In
mathematics
Mathematics is a field of study that discovers and organizes methods, Mathematical theory, theories and theorems that are developed and Mathematical proof, proved for the needs of empirical sciences and mathematics itself. There are many ar ...
, specifically
abstract algebra
In mathematics, more specifically algebra, abstract algebra or modern algebra is the study of algebraic structures, which are set (mathematics), sets with specific operation (mathematics), operations acting on their elements. Algebraic structur ...
, the isomorphism theorems (also known as Noether's isomorphism theorems) are
theorems that describe the relationship among
quotients,
homomorphisms, and
subobjects. Versions of the theorems exist for
groups,
rings,
vector spaces,
modules,
Lie algebra
In mathematics, a Lie algebra (pronounced ) is a vector space \mathfrak g together with an operation called the Lie bracket, an alternating bilinear map \mathfrak g \times \mathfrak g \rightarrow \mathfrak g, that satisfies the Jacobi ident ...
s, and other
algebraic structures. In
universal algebra, the isomorphism theorems can be generalized to the context of algebras and
congruences.
History
The isomorphism theorems were formulated in some generality for homomorphisms of modules by
Emmy Noether
Amalie Emmy Noether (23 March 1882 – 14 April 1935) was a German mathematician who made many important contributions to abstract algebra. She also proved Noether's theorem, Noether's first and Noether's second theorem, second theorems, which ...
in her paper ''Abstrakter Aufbau der Idealtheorie in algebraischen Zahl- und Funktionenkörpern'', which was published in 1927 in
Mathematische Annalen. Less general versions of these theorems can be found in work of
Richard Dedekind and previous papers by Noether.
Three years later,
B.L. van der Waerden published his influential ''
Moderne Algebra'', the first
abstract algebra
In mathematics, more specifically algebra, abstract algebra or modern algebra is the study of algebraic structures, which are set (mathematics), sets with specific operation (mathematics), operations acting on their elements. Algebraic structur ...
textbook that took the
groups-
rings-
fields approach to the subject. Van der Waerden credited lectures by Noether on
group theory
In abstract algebra, group theory studies the algebraic structures known as group (mathematics), groups.
The concept of a group is central to abstract algebra: other well-known algebraic structures, such as ring (mathematics), rings, field ( ...
and
Emil Artin on algebra, as well as a seminar conducted by Artin,
Wilhelm Blaschke,
Otto Schreier, and van der Waerden himself on
ideals as the main references. The three isomorphism theorems, called ''homomorphism theorem'', and ''two laws of isomorphism'' when applied to groups, appear explicitly.
Groups
We first present the isomorphism theorems of the
groups.
Theorem A (groups)
Let
and
be groups, and let
be a
homomorphism. Then:
# The
kernel of
is a
normal subgroup of
,
# The
image
An image or picture is a visual representation. An image can be Two-dimensional space, two-dimensional, such as a drawing, painting, or photograph, or Three-dimensional space, three-dimensional, such as a carving or sculpture. Images may be di ...
of
is a
subgroup of
, and
# The image of
is
isomorphic to the
quotient group .
In particular, if
is
surjective then
is isomorphic to
.
This theorem is usually called the ''first isomorphism theorem''.
Theorem B (groups)

Let
be a group. Let
be a subgroup of
, and let
be a normal subgroup of
. Then the following hold:
# The
product is a subgroup of
,
# The subgroup
is a normal subgroup of
,
# The
intersection is a normal subgroup of
, and
# The quotient groups
and
are isomorphic.
Technically, it is not necessary for
to be a normal subgroup, as long as
is a subgroup of the
normalizer of
in
. In this case,
is not a normal subgroup of
, but
is still a normal subgroup of the product
.
This theorem is sometimes called the ''second isomorphism theorem'',
''diamond theorem''
or the ''parallelogram theorem''.
An application of the second isomorphism theorem identifies
projective linear groups: for example, the group on the
complex projective line starts with setting
, the group of
invertible 2 × 2
complex matrices,
, the subgroup of
determinant
In mathematics, the determinant is a Scalar (mathematics), scalar-valued function (mathematics), function of the entries of a square matrix. The determinant of a matrix is commonly denoted , , or . Its value characterizes some properties of the ...
1 matrices, and
the normal subgroup of scalar matrices
, we have
, where
is the
identity matrix, and
. Then the second isomorphism theorem states that:
:
Theorem C (groups)
Let
be a group, and
a normal subgroup of
.
Then
# If
is a subgroup of
such that
, then
has a subgroup isomorphic to
.
# Every subgroup of
is of the form
for some subgroup
of
such that
.
# If
is a normal subgroup of
such that
, then
has a normal subgroup isomorphic to
.
# Every normal subgroup of
is of the form
for some normal subgroup
of
such that
.
# If
is a normal subgroup of
such that
, then the quotient group
is isomorphic to
.
The last statement is sometimes referred to as the ''third isomorphism theorem''. The first four statements are often subsumed under Theorem D below, and referred to as the ''lattice theorem'', ''correspondence theorem'', or ''fourth isomorphism theorem''.
Theorem D (groups)
Let
be a group, and
a normal subgroup of
.
The canonical projection homomorphism
defines a bijective correspondence
between the set of subgroups of
containing
and the set of (all) subgroups of
. Under this correspondence normal subgroups correspond to normal subgroups.
This theorem is sometimes called the
''correspondence theorem'', the ''lattice theorem'', and the ''fourth isomorphism theorem''.
The
Zassenhaus lemma (also known as the butterfly lemma) is sometimes called the fourth isomorphism theorem.
Discussion
The first isomorphism theorem can be expressed in
category theoretical language by saying that the
category of groups is (normal epi, mono)-factorizable; in other words, the
normal epimorphisms and the
monomorphisms form a
factorization system for the
category. This is captured in the
commutative diagram in the margin, which shows the
objects and
morphisms whose existence can be deduced from the morphism
. The diagram shows that every morphism in the category of groups has a
kernel in the category theoretical sense; the arbitrary morphism ''f'' factors into
, where ''ι'' is a monomorphism and ''π'' is an epimorphism (in a
conormal category, all epimorphisms are normal). This is represented in the diagram by an object
and a monomorphism
(kernels are always monomorphisms), which complete the
short exact sequence running from the lower left to the upper right of the diagram. The use of the
exact sequence convention saves us from having to draw the
zero morphisms from
to
and
.
If the sequence is right split (i.e., there is a morphism ''σ'' that maps
to a -preimage of itself), then ''G'' is the
semidirect product of the normal subgroup
and the subgroup
. If it is left split (i.e., there exists some
such that
), then it must also be right split, and
is a
direct product decomposition of ''G''. In general, the existence of a right split does not imply the existence of a left split; but in an
abelian category (such as
that of abelian groups), left splits and right splits are equivalent by the
splitting lemma, and a right split is sufficient to produce a
direct sum decomposition
. In an abelian category, all monomorphisms are also normal, and the diagram may be extended by a second short exact sequence
.
In the second isomorphism theorem, the product ''SN'' is the
join of ''S'' and ''N'' in the
lattice of subgroups of ''G'', while the intersection ''S'' ∩ ''N'' is the
meet.
The third isomorphism theorem is generalized by the
nine lemma to
abelian categories and more general maps between objects.
Note on numbers and names
Below we present four theorems, labelled A, B, C and D. They are often numbered as "First isomorphism theorem", "Second..." and so on; however, there is no universal agreement on the numbering. Here we give some examples of the group isomorphism theorems in the literature. Notice that these theorems have analogs for rings and modules.
It is less common to include the Theorem D, usually known as the ''
lattice theorem'' or the ''correspondence theorem'', as one of isomorphism theorems, but when included, it is the last one.
Rings
The statements of the theorems for
rings are similar, with the notion of a normal subgroup replaced by the notion of an
ideal.
Theorem A (rings)
Let
and
be rings, and let
be a
ring homomorphism. Then:
# The
kernel of
is an ideal of
,
# The
image
An image or picture is a visual representation. An image can be Two-dimensional space, two-dimensional, such as a drawing, painting, or photograph, or Three-dimensional space, three-dimensional, such as a carving or sculpture. Images may be di ...
of
is a
subring of
, and
# The image of
is
isomorphic to the
quotient ring .
In particular, if
is surjective then
is isomorphic to
.
Theorem B (rings)
Let
be a ring. Let
be a subring of
, and let
be an ideal of
. Then:
# The
sum is a subring of
,
# The intersection
is an ideal of
, and
# The quotient rings
and
are isomorphic.
Theorem C (rings)
Let ''R'' be a ring, and ''I'' an ideal of ''R''. Then
# If
is a subring of
such that
, then
is a subring of
.
# Every subring of
is of the form
for some subring
of
such that
.
# If
is an ideal of
such that
, then
is an ideal of
.
# Every ideal of
is of the form
for some ideal
of
such that
.
# If
is an ideal of
such that
, then the quotient ring
is isomorphic to
.
Theorem D (rings)
Let
be an ideal of
. The correspondence
is an
inclusion-preserving
bijection between the set of subrings
of
that contain
and the set of subrings of
. Furthermore,
(a subring containing
) is an ideal of
if and only if is an ideal of
.
Modules
The statements of the isomorphism theorems for
modules are particularly simple, since it is possible to form a
quotient module from any
submodule. The isomorphism theorems for
vector spaces (modules over a
field) and
abelian groups (modules over
) are special cases of these. For
finite-dimensional vector spaces, all of these theorems follow from the
rank–nullity theorem.
In the following, "module" will mean "''R''-module" for some fixed ring ''R''.
Theorem A (modules)
Let
and
be modules, and let
be a
module homomorphism. Then:
# The
kernel of
is a submodule of
,
# The
image
An image or picture is a visual representation. An image can be Two-dimensional space, two-dimensional, such as a drawing, painting, or photograph, or Three-dimensional space, three-dimensional, such as a carving or sculpture. Images may be di ...
of
is a submodule of
, and
# The image of
is
isomorphic to the
quotient module .
In particular, if
is surjective then
is isomorphic to
.
Theorem B (modules)
Let
be a module, and let
and
be submodules of
. Then:
# The sum
is a submodule of
,
# The intersection
is a submodule of
, and
# The quotient modules
and
are isomorphic.
Theorem C (modules)
Let ''M'' be a module, ''T'' a submodule of ''M''.
# If
is a submodule of
such that
, then
is a submodule of
.
# Every submodule of
is of the form
for some submodule
of
such that
.
# If
is a submodule of
such that
, then the quotient module
is isomorphic to
.
Theorem D (modules)
Let
be a module,
a submodule of
. There is a bijection between the submodules of
that contain
and the submodules of
. The correspondence is given by
for all
. This correspondence commutes with the processes of taking sums and intersections (i.e., is a
lattice isomorphism between the lattice of submodules of
and the lattice of submodules of
that contain
).
Universal algebra
To generalise this to
universal algebra, normal subgroups need to be replaced by
congruence relations.
A congruence on an
algebra is an
equivalence relation that forms a subalgebra of
considered as an algebra with componentwise operations. One can make the set of
equivalence classes
into an algebra of the same type by defining the operations via representatives; this will be
well-defined since
is a subalgebra of
. The resulting structure is the
quotient algebra.
Theorem A (universal algebra)
Let
be an algebra
homomorphism. Then the image of
is a subalgebra of
, the relation given by
(i.e. the
kernel of
) is a congruence on
, and the algebras
and
are
isomorphic. (Note that in the case of a group,
iff
In logic and related fields such as mathematics and philosophy, "if and only if" (often shortened as "iff") is paraphrased by the biconditional, a logical connective between statements. The biconditional is true in two cases, where either both ...
, so one recovers the notion of kernel used in group theory in this case.)
Theorem B (universal algebra)
Given an algebra
, a subalgebra
of
, and a congruence
on
, let
be the trace of
in
and
the collection of equivalence classes that intersect
. Then
#
is a congruence on
,
#
is a subalgebra of
, and
# the algebra
is isomorphic to the algebra
.
Theorem C (universal algebra)
Let
be an algebra and
two congruence relations on
such that
. Then
is a congruence on
, and
is isomorphic to
Theorem D (universal algebra)
Let
be an algebra and denote
the set of all congruences on
. The set
is a
complete lattice ordered by inclusion.
If
is a congruence and we denote by
the set of all congruences that contain
(i.e.