List Of Court Cases Involving The American Civil Liberties Union
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

The
American Civil Liberties Union The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is a nonprofit organization founded in 1920 "to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States". T ...
(ACLU) has been involved in the following legal cases, either by representing a party, or filing an amicus brief, or otherwise significantly involved.


1920s

1925 * ''Tennessee v. Scopes'' (Scopes Trial) - paid for
John Scopes John is a common English name and surname: * John (given name) * John (surname) John may also refer to: New Testament Works * Gospel of John, a title often shortened to John * First Epistle of John, often shortened to 1 John * Second ...
' defense * '' Gitlow v. New York'', - represented Benjamin Gitlow 1927 * ''
Whitney v. California ''Whitney v. California'', 274 U.S. 357 (1927), was a United States Supreme Court decision upholding the conviction of an individual who had engaged in speech that raised a threat to society. ''Whitney'' was explicitly overruled by ''Brandenburg v. ...
'',


1930s

1931 * ''
Stromberg v. California ''Stromberg v. California'', 283 U.S. 359 (1931), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 7–2, that a California statute banning red flags was unconstitutional because it violated the First an ...
'', - represented Yetta Stromberg 1932 * ''
Powell v. Alabama ''Powell v. Alabama'', 287 U.S. 45 (1932), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court reversed the convictions of nine young black men for allegedly raping two white women on a freight train near Scottsboro, Alabama. Th ...
'', - represented the Scottsboro Boys 1933 * ''
United States v. One Book Called Ulysses ''United States v. One Book Called Ulysses'', 5 F. Supp. 182 (S.D.N.Y. 1933), is a decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in a case dealing with freedom of expression. At issue was whether James Joyce's ...
'' 1935 * '' Patterson v. Alabama'' 1937 * ''
De Jonge v. Oregon ''De Jonge v. Oregon'', 299 U.S. 353 (1937), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause applies freedom of assembly Inco ...
'', - represented Dirk De Jonge 1938 * ''
Lovell v. City of Griffin ''Lovell v. City of Griffin'', 303 U.S. 444 (1938), is a United States Supreme Court case. This case was remarkable in its discussion of the requirement of persons to seek government sanction to distribute religious material. In this particular ca ...
'' 1939 * '' Hague v. CIO'', . 1939 * '' Bolanos v. California'' - represented Wesley Packard


1940s

1940 * ''
Cantwell v. Connecticut ''Cantwell v. Connecticut'', 310 U.S. 296 (1940), is a landmark court decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment's ''federal'' protection of religious free exercise incorporates via the Due Process Clause of t ...
'' 1941 * ''
Edwards v. California ''Edwards v. People of State of California'', 314 U.S. 160 (1941), was a List of landmark court decisions in the United States, landmark Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court case where a California law prohibiting the br ...
'' 1942 * '' Betts v. Brady'' 1943 * ''
Hirabayashi v. United States ''Hirabayashi v. United States'', 320 U.S. 81 (1943), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court held that the application of curfews against members of a minority group were constitutional when the nati ...
'', -
Amicus curiae An ''amicus curiae'' (; ) is an individual or organization who is not a party to a legal case, but who is permitted to assist a court by offering information, expertise, or insight that has a bearing on the issues in the case. The decision on ...
for Gordon Kiyoshi Hirabayashi * ''
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette ''West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette'', 319 U.S. 624 (1943), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment protects students from being forced to salute the Ame ...
'', - Amicus curiae * ''
Martin v. Struthers ''Martin v. Struthers'', 319 U.S. 141 (1943), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a law prohibiting the distribution of handbills from door to door violated the First Amendment rights of a Jehovah's Witness, specifi ...
'' 1944 * ''
Korematsu v. United States ''Korematsu v. United States'', 323 U.S. 214 (1944), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States to uphold the exclusion of Japanese Americans from the West Coast Military Area during World War II. The decision has been wid ...
'' * '' Smith v. Allwright'' 1946 * '' Hannegan v. Esquire'' 1947 * ''
Everson v. Board of Education ''Everson v. Board of Education'', 330 U.S. 1 (1947), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that applied the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to state law. Prior to this decision, the clause, which states, "Congress ...
'', - Amicus curiae for Arch R. Everson 1948 * ''
Shelley v. Kraemer ''Shelley v. Kraemer'', 334 U.S. 1 (1948), is a List of landmark court decisions in the United States, landmark United States Supreme Court case that held that racially restrictive housing Covenant (law), covenants cannot legally be enforced. The ...
''


1950s

1951 * ''
Kunz v. New York ''Kunz v. New York'', 340 U.S. 290 (1951), was a United States Supreme Court case finding a requirement mandating a permit to speak on religious issues in public was unconstitutional. It was argued October 17, 1950, and decided January 15, 1951, 8 ...
'' 1952 * '' Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson'' * ''
Rochin v. California ''Rochin v. California'', 342 U.S. 165 (1952), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that added behavior that "shocks the conscience" into tests of what violates due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United S ...
'' 1954 *'' Brown v. Board of Education'', - Amicus curiae for Oliver Brown *''
Hernandez v. Texas ''Hernandez v. Texas'', 347 U.S. 475 (1954), was a List of landmark court decisions in the United States, landmark case, "the first and only Mexican-American civil-rights case heard and decided by the United States Supreme Court during the post-Wo ...
'', 347 U.S. 475 (1954) civil rights 1957 * '' Roth v. United States'', - Amicus curiae for Samuel Roth * ''
Watkins v. United States ''Watkins v. United States'', 354 U.S. 178 (1957), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the power of the United States Congress is not unlimited in conducting investigations and that nothing in the United States C ...
'' * ''
Yates v. United States ''Yates v. United States'', 354 U.S. 298 (1957), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the First Amendment protected radical and reactionary speech, unless it posed a " clear and present danger." Background ...
'', - Amicus curiae for Yates 1958 * ''
Kent v. Dulles ''Kent v. Dulles'', 357 U.S. 116 (1958), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on the right to travel and passport restrictions as they relate to First Amendment free speech rights. It was the first case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ...
'' * '' Speiser v. Randall'', - ACLU lawyer Lawrence Speiser defended himself * ''
Trop v. Dulles ''Trop v. Dulles'', 356 U.S. 86 (1958), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to revoke citizenship as a punishment for a crime. The ruling's reference to "evolving standards of decency" is fr ...
'' 1959 * ''
Smith v. California ''Smith v. California'', 361 U.S. 147 (1959), was a U.S. Supreme Court case upholding the freedom of the press. The decision deemed unconstitutional a city ordinance that made one in possession of obscene books criminally liable because it did not ...
''


1960s

1961 * ''
Mapp v. Ohio ''Mapp v. Ohio'', 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents prosecutors from using Evidence (law), evidence in co ...
'', - Amicus curiae for Dollree Mapp * ''
Poe v. Ullman ''Poe v. Ullman'', 367 U.S. 497 (1961), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge a Connecticut law that banned the use of contraceptives and banned doctors from advising their use because the ...
'' 1962 * ''
Engel v. Vitale ''Engel v. Vitale'', 370 U.S. 421 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and encourage its recitation in public school ...
'', - represented Steven I. Engel 1963 * '' Abington School District v. Schempp'', - represented Edward Schempp * ''
Gideon v. Wainwright ''Gideon v. Wainwright'', 372 U.S. 335 (1963), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires U.S. states to provide attorneys to criminal defendants who are unable ...
'', - Amicus curiae for
Clarence Earl Gideon Clarence Earl Gideon (August 30, 1910 – January 18, 1972) was a poor drifter accused in a Florida state court of felony breaking and entering. While in prison, he appealed his case to the US Supreme Court, resulting in the landmark 1963 decisio ...
1964 * '' Baggett v. Bullitt'' * '' Carroll v. Princess Anne County'' * ''
Escobedo v. Illinois ''Escobedo v. Illinois'', 378 U.S. 478 (1964), was a Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment to the United ...
'', - Amicus curiae for
Danny Escobedo Danny Escobedo (born c. 1937) was a Chicago petitioner in the Supreme Court case of ''Escobedo v. Illinois'', which established a criminal suspect's right to remain silent and have an attorney present during questioning. This case was an important ...
* ''
Jacobellis v. Ohio ''Jacobellis v. Ohio'', 378 U.S. 184 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court decision handed down in 1964 involving whether the state of Ohio could, consistent with the First Amendment, ban the showing of the Louis Malle film ''The Lovers'' ('' ...
'' * ''
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan ''New York Times Co. v. Sullivan'', 376 U.S. 254 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution's freedom of speech protections limit the ability of American public officials to sue for ...
'', - Amicus curiae for
The New York Times ''The New York Times'' (''the Times'', ''NYT'', or the Gray Lady) is a daily newspaper based in New York City with a worldwide readership reported in 2020 to comprise a declining 840,000 paid print subscribers, and a growing 6 million paid ...
* ''
Reynolds v. Sims ''Reynolds v. Sims'', 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population. Along with ''Baker v. Carr'' (196 ...
'', - represented B.A. Reynolds 1965 * ''
Griswold v. Connecticut ''Griswold v. Connecticut'', 381 U.S. 479 (1965), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects the liberty of married couples to buy and use contraceptives withou ...
'', - Amicus curiae for Estelle T. Griswold * ''
Lamont v. Postmaster General ''Lamont v. Postmaster General'', 381 U.S. 301 (1965), was a landmark First Amendment Supreme Court case, in which the ruling of the Supreme Court struck down § 305(a) of the Postal Service and Federal Employees Salary Act of 1962, a federal statu ...
'' * ''
United States v. Seeger ''United States v. Seeger'', 380 U.S. 163 (1965), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the exemption from the military draft for conscientious objectors could be reserved not only for those professing conformity with the ...
'', - Amicus curiae for Seeger, Jakobson and Peter 1966 * ''
Bond v. Floyd ''Bond v. Floyd'', 385 U.S. 116 (1966), was a United States Supreme Court case. Background Julian Bond, an African American, was elected to the Georgia House of Representatives in June 1965. Bond was a member of the Student Nonviolent Coordinat ...
'' * ''
Miranda v. Arizona ''Miranda v. Arizona'', 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution restricts prosecutors from using a person's statements made in response to ...
'', - Amicus curiae for Ernesto Miranda 1967 * ''
Keyishian v. Board of Regents ''Keyishian v. Board of Regents'', 385 U.S. 589 (1967), was a Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that states cannot prohibit employees from being members of the Communist Party and that thi ...
'' * ''
Loving v. Virginia ''Loving v. Virginia'', 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a List of landmark court decisions in the United States, landmark civil rights decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States, laws ban ...
'' * ''
Whitus v. Georgia ''Whitus v. Georgia'', 385 U.S. 545 (1967), found in favor of the petitioner (Whitus), who had been convicted for murder, and as such reversed their convictions.. This was due to the Georgia jury selection policies, in which it was alleged racia ...
'' 1968 * ''
Epperson v. Arkansas ''Epperson v. Arkansas'', 393 U.S. 97 (1968), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that invalidated an Arkansas statute prohibiting the teaching of human evolution in the public schools. The Court held that the First Amendment to the Un ...
'', - Amicus curiae for Susan Epperson * ''
Jones v. Mayer ''Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.'', 392 U.S. 409 (1968), is a List of landmark court decisions in the United States, landmark United States Supreme Court case, which held that Congress could regulate the sale of private property to prevent racial di ...
'', - Amicus curiae for Joseph Lee Jones * '' King v. Smith'' * ''
Levy v. Louisiana ''Levy v. Louisiana'', 391 U.S. 68 (1968), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. This decision deals primarily with the civil rights of illegitimate children, specifically in regards to their ability to sue on a deceased parent ...
'' * ''
Terry v. Ohio ''Terry v. Ohio'', 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime. Spe ...
'', - Amicus curiae for John W. Terry * '' Washington v. Lee'' 1969 * '' Brandenburg v. Ohio'', - represented Clarence Brandenburg * ''
Gregory v. Chicago ''Gregory v. Chicago'', 394 U.S. 111 (1969), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court overturned the disorderly conduct charges against Dick Gregory and others for peaceful demonstrations in Chicago. Background Social activists ...
'' * ''
Street v. New York ''Street v. New York'', 394 U.S. 576 (1969), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a New York state law making it a crime "publicly omutilate, deface, defile, or defy, trample upon, or cast contempt upon either by w ...
'' * ''
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District ''Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District'', 393 U.S. 503 (1969), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that defined First Amendment rights of students in U.S. public schools. The ''Tinker'' test, also k ...
'', - represented the Tinker and Eckhardt families * '' Watts v. United States''


1970s

1970 * ''
Goldberg v. Kelly ''Goldberg v. Kelly'', 397 U.S. 254 (1970), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires an evidentiary hearing before a recipien ...
'' 1971 * ''
Cohen v. California ''Cohen v. California'', 403 U.S. 15 (1971), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment prevented the conviction of Paul Robert Cohen for the crime of disturbing the peace by wearing a jacket displaying "Fu ...
'', - Amicus curiae for Paul Robert Cohen * '' New York Times Co. v. United States'', - Amicus curiae for
The New York Times ''The New York Times'' (''the Times'', ''NYT'', or the Gray Lady) is a daily newspaper based in New York City with a worldwide readership reported in 2020 to comprise a declining 840,000 paid print subscribers, and a growing 6 million paid ...
and
The Washington Post ''The Washington Post'' (also known as the ''Post'' and, informally, ''WaPo'') is an American daily newspaper published in Washington, D.C. It is the most widely circulated newspaper within the Washington metropolitan area and has a large nati ...
* '' Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe'' * ''
Reed v. Reed ''Reed v. Reed'', 404 U.S. 71 (1971), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the administrators of estates cannot be named in a way that discriminates between sexes. In ''Reed v. Reed'' the Supreme Court rule ...
'', - represented Sally Reed * ''
United States v. Vuitch ''United States v. Vuitch'', 402 U.S. 62 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court abortion rights case, which held that the District of Columbia's abortion law banning the practice except when necessary for the health or life of the woman was not ...
'' 1972 * ''
Eisenstadt v. Baird ''Eisenstadt v. Baird'', 405 U.S. 438 (1972), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that established the right of unmarried people to possess contraception on the same basis as married couples. The Court struck down a Massachusetts la ...
'', - Amicus curiae for William Baird * ''
Furman v. Georgia ''Furman v. Georgia'', 408 U.S. 238 (1972), was a landmark criminal case in which the United States Supreme Court invalidated all then existing legal constructions for the death penalty in the United States. It was 5–4 decision, with each mem ...
'', - Amicus curiae for William Furman, Lucious Jackson and Elmer Branch * ''
Laird v. Tatum ''Laird v. Tatum'', 408 U.S. 1 (1972), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court dismissed for lack of ripeness a claim in which the plaintiff accused the U.S. Army of alleged unlawful "surveillance of lawful citizen political activity." ...
'', 408 U.S. 1 1973 * ''
Roe v. Wade ''Roe v. Wade'', 410 U.S. 113 (1973),. was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States conferred the right to have an abortion. The decision struck down many federal and st ...
'', * ''
Doe v. Bolton ''Doe v. Bolton'', 410 U.S. 179 (1973), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States overturning the abortion law of Georgia. The Supreme Court's decision was released on January 22, 1973, the same day as the decision in the better-kno ...
'', - represented "Mary Doe" * ''
Frontiero v. Richardson __NOTOC__ ''Frontiero v. Richardson'', 411 U.S. 677 (1973), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case which decided that benefits given by the United States military to the family of service members cannot be given out differently because of ...
'', - Amicus curiae for Sharron Frontiero * '' Schlesinger v. Holtzman'' * ''
Miller v. California ''Miller v. California'', 413 U.S. 15 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court modifying its definition of obscenity from that of "utterly without socially redeeming value" to that which lacks "serious literary, artistic, politi ...
'', - Amicus curiae for Marvin Miller 1974 * '' Communist Party of Indiana v. Whitcomb'' * '' Smith v. Goguen'' * '' United States v. Nixon'', - Amicus curiae against
Richard Nixon Richard Milhous Nixon (January 9, 1913April 22, 1994) was the 37th president of the United States, serving from 1969 to 1974. A member of the Republican Party, he previously served as a representative and senator from California and was ...
1975 * ''
O'Connor v. Donaldson ''O'Connor v. Donaldson'', 422 U.S. 563 (1975), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court in mental health law ruling that a state cannot constitutionally confine a non-dangerous individual who is capable of surviving safely in freedom by t ...
'' * '' Taylor v. Louisiana'' 1976 * ''
Buckley v. Valeo ''Buckley v. Valeo'', 424 U.S. 1 (1976), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on campaign finance. A majority of justices held that, as provided by section 608 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, limits on election expenditure ...
'' 1977 * ''
Wooley v. Maynard ''Wooley v. Maynard'', 430 U.S. 705 (1977), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that New Hampshire could not constitutionally require citizens to display the state motto upon their license plates when the state motto w ...
'' 1978 * ''
In re Primus ''In re Primus'', 436 U.S. 412 (1978), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that solicitation of prospective litigants by nonprofit organizations that engage in litigation as a form of political expression and political a ...
'' * ''
National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie ''National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie'', 432 U.S. 43 (1977), arising out of what is sometimes referred to as the Skokie Affair, was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court dealing with freedom of speech and freedom of assem ...
'', - represented the
National Socialist Party of America The National Socialist Party of America (NSPA) was a Chicago-based organization founded in 1970 by Frank Collin shortly after he left the National Socialist White People's Party. The NSWPP had been the American Nazi Party until shortly after the ...
. Also known as ''Smith v. Collin''


1980s

1980 * ''
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins ''Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins'', 447 U.S. 74 (1980), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision issued on June 9, 1980 which affirmed the decision of the California Supreme Court in a case that arose out of a free speech dispute between the Pruneya ...
'' 1982 * ''
Island Trees School District v. Pico ''Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico'', 457 U.S. 853 (1982), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court split on the First Amendment issue of local school boards removing library books from junior ...
'' * ''
New York v. Ferber ''New York v. Ferber'', 458 U.S. 747 (1982), was a landmark decision of the U.S Supreme Court, unanimously ruling that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution did not forbid states from banning the sale of material depicting childre ...
'',

- Amicus curiae for Paul Ferber * ''
McLean v. Arkansas ''McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education'', 529 F. Supp. 1255 (E.D. Ark. 1982), was a 1981 legal case in the US state of Arkansas. A lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas by various parents, r ...
'' 1983 * ''
Bob Jones University v. United States ''Bob Jones University v. United States'', 461 U.S. 574 (1983), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that the religion clauses of the First Amendment did not prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from revoking the tax exempt ...
'' * ''
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health ''City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health'', 462 U.S. 416 (1983), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court affirmed its abortion rights jurisprudence. In an opinion by Justice Powell, the Court struck down several provisio ...
'', . 1985 * ''
Wallace v. Jaffree ''Wallace v. Jaffree'', 472 U.S. 38 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case deciding on the issue of silent school prayer. Background An Alabama law authorized teachers to set aside one minute at the start of each day for a moment for ...
'', - Amicus curiae for Ishmael Jaffree 1987 * ''
Edwards v. Aguillard ''Edwards v. Aguillard'', 482 U.S. 578 (1987), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the constitutionality of teaching creationism. The Court considered a Louisiana law requiring that where evolutionary science was taught in public ...
'', - represented Aguillard pro bono 1988 * '' Nelson v. Streeter'' - represented artist in Harold Washington portrait controversy 1989 * ''
County of Allegheny v. ACLU ''County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union'', 492 U.S. 573 (1989), was a Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court case in which the Court considered the constitutionality of two recurring Christmas and Hanukkah h ...
'', - represented itself *''
Texas v. Johnson ''Texas v. Johnson'', 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the American flag was protected speech under the First Amendment to the Constitution, as do ...
'', - Amicus curiae for Gregory Lee Johnson * ''
United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez ''United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez'', 494 U.S. 259 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court decision that determined that Fourth Amendment protections do not apply to searches and seizures by United States agents of property owned by a nonresid ...
'', - Amicus curiae for Rene Martin Verdugo-Urquidez * ''
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services ''Webster v. Reproductive Health Services'', 492 U.S. 490 (1989), was a Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court decision on upholding a Missouri law that imposed restrictions on the use of state funds, facilities, and employ ...
'',


1990s

1990 * '' Cruzan v. Director of the Missouri Department of Health'' - represented
Nancy Cruzan ''Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health'', 497 U.S. 261 (1990), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States involving a young adult incompetent. The first "right to die" case ever heard by the Court, ''Cruzan'' wa ...
's family *'' Employment Division v. Smith'', - Amicus curiae for Alfred Smith and Galen Black * '' Hodgson v. Minnesota'', . * ''
United States v. Eichman ''United States v. Eichman'', 496 U.S. 310 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case that invalidated a federal law against flag desecration as a violation of free speech under the First Amendment. It was argued together with the case ''Unite ...
'', - Amicus curiae for Shawn Eichman 1991 * ''
Rust v. Sullivan ''Rust v. Sullivan'', 500 U.S. 173 (1991), was a case in the United States Supreme Court that upheld Department of Health and Human Services regulations prohibiting employees in federally funded family-planning facilities from counseling a patien ...
'', . 1992 * ''
Hudson v. McMillian ''Hudson v. McMillian'', 503 U.S. 1 (1992), is a United States Supreme Court decision where the Court on a 7—2 vote held that the use of excessive physical force against a prisoner may constitute cruel and unusual punishment even though the inmat ...
'' * '' Lee v. Weisman'', - Amicus curiae for Deborah Weisman * ''
Planned Parenthood v. Casey ''Planned Parenthood v. Casey'', 505 U.S. 833 (1992), was a landmark case of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court upheld the right to have an abortion as established by the "essential holding" of ''Roe v. Wade'' (1973) and is ...
'', - represented Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania * ''
R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul ''R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul'', 505 U.S. 377 (1992), is a case of the United States Supreme Court that unanimously struck down St. Paul's Bias-Motivated Crime Ordinance and reversed the conviction of a teenager, referred to in court documents only ...
'', - Amicus curiae for R. A. V. 1993 * ''
J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. ''J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.'', 511 U.S. 127 (1994), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that peremptory challenges based solely on a prospective juror's sex are unconstitutional. ''J.E.B.'' extended ...
'' * ''
Wisconsin v. Mitchell ''Wisconsin v. Mitchell'', 508 U.S. 476 (1993), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that enhanced penalties for hate crimes do not violate criminal defendants' First Amendment rights.. It was a landmark precedent pertaining t ...
'' 1994 * ''
City of Ladue v. Gilleo ''City of Ladue v. Gilleo'', 512 U.S. 43 (1994), was a free speech decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. It was a legal case, case challenging the legality of a city ordinance restricting the placement of signs in the yards of reside ...
'' 1995 * '' Capitol Square Review Board v. Pinett'' * ''
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah ''Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah'', 508 U.S. 520 (1993), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an ordinance passed in Hialeah, Florida, forbidding the "unnecessar killing of "an animal in a public ...
'' * '' Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston'' * '' McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission'' * ''
Miller v. Johnson ''Miller v. Johnson'', 515 U.S. 900 (1995), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning "affirmative gerrymandering/racial gerrymandering", where racial minority-majority electoral districts are created during redistricting to increase minori ...
'', . * '' Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. State of New York'', - Amicus curiae 1996 * '' ACLU v. Zell Miller'

- represented itself * '' Romer v. Evans'', . * '' NOW v. Scheidler'', - Amicus curiae 1997 * ''
Reno v. ACLU ''Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union'', 521 U.S. 844 (1997), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, unanimously ruling that anti-indecency provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act violated the First Amendme ...
'', . 1999 * '' ACLU v. Schundler'' *''
Hunt v. Cromartie ''Hunt v. Cromartie'', 526 U.S. 541 (1999), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding North Carolina's 12th congressional district.. In an earlier case, ''Shaw v. Reno'', , the Supreme Court ruled that the 12th district of North Carolina a ...
'', - Amicus curiae


2000s

2000 * '' Stenberg v. Carhart'', - Amicus curiae * ''
Curley v. NAMBLA ''Curley v. NAMBLA'' was a wrongful death lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in 2000, by Barbara and Robert Curley against the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), saying the organizatio ...
'' - represented
NAMBLA Nambla is a census village in Baramula district, Jammu & Kashmir, India. As per the 2011 Census of India The 2011 Census of India or the 15th Indian Census was conducted in two phases, house listing and population enumeration. The House ...
pro bono * ''
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale ''Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale'', 530 U.S. 640 (2000), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court, decided on June 28, 2000, that held that the constitutional right to freedom of association allowed the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) to ...
'', - Amicus curiae * ''
City of Indianapolis v. Edmond ''City of Indianapolis v. Edmond'', 531 U.S. 32 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, 6–3, that police may not conduct vehicle searches, specifically ones involving drug-sniffing police dogs, at a checkpoint or ...
'' 2002 * '' ACLU v. Ashcroft (2002)'' 2003 * '' State v. Dalton'' *''
McConnell v. FEC ''McConnell v. Federal Election Commission'', 540 U.S. 93 (2003), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of most of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), often referr ...
'' * ''
Lawrence v. Texas ''Lawrence v. Texas'', 539 U.S. 558 (2003), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that most sanctions of criminal punishment for consensual, adult non- procreative sexual activity (commonly referred to as so ...
'', - Amicus curiae * ''
Goodridge v. Department of Public Health ''Goodridge v. Dept. of Public Health'', 798 N.E.2d 941 ( Mass. 2003), is a landmark Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case in which the Court held that the Massachusetts Constitution requires the state to legally recognize same-sex marria ...
'' - Amicus curiae * '' Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of New England'' - Amicus curiae * '' United States v. American Library Association'' 2004 * '' ACLU v. Ashcroft (2004)'' * '' ACLU v. Department of Defense'' - appellant * ''
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld ''Hamdi v. Rumsfeld'', 542 U.S. 507 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court recognized the power of the U.S. government to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens m ...
'' - Amicus curiae * ''
Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow ''Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow'', 542 U.S. 1 (2004), was a case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.. The lawsuit, originally filed as ''Newdow v. United States Congress, Elk Grove Unified School District, et al.'' in 2000, led to a 2 ...
'' - Amicus curiae * ''
Rumsfeld v. Padilla ''Rumsfeld v. Padilla'', 542 U.S. 426 (2004), was a United States Supreme Court case, in which José Padilla, an American citizen, sought ''habeas corpus'' relief against Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, as a result of his detention by the ...
'' - Amicus curiae * ''
Rasul v. Bush ''Rasul v. Bush'', 542 U.S. 466 (2004), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that foreign nationals held in the Guantanamo Bay detention camp could petition federal courts for writs of ''habeas corpus ...
'' - Amicus curiae * ''
Locke v. Davey ''Locke v. Davey'', 540 U.S. 712 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of a Washington publicly funded scholarship program which excluded students pursuing a "degree in devotional theology." This case exa ...
'' - Amicus curiae 2005 * ''
Castle Rock v. Gonzales ''Castle Rock v. Gonzales'', 545 U.S. 748 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, 7–2, that a town and its police department could not be sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failing to enforce a restraining order, w ...
'' - Amicus curiae for Jessica Gonzales *'' Citizens for Equal Protection v. Bruning'' - Plaintiff alongside Citizens for Equal Protection and Nebraska Advocates for Justice Equality * '' City of San Diego and Mt. Soledad Memorial Association v. Paulson'' - represented Philip Paulson * ''
McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky ''McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky'', 545 U.S. 844 (2005), was a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on March 2, 2005. At issue was whether the Court should continue to inquire into the purpose ...
'' - ACLU defended itself * '' The King’s English v. Shurtleff'' - represented King's English and others * ''
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District ''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District'', 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005) was the first direct challenge brought in the United States federal courts testing a public school district policy that required the teaching of intelligent design ...
'' - represented eleven parents * '' Varian v. Delfino'' - Amicus curiae for Michelangelo Delfino and Mary Day * ''
Gonzales v. Oregon ''Gonzales v. Oregon'', 546 U.S. 243 (2006), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court which ruled that the United States Attorney General cannot enforce the federal Controlled Substances Act against physicians who prescribed drugs, in com ...
'' - Amicus curiae for
Oregon Oregon () is a U.S. state, state in the Pacific Northwest region of the Western United States. The Columbia River delineates much of Oregon's northern boundary with Washington (state), Washington, while the Snake River delineates much of it ...
* ''
Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights ''Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.'', 547 U.S. 47 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the federal government, under the Solomon Amendment, could constitutionally withhold fundin ...
'' - Amicus curiae for Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights * ''
MGM v. Grokster ''MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.'', 545 U.S. 913 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled unanimously that the defendants, peer-to-peer file sharing companies Grokster and Streamcast (maker of Morpheus), cou ...
'' - Amicus curiae in support of Grokster 2006 * '' Qassim v. Bush'' - Amicus curiae in support of Qassim * ''
ACLU v. NSA ''American Civil Liberties Union v. National Security Agency'', 493 F.3d 644 (6th Cir. 2007), is a case decided July 6, 2007, in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that the plaintiffs in the case did not have stand ...
'' * ''
Howard v. Arkansas ''Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Howard''367 Ark. 55238 S.W.3d 1
(2006), is a decision by ...
'' - represented Matthew Lee Howard and other plaintiffs 2007 * ''
Morse v. Frederick ''Morse v. Frederick'', 551 U.S. 393 (2007), is a United States Supreme Court case where the Court held, 5–4, that the First Amendment does not prevent educators from suppressing student speech that is reasonably viewed as promoting illegal d ...
'' - Amicus curiae in support of Frederick * ''
Gonzales v. Carhart ''Gonzales v. Carhart'', 550 U.S. 124 (2007), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. The case reached the high court after U.S. Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, appealed a rul ...
'' and ''
Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood ''Gonzales v. Carhart'', 550 U.S. 124 (2007), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. The case reached the high court after U.S. Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, appealed a ruli ...
'' - Amicus curiae in support of Carhart and Planned Parenthood 2008 *
Abdel-Moniem El-Ganayni Abdel-Moniem ibn Ali El-Ganayni ( ar, عبد المنعم بن علي الجنايني) is an Egyptian-born American nuclear physicist, former prison Imam, and an active member of the Pittsburgh Muslim community. In 2007 El-Ganayni's U.S. securi ...
vs. the United States Department of Energy et al. - represented Dr. El-Ganayni pro-bono 2009 * ''
In re Gill ''In re: Gill'' is a landmark Florida court case that in 2010 ended Florida's 33-year ban on adoptions by homosexuals. In 2007, Frank Martin Gill, an openly gay man, had petitioned the circuit court to adopt two boys that he and his partner had ...
'' - represented Martin Gill * ''
Safford Unified School District v. Redding ''Safford Unified School District v. Redding'', 557 U.S. 364 (2009), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a strip search of a middle school student by school officials violated the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Co ...
'' – represented respondent Redding


2010s

2010 *''
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Perry, also known as pear cider, is an alcoholic beverage made from fermented pears, traditionally the perry pear. It has been common for centuries in England, particularly in Gloucestershire, Herefordshire, and Worcestershire. It is also mad ...
'' - Amicus curiae; private communications between officials in the organization were ordered to be released publicly as court evidence *'' Amnesty v. Blair'' - Amicus curiae *'' Davis v. Billington'' 2013 *''
Clapper v. Amnesty International ''Clapper v. Amnesty International USA'', 568 U.S. 398 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Amnesty International USA and others lacked standing to challenge section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveilla ...
'' *''
Missouri v. McNeely ''Missouri v. McNeely'', 569 U.S. 141 (2013), was a case decided by United States Supreme Court, on appeal from the Supreme Court of Missouri, regarding exceptions to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution under exigent circumsta ...
'' *'' United States v. Windsor'' 2015 *'' Ingersoll v. Arlene's Flowers'' *'' ACLU and others v. NSA'' *''
Obergefell v. Hodges ''Obergefell v. Hodges'', ( ), is a landmark LGBT rights case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection ...
''


Alphabetical

* Abington School District v. Schempp *
Abrams v. United States ''Abrams v. United States'', 250 U.S. 616 (1919), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States upholding the 1918 Amendment to the Espionage Act of 1917 which made it a criminal offense to urge the curtailment of production of the mat ...
*
ACLU v. NSA ''American Civil Liberties Union v. National Security Agency'', 493 F.3d 644 (6th Cir. 2007), is a case decided July 6, 2007, in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that the plaintiffs in the case did not have stand ...
* ACLU v. Schundler * Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union *
American Civil Liberties Union v. Ashcroft ''American Civil Liberties Union v. Ashcroft'' (filed April 9, 2004 in the United States) is a lawsuit filed on behalf of a formerly unknown Internet Service Provider (ISP) owner by the American Civil Liberties Union against the U.S. federal gover ...
*
American Civil Liberties Union v. Department of Defense ''American Civil Liberties Union v. Department of Defense'', No. 1:04-cv-04151, 389 F. Supp. 2d 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (''ACLU v. DoD''), is a case in United States Federal Court, wherein the American Civil Liberties Union sued the Department of Defen ...
* Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England * Baggett v. Bullitt * Betts v. Brady *
Bob Jones University v. United States ''Bob Jones University v. United States'', 461 U.S. 574 (1983), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that the religion clauses of the First Amendment did not prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from revoking the tax exempt ...
*
Bond v. Floyd ''Bond v. Floyd'', 385 U.S. 116 (1966), was a United States Supreme Court case. Background Julian Bond, an African American, was elected to the Georgia House of Representatives in June 1965. Bond was a member of the Student Nonviolent Coordinat ...
*
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale ''Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale'', 530 U.S. 640 (2000), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court, decided on June 28, 2000, that held that the constitutional right to freedom of association allowed the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) to ...
* Brandenburg v. Ohio * Brown v. Board of Education *
Buckley v. Valeo ''Buckley v. Valeo'', 424 U.S. 1 (1976), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on campaign finance. A majority of justices held that, as provided by section 608 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, limits on election expenditure ...
*
Cantwell v. Connecticut ''Cantwell v. Connecticut'', 310 U.S. 296 (1940), is a landmark court decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment's ''federal'' protection of religious free exercise incorporates via the Due Process Clause of t ...
* Capitol Square Review Board v. Pinett * Carroll v. Princess Anne County *
Castle Rock v. Gonzales ''Castle Rock v. Gonzales'', 545 U.S. 748 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, 7–2, that a town and its police department could not be sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failing to enforce a restraining order, w ...
*
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah ''Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah'', 508 U.S. 520 (1993), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an ordinance passed in Hialeah, Florida, forbidding the "unnecessar killing of "an animal in a public ...
* Citizens for Equal Protection v. Bruning *
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health ''City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health'', 462 U.S. 416 (1983), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court affirmed its abortion rights jurisprudence. In an opinion by Justice Powell, the Court struck down several provisio ...
*
City of Ladue v. Gilleo ''City of Ladue v. Gilleo'', 512 U.S. 43 (1994), was a free speech decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. It was a legal case, case challenging the legality of a city ordinance restricting the placement of signs in the yards of reside ...
*
City of Indianapolis v. Edmond ''City of Indianapolis v. Edmond'', 531 U.S. 32 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, 6–3, that police may not conduct vehicle searches, specifically ones involving drug-sniffing police dogs, at a checkpoint or ...
*
Cohen v. California ''Cohen v. California'', 403 U.S. 15 (1971), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment prevented the conviction of Paul Robert Cohen for the crime of disturbing the peace by wearing a jacket displaying "Fu ...
* Communist Party of Indiana v. Whitcomb *
County of Allegheny v. ACLU ''County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union'', 492 U.S. 573 (1989), was a Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court case in which the Court considered the constitutionality of two recurring Christmas and Hanukkah h ...
*
Nancy Cruzan ''Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health'', 497 U.S. 261 (1990), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States involving a young adult incompetent. The first "right to die" case ever heard by the Court, ''Cruzan'' wa ...
*
Curley v. NAMBLA ''Curley v. NAMBLA'' was a wrongful death lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in 2000, by Barbara and Robert Curley against the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), saying the organizatio ...
* Davis v. Billington *
De Jonge v. Oregon ''De Jonge v. Oregon'', 299 U.S. 353 (1937), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause applies freedom of assembly Inco ...
*
Doe v. Bolton ''Doe v. Bolton'', 410 U.S. 179 (1973), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States overturning the abortion law of Georgia. The Supreme Court's decision was released on January 22, 1973, the same day as the decision in the better-kno ...
*
Edwards v. Aguillard ''Edwards v. Aguillard'', 482 U.S. 578 (1987), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the constitutionality of teaching creationism. The Court considered a Louisiana law requiring that where evolutionary science was taught in public ...
*
Edwards v. California ''Edwards v. People of State of California'', 314 U.S. 160 (1941), was a List of landmark court decisions in the United States, landmark Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court case where a California law prohibiting the br ...
*
Eisenstadt v. Baird ''Eisenstadt v. Baird'', 405 U.S. 438 (1972), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that established the right of unmarried people to possess contraception on the same basis as married couples. The Court struck down a Massachusetts la ...
*
Abdel-Moniem El-Ganayni Abdel-Moniem ibn Ali El-Ganayni ( ar, عبد المنعم بن علي الجنايني) is an Egyptian-born American nuclear physicist, former prison Imam, and an active member of the Pittsburgh Muslim community. In 2007 El-Ganayni's U.S. securi ...
*
Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow ''Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow'', 542 U.S. 1 (2004), was a case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.. The lawsuit, originally filed as ''Newdow v. United States Congress, Elk Grove Unified School District, et al.'' in 2000, led to a 2 ...
* Employment Division v. Smith *
Engel v. Vitale ''Engel v. Vitale'', 370 U.S. 421 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and encourage its recitation in public school ...
*
Epperson v. Arkansas ''Epperson v. Arkansas'', 393 U.S. 97 (1968), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that invalidated an Arkansas statute prohibiting the teaching of human evolution in the public schools. The Court held that the First Amendment to the Un ...
*
Escobedo v. Illinois ''Escobedo v. Illinois'', 378 U.S. 478 (1964), was a Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment to the United ...
*
Everson v. Board of Education ''Everson v. Board of Education'', 330 U.S. 1 (1947), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that applied the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to state law. Prior to this decision, the clause, which states, "Congress ...
*
Frontiero v. Richardson __NOTOC__ ''Frontiero v. Richardson'', 411 U.S. 677 (1973), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case which decided that benefits given by the United States military to the family of service members cannot be given out differently because of ...
*
Furman v. Georgia ''Furman v. Georgia'', 408 U.S. 238 (1972), was a landmark criminal case in which the United States Supreme Court invalidated all then existing legal constructions for the death penalty in the United States. It was 5–4 decision, with each mem ...
*
Gideon v. Wainwright ''Gideon v. Wainwright'', 372 U.S. 335 (1963), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires U.S. states to provide attorneys to criminal defendants who are unable ...
* Gitlow v. New York *
Goldberg v. Kelly ''Goldberg v. Kelly'', 397 U.S. 254 (1970), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires an evidentiary hearing before a recipien ...
*
Gonzales v. Carhart ''Gonzales v. Carhart'', 550 U.S. 124 (2007), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. The case reached the high court after U.S. Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, appealed a rul ...
*
Gonzales v. Oregon ''Gonzales v. Oregon'', 546 U.S. 243 (2006), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court which ruled that the United States Attorney General cannot enforce the federal Controlled Substances Act against physicians who prescribed drugs, in com ...
*
Goodridge v. Department of Public Health ''Goodridge v. Dept. of Public Health'', 798 N.E.2d 941 ( Mass. 2003), is a landmark Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case in which the Court held that the Massachusetts Constitution requires the state to legally recognize same-sex marria ...
*
Gregory v. Chicago ''Gregory v. Chicago'', 394 U.S. 111 (1969), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court overturned the disorderly conduct charges against Dick Gregory and others for peaceful demonstrations in Chicago. Background Social activists ...
*
Griswold v. Connecticut ''Griswold v. Connecticut'', 381 U.S. 479 (1965), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects the liberty of married couples to buy and use contraceptives withou ...
*
Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization ''Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization'', 307 U.S. 496 (1939), is a US labor law case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court. Facts In Jersey City, New Jersey, Jersey City, New Jersey, Mayor Frank ...
*
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld ''Hamdi v. Rumsfeld'', 542 U.S. 507 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court recognized the power of the U.S. government to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens m ...
* Hannegan v. Esquire *
Hirabayashi v. United States ''Hirabayashi v. United States'', 320 U.S. 81 (1943), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court held that the application of curfews against members of a minority group were constitutional when the nati ...
* Hodgson v. Minnesota *
Howard v. Arkansas ''Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Howard''367 Ark. 55238 S.W.3d 1
(2006), is a decision by ...
*
Hudson v. McMillian ''Hudson v. McMillian'', 503 U.S. 1 (1992), is a United States Supreme Court decision where the Court on a 7—2 vote held that the use of excessive physical force against a prisoner may constitute cruel and unusual punishment even though the inmat ...
*
Hunt v. Cromartie ''Hunt v. Cromartie'', 526 U.S. 541 (1999), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding North Carolina's 12th congressional district.. In an earlier case, ''Shaw v. Reno'', , the Supreme Court ruled that the 12th district of North Carolina a ...
* Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston * Ingersoll v. Arlene's Flowers *
In re Gill ''In re: Gill'' is a landmark Florida court case that in 2010 ended Florida's 33-year ban on adoptions by homosexuals. In 2007, Frank Martin Gill, an openly gay man, had petitioned the circuit court to adopt two boys that he and his partner had ...
*
In re Primus ''In re Primus'', 436 U.S. 412 (1978), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that solicitation of prospective litigants by nonprofit organizations that engage in litigation as a form of political expression and political a ...
*
Island Trees School District v. Pico ''Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico'', 457 U.S. 853 (1982), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court split on the First Amendment issue of local school boards removing library books from junior ...
*
Jacobellis v. Ohio ''Jacobellis v. Ohio'', 378 U.S. 184 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court decision handed down in 1964 involving whether the state of Ohio could, consistent with the First Amendment, ban the showing of the Louis Malle film ''The Lovers'' ('' ...
*
J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. ''J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.'', 511 U.S. 127 (1994), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that peremptory challenges based solely on a prospective juror's sex are unconstitutional. ''J.E.B.'' extended ...
*
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. ''Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.'', 392 U.S. 409 (1968), is a landmark United States Supreme Court The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate ...
* Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson *
Kent v. Dulles ''Kent v. Dulles'', 357 U.S. 116 (1958), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on the right to travel and passport restrictions as they relate to First Amendment free speech rights. It was the first case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ...
*
Keyishian v. Board of Regents ''Keyishian v. Board of Regents'', 385 U.S. 589 (1967), was a Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that states cannot prohibit employees from being members of the Communist Party and that thi ...
* King v. Smith *
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District ''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District'', 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005) was the first direct challenge brought in the United States federal courts testing a public school district policy that required the teaching of intelligent design ...
*
Korematsu v. United States ''Korematsu v. United States'', 323 U.S. 214 (1944), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States to uphold the exclusion of Japanese Americans from the West Coast Military Area during World War II. The decision has been wid ...
*
Kunz v. New York ''Kunz v. New York'', 340 U.S. 290 (1951), was a United States Supreme Court case finding a requirement mandating a permit to speak on religious issues in public was unconstitutional. It was argued October 17, 1950, and decided January 15, 1951, 8 ...
*
Lamont v. Postmaster General ''Lamont v. Postmaster General'', 381 U.S. 301 (1965), was a landmark First Amendment Supreme Court case, in which the ruling of the Supreme Court struck down § 305(a) of the Postal Service and Federal Employees Salary Act of 1962, a federal statu ...
*
Lawrence v. Texas ''Lawrence v. Texas'', 539 U.S. 558 (2003), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that most sanctions of criminal punishment for consensual, adult non- procreative sexual activity (commonly referred to as so ...
* Lee v. Weisman *
Levy v. Louisiana ''Levy v. Louisiana'', 391 U.S. 68 (1968), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. This decision deals primarily with the civil rights of illegitimate children, specifically in regards to their ability to sue on a deceased parent ...
*
Locke v. Davey ''Locke v. Davey'', 540 U.S. 712 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of a Washington publicly funded scholarship program which excluded students pursuing a "degree in devotional theology." This case exa ...
*
Lovell v. City of Griffin ''Lovell v. City of Griffin'', 303 U.S. 444 (1938), is a United States Supreme Court case. This case was remarkable in its discussion of the requirement of persons to seek government sanction to distribute religious material. In this particular ca ...
*
Loving v. Virginia ''Loving v. Virginia'', 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a List of landmark court decisions in the United States, landmark civil rights decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States, laws ban ...
*
Mapp v. Ohio ''Mapp v. Ohio'', 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents prosecutors from using Evidence (law), evidence in co ...
*
Martin v. Struthers ''Martin v. Struthers'', 319 U.S. 141 (1943), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a law prohibiting the distribution of handbills from door to door violated the First Amendment rights of a Jehovah's Witness, specifi ...
*
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission ''McConnell v. Federal Election Commission'', 540 U.S. 93 (2003), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of most of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), often referred to as the McCain– Feingold Act ...
*
McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky ''McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky'', 545 U.S. 844 (2005), was a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on March 2, 2005. At issue was whether the Court should continue to inquire into the purpose ...
* McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission *
McLean v. Arkansas ''McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education'', 529 F. Supp. 1255 (E.D. Ark. 1982), was a 1981 legal case in the US state of Arkansas. A lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas by various parents, r ...
*
MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. ''MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.'', 545 U.S. 913 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled unanimously that the defendants, peer-to-peer file sharing companies Grokster and Streamcast (maker of Morpheus), cou ...
*
Miller v. California ''Miller v. California'', 413 U.S. 15 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court modifying its definition of obscenity from that of "utterly without socially redeeming value" to that which lacks "serious literary, artistic, politi ...
*
Miller v. Johnson ''Miller v. Johnson'', 515 U.S. 900 (1995), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning "affirmative gerrymandering/racial gerrymandering", where racial minority-majority electoral districts are created during redistricting to increase minori ...
*
Miranda v. Arizona ''Miranda v. Arizona'', 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution restricts prosecutors from using a person's statements made in response to ...
*
Morse v. Frederick ''Morse v. Frederick'', 551 U.S. 393 (2007), is a United States Supreme Court case where the Court held, 5–4, that the First Amendment does not prevent educators from suppressing student speech that is reasonably viewed as promoting illegal d ...
*
Mount Soledad cross controversy Mount is often used as part of the name of specific mountains, e.g. Mount Everest. Mount or Mounts may also refer to: Places * Mount, Cornwall, a village in Warleggan parish, England * Mount, Perranzabuloe, a hamlet in Perranzabuloe parish, C ...
*
National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler ''National Organization for Women v. Scheidler'', 510 U.S. 249 (1994), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) could apply to enterprises without economic m ...
*
National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie ''National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie'', 432 U.S. 43 (1977), arising out of what is sometimes referred to as the Skokie Affair, was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court dealing with freedom of speech and freedom of assem ...
*
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan ''New York Times Co. v. Sullivan'', 376 U.S. 254 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution's freedom of speech protections limit the ability of American public officials to sue for ...
* New York Times Co. v. United States *
New York v. Ferber ''New York v. Ferber'', 458 U.S. 747 (1982), was a landmark decision of the U.S Supreme Court, unanimously ruling that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution did not forbid states from banning the sale of material depicting childre ...
*
O'Connor v. Donaldson ''O'Connor v. Donaldson'', 422 U.S. 563 (1975), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court in mental health law ruling that a state cannot constitutionally confine a non-dangerous individual who is capable of surviving safely in freedom by t ...
* Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe * Patterson v. Alabama *
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Perry, also known as pear cider, is an alcoholic beverage made from fermented pears, traditionally the perry pear. It has been common for centuries in England, particularly in Gloucestershire, Herefordshire, and Worcestershire. It is also mad ...
*
Planned Parenthood v. Casey ''Planned Parenthood v. Casey'', 505 U.S. 833 (1992), was a landmark case of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court upheld the right to have an abortion as established by the "essential holding" of ''Roe v. Wade'' (1973) and is ...
*
Poe v. Ullman ''Poe v. Ullman'', 367 U.S. 497 (1961), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge a Connecticut law that banned the use of contraceptives and banned doctors from advising their use because the ...
*
Powell v. Alabama ''Powell v. Alabama'', 287 U.S. 45 (1932), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court reversed the convictions of nine young black men for allegedly raping two white women on a freight train near Scottsboro, Alabama. Th ...
*
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins ''Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins'', 447 U.S. 74 (1980), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision issued on June 9, 1980 which affirmed the decision of the California Supreme Court in a case that arose out of a free speech dispute between the Pruneya ...
* Qassim v. Bush *
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul ''R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul'', 505 U.S. 377 (1992), is a case of the United States Supreme Court that unanimously struck down St. Paul's Bias-Motivated Crime Ordinance and reversed the conviction of a teenager, referred to in court documents only ...
*
Rasul v. Bush ''Rasul v. Bush'', 542 U.S. 466 (2004), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that foreign nationals held in the Guantanamo Bay detention camp could petition federal courts for writs of ''habeas corpus ...
*
Reed v. Reed ''Reed v. Reed'', 404 U.S. 71 (1971), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the administrators of estates cannot be named in a way that discriminates between sexes. In ''Reed v. Reed'' the Supreme Court rule ...
*
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union ''Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union'', 521 U.S. 844 (1997), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, unanimously ruling that anti-indecency provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act violated the First Amendme ...
*
Reynolds v. Sims ''Reynolds v. Sims'', 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population. Along with ''Baker v. Carr'' (196 ...
*
Rochin v. California ''Rochin v. California'', 342 U.S. 165 (1952), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that added behavior that "shocks the conscience" into tests of what violates due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United S ...
*
Roe v. Wade ''Roe v. Wade'', 410 U.S. 113 (1973),. was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States conferred the right to have an abortion. The decision struck down many federal and st ...
* Romer v. Evans * Roth v. United States *
Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc. ''Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.'', 547 U.S. 47 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the federal government, under the Solomon Amendment, could constitutionally withhold fundin ...
*
Rumsfeld v. Padilla ''Rumsfeld v. Padilla'', 542 U.S. 426 (2004), was a United States Supreme Court case, in which José Padilla, an American citizen, sought ''habeas corpus'' relief against Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, as a result of his detention by the ...
*
Rust v. Sullivan ''Rust v. Sullivan'', 500 U.S. 173 (1991), was a case in the United States Supreme Court that upheld Department of Health and Human Services regulations prohibiting employees in federally funded family-planning facilities from counseling a patien ...
* Scopes Trial * Schlesinger v. Holtzman *
Shelley v. Kraemer ''Shelley v. Kraemer'', 334 U.S. 1 (1948), is a List of landmark court decisions in the United States, landmark United States Supreme Court case that held that racially restrictive housing Covenant (law), covenants cannot legally be enforced. The ...
* Smith v. Allwright * Smith v. Collin *
Smith v. California ''Smith v. California'', 361 U.S. 147 (1959), was a U.S. Supreme Court case upholding the freedom of the press. The decision deemed unconstitutional a city ordinance that made one in possession of obscene books criminally liable because it did not ...
* Smith v. Goguen * Speiser v. Randall * State v. Dalton * Stenberg v. Carhart *
Street v. New York ''Street v. New York'', 394 U.S. 576 (1969), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a New York state law making it a crime "publicly omutilate, deface, defile, or defy, trample upon, or cast contempt upon either by w ...
*
Stromberg v. California ''Stromberg v. California'', 283 U.S. 359 (1931), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 7–2, that a California statute banning red flags was unconstitutional because it violated the First an ...
* Taylor v. Louisiana *
Terry v. Ohio ''Terry v. Ohio'', 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime. Spe ...
*
Texas v. Johnson ''Texas v. Johnson'', 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the American flag was protected speech under the First Amendment to the Constitution, as do ...
* The King's English v. Shurtleff *
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District ''Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District'', 393 U.S. 503 (1969), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that defined First Amendment rights of students in U.S. public schools. The ''Tinker'' test, also k ...
*
Trop v. Dulles ''Trop v. Dulles'', 356 U.S. 86 (1958), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to revoke citizenship as a punishment for a crime. The ruling's reference to "evolving standards of decency" is fr ...
*
United States v. Eichman ''United States v. Eichman'', 496 U.S. 310 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case that invalidated a federal law against flag desecration as a violation of free speech under the First Amendment. It was argued together with the case ''Unite ...
*
United States v. One Book Called Ulysses ''United States v. One Book Called Ulysses'', 5 F. Supp. 182 (S.D.N.Y. 1933), is a decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in a case dealing with freedom of expression. At issue was whether James Joyce's ...
* United States v. Nixon *
United States v. Seeger ''United States v. Seeger'', 380 U.S. 163 (1965), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the exemption from the military draft for conscientious objectors could be reserved not only for those professing conformity with the ...
*
United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez ''United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez'', 494 U.S. 259 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court decision that determined that Fourth Amendment protections do not apply to searches and seizures by United States agents of property owned by a nonresid ...
*
United States v. Vuitch ''United States v. Vuitch'', 402 U.S. 62 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court abortion rights case, which held that the District of Columbia's abortion law banning the practice except when necessary for the health or life of the woman was not ...
* Varian v. Delfino *
Wallace v. Jaffree ''Wallace v. Jaffree'', 472 U.S. 38 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case deciding on the issue of silent school prayer. Background An Alabama law authorized teachers to set aside one minute at the start of each day for a moment for ...
* Washington v. Lee *
Watkins v. United States ''Watkins v. United States'', 354 U.S. 178 (1957), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the power of the United States Congress is not unlimited in conducting investigations and that nothing in the United States C ...
* Watts v. United States *
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services ''Webster v. Reproductive Health Services'', 492 U.S. 490 (1989), was a Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court decision on upholding a Missouri law that imposed restrictions on the use of state funds, facilities, and employ ...
*
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette ''West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette'', 319 U.S. 624 (1943), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment protects students from being forced to salute the Ame ...
*
Whitney v. California ''Whitney v. California'', 274 U.S. 357 (1927), was a United States Supreme Court decision upholding the conviction of an individual who had engaged in speech that raised a threat to society. ''Whitney'' was explicitly overruled by ''Brandenburg v. ...
*
Whitus v. Georgia ''Whitus v. Georgia'', 385 U.S. 545 (1967), found in favor of the petitioner (Whitus), who had been convicted for murder, and as such reversed their convictions.. This was due to the Georgia jury selection policies, in which it was alleged racia ...
*
Wisconsin v. Mitchell ''Wisconsin v. Mitchell'', 508 U.S. 476 (1993), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that enhanced penalties for hate crimes do not violate criminal defendants' First Amendment rights.. It was a landmark precedent pertaining t ...
*
Wooley v. Maynard ''Wooley v. Maynard'', 430 U.S. 705 (1977), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that New Hampshire could not constitutionally require citizens to display the state motto upon their license plates when the state motto w ...
*
Yates v. United States ''Yates v. United States'', 354 U.S. 298 (1957), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the First Amendment protected radical and reactionary speech, unless it posed a " clear and present danger." Background ...


References


ACLU list of successes


New Hampshire ACLU: "100 greatest ACLU cases" {{ACLU Case law lists by party or amicus, ACLU
ACLU The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is a nonprofit organization founded in 1920 "to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States". T ...
ACLU The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is a nonprofit organization founded in 1920 "to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States". T ...
*