicians Rules of inference Paradoxes Fallacies Logic

Portal Category WikiProject (talk) changes

v t e






Epistemology Logic Ethics Aesthetics


Action Art

Culture Design Music Film

Business Color Cosmos Dialogue Education Environment Futility Happiness Healthcare History Human nature Humor Feminism Language Life Literature Mathematics Mind

Pain Psychology

of psychiatry Philosophy
of perception Philosophy Religion Science

Physics Chemistry Biology Geography

Sexuality Social science

Culture Economics Justice Law Politics Society

Space and time Sport Technology

Artificial intelligence Computer science Engineering Information


Schools of thought

By era

Ancient Western

Medieval Renaissance Early modern Modern Contemporary



Agriculturalism Confucianism Legalism Logicians Mohism Chinese naturalism Neotaoism Taoism Yangism Zen


Aristotelianism Atomism Cynicism Cyrenaics Eleatics Eretrian school Epicureanism Hermeneutics Ionian

Ephesian Milesian

Megarian school Neoplatonism Peripatetic Platonism Pluralism Presocratic Pyrrhonism Pythagoreanism Neopythagoreanism Sophistic Stoicism


Samkhya Nyaya Vaisheshika Yoga Mīmāṃsā Ājīvika Ajñana Cārvāka Jain

Anekantavada Syādvāda


Śūnyatā Madhyamaka Yogacara Sautrāntika Svatantrika


Mazdakism Zoroastrianism Zurvanism



Christian philosophy Scholasticism Thomism Renaissance humanism

East Asian

Korean Confucianism Edo Neo-Confucianism Neo-Confucianism



Acintya bheda abheda Advaita Bhedabheda Dvaita Dvaitadvaita Shuddhadvaita Vishishtadvaita



Averroism Avicennism Illuminationism ʿIlm al-Kalām Sufi





Cartesianism Kantianism Neo-Kantianism Hegelianism Marxism Spinozism


Anarchism Classical Realism Liberalism Collectivism Conservatism Determinism Dualism Empiricism Existentialism Foundationalism Historicism Holism Humanism Idealism

Absolute British German Objective Subjective Transcendental

Individualism Kokugaku Materialism Modernism Monism Naturalism Natural law Nihilism New Confucianism Neo-scholasticism Pragmatism Phenomenology Positivism Reductionism Rationalism Social contract Socialism Transcendentalism Utilitarianism



Applied ethics Analytic feminism Analytical Marxism Communitarianism Consequentialism Critical rationalism Experimental philosophy Falsificationism Foundationalism / Coherentism Generative linguistics Internalism and Externalism Logical positivism Legal positivism Normative ethics Meta-ethics Moral realism Neo-Aristotelian Quinean naturalism Ordinary language philosophy Postanalytic philosophy Quietism Rawlsian Reformed epistemology Systemics Scientism Scientific realism Scientific skepticism Contemporary utilitarianism Vienna Circle Wittgensteinian


Critical theory Deconstruction Existentialism Feminist Frankfurt School New Historicism Hermeneutics Neo-Marxism Phenomenology Postmodernism Post-structuralism Social constructionism Structuralism Western Marxism


Kyoto School Objectivism Russian cosmism more...



Formalism Institutionalism Aesthetic response


Consequentialism Deontology Virtue

Free will

Compatibilism Determinism Libertarianism


Atomism Dualism Monism Naturalism


Constructivism Empiricism Idealism Particularism Fideism Rationalism / Reasonism Skepticism Solipsism


Behaviorism Emergentism Eliminativism Epiphenomenalism Functionalism Objectivism Subjectivism


Absolutism Particularism Relativism Nihilism Skepticism Universalism


Action Event Process


Anti-realism Conceptualism Idealism Materialism Naturalism Nominalism Physicalism Realism

by region Philosophy-related lists Miscellaneous

By region

African Ethiopian Aztec Native America Eastern Chinese Egyptian Czech Indian Indonesian Iranian Japanese Korean Vietnam Pakistani Western American Australian British Danish French German Greek Italian Polish Romanian Russian Slovene Spanish Turkish


Outline Index Years Problems Schools Glossary Philosophers Movements Publications


Women in philosophy Sage (philosophy)

Portal Category Book

v t e

of language


(Cratylus) Gorgias Confucius Xunzi Aristotle Stoics Pyrrhonists Scholasticism Ibn Rushd Ibn Khaldun Thomas Hobbes Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Johann Herder Ludwig Noiré Wilhelm von Humboldt Fritz Mauthner Paul Ricœur Ferdinand de Saussure Gottlob Frege Franz Boas Paul Tillich Edward Sapir Leonard Bloomfield Zhuangzi Henri Bergson Lev Vygotsky Ludwig Wittgenstein

Philosophical Investigations Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

Bertrand Russell Rudolf Carnap Jacques Derrida

Of Grammatology Limited Inc

Benjamin Lee Whorf Gustav Bergmann J. L. Austin Noam Chomsky Hans-Georg Gadamer Saul Kripke A. J. Ayer G. E. M. Anscombe Jaakko Hintikka Michael Dummett Donald Davidson Roger Gibson Paul Grice Gilbert Ryle P. F. Strawson Willard Van Orman Quine Hilary Putnam David Lewis John Searle Joxe Azurmendi Scott Soames Stephen Yablo John Hawthorne Stephen Neale Paul Watzlawick


Causal theory of reference Contrast theory of meaning Contrastivism Conventionalism Cratylism Deconstruction Descriptivist theory of names Direct reference theory Dramatism Expressivism Linguistic determinism Logical atomism Logical positivism Mediated reference theory Nominalism Non-cognitivism Phallogocentrism Quietism Relevance theory Semantic externalism Semantic holism Structuralism Supposition theory Symbiosism Theological noncognitivism Theory of descriptions Verification theory


Ambiguity Linguistic relativity Meaning Language Truth-bearer Proposition Use–mention distinction Concept Categories Set Class Intension Logical form Metalanguage Mental representation Principle of compositionality Property Sign Sense and reference Speech act Symbol Entity Sentence Statement more...

Related articles

Analytic philosophy Philosophy
of information Philosophical logic Linguistics Pragmatics Rhetoric Semantics Formal semantics Semiotics

Category Task Force Discussion

Authority control

GND: 4053169-7 HDS: 11414 N