Austroraptor Restoration

''Austroraptor'' ( ) is a genus of large dromaeosaurid dinosaur that lived during the Late Cretaceous Period in what is now Argentina.

''Austroraptor'' was a large-sized, moderately-built, ground-dwelling, bipedal carnivore, estimated at in length. It is one of the largest dromaeosaurids known, with only ''Achillobator'', ''Dakotaraptor'', and ''Utahraptor'' approaching or surpassing it in length.

Discovery and naming

The type specimen of ''Austroraptor cabazai'', holotype MML-195, was recovered in the Bajo de Santa Rosa locality of the Allen Formation, in Río Negro, Argentina. The specimen was collected in 2002 by the team of Fernando Emilio Novas of the ''Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales''. It consists of a fragmentary skeleton including parts of the skull, lower jaw, a few neck and torso vertebrae, some ribs, a humerus, and assorted bones from both legs. The specimen was prepared by Marcelo Pablo Isasi and Santiago Reuil. In 2008, the type species ''Austroraptor cabazai'' was named and described by Fernando Emilio Novas, Diego Pol, Juan Canale, Juan Porfiri and Jorge Calvo. The genus name ''Austroraptor'' means "Southern thief," and is derived from the Latin word ''auster'' meaning "the south wind" and the Latin word ''raptor'' meaning "thief." The specific name ''cabazai'' was chosen in honor of Héctor "Tito" Cabaza, who founded the ''Museo Municipal de Lamarque'' where the specimen was partially studied.

In 2012, Phil Currie and Ariana Paulina-Carabajal referred a second specimen to ''Austroraptor cabazai'', MML-220, that was found in 2008. This specimen, a partial skeleton with the skull of an adult individual slightly smaller than the holotype, is also housed in the collection of the Museo Municipal de Lamarque in Argentina. It complements the holotype in several elements, mainly the lower arm, hand and foot.

Description

It is the largest dromaeosaur to be discovered in the Southern Hemisphere; Novas ''et al.'' estimated that ''Austroraptor'' measured in length from head to tail. Gregory S. Paul later estimated its length at and weight of . However, Thomas R. Holtz Jr. has suggested that its weight is comparable to a lion, around .Supplementary Information 2012
/ref>

The skull is low and elongated, much more so than that of other dromaeosaurs, and measures . ''Austroraptor'' has conical, non-serrated teeth, which Novas ''et al.'' compared to those of spinosaurids, based on how the enamel of the surface of its teeth is fluted. ''Austroraptor'' shares a trait that is unique to it and to ''Adasaurus'': the descending process of the lacrimal bones curves anteriorly to a large degree. ''Austroraptor'' has a bizarre morphology in its pedal phalanges, which are strangely disproportionate. Phalanx IV-2 is over twice the width of phalanx II-2, and nearly three times the expected width based on similarly sized members of its taxonomic family. This has suggested to some researchers that the holotype specimen is a paleontological chimera; however, there is no uncertainty about the affinity of the taxon, so a chimera hypothesis can not be assured.

Several of ''Austroraptor'''s skull bones bear some resemblance to those of the smaller troodontids. The front limbs of ''Austroraptor'' were short for a dromaeosaur, with its humerus less than half the length of its femur. Among the Dromaeosauridae, only this genus, ''Tianyuraptor'', ''Zhenyuanlong'' and ''Mahakala'' have similarly reduced forelimbs. The relative length of its arms has caused ''Austroraptor'' to be compared to another, more famous short-armed dinosaur, ''Tyrannosaurus,'' though there is no close relationship between the two taxa.

Distinguishing traits

However little of the entire skeleton was found, the bones that are available for analysis possess some distinct characteristics that differentiate ''Austroraptor'' from other dromaeosaurs. ''Austroraptor'' is particularly notable because of its relatively short forearms, which are much shorter in proportion when compared to the majority of the members of Dromaeosauridae. According to Novas ''et al.'' 2008, ''Austroraptor'' can be distinguished based on the following characteristics:
*A lacrimal that is highly pneumatized, with the descending process strongly curved rostrally, and with a caudal process flaring out horizontally above the orbit.
*The lack of a dorsomedial process on the postorbital bone for articulation with the frontal bone, and with the squamosal process extremely reduced.
*The maxillary and dentary teeth are small, conical, devoid of serrations and fluted.
*The humerus is short, at approximately 46% of length of the femur.
*The pedal phalanx II-2 is transversely narrow, contrasting with the extremely robust phalanx IV-2.

In 2012, comparison with a second specimen showed that the fourth toe was not especially broad; the purported second phalanx had in fact been a first phalanx.

Classification

A cladistic analysis of the holotype specimen's anatomical features by the describers placed ''Austroraptor'' within the subfamily Unenlagiinae of Dromaeosauridae. This assignment was based on characteristics observed in the bones of the skull, the teeth, and the geometry and formation of the specimen's vertebral elements. It was determined that ''Austroraptor'' was a close relative of the unenlagiine dromaeosaur ''Buitreraptor'', with which it shares certain derived characteristics of the neck vertebrae.

The following cladogram is based on the phylogenetic analysis conducted by Turner, Makovicky and Norell in 2012, showing the relationships of ''Austroraptor'' among the other genera assigned to the taxon Unenlagiinae:

Cau ''et al.'' 2017 published a phylogenetic analysis of the Dromaeosauridae during the description of Halszkaraptor, in which members of the Unenlagiinae are classified as:

In 2019, during the description of ''Hesperornithoides'', many paravian groups were examined for the inclusion of the new genus. In this analysis, ''Austroraptor'' is found to be a more basal member of Unenlagiinae.

Paleobiology

It has been suggested that unenlagiines had better capacities for running and pursuit predation than other dromaeosaurids. While Laurasian dromaeosaurids (Eudromaeosauria) were more stocky and had shorter legs and had an active predatory lifestyle, unenlagiines could likely maintain high speeds for extended amounts of time because they were more gracile. Unenlagiines have modified metatarsals that resemble those of microraptorines: they are relatively thin and lengthened. Based on these adaptations, it is likely that unenlagiines preyed on small, fast animals, although the exact animals are unknown. ''Buitreraptor'' features particular traits that can be attributed to specific hunting methods.

Models for ''Buitreraptor'' propose that it hunted by traveling large distances in pursuit of prey, which may explain the long-legged trait shared by various genera of Unenlagiidae. ''Buitreraptor'' is characterized by its long forelimbs and hands; it likely relied on them to restrain prey and the curved claw of the second pedal digit would have injured or killed the victim. ''Buitreraptor'' probably swallowed its prey whole due to its lack of serrated teeth with flesh-tearing capabilities; the teeth functioned to simply hold prey.

The same model was proposed for the much larger ''Austroraptor'' with few exceptions:
*It would not have used its arms to handle prey, due to their relatively small size.
*Its teeth were conical and probably stronger, so it may have been able to use them for hunting larger prey.

The teeth of ''Austroraptor'' are conical and lacking denticles, similarly to those of spinosaurids. Since it probably had
subarctometatarsal
condition and similar hindlimb lengths compared to ''Buitreraptor'', ''Austroraptor'' likely had well-developed cursorial capacities. An unpublished theory is that austroraptor may have had a piscivorous diet. Austroraptor had non-serrated conical teeth, similar to those of spinosaurids, relatively short forearms, and proportionally long legs which may have aided it in wading.

Paleoecology

The holotype specimen was found in terrestrial sediments that were deposited during the Campanian–Maastrichtian stage of the Late Cretaceous period. Thomas R. Holtz Jr. has estimated that ''Austroraptor'' lived between 78 million and 66 million years ago, until the end of the Mesozoic era. ''Austroraptor'' shared its paleoenvironment in the Allen Formation with diverse dinosaurs and early mammals. The discovery of ''Austroraptor'' increases the understanding of ecological and morphological diversity among unenlagiines, demonstrating that members of the subfamily included giant short-armed and small long-armed members, and suggesting that during the end of the Cretaceous large coelurosaurs became common after the decreasing dominance of carcharodontosaurids. This genus represents the earliest record of Gondwanan dromaeosaurids, and supports the fact that large dromaeosaurids took the role of large predators alongside abelisaurids such as ''Quilmesaurus''.

During his description of ''Pellegrinisaurus'', Salgado suggested that large titanosaurs and theropods inhabited interior environments of the region, and contemporaneous hadrosaurids and the titanosaur ''Aeolosaurus'' inhabited coastal lowlands. The diversity among titanosaurs indicates that the Allen Formation had environments that supported a great range of herbivorous dinosaurs. Other contemporaneous paleofauna includes the titanosaurs '' Laplatasaurus'', ''Rocasaurus'' and ''Saltasaurus'', the bird ''Limenavis'', and the hadrosaurids ''Bonapartesaurus'', ‘’ Kelumapusaura’’, and '' Lapampasaurus''.

See also

* Allen Formation
* Timeline of dromaeosaurid research
* 2008 in paleontology

Notes

References

External links

*
*

{{Taxonbar, from=Q132257

Allen Formation
Campanian life
Cretaceous Argentina
Fossil taxa described in 2008
Fossils of Argentina
Late Cretaceous dinosaurs of South America
Taxa named by Fernando Novas
Unenlagiines