Émilie Du Châtelet

Gabrielle Émilie Le Tonnelier de Breteuil, Marquise du Châtelet (; 17 December 1706 – 10 September 1749) was a French mathematician and physicist.

Her most recognized achievement is her philosophical magnum opus, ''Institutions de Physique'' (Paris, 1740, first edition; ''Foundations of Physics''). She then revised the text substantially for a second edition with the slightly modified title ''Institutions physiques'' (Paris, 1742). It circulated widely, generated heated debates, and was translated into German and Italian in 1743. The ''Institutions'' covers a wide range of topics, including the principles of knowledge, the existence of God, hypotheses, space, time, matter and the forces of nature. Several chapters treat Newton's theory of universal gravity and associated phenomena. Later in life, she translated into French, and wrote an extensive commentary on, Isaac Newton's ''Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica''. The text, published posthumously in 1756, is still considered the standard French translation to this day.

Du Châtelet participated in the famous ''vis viva'' debate, concerning the best way to measure the force of a body and the best means of thinking about conservation principles. Posthumously, her ideas were represented prominently in the most famous text of the French Enlightenment, the ''Encyclopédie'' of Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d'Alembert, first published shortly after du Châtelet's death.

She is also known as the intellectual collaborator with and romantic partner of Voltaire. In the two centuries since her death, numerous biographies, books, and plays have been written about her life and work. In the early twenty-first century, her life and ideas have generated renewed interest.

Contribution to philosophy

Du Châtelet wrote a number of significant scientific and philosophical works, including an essay on the nature of fire which was published by the Royal Academy of Sciences in Paris, as well as her ''magnum opus'', the ''Institutions de physique,'' which was also translated into German and Italian. In addition to her original works, Du Châtelet also produced influential translations of major works by authors such as Bernard Mandeville and Isaac Newton.

Because of her well-known collaboration and romantic involvement with Voltaire that spanned much of her adult life, her accomplishments have often been subsumed under his, and historical accounts have often mentioned her only within the context of Voltaire's life and work during the period of the early French Enlightenment. However, the nature of their relationship was collaborative. Voltaire acknowledged that du Châtelet's mathematical expertise was a crucial aid in understanding the technical parts of Newton's ''Principia'' while writing his popularization of the Newtonian philosophy, ''Éléments de la philosophie de Newton''.

Recently, scholars have taken a renewed interest in du Châtelet, which has resulted in a renewed appreciation of her original contributions. Historical evidence indicates that her work had a very significant influence on the philosophical and scientific conversations of the 1730s and 1740s – in fact, she was famous and respected by the greatest thinkers of her time. Francesco Algarotti styled the dialogue of ''Il Newtonianismo per le dame'' based on conversations he observed between du Châtelet and Voltaire at Cirey.

Du Châtelet corresponded with the renowned mathematicians Johann II Bernoulli and Leonhard Euler, early developers of calculus. She was also tutored by Bernoulli's prodigy students, Pierre Louis Moreau de Maupertuis and Alexis Claude Clairaut. Frederick the Great of Prussia, who re-founded the Academy of Sciences in Berlin, was her great admirer, and corresponded with both Voltaire and du Châtelet regularly. He introduced du Châtelet to Leibniz's philosophy by sending her the works of Christian Wolff, and du Châtelet sent him a copy of her ''Institutions''.

Her works were published and republished in Paris, London, and Amsterdam; they were translated into German and Italian; and, they were discussed in the most important scholarly journals of the era, including the '' Memoires des Trévoux'', the ''Journal des Sçavans'', the '' Göttingische Zeitungen von gelehrten Sachen'', and others.

Many of her ideas were represented in various sections of the ''Encyclopédie'' of Diderot and D'Alembert, and some of the articles in the ''Encyclopédie'' are a direct copy of her work.

Biography

Early life

Émilie du Châtelet was born on 17 December 1706 in Paris, the only daughter amongst six children. Three brothers lived to adulthood: René-Alexandre Le Tonnelier de Breteuil (1698–1720), Charles-Auguste Le Tonnelier de Breteuil (1701–1731) and abbot (1710–1781). Her eldest brother, René-Alexandre, died in 1720, and the next brother, Charles-Auguste, died in 1731. However, her younger brother, Elisabeth-Théodore, lived to a successful old age, becoming an abbot and eventually a bishop. Two other brothers died very young. Du Châtelet also had a half-sister, Michelle, born in 1686, of her father and Anne Bellinzani, an intelligent woman who was interested in astronomy and married to an important Parisian official.

Her father was Louis Nicolas le Tonnelier de Breteuil (1648–1728), a member of the lesser nobility. At the time of du Châtelet's birth, her father held the position of the Principal Secretary and Introducer of Ambassadors to King Louis XIV. He held a weekly ''salon'' on Thursdays, to which well-respected writers and scientists were invited. Her mother was Gabrielle Anne de Froulay (1670–1740), Baronne de Breteuil and daughter of soldier (1601–1671). Her paternal grandfather was administrator (1609–1685). Her paternal uncle was cleric Claude Le Tonnelier de Breteuil (1644–1698). Among her cousins was nobleman François Victor Le Tonnelier de Breteuil (1686–1743), son of her uncle François Le Tonnelier de Breteuil (1638–1705). Among her nephews was aristocrat, diplomat and statesman Louis Auguste Le Tonnelier de Breteuil (1730–1807).

Early education

Du Châtelet's education has been the subject of much speculation, and nothing is known with certainty.

Among their acquaintances was Fontenelle, the perpetual secretary of the French Académie des Sciences. Du Châtelet's father Louis-Nicolas, recognizing her early brilliance, arranged for Fontenelle to visit and talk about astronomy with her when she was 10 years old. Her mother, Gabrielle-Anne de Froulay, had been brought up in a convent, which was at that time the predominant educational institution available to French girls and women. While some sources believe her mother did not approve of her intelligent daughter, or of her husband's encouragement of Émilie's intellectual curiosity, there are also other indications that her mother not only approved of du Châtelet's early education, but actually encouraged her to vigorously question stated fact.

In either case, such encouragement would have been seen as unusual for parents of their time and status. When she was small, her father arranged training for her in physical activities such as fencing and riding, and as she grew older, he brought tutors to the house for her. As a result, by the age of twelve she was fluent in Latin, Italian, Greek and German; she was later to publish translations into French of Greek and Latin plays and philosophy. She received education in mathematics, literature, and science.

Du Châtelet also liked to dance, was a passable performer on the harpsichord, sang opera, and was an amateur actress. As a teenager, short of money for books, she used her mathematical skills to devise highly successful strategies for gambling.

Marriage

On 12 June 1725, she married the Marquis Florent-Claude du Chastellet-Lomont (1695–1765).The ''Lomont'' suffix indicates the branch of the ''du Chastellet'' family; another such branch was the ''du Chastellet-Clemont''. Her marriage conferred the title of Marquise du Chastellet.The spelling ''Châtelet'' (replacing the ''s'' by a circumflex over the ''a'') was introduced by Voltaire, and has now become standard. () Like many marriages among the nobility, theirs was arranged. As a wedding gift, her husband was made governor of Semur-en-Auxois in Burgundy by his father; the recently married couple moved there at the end of September 1725. Du Châtelet was eighteen at the time, her husband thirty-four.

Émilie du Châtelet and the Marquis Florent-Claude du Chastellet-Lomont had three children: Françoise-Gabrielle-Pauline (1726–1754), married in 1743 to Alfonso Carafa, Duca di Montenero (1713–1760), Louis Marie Florent (1727–1793), and Victor-Esprit (1733–1734). Victor-Esprit died as an infant in late summer 1734, likely the last Sunday in August. On 4 September 1749 Émilie du Châtelet gave birth to Stanislas-Adélaïde du Châtelet, daughter of Jean François de Saint-Lambert. She died as a toddler in Lunéville on 6 May 1751.

Resumption of studies

After bearing three children, Émilie, Marquise du Châtelet, considered her marital responsibilities fulfilled and reached an agreement with her husband to live separate lives while still maintaining one household. In 1733, aged 26, du Châtelet resumed her mathematical studies. Initially, she was tutored in algebra and calculus by Moreau de Maupertuis, a member of the Academy of Sciences; although mathematics was not his forte, he had received a solid education from Johann Bernoulli, who also taught Leonhard Euler. However by 1735 du Châtelet had turned for her mathematical training to Alexis Clairaut, a mathematical prodigy known best for Clairaut's equation and Clairaut's theorem. Du Châtelet resourcefully sought some of France's best tutors and scholars to mentor her in mathematics. On one occasion at the Café Gradot, a place where men frequently gathered for intellectual discussion, she was politely ejected when she attempted to join one of her teachers. Undeterred, she returned and entered after having men's clothing made for her.

Relationship with Voltaire

Du Châtelet may have met Voltaire in her childhood at one of her father's '' salons''; Voltaire himself dates their meeting to 1729, when he returned from his exile in London. However, their friendship developed from May 1733 when she re-entered society after the birth of her third child.

Du Châtelet invited Voltaire to live at her country house at Cirey in Haute-Marne''. This was through a poem dedicated to her at the beginning of the text and in the preface, where Voltaire praised her study and contributions. The book's chapters on optics show strong similarities with her own ''Essai sur l'optique''. She was able to contribute further to the campaign by a laudatory review in the '' Journal des savants''.

Sharing a passion for science, Voltaire and du Châtelet collaborated scientifically. They set up a laboratory in du Châtelet's home in Lorraine. In a healthy competition, they both entered the 1738 Paris Academy prize contest on the nature of fire, since du Châtelet disagreed with Voltaire's essay. Although neither of them won, both essays received honourable mention and were published. She thus became the first woman to have a scientific paper published by the Academy.

Social life after living with Voltaire

Du Châtelet's relationship with Voltaire caused her to give up most of her social life to become more involved with her study in mathematics with the teacher of Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis. He introduced the ideas of Isaac Newton to her. Letters written by du Châtelet explain how she felt during the transition from Parisian socialite to rural scholar, from "one life to the next".

Later pregnancy and death

In May 1748, du Châtelet began an affair with the poet Jean François de Saint-Lambert and became pregnant. In a letter to a friend, she confided her fears that she would not survive her pregnancy. On the night of 4 September 1749 she gave birth to a daughter, Stanislas-Adélaïde. Du Châtelet died on 10 September 1749 at Château de Lunéville, from a pulmonary embolism. She was 42. Her infant daughter died 20 months later.

Scientific research and publications

Criticizing Locke and the debate on ''thinking matter''

In her writings, du Châtelet criticized John Locke's philosophy. She emphasizes the necessity of the verification of knowledge through experience: "Locke's idea of the possibility of ''thinking matter'' is ��abstruse". Her critique on Locke originated in her commentary on Bernard de Mandeville's '' The Fable of the Bees''. She resolutely favored universal principles that precondition human knowledge and action, and maintained that this kind of law is innate. Du Châtelet claimed the necessity of a universal presupposition, because if there were no such beginning, all our knowledge is relative. In that way, Du Châtelet rejected Locke's aversion to innate ideas and prior principles. She also reversed Locke's negation of the principle of contradiction, which would constitute the basis of her methodic reflections in the ''Institutions''. On the contrary, she affirmed her arguments in favor of the necessity of prior and universal principles. "Two and two could then make as well 4 as 6 if prior principles did not exist."

References by Pierre Louis Moreau de Maupertuis and Julien Offray de La Mettrie to du Châtelet's deliberations on motion, free will, ''thinking matter'', numbers, and the way to conduct metaphysics are a sign of the importance of her reflections. She rebuts the claim to finding truth by using mathematical laws, and argues against Maupertuis.

Fire, heat, and combustion

In 1737, the Royal Academy of Science in Paris (now French Academy of Sciences) announced an essay competition on the question of the nature and propagation of fire, to be awarded the following year. Voltaire, who was then working with Du Châtelet at her estate in Cirey, entered the competition. Eventually, Du Châtelet decided to enter herself, though without informing Voltaire, with whom she had significant theoretical disagreements. While neither of them won the competition, their essays were judged to be of sufficient quality to be published in the collections of the Academy, alongside the winning essays. Her ''Dissertation sur la nature et la propagation du feu'' thus appeared in 1739, the first time the Academy published a work written by a woman. Du Châtelet's essay takes the position that fire is a distinctive type of matter, a common view in the period, and sought to use mechanical theory to understand its properties. For instance, she argued that it is a massless particle, whereas Voltaire had claimed fire had weight. She also speculated that there may be colors in other suns that are not found in the spectrum of sunlight on Earth.

''Institutions de Physique''

Her book ''Institutions de Physique'' ("Lessons in Physics") was published in 1740; it was presented as a review of new ideas in science and philosophy to be studied by her 13-year-old son, but it incorporated and sought to reconcile complex ideas from the leading thinkers of the time. The book and subsequent debate contributed to her becoming a member of the Academy of Sciences of the Institute of Bologna in 1746. Du Châtelet originally preferred anonymity in her role as the author, because she wished to conceal her gender. Ultimately, however, ''Institutions'' was convincing to salon-dwelling intellectuals in spite of the commonplace sexism.

''Institutions'' discussed, refuted, and synthesized many ideas of prominent mathematicians and physicists of the time. In particular, the text is famous for discussing ideas that originated with G. W. Leibniz and Christian Wolff, and for using the principle of sufficient reason often associated with their philosophical work. This main work is equally famous for providing a detailed discussion and evaluation of ideas that originated with Isaac Newton and his followers. That combination is more remarkable than it might seem now, since the ideas of Leibniz and Newton were regarded as fundamentally opposed to one another by most of the major philosophical figures of the eighteenth century.

In chapter I, du Châtelet included a description of her rules of reasoning, based largely on Descartes’s principle of contradiction and Leibniz’s principle of sufficient reason. In chapter II, she applied these rules of reasoning to metaphysics, discussing God, space, time, and matter. In chapters III through VI, du Châtelet continued to discuss the role of God and his relationship to his creation. In chapter VII, she broke down the concept of matter into three parts: the macroscopic substance available to sensory perception, the atoms composing that macroscopic material, and an even smaller constituent unit similarly imperceptible to human senses. However, she carefully added that there was no way to know how many levels truly existed.

The remainder of ''Institutions'' considered more metaphysics and classical mechanics. Du Châtelet discussed the concepts of space and time in a manner more consistent with modern relativity than her contemporaries. She described both space and time in the abstract, as representations of the relationships between coexistent bodies rather than physical substances. This included an acknowledgement that "absolute" place is an idealization and that "relative" place is the only real, measurable quantity. Du Châtelet also presented a thorough explanation of Newton’s laws of motion and their function on earth.

Forces Vives

In 1741, du Châtelet published a book entitled ''Réponse de Madame la Marquise du Chastelet, a la lettre que M. de Mairan''. D'Ortous de Mairan, secretary of the Academy of Sciences, had published a set of arguments addressed to her regarding the appropriate mathematical expression for ''forces vives'' ("living forces"). Du Châtelet presented a point-by-point rebuttal of de Mairan's arguments, causing him to withdraw from the controversy.

Immanuel Kant's first publication in 1747, 'Thoughts on the True Estimation of Living Forces' (''Gedanken zur wahren Schätzung der lebendigen Kräfte''), focused on du Châtelet's pamphlet rebutting the arguments of the secretary of the French Academy of Sciences, Mairan. Kant's opponent, Johann Augustus Eberhard, accused Kant of taking ideas from du Châtelet. In his ''Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime'', Kant wrote ad hominem and sexist critiques of learned women of the time, including Mme Du Châtelet, rather than writing about their work. Kant stated: "A woman who has a head full of Greek, like Mme. Dacier, or who conducts disputations about mechanics, like the Marquise du Châtelet might as well also wear a beard; for that might perhaps better express the mien of depth for which they strive."

Advocacy of kinetic energy

Although in the early eighteenth century the concepts of force and momentum had been long understood, the idea of energy as being transferable between different systems was still in its infancy, and would not be fully resolved until the nineteenth century. It is now accepted that the total mechanical momentum of a system is conserved and that none is lost to friction. Simply put, there is no 'momentum friction', and momentum cannot transfer between different forms, and particularly, there is no 'potential momentum'. In the twentieth century, Emmy Noether proved this to be true for all problems where the initial state is symmetric in generalized coordinates. E.g., mechanical energy, either kinetic or potential, may be lost to another form, but the total is conserved in time.

Du Châtelet's contribution was the hypothesis of the conservation of total energy, as distinct from momentum. In doing so, she became the first to elucidate the concept of energy as such, and to quantify its relationship to mass and velocity based on her own empirical studies. Inspired by the theories of Gottfried Leibniz, she repeated and publicized an experiment originally devised by Willem 's Gravesande in which heavy balls were dropped from different heights into a sheet of soft clay. Each ball's kinetic energy – as indicated by the quantity of material displaced – was shown to be proportional to the square of the velocity: She showed that if two balls were identical except for their mass, they would make the same size indentation in the clay if the quantity $mv^2$ (then called ''vis viva'') were the same for each ball.

Newton's work assumed the exact conservation of only mechanical momentum. A broad range of mechanical problems in physics are soluble only if energy conservation is included. The collision and scattering of two point masses is one example. Leonhard Euler and Joseph-Louis Lagrange'' (often referred to as simply the ''Principia''), including her derivation of the notion of conservation of energy from its principles of mechanics. Despite modern misconceptions, Newton's work on his ''Principia'' was not perfect. Du Châtelet took on the task of not only translating his work from Latin to French, but adding important information to it as well. Her commentary was as essential to her contemporaries as her spreading of Newton's ideas. Du Châtelet's commentary was very extensive, comprising almost two-thirds of volume II of her edition.

To undertake a formidable project such as this, du Châtelet prepared to translate the ''Principia'' by continuing her studies in analytic geometry, mastering calculus, and reading important works in experimental physics. It was her rigorous preparation that allowed her to add a lot more accurate information to her commentary, both from herself and other scientists she studied or worked with. She was one of only 20 or so people in the 1700s who could understand such advanced math and apply the knowledge to other works. This helped du Châtelet greatly, not only with her work on the ''Principia'' but also in her other important works like the ''Institutions de Physique''.

Du Châtelet made very important corrections in her translation that helped support Newton's theories about the universe. Newton, based on the theory of fluids, suggested that gravitational attraction would cause the poles of the earth to flatten, thus causing the earth to bulge outwards at the equator. In Clairaut's ''Memoire'', which confirmed Newton's hypothesis about the shape of the Earth and gave more accurate approximations, Clairaut discovered a way to determine the shape of the other planets in the Solar System. Du Châtelet used Clairaut's proposal that the planets had different densities in her commentary to correct Newton's belief that the Earth and the other planets were made of homogeneous substances.

Du Châtelet used the work of Daniel Bernoulli, a Swiss mathematician and physicist, to further explain Newton's theory of the tides. This proof depended upon the three-body problem which still confounded even the best mathematicians in 18th century Europe. Using Clairaut's hypothesis about the differing of the planets' densities, Bernoulli theorized that the moon was 70 times denser than Newton had believed. Du Châtelet used this discovery in her commentary of the ''Principia'', further supporting Newton's theory about the law of gravitation.

Published ten years after her death, today du Châtelet's translation of the ''Principia'' is still the standard translation of the work into French, and remains the only complete rendition in that language. Her translation was so important that it was the only one in any language used by Newtonian expert I. Bernard Cohen to write his own English version of Newton's ''Principia''. Du Châtelet not only used the works of other great scientists to revise Newton's work, but she added her own thoughts and ideas as a scientist in her own right. Her contributions in the French translation made Newton and his ideas look even better in the scientific community and around the world, and recognition for this is owed to du Châtelet. This enormous project, along with her ''Foundations of Physics'', proved du Châtelet's abilities as a great mathematician. Her translation and commentary of the ''Principia'' contributed to the completion of the scientific revolution in France and to its acceptance in Europe.

Possible Influence on

Immanuel Kant

Kant mostly engaged with Georg Friedrich Meier’s Excerpts from the Doctrine of Reason (1752) in his logic lectures. It is highly plausible that Du Châtelet’s presence was recognized by contemporaries such as Baumgarten, which alludes to a connection that might have broader implications for Kant’s knowledge of Du Châtelet. Notably, Meier’s involvement in the publication of Christine Ziegler (later Unzer)’s work Grundriss einer Weltweisheit für das Frauenzimmer (A Sketch of a World Wisdom for Women) suggests a potential linkage to Du Châtelet’s philosophical ideas. Hence, Du Châtelet’s name held certain significance within Meier’s sphere of influence. The immediate translation of the Institutions into German following its release also implies its likely role in paving the philosophical path for Kant’s later endeavors.

Illusions and happiness

In '' Discours sur le bonheur'', Émilie Du Châtelet argues that illusions are an instrument for happiness. To be happy, “one must have freed oneself of prejudice, one must be virtuous, healthy, have tastes and passions, and be susceptible to illusions...”. She mentions many things one needs for happiness, but emphasizes the necessity of illusions and that one should not dismiss all illusions. One should not abandon all illusions because they can bestow positivity and hope, which can ameliorate one's well-being. But Du Châtelet also warns against trusting all illusions, because many illusions are harmful to oneself. They may cause negativity through a false reality, which can cause disappointment or even limit one’s abilities. This lack of self-awareness from so many illusions may cause one to be self-deceived. She suggests a balance of trusting and rejecting illusions for happiness, so as not to become self-deceived.

In ''Foundation of Physics'', Émilie Du Châtelet discusses avoiding error by applying two principles – the principle of contradiction and the principle of sufficient reason. Du Châtelet presumed that all knowledge is developed from more fundamental knowledge that relies on infallible knowledge. She states that this infallible fundamental knowledge is most reliable because it is self-explanatory and exists with a small number of conclusions. Her logic and principles are used for an arguably less flawed understanding of physics, metaphysics, and morals.

The principle of contradiction essentially claims that the thing implying a contradiction is impossible. So, if one does not use the principle of contradiction, one will have errors including the failure to reject a contradiction-causing element. To get from the possible or impossible to the actual or real, the principle of sufficient reason was revised by Du Châtelet from Leibniz's concept and integrated into science. The principle of sufficient reason suggests that every true thing has a reason for being so, and things without a reason do not exist. In essence, every effect has a cause, so the element in question must have a reasonable cause to be so.

In application, Émilie Du Châtelet proposed that being happy and immoral are mutually exclusive. According to Du Châtelet, this principle is embedded within the hearts of all individuals, and even wicked individuals have an undeniable consciousness of this contradiction that is grueling. It suggests one cannot be living a happy life while living immorally. So, her suggested happiness requires illusions with a virtuous life. These illusions are naturally given like passions and tastes, and cannot be created. Du Châtelet recommended we maintain the illusions we receive and work to not dismantle the trustworthy illusions, because we cannot get them back. In other words, true happiness is a blending of illusions and morality. If one merely attempts to be moral, one will not obtain the happiness one deeply seeks. If one just strives for the illusions, one will not get the happiness that is genuinely desired. One needs to endeavor in both illusions and happiness to get the sincerest happiness.

Other contributions

Development of financial derivatives

Du Châtelet lost the considerable sum for the time of 84,000 francs—some of it borrowed—in one evening at the table at the Court of Fontainebleau, to card cheats. To raise the money to pay back her debts, she devised an ingenious financing arrangement similar to modern derivatives, whereby she paid tax collectors a fairly low sum for the right to their future earnings (they were allowed to keep a portion of the taxes they collected for the King), and promised to pay the court gamblers part of these future earnings.

Biblical scholarship

Du Châtelet wrote a critical analysis of the entire Bible. A synthesis of her remarks on the Book of Genesis was published in English in 1967 by Ira O. Wade of Princeton in his book ''Voltaire and Madame du Châtelet: An Essay on Intellectual Activity at Cirey'' and a book of her complete notes was published in 2011, in the original French, edited and annotated by Bertram Eugene Schwarzbach.

Translation of the ''Fable of the Bees'', and other works

Du Châtelet translated '' The Fable of the Bees'' in a free adaptation. She also wrote works on optics, rational linguistics, and the nature of free will.

Support of women's education

In her first independent work, the preface to her translation of the ''Fable of the Bees'', du Châtelet argued strongly for women's education, particularly a strong secondary education as was available for young men in the French '' collèges''. By denying women a good education, she argued, society prevents women from becoming eminent in the arts and sciences.

Legacy

Du Châtelet made a crucial scientific contribution in making Newton's historic work more accessible in a timely, accurate and insightful French translation, augmented by her own original concept of energy conservation.

A main-belt minor planet and a crater on Venus have been named in her honor, and she is the subject of three plays: ''Legacy of Light'' by Karen Zacarías; ''Émilie: La Marquise Du Châtelet Defends Her Life Tonight'' by Lauren Gunderson and ''Urania: the Life of Émilie du Châtelet'' by Jyl Bonaguro. The opera ''Émilie'' by Kaija Saariaho is about the last moments of her life.

Du Châtelet is often represented in portraits with mathematical iconography, such as holding a pair of dividers or a page of geometrical calculations. In the early nineteenth century, a French pamphlet of celebrated women (''Femmes célèbres'') introduced a possibly apocryphal story of her childhood. According to this story, a servant fashioned a doll for her by dressing up wooden dividers as a doll; however, du Châtelet undressed the dividers, and intuiting their original purpose, drew a circle with them.

The Institut Émilie du Châtelet, which was founded in France in 2006, supports "the development and diffusion of research on women, sex, and gender".

Since 2016, the French Society of Physics (la Société Française de Physique) has awarded the Émilie Du Châtelet Prize to a physicist or team of researchers for excellence in Physics.

Duke University also presents an annual Du Châtelet Prize in Philosophy of Physics "for previously unpublished work in philosophy of physics by a graduate student or junior scholar".

On December 17, 2021, Google Doodle honored du Châtelet.

Émilie du Châtelet was portrayed by the actress Hélène de Fougerolles in the docudrama ''Einstein's Big Idea''.

Works

Scientific
* ''Dissertation sur la nature et la propagation du feu'' (1st edition, 1739; 2nd edition, 1744)
* ''Institutions de physique'' (1st edition, 1740; 2nd edition, 1742)
* ''Principes mathématiques de la philosophie naturelle par feue Madame la Marquise du Châtelet'' (1st edition, 1756; 2nd edition, 1759)

Other
* ''Examen de la Genèse''
* ''Examen des Livres du Nouveau Testament''
* ''Discours sur le bonheur''

See also

* Timeline of women in science

Explanatory notes

Notes

References

* Team, Project Vox.
Du Châtelet (1706–1749)
. ''Project Vox''. Retrieved 2023-10-20.
*
*
*
*
*

Further reading

*
*
*
*
*

External links

Émilie Du Châtelet (1706-1749)
''Project Vox''
* Zinsser, Judith. 2007
Mentors, the marquise Du Châtelet and historical memory

*


Agnes Scott College

Correspondence between Frederick the Great and the Marquise du Châtelet
Digital edition of Trier University Library (French and German text)
*

{{DEFAULTSORT:Chatelet, Emilie Du
1706 births
1749 deaths
18th-century French mathematicians
18th-century French philosophers
18th-century French women scientists
18th-century French women writers
18th-century French writers
Scientists from Paris
French marchionesses
Contributors to the Encyclopédie (1751–1772)
French physicists
French women scientists
Women encyclopedists
French women mathematicians
French women physicists
Deaths in childbirth
Deaths from pulmonary embolism
18th-century French translators
French women philosophers
Latin–French translators
18th-century French scientists
Muses (persons)