In
set theory
Set theory is the branch of mathematical logic that studies Set (mathematics), sets, which can be informally described as collections of objects. Although objects of any kind can be collected into a set, set theory – as a branch of mathema ...
, a branch of
mathematics
Mathematics is a field of study that discovers and organizes methods, Mathematical theory, theories and theorems that are developed and Mathematical proof, proved for the needs of empirical sciences and mathematics itself. There are many ar ...
, the axiom of uniformization is a weak form of the
axiom of choice. It states that if
is a
subset
In mathematics, a Set (mathematics), set ''A'' is a subset of a set ''B'' if all Element (mathematics), elements of ''A'' are also elements of ''B''; ''B'' is then a superset of ''A''. It is possible for ''A'' and ''B'' to be equal; if they a ...
of
, where
and
are
Polish spaces, then there is a subset
of
that is a
partial function
In mathematics, a partial function from a set to a set is a function from a subset of (possibly the whole itself) to . The subset , that is, the '' domain'' of viewed as a function, is called the domain of definition or natural domain ...
from
to
, and whose domain (the
set of all
such that
exists) equals
:
Such a function is called a uniformizing function for
, or a uniformization of
.
To see the relationship with the axiom of choice, observe that
can be thought of as associating, to each element of
, a subset of
. A uniformization of
then picks exactly one element from each such subset, whenever the subset is
non-empty. Thus, allowing arbitrary sets ''X'' and ''Y'' (rather than just Polish spaces) would make the axiom of uniformization equivalent to the axiom of choice.
A
pointclass
In the mathematical field of descriptive set theory, a pointclass is a collection of Set (mathematics), sets of point (mathematics), points, where a ''point'' is ordinarily understood to be an element of some perfect set, perfect Polish space. In ...
is said to have the uniformization property if every
relation in
can be uniformized by a partial function in
. The uniformization property is implied by the
scale property, at least for
adequate pointclasses of a certain form.
It follows from
ZFC alone that
and
have the uniformization property. It follows from the existence of sufficient
large cardinals that
*
and
have the uniformization property for every
natural number
In mathematics, the natural numbers are the numbers 0, 1, 2, 3, and so on, possibly excluding 0. Some start counting with 0, defining the natural numbers as the non-negative integers , while others start with 1, defining them as the positive in ...
.
*Therefore, the collection of
projective sets has the uniformization property.
*Every relation in
L(R) can be uniformized, but ''not necessarily'' by a function in L(R). In fact, L(R) does not have the uniformization property (equivalently, L(R) does not satisfy the axiom of uniformization).
**(Note: it's trivial that every relation in L(R) can be uniformized ''in V'', assuming V satisfies the axiom of choice. The point is that every such relation can be uniformized in some transitive inner model of V in which the
axiom of determinacy holds.)
References
* {{cite book , author=Moschovakis, Yiannis N. , authorlink = Yiannis N. Moschovakis, title=Descriptive Set Theory , url=https://archive.org/details/descriptivesetth0000mosc , url-access=registration , publisher=North Holland , year=1980 , isbn=0-444-70199-0
Set theory
Descriptive set theory
Axiom of choice