Phellinus Ellipsoideus

''Phellinus ellipsoideus'' (formerly ''Fomitiporia ellipsoidea'') is a species of polypore fungus in the family Hymenochaetaceae, a specimen of which produced the largest fungal fruit body ever recorded. Found in China, the fruit bodies produced by the species are brown, woody basidiocarps that grow on dead wood, where the fungus feeds as a saprotroph. The basidiocarps are perennial, allowing them to grow very large under favourable circumstances. They are resupinate, measuring or more in length, though typically extending less than a centimetre from the surface of the wood. ''P. ellipsoideus'' produces distinct ellipsoidal spores, after which it is named, and unusual setae. These two features allow it to be readily differentiated microscopically from other, similar species. Chemical compounds isolated from the species include several steroidal compounds. These may have pharmacological applications, but further research is needed.

The species was named in 2008 by Bao-Kai Cui and Yu-Cheng Dai based on collections made in Fujian Province. It was placed in the genus ''Fomitiporia'', but later analysis suggests that it is more closely related to '' Phellinus'' species. It was revealed in 2011 that a very large fruit body, measuring up to in length, had been found on Hainan Island. The specimen, which was 20 years old, was estimated to weigh between . This was markedly larger than the previously largest recorded fungal fruit body, a specimen of ''Rigidoporus ulmarius'' found in the United Kingdom that had a circumference of . The findings were formally published in September 2011, but attracted international attention from the mainstream press prior to this.

Taxonomy and phylogenetics

The species was first described in 2008 by Bao-Kai Cui and Yu-Cheng Dai, both of the Beijing Forestry University.MycoBank; Cui and Dai 2008, p. 343 Five specimens of the then-unknown species were collected during field work in the Wanmulin Nature Reserve (), Jian'ou, Fujian Province. The pair named the species ''Fomitiporia ellipsoidea'' in an article in the journal ''Mycotaxon''. The specific name ''ellipsoidea'' is from the Latin meaning "ellipsoid", and refers to the shape of the spores.Cui and Dai 2008, p. 344 Species of the order Hymenochaetales, to which this taxon belongs, make up 25% of the over 700 species of polypore found in China.

Phylogenetic analysis of large subunit and internal transcribed spacer DNA sequence data, the results of which were published in 2012, concluded that the species then known as ''F. ellipsoidea'' was closely related to ''Phellinus gabonensis'', '' P. caribaeo-quercicolus'' and the newly described '' P. castanopsidis''. The four species share morphological characteristics, and form a monophyletic clade. This clade resolved more closely with the '' Phellinus'' type species '' P. igniarius'' than it did with the ''Fomitiporia'' type species '' F. langloisii'', and so the authors proposed a transference of ''F. ellipsoidea'' to ''Phellinus'', naming the new combination ''Phellinus ellipsoideus''. While the taxonomic database Index Fungorum follows the 2012 study, MycoBank continues to list ''Fomitiporia ellipsoidea'' as the correct binomial.MycoBank; Index Fungorum Some mycologists consider ''Fomitiporia'' to be a synonym of ''Phellinus'' anyway.Cui and Decock 2013, p. 349

Description

''Phellinus ellipsoideus'' produces resupinate fruit bodies that are hard and woody, whether fresh or dry. The original description characterized them as measuring up to "or more" in length, in width, and extending from the wood on which they grow at their thickest point. The outermost layer is typically yellow to yellowish-brown, measuring in thickness. The shiny surface of the hymenium, the spore-producing section of the fruit body, is covered in pores and ranges in colour from yellow-brown to rust-brown. There are between 5 and 8 pores per millimetre. The tubes are up to in depth, have the same colouration as the surface of the hymenium, and are distinctively layered. They are also hard and woody. The very thin yellow-brown layer of flesh measures less than in width. As with much of the rest of the fruit body, it is firm, solid, and reminiscent of wood.Cui and Dai 2008, p. 346 The fruit bodies lack any odour or taste.

Microscopic features

''Phellinus ellipsoideus'' produces basidiospores that are ellipsoidal or broadly ellipsoidal in shape. The spore shape is one of the features that makes the species readily recognisable microscopically, and the spores measure from 4.5 to 6.1 by 3.5 to 5 micrometres (μm). The average spore length is 5.25 μm, while the average width is 4.14 μm. The spores have thick cell walls, and are hyaline. They are strongly cyanophilous, meaning that the cell walls will readily absorb methyl blue stain. In addition, they are weakly dextrinoid, meaning that they will stain slightly reddish-brown in Melzer's reagent or Lugol's solution. The spores are borne on barrel-shaped basidia, with four spores per basidium, measuring 8 to 12 by 6 to 7 μm. There are also basidioles, which are similar in shape to the basidia, but slightly smaller.

In addition to the spore shape, the species is readily identified with the use of a microscope because of its setae. Setae are a kind of unusual cystidia unique to the family Hymenochaetaceae, and, in ''P. ellipsoideus'', are found in the hymenium. In shape, the setae are ventricose, with distinctive hooks on their tips. In colour, they are yellow-brown, and they have thick cell walls. They measure 20 to 30 by 10 to 14 μm. Neither more standard cystidia nor cystidioles (underdeveloped cystidia) can be found in the species, but there are a number of rhomboid crystals throughout the hymenium and the flesh.

Most of the tissue of a fungal fruit body is made up of hyphae, which can be of three forms: generative, skeletal and binding. In ''P. ellipsoideus'', the tissue is dominated by skeletal hyphae, but also has generative hyphae; it lacks binding hyphae. For this reason, the hyphal structure of ''P. ellipsoideus'' is referred to as "dimitic". The hyphae are divided into separate cells by septae, and lack clamp connections. The skeletal hyphae do not react with Melzer's reagent or Lugol's solution, and are not cyanophilous. While the hyphae will darken when a solution of potassium hydroxide is applied (the KOH test), they remain otherwise unchanged.

The main structure of the fruit body consists primarily of an agglutination (mass) of interwoven skeletal hyphae, which are golden- to rust-brown. The hyphae are unbranched, forming long tubes 2 to 3.6 μm in diameter, enveloping a lumen of variable thickness. There are also hyaline generative hyphae. These hyphae have thinner walls than the skeletal hyphae, and are also septate (possessing of septa), but are sometimes branched. They measure 2 to 3 μm in diameter. The flesh, again, is primarily made up of skeletal hyphae with some generative hyphae. The thick-walled skeletal hyphae are a yellow-brown to rust brown, and are slightly less agglutinate. The hyphae in the flesh are a little smaller; the skeletal hyphae measure 1.8 to 3.4 μm in diameter, while the generative hyphae measure 1.5 to 2.6 μm in diameter.

Similar species

A cogeneric species potentially similar to ''Phellinus ellipsoideus'' is '' P. caribaeo-quercicola''. The latter species shares the hooked hymenial setae and ellipsoidal to broadly ellipsoidal spores. However, details of the fruit body differ, and the spores are hyaline to yellowish, and not dextrinoid. Further, the species is known only from tropical America, where it grows on the Cuban oak. '' P. castanopsidis'', newly described in 2013, is not perennial, and has a pale greyish-brown pore surface. The spores are also slightly larger than those of ''P. ellipsoideus''.

''Phellinus ellipsoideus'' differs from species of ''Fomitiporia'' in two key respects. Its spores are less dextrinoid than those of the genus and their shape is atypical. Other than this, it is typical of the genus, according to the original description. Five species of ''Fomitiporia'', '' F. bannaensis'', '' F. pseudopunctata'', '' F. sonorae'', '' F. sublaevigata'' and '' F. tenuis'', share with ''P. ellipsoideus'' the resupinate fruit bodies and the setae in the hymenium. Despite this, all of them but ''P. ellipsoideus'' have straight hymenial setae, and all of them have spores that are spherical or almost spherical, which is much more typical of the genus.Cui and Dai 2008, p. 347 '' F. uncinata'' (formerly ''Phellinus uncinatus'') has hooked hymenial setae, and the spores are, as with ''P. ellipsoideus'', thick-walled and dextrinoid. The species can be differentiated by the fact the spores are spherical or nearly so, and somewhat larger than those of ''P. ellipsoideus'', measuring 5.5 to 7 by 5 to 6.5 μm. The species is also known only from tropical America, where it grows on bamboo.Dai 2010, p. 173

Distribution and ecology

''Phellinus ellipsoideus'' has been recorded growing on the fallen wood of oaks of the subgenus ''Cyclobalanopsis'', as well as the wood of other flowering plants. The species favours the trunks of trees,Dai 2011, p. 10 where it feeds as a saprotroph, causing white rot. ''P. ellipsoideus'' fruit bodies are perennial growers, allowing them to, in the correct circumstances, grow very large. The species is found in the tropical and subtropical areas of China; it has been recorded in Fujian Province and Hainan Province. It is not a common species, and fruit bodies are only occasionally encountered.

Largest fruit body

In 2010, Cui and Dai were performing field work in tropical woodland on Hainan Island, China, studying wood-rotting fungi. The pair uncovered a very large ''P. ellipsoideus'' fruit body on a fallen ''Quercus asymmetrica'' log, which turned out to be the largest fungal fruit body ever documented. The fruit body was found at an altitude of , in old-growth forest.Money 2011 They were initially unable to identify the specimen as ''P. ellipsoideus'', because of its large size, but tests revealed its identity after samples were taken for analysis. After their initial encounter with the large fruit body, Cui and Dai returned to it on two subsequent occasions, so that they could study it further. Nicholas P. Money, executive editor of ''Fungal Biology'', in which the findings were published, praised the pair for not removing the fruit body, thereby allowing it "to continue its business and to marvel visitors to Hainan Island". The discovery was formally published in ''Fungal Biology'' in September 2011, but gained attention in the mainstream press worldwide prior to this.

The fruit body was 20 years old, and up to long. It was between wide, and between thick. The total volume of the fruit body was somewhere between . It was estimated to weigh between , based on three samples from different areas of the fruit body.Cui and Dai 2011, p. 813 The specimen had an average of 49 pores per square millimetre, roughly equivalent to 425 million pores. Money estimated that, based on spore output from other polypore species, the fruit body would be able to release a trillion spores a day.

Prior to this discovery, the largest recorded fruit body of any fungus was a specimen of ''Rigidoporus ulmarius'', found in Kew Gardens, United Kingdom. It measured in diameter, and had a circumference of . While the largest individual fruit bodies belong to polypores, individual organisms belonging to certain ''Armillaria'' species can grow extremely large. In 2003, a large specimen of '' A. solidipes'' (synonymous with ''A. ostoyae'') was recorded in the Blue Mountains, Oregon, covering an area of . At the time, the organism was estimated to be 8650 years old. Prior to this, an '' A. gallica'' (synonymous with ''A. bulbosa'') organism was the largest recorded, covering , weighing approximately . However, whilst these organisms cover a large area, the individual fruit bodies (the mushrooms) are not remarkably large, typically with stems of up to in height and caps less than in diameter, weighing from each.

Medicinal uses and biochemistry

The fruit bodies of both ''Phellinus'' and ''Fomitiporia'' species have seen use in traditional medicine for gastrointestinal cancer and heart disease.

In 2011, research into the chemistry of ''P. ellipsoideus'' was published in the journal ''Mycosystema'' by Cui, along with Hai-Ying Bao and Bao-Kai Liu of the Jilin Agricultural University. The research discussed how several chemical compounds could be isolated from ''P. ellipsoideus'' with petroleum ether and (after defatting) chloroform. The nine compounds isolated from these extracts included the common ergosterol and its derivative ergosterol peroxide. Two of the compounds, ergosta-7,22,25-triene-3-one and benzo ,2-b:5,4-b'ifuran-3,5-dione-8-methyl formate, were new to science. All of these chemicals were steroidal; such compounds play important physiological roles in cell membranes.

Steroidal compounds, like those isolated from ''P. ellipsoideus'', can have pharmacological applications; for instance, some can act as anti-inflammatories (including ergosterol) or inhibit tumour growth. The 2011 study concluded that, as ''P. ellipsoideus'' contained a large number of diverse steroidal compounds, there may be comparatively high pharmacological activity in the fungus; however, more research would be needed to confirm this.Bao, Cui and Liu 2011, p. 163 Later publications echoed this research, claiming that the fungus has "potential medicinal functions".Cui and Decock 2013, p. 349; Zhou and Xue 2012, p. 908 Research published in 2012 named fomitiporiaester A, a natural furan derivative isolated from methanolic extract of ''P. ellipsoideus'' fruit bodies. The chemical, methyl 3,5-dioxo-1,3,5,7-tetrahydrobenzo ,2-c:4,5-c'ifuran-4-carboxylate, displayed significant antitumour ability in a mouse model.

Industrial uses

''Phellinus ellipsoideus'' is used to make MuSkin, or mushroom leather, a vegan alternative to leather.Mathew 2017; Munyal 2017

See also

*Largest organisms
*Largest fungal fruit bodies

Notes

References

Bibliography

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

{{Taxonbar, from=Q612243

Fungi described in 2008
Fungi of China
ellipsoideus
Medicinal fungi
Taxa named by Yu-Cheng Dai
Taxa named by Bao-Kai Cui