|
Kurt Gödel
Kurt Friedrich Gödel ( ; ; April 28, 1906 – January 14, 1978) was a logician, mathematician, and philosopher. Considered along with Aristotle and Gottlob Frege to be one of the most significant logicians in history, Gödel profoundly influenced scientific and philosophical thinking in the 20th century (at a time when Bertrand Russell,For instance, in their "Principia Mathematica' (''Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' edition). Alfred North Whitehead, and David Hilbert were using logic and set theory to investigate the foundations of mathematics), building on earlier work by Frege, Richard Dedekind, and Georg Cantor. Gödel's discoveries in the foundations of mathematics led to the proof of his completeness theorem in 1929 as part of his dissertation to earn a doctorate at the University of Vienna, and the publication of Gödel's incompleteness theorems two years later, in 1931. The incompleteness theorems address limitations of formal axiomatic systems. In parti ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Brünn
Brno ( , ; ) is a Statutory city (Czech Republic), city in the South Moravian Region of the Czech Republic. Located at the confluence of the Svitava (river), Svitava and Svratka (river), Svratka rivers, Brno has about 403,000 inhabitants, making it the second-largest city in the Czech Republic after the capital, Prague, and one of the List of cities in the European Union by population within city limits, 100 largest cities of the European Union. The Brno metropolitan area has approximately 730,000 inhabitants. Brno is the former capital city of Moravia and the political and cultural hub of the South Moravian Region. It is the centre of the Judiciary of the Czech Republic, Czech judiciary, with the seats of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic, Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic, Supreme Court, the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic, Supreme Administrative Court, and the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office, and a number of state ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Gödel's Loophole
Gödel's Loophole is a supposed "inner contradiction" in the Constitution of the United States which Austrian-American logician, mathematician, and analytic philosopher Kurt Gödel postulated in 1947. The loophole would permit America's republican structure to be legally turned into a dictatorship. Gödel told his friend Oskar Morgenstern about the existence of the flaw and Morgenstern told Albert Einstein about it at the time, but Morgenstern, in his recollection of the incident in 1971, never mentioned the exact problem as Gödel saw it. This has led to speculation about the precise nature of what has come to be called "Gödel's Loophole." It has been called "one of the great unsolved problems of constitutional law" by American constitutional law scholar John Nowak. History When Gödel was studying to take his American citizenship test in 1947, he came across what he called an "inner contradiction" in the U.S. Constitution. At the time, he was at the Institute for Advanced ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Diagonal Lemma
In mathematical logic, the diagonal lemma (also known as diagonalization lemma, self-reference lemma or fixed point theorem) establishes the existence of self-referential sentences in certain formal theories. A particular instance of the diagonal lemma was used by Kurt Gödel in 1931 to construct his proof of the incompleteness theorems as well as in 1933 by Tarski to prove his undefinability theorem. In 1934, Carnap was the first to publish the diagonal lemma at some level of generality. The diagonal lemma is named in reference to Cantor's diagonal argument in set and number theory. The diagonal lemma applies to any sufficiently strong theories capable of representing the diagonal function. Such theories include first-order Peano arithmetic \mathsf, the weaker Robinson arithmetic \mathsf as well as any theory containing \mathsf (i.e. which interprets it). A common statement of the lemma (as given below) makes the stronger assumption that the theory can represent all recurs ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Condensation Lemma
In set theory, a branch of mathematics, the condensation lemma is a result about sets in the constructible universe. It states that if ''X'' is a transitive set and is an elementary submodel of some level of the constructible hierarchy Lα, that is, (X,\in)\prec (L_\alpha,\in), then in fact there is some ordinal \beta\leq\alpha such that X=L_\beta. More can be said: If ''X'' is not transitive, then its transitive collapse is equal to some L_\beta, and the hypothesis of elementarity can be weakened to elementarity only for formulas which are \Sigma_1 in the Lévy hierarchy. Also, Devlin showed the assumption that ''X'' is transitive automatically holds when \alpha=\omega_1.W. Marek, M. Srebrny, "Gaps in the Constructible Universe" (1973), p.364. The lemma was formulated and proved by Kurt Gödel in his proof that the axiom of constructibility The axiom of constructibility is a possible axiom for set theory in mathematics that asserts that every set is constructible. The ax ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Compactness Theorem
In mathematical logic, the compactness theorem states that a set of first-order sentences has a model if and only if every finite subset of it has a model. This theorem is an important tool in model theory, as it provides a useful (but generally not effective) method for constructing models of any set of sentences that is finitely consistent. The compactness theorem for the propositional calculus is a consequence of Tychonoff's theorem (which says that the product of compact spaces is compact) applied to compact Stone spaces, hence the theorem's name. Likewise, it is analogous to the finite intersection property characterization of compactness in topological spaces: a collection of closed sets in a compact space has a non-empty intersection if every finite subcollection has a non-empty intersection. The compactness theorem is one of the two key properties, along with the downward Löwenheim–Skolem theorem, that is used in Lindström's theorem to characterize first-ord ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Axiom Of Constructibility
The axiom of constructibility is a possible axiom for set theory in mathematics that asserts that every set is constructible. The axiom is usually written as ''V'' = ''L''. The axiom, first investigated by Kurt Gödel, is inconsistent with the proposition that zero sharp exists and stronger large cardinal axioms (see list of large cardinal properties). Generalizations of this axiom are explored in inner model theory. Implications The axiom of constructibility implies the axiom of choice (AC), given Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory without the axiom of choice (ZF). It also settles many natural mathematical questions that are independent of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice (ZFC); for example, the axiom of constructibility implies the generalized continuum hypothesis, the negation of Suslin's hypothesis, and the existence of an analytical (in fact, \Delta^1_2) non-measurable set of real numbers, all of which are independent of ZFC. The axiom of constructib ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Continuum Hypothesis
In mathematics, specifically set theory, the continuum hypothesis (abbreviated CH) is a hypothesis about the possible sizes of infinite sets. It states: Or equivalently: In Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice (ZFC), this is equivalent to the following equation in aleph numbers: 2^=\aleph_1, or even shorter with beth numbers: \beth_1 = \aleph_1. The continuum hypothesis was advanced by Georg Cantor in 1878, and establishing its truth or falsehood is the first of Hilbert's 23 problems presented in 1900. The answer to this problem is independent of ZFC, so that either the continuum hypothesis or its negation can be added as an axiom to ZFC set theory, with the resulting theory being consistent if and only if ZFC is consistent. This independence was proved in 1963 by Paul Cohen, complementing earlier work by Kurt Gödel in 1940. The name of the hypothesis comes from the term '' continuum'' for the real numbers. History Cantor believed the continuum ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
ω-consistent Theory
In mathematical logic, an ω-consistent (or omega-consistent, also called numerically segregative) W. V. O. Quine (1971), ''Set Theory and Its Logic''. theory is a theory (collection of sentences) that is not only (syntactically) consistentS. C. Kleene, ''Introduction to Metamathematics'' (1971), p.207. Bibliotheca Mathematica: ''A Series of Monographs on Pure and Applied Mathematics'' Vol. I, Wolters-Noordhoff, North-Holland 0-7204-2103-9, Elsevier 0-444-10088-1. (that is, does not prove a contradiction), but also avoids proving certain infinite combinations of sentences that are intuitively contradictory. The name is due to Kurt Gödel, who introduced the concept in the course of proving the incompleteness theorem. Definition A theory ''T'' is said to interpret the language of arithmetic if there is a translation of formulas of arithmetic into the language of ''T'' so that ''T'' is able to prove the basic axioms of the natural numbers under this translation. A ''T'' tha ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel Set Theory
In the foundations of mathematics, von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory (NBG) is an axiomatic set theory that is a conservative extension of Zermelo–Fraenkel–choice set theory (ZFC). NBG introduces the notion of class, which is a collection of sets defined by a formula whose quantifiers range only over sets. NBG can define classes that are larger than sets, such as the class of all sets and the class of all ordinals. Morse–Kelley set theory (MK) allows classes to be defined by formulas whose quantifiers range over classes. NBG is finitely axiomatizable, while ZFC and MK are not. A key theorem of NBG is the class existence theorem, which states that for every formula whose quantifiers range only over sets, there is a class consisting of the sets satisfying the formula. This class is built by mirroring the step-by-step construction of the formula with classes. Since all set-theoretic formulas are constructed from two kinds of atomic formulas (membership and equality ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Modal Companion
In logic, a modal companion of a superintuitionistic (intermediate) logic ''L'' is a normal modal logic that interprets ''L'' by a certain canonical translation, described below. Modal companions share various properties of the original intermediate logic, which enables to study intermediate logics using tools developed for modal logic. Gödel–McKinsey–Tarski translation Let ''A'' be a propositional intuitionistic formula. A modal formula ''T''(''A'') is defined by induction on the complexity of ''A'': :T(p)=\Box p, for any propositional variable p, :T(\bot)=\bot, :T(A\land B)=T(A)\land T(B), :T(A\lor B)=T(A)\lor T(B), :T(A\to B)=\Box(T(A)\to T(B)). As negation is in intuitionistic logic defined by A\to\bot, we also have :T(\neg A)=\Box\neg T(A). ''T'' is called the Gödel translation or Gödel– McKinsey– Tarski translation. The translation is sometimes presented in slightly different ways: for example, one may insert \Box before every subformula. All such variants are pr ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Gödel–Gentzen Translation
In proof theory, a discipline within mathematical logic, double-negation translation, sometimes called negative translation, is a general approach for embedding classical logic into intuitionistic logic. Typically it is done by translating formulas to formulas that are classically equivalent but intuitionistically inequivalent. Particular instances of double-negation translations include Glivenko's translation for propositional logic, and the Gödel–Gentzen translation and Kuroda's translation for first-order logic. Propositional logic The easiest double-negation translation to describe comes from Glivenko's theorem, proved by Valery Glivenko in 1929. It maps each classical formula φ to its double negation ¬¬φ. Glivenko's theorem states: :If φ is a propositional formula, then φ is a classical tautology if and only if ¬¬φ is an intuitionistic tautology. Glivenko's theorem implies the more general statement: :If ''T'' is a set of propositional formulas and φ a proposi ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Gödel's Ontological Proof
Gödel's ontological proof is a formal argument by the mathematician Kurt Gödel (1906–1978) for the existence of God. The argument is in a line of development that goes back to Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109). St. Anselm's ontological argument, in its most succinct form, is as follows: "God, by definition, is that for which no greater can be conceived. God exists in the understanding. If God exists in the understanding, we could imagine Him to be greater by existing in reality. Therefore, God must exist." A more elaborate version was given by Gottfried Leibniz (1646–1716); this is the version that Gödel studied and attempted to clarify with his ontological argument. The argument uses modal logic, which deals with statements about what is ''necessarily'' true or ''possibly'' true. From the axioms that a property can only be positive if not-having-it is not positive, and that properties implied by a positive property must all also be themselves positive, it concludes that (s ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
