Noronha skink

The Noronha skink (''Trachylepis atlantica'') is a species of skink from the island of Fernando de Noronha off northeastern Brazil. It is covered with dark and light spots on the upperparts and is usually about in length. The tail is long and muscular, but breaks off easily. Very common throughout Fernando de Noronha, it is an opportunistic feeder, eating both insects and plant material, including nectar from the ''Erythrina velutina'' tree, as well as other material ranging from cookie crumbs to eggs of its own species. Introduced predators such as feral cats prey on it and several parasitic worms infect it.

Perhaps seen by Amerigo Vespucci in 1503, it was first formally described in 1839. Its subsequent taxonomic history has been complex, riddled with confusion with ''Trachylepis maculata'' and other species, homonyms, and other problems. The species is classified in the otherwise mostly African genus ''Trachylepis'' and is thought to have reached its island from Africa by rafting. The enigmatic ''Trachylepis tschudii'', supposedly from Peru, may well be the same species.

Discovery and taxonomy

In an early account of what may be Fernando de Noronha, purportedly based on a voyage by Amerigo Vespucci in 1503, the island was said to be inhabited by "lizards with two tails", which is thought be a reference to the Noronha skink.Carleton and Olson, 1999, p. 48 The tail is long and fragile, and it breaks easily, like that of many skinks and other lizards, following which it may regenerate. However, when it does not completely break off, a new tail may nevertheless grow out of the broken part, so that the tail appears forked.

19th century

The species was first formally described by John Edward Gray in 1839, based on two specimens collected by HMS ''Chanticleer'' before 1838. He introduced the names ''Tiliqua punctata'', for the Noronha skink, and ''Tiliqua maculata'', for a species from Guyana, among many others.Gray, 1839, p. 289 Six years later, he transferred both to the genus ''Euprepis''. In 1887, George Boulenger placed both in the genus ''Mabuya'' (misspelled "''Mabuia''") and considered them identical, using the name "''Mabuia punctata''" for the species, which was said to occur both on Fernando de Noronha and in Guyana. He also included '' Mabouya punctatissima'' O'Shaughnessy, 1874, purportedly from South Africa, as a synonym. In 1874, A.W.E. O'Shaughnessy described the new species ''Mabouya punctatissima'' on the basis of a specimen, purchased from a Mr. Parzudaki, which had been labeled as coming from the Cape of Good Hope, a location O'Shaughnessy considered "very doubtful".O'Shaughnessy, 1874, p. 300. G.A. Boulenger, in 1887 synonymized it under ''Mabuia punctata'' (the Noronha skink) without comment, a position followed by H. Travassos with some doubt. The latter wrote that the description of ''punctatissima'' suggested to him that ''punctatissima'' and the Noronha skink are morphologically different, but that Boulenger's examination of the type and the uncertainty of the type locality inclined him to favor the synonymy. In 2002, P. Mausfeld and D. Vrcibradic re-examined the holotype, which is the only known specimen. It is similar to ''T. atlantica'', but larger, and lacks well-developed keels on its dorsal scales. Therefore, they suggested that it was not the same as ''T. atlantica'' and that its original locality may have been correct. Although it may represent a valid species of southern African ''Trachylepis'', the name ''Trachylepis punctatissima'' is preoccupied by ''Euprepes punctatissimus'' A. Smith, 1849, also currently placed in ''Trachylepis''.Mausfeld and Vrcibradic, 2002, p. 294.

20th century

In 1900, L.G. Andersson claimed that Gray's name ''punctata'' was preoccupied by ''Lacerta punctata'' Linnaeus, 1758, which he identified as '' Mabuya homalocephala''. He therefore replaced the name ''punctata'' with its junior synonym ''maculata'', using the name ''Mabuya maculata'' for the skink of Fernando de Noronha.Mausfeld and Vrcibradic, 2002, p. 292 Linnaeus's ''Lacerta punctata'' in fact refers to the Asian species ''Lygosoma punctatum'', not to ''Mabuya homalocephala'', but Gray's name ''punctata'' remains invalid regardless.Bauer, 2003, p. 4 In 1931, C.E. and M.D. Burt resurrected the name ''Mabuya punctata'' (now spelled correctly) for the Noronha skink, noting that it was "apparently a very distinct species", but did not mention ''maculata'', and in 1935, E.R. Dunn disputed Boulenger's conclusion as to the synonymy of ''punctata'' and ''maculata'' and, in apparent ignorance of Andersson's work, restored the name ''Mabuya punctata'' for the Noronha skink. He wrote that the Noronha skink was very distinct from other American ''Mabuya'' and more similar in some respects to African species.Dunn, 1935, p. 536

Karl Patterson Schmidt, in 1945, agreed with Dunn's conclusion that ''maculata'' and ''punctata'' of Gray were not the same, but he noted Andersson's point that ''punctata'' was preoccupied and therefore introduced the new name ''Mabuya atlantica'' to replace ''punctata''.Schmidt, 1945, p. 45 The next year, H. Travassos, disagreeing with Dunn and unaware of Andersson's and Schmidt's contributions,Travassos, 1948, p. 201 considered both of Gray's names to be synonymous and restored the name ''Mabuya punctata'' for the Noronha skink. He also considered ''Mabouya punctatissima'' and ''Trachylepis (Xystrolepis) punctata'' Tschudi, 1845, described from Peru, as synonyms of this species. In 1948, he acknowledged the preoccupation of ''punctata'' noted by Andersson and accordingly retired ''Mabuya punctata'' in favor of ''Mabuya maculata'', as Andersson had done.Travassos, 1948, p. 206 The name ''Mabuya maculata'' remained in general usage for the Noronha skink in subsequent decades, though some have used ''Mabuya punctata'', "not ... aware of the last nomenclatural changes."

21st century

In 2002, P. Mausfeld and D. Vrcibradic published a note on the nomenclature of the Noronha skink informed by a re-examination of Gray's original type specimens; despite extensive attempts to correctly name the species, they were apparently the first to do so since Boulenger in 1887.Mausfeld and Vrcibradic, 2002, p. 293 Based on differences in the number of scales, subdigital lamellae ( lamellae on the lower sides of the digits), and keels (longitudinal ridges) on the dorsal scales (located on the upperparts), as well as the separation of the parietal scales (on the head behind the eyes) in ''maculata'', they concluded that the two were not, after all, identical, and that Schmidt's name ''Mabuya atlantica'' should therefore be used. Mausfeld and Vrcibradic considered ''Mabouya punctatissima'' to represent a different species on the basis of morphological differences, but were unable to resolve the status of ''Trachylepis (Xystrolepis) punctata''.

In the same year, Mausfeld and others conducted a molecular phylogenetic study on the Noronha skink, using the mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA genes, and showed that the species is more closely related to African than to South American ''Mabuya'' species,Mausfeld et al., 2002, p. 281 as previously suggested on the basis of morphological similarities. They split the old genus ''Mabuya'' into four genera for geographically discrete clades, including ''Euprepis'' for the African–Noronha clade, thus renaming the Noronha species to ''Euprepis atlanticus''.Mausfeld et al., 2002, p. 290 In 2003, A.M. Bauer found that the name ''Euprepis'' had been incorrectly applied to this clade and that ''Trachylepis'' was correct instead, so that the Noronha skink is currently referred to as ''Trachylepis atlantica''.Bauer, 2003, p. 5, corrected the generic name from ''Euprepis'' to ''Trachylepis'', but did not explicitly use the name combination ''Trachylepis atlantica'', which was first used by Ananjeva et al., 2006, p. 76. Additional molecular phylogenetic studies published in 2003 and 2006 confirmed the relationship between the Noronha skink and African ''Trachylepis''.

In 2009, Miralles and others reviewed the taxon ''maculata'' and concluded that the animal now known as ''Trachylepis maculata'' also belongs in the African clade, but they were unable to determine whether or not it is indigenous to Guyana.Miralles et al., 2009, p. 62 They also reviewed ''Trachylepis (Xystrolepis) punctata'' and replaced it with ''Trachylepis tschudii'' because the older name was preoccupied by Linnaeus's and Gray's ''punctata''.Miralles et al., 2009, p. 57 Although they were unable to resolve the identity of ''T. tschudii'', which is still known from a single specimen, they believed that it is most likely the same species as the Noronha skink; it may be either a representative of an undiscovered Amazonian population of the latter or simply a mislabeled animal from Fernando de Noronha.Miralles et al., 2009, p. 58

Description

The Noronha skink is covered with light and dark spots above, but there is substantial variation in the precise colors. There are no longitudinal stripes. The scales on the underparts are yellowish or grayish. The eyelids are white to yellow. It has a small head with small nostrils, which are placed far to the front at the sides of the head. The mouth contains small and conical teeth and a thin but well-developed tongue. The eyes are small and placed laterally and contain dark, rounded irises. There are three to five well-developed auricular lobules (small projections) in front of the ears; these lobules are absent in true ''Mabuya''. The hindlimbs are longer and stronger than the forelimbs, which are small. The tail is longer than the body and is muscular but very brittle. It is nearly cylindrical in form and tapers towards the end.Travassos, 1946, p. 8

In reptiles, features of the scales are important in distinguishing among species and groups of species. In the Noronha skink, the supranasal scales (located above the nose) are in contact, as are the prefrontal scales (behind the nose) in most individuals. The two frontoparietal scales (above and slightly behind the eyes) are not fused. Unlike in ''T. maculata'', the parietal scales (behind the frontoparietals) are in contact with each other. There are four supraocular scales (above the eyes) in almost all specimens and five supraciliary scales (immediately above the eyes, below the supraoculars). The dorsal scales (on the upperparts) have three keels, two fewer than in ''T. maculata''. There are 34 to 40 (mode 38) midbody scales (counted around the body midway between the fore- and hindlimbs), 58 to 69 (mode 63–64) dorsal, and 66 to 78 (mode 70) ventral scales (on the underparts). ''Mabuya'' species and ''T. maculata'' generally have fewer midbody scales (up to 34). There are 21 to 29 subdigital lamellae under the fourth toe, more than in ''T. maculata'', which has 18. The Noronha skink has 26  presacral vertebrae (located before the sacrum), similar to most ''Trachylepis'', but unlike American ''Mabuya'', which have at least 28.

Although there is substantial variation in measurements within the species, no discrete groups can be detected and it is not possible to separate the sexes unambiguously using measurements alone.Travassos, 1946, p. 51 Among 15 male and 21 female ''T. atlantica'' collected in 2006, snout to vent length was , averaging , in males and , averaging , in females and body mass was , averaging , in males and , averaging , in females. Males are significantly larger than females. In 100 specimens collected in 1876, head length was , averaging ; head width was , averaging , and tail length was , averaging 117 mm.Travassos, 1946, pp. 26–28; summarized in Mausfeld and Vrcibradic, 2002, table 1

Ecology and behavior

The Noronha skink is very abundant throughout Fernando de Noronha,Carleton and Olson, 1999, p. 48; Rocha et al., 2009, p. 450; Gasparini et al., 2007, p. 31; Silva et al., 2005, p. 62 even occurring commonly in houses,Silva et al., 2005, p. 62 and also occurs on the smaller islands that surround the main island of the archipelago. Its abundance may be a result of the absence of ecologically similar competitors.Rocha et al., 2009, p. 458 Apart from ''T. atlantica'', the reptile fauna of Fernando de Noronha consists of the indigenous amphisbaenian ''Amphisbaena ridleyi'' and two introduced lizards, the gecko '' Hemidactylus mabouia'' and the tegu ''Tupinambis merianae''.Rocha et al., 2009, p. 450

The species is found in several microhabitats, but most often on rocks. Although predominantly ground-dwelling, it is a good climber.Sazima et al., 2005, p. 7 Nothing is known about its reproduction except that skinks studied in late October and early November, during the dry season, showed little evidence of reproductive activity. The Noronha skink is oviparous (egg-laying), like many ''Trachylepis'', but unlike ''Mabuya'', which are all viviparous (giving live birth).Mausfeld et al., 2002, p. 289

''Trachylepis atlantica'' is active during the day. Its body temperature averages , a few degrees higher than the environment temperature. During the day, body temperature peaks at up to around midday and is lower earlier and later. In the early morning, the lizard may bask in the sun. During foraging, it spends about 28.4% of its time moving on average, a relatively high value for ''Trachylepis''.Rocha et al., 2009, p. 453

A geologist who visited the island in 1876Branner, 1888, p. 861 noted that the skink is curious and bold:

While seated upon the bare rocks I have often observed these little animals watching me, apparently with as much curiosity as I watched them, turning their heads from side to side as if in an effort to be wise. If I kept quiet for a few minutes they would creep up to me and finally upon me; if I moved, they ran down the faces of the rocks, and turning, stuck their heads above the edges to watch me.

Diet

The Noronha skink is an opportunistic omnivoreSilva et al., 2005, p. 63 and "thrives on anything edible".Sazima et al., 2005, p. 2 Analysis of stomach contents indicates that it mainly eats plant material, at least during the dry period,Rocha et al., 2009, p. 457 but it also feeds on insects, including larvae, termites (Isoptera), ants (Formicidae), and beetles (Coleoptera).Rocha et al., 2009, p. 454 Its prey is mostly mobile, rather than sedentary,Rocha et al., 2009, p. 455 which is consistent with the relatively high proportion of time it spends moving.Rocha et al., 2009, p. 456 Related skink species eat mostly insects, but island populations may often be more herbivorous. Animal prey averages 6.9 mm³ in volume, less than in most other ''Trachylepis''.

When the mulungu tree ''Erythrina velutina'' blooms during the dry season, Noronha skinks climb up to to reach the inflorescences of the tree and to eat the nectar by inserting their heads into the flowers. They probably use the nectar both for its sugar and water content. In this way, the skinks aid in pollinating the tree, as they acquire pollen on their scales and leave pollen on stigmas when visiting a flower.Sazima et al., 2009, p. 26 Pollination is rare behavior among lizards, but occurs most frequently in island species. Humans have introduced additional food sources to the island, including ''Acacia'' seeds, feces of the rock cavy (''Kerodon rupestris''), carrion flies, juvenile ''Hemidactylus mabouya'', and even cookie crumbs given by tourists.Gasparini et al., 2007, p. 30 The availability of these additional food sources may increase the abundance of the skink.Gasparini et al., 2007, p. 32 In 1887, H. N. Ridley observed Noronha skinks eating banana skins and yolk from doves' eggs. Several cases of cannibalism have been reported, involving skinks eating eggs, juveniles, and the tail of an adult.Silva et al., 2005, table 1

Relationships with other species

The Noronha skink probably lacked predators before Fernando de Noronha was discovered by humans, but several species that arrived since do prey on it, most commonly the cat (''Felis catus'') and cattle egret (''Bubulcus ibis''). These may negatively affect skink abundance at some localities on the island. The Argentine black and white tegu lizard, ''Tupinambis merianae'', and three introduced rodents, the house mouse (''Mus musculus''), brown rat (''Rattus norvegicus'') and black rat (''Rattus rattus''), have also been observed to eat Noronha skinks, but the rodents, particularly the house mouse, may have been scavenging on already dead skinks.

According to a 2006 study, the Noronha skink is infected by several parasitic worms, most frequently by the nematode '' Spinicauda spinicauda''. Another nematode, '' Moaciria alvarengai'', is much rarer. Other rare parasites include two trematodes—'' Mesocoelium monas'' and an undetermined species of '' Platynossomum''—and an undetermined species of '' Oochoristica'', a cestode.Ramalho et al., 2009, p. 1026 ''S. spinicauda'' is usually only found in teiid lizards; it may have entered the archipelago when ''Tupinambis merianae'', a teiid, was introduced to the island in 1960. Among nematodes, previous studies in 1956 and 1957 had only reported ''M. alvarengai'' and '' Thelandros alvarengai'' from the skink; the presence of ''S. spinicauda'' could explain the rarity of ''M. alvarengai'' and absence of ''T. alvarengai'' in Noronha skinks observed in 2006.Ramalho et al., 2009, p. 1027

Origin

Phylogenetic analyses using a variety of mitochondrial and nuclear genes places the Noronha skink among the tropical African species of ''Trachylepis'', a position also supported by morphological similarities. It may have arrived on its island on rafting vegetation from southwestern Africa via the Benguela Current and the South Equatorial Current, which passes Fernando de Noronha. This possibility was first suggested by Alfred Russel Wallace before 1888. Mausfeld and coworkers calculated that the journey from Africa to Fernando de Noronha would take 139 days. Because this period seemed too long for the skink to survive, they proposed that the Noronha skink instead arrived via Ascension Island, where a skink may have persisted into historical times.Mausfeld et al., 2002, pp. 286–287; Carranza and Arnold, 2003, p. 281

The South American and Caribbean ''Mabuya'' skinks form a clade that appears to be derived from a separate colonization from Africa. Both transatlantic colonization events are believed to have occurred within the last 9 million years.Carranza and Arnold, 2003, p. 281

Conservation status

The reptile is thought to be stable in terms of population trends and not under any threat of extinction. However, the climate is rapidly changing, so this could change at any point in time. Although environmental changes do not affect the species in particular, the density of the species is at risk of decreasing should the environment change drastically as well as if tourism trends or more invasive animals are introduced. Additionally, the urbanization of surrounding areas to the lizards habitat could be detrimental, therefore International Union for Conservation of Nature evaluated it as least concern.

Notes

References

External links

Trachylepis atlantica
in th
Reptile Database

Literature cited

* Ananjeva, N. B.; Orlov, N. L.; Khalikov, R. G.; Darevsky, I. S.; and Barabanov, A.; 2006
The reptiles of northern Eurasia: taxonomic diversity, distribution, conservation status
Series faunistica 47. Pensoft Publishers, 245 pp. 
* Avila-Pires, T. C. S.; 1995
Lizards of Brazilian Amazonia (Reptilia: Squamata)
''Zoologische Verhandelingen'' 299:1–706
* Bauer, A. M.; 2003. On the identity of ''Lacerta punctata'' Linnaeus 1758, the type species of the genus ''Euprepis'' Wagler 1830, and the generic assignment of Afro-Malagasy skinks. ''African Journal of Herpetology'' 52:1–7
* Boulenger, G. A.; 1887
Catalogue of the Lizards in the British Museum (Natural History). Second edition. Vol. III. Lacertidae, Gerrosauridae, Scincidae, Anelytropidae, Dibamidae, Chamaeleonidae
London: published by order of the Trustees of the British Museum, 575 pp.
* Branner, J. C.; 1888
Notes on the fauna of the islands of Fernando de Noronha
(subscription required). ''American Naturalist'' 22(262):861–871
* Burt, C. E.; and Burt, M. D.; 1931
South American lizards in the collection of the American Museum of Natural History
''Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History'' 61:227–395
* Carleton, M. D.; and Olson, S. L.; 1999
Amerigo Vespucci and the rat of Fernando de Noronha: a new genus and species of Rodentia (Muridae, Sigmodontinae) from a volcanic island off Brazil's continental shelf
''American Museum Novitates'' 3256:1–59
* Carranza, S.; and Arnold, N. E.; 2003
Investigating the origin of transoceanic distributions: mtDNA shows ''Mabuya'' lizards (Reptilia, Scincidae) crossed the Atlantic twice
(subscription required). ''Systematics and Biodiversity'' 1(2):275–282
* Dunn, E. R.; 1935
Notes on American Mabuyas
(subscription required). ''Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia'' 87:533–557
* Finley, R. B., Jr.; 1945
Notes on lizards from Fernando Noronha
(subscription required). ''Copeia'' 1945(3):162–164.
* Gasparini, J.L., Peloso, P.L. and Sazima, I. 2007. New opportunities and hazards brought by humans to the island habitat of the skink ''Euprepis atlanticus''. ''Herpetological Bulletin'' 100:30–33
* Gray, J. E.; 1839
Catalogue of the slender-tongued saurians, with the description of many new genera and species
''Annals and Magazine of Natural History'' (1)2:287–293
* Gray, J. E.; 1845
Catalogue of the specimens of lizards in the collection of the British Museum
London: published by order of the Trustees of the British Museum, 289 pp.
* Greer, A. E.; Arnold, C.; and Arnold, E. N.; 2000
The systematic significance of the number of presacral vertebrae in the scincid lizard genus ''Mabuya''
(subscription required). ''Amphibia-Reptilia'' 21:121–126
* Mausfeld, P.; and Vrcibradic, D.; 2002
On the nomenclature of the skink (''Mabuya'') endemic to the western Atlantic archipelago of Fernando de Noronha, Brazil
(subscription required). ''Journal of Herpetology'' 36(2):292–295
* Mausfeld, P.; Schmitz, A.; Böhme, W.; Misof, B.; Vrcibradic, D.; and Duarte, C. F.; 2002
Phylogenetic affinities of ''Mabuya atlantica'' Schmidt, 1945, endemic to the Atlantic Ocean archipelago of Fernando de Noronha (Brazil): Necessity of partitioning the genus ''Mabuya'' Fitzinger, 1826 (Scincidae: Lygosominae)
(subscription required). ''Zoologischer Anzeiger'' 241:281–293
* Miralles, A.; Chaparro, J. C.; and Harvey, M. B.; 2009
Three rare and enigmatic South American skinks
(first page only). ''Zootaxa'' 2012:47–68
* O'Shaughnessy, A. M. E.; 1874
Descriptions of new species of Scincidae in the collection of the British Museum
''Annals and Magazine of Natural History'' (4)13:298–301
* Ramalho, A. C. O.; da Silva, R. J.; Schwartz, H. O.; and Péres, A. K., Jr.; 2009
Helminths from an introduced species (''Tupinambis merianae''), and two endemic species (''Trachylepis atlantica'' and ''Amphisbaena ridleyi'') from Fernando de Noronha archipelago, Brazil
''Journal of Parasitology'' 95(4):1026–1038
* Ridley, H. N.; 1888a
A visit to Fernando do Noronha
''The Zoologist'' (3)12(134):41–49
* Ridley, H. N.; 1888b
Notes on the zoology of Fernando Noronha
''Journal of the Linnean Society: Zoology'' 20:473–570
* Rocha, C. F. D.; Vrcibradic, D.; Menezes, V. A.; and Ariani, C. V.; 2009
Ecology and natural history of the easternmost native lizard species in South America, ''Trachylepis atlantica'' (Scincidae), from the Fernando de Noronha archipelago, Brazil
(subscription required). ''Journal of Herpetology'' 43(3):450–459
* Sazima, I.; Sazima, C.; and Sazima, M.; 2005
Little dragons prefer flowers to maidens: A lizard that laps nectar and pollinates trees
''Biota Neotropical'' 5(1):1–8
* Sazima, I.; Sazima, C.; and Sazima, M.; 2009
A catch-all leguminous tree: ''Erythrina velutina'' visited and pollinated by vertebrates at an oceanic island
(subscription required). ''Australian Journal of Botany'' 57:26–30
* Schleich, H.-H.; Kästle, W.; and Kabisch, K.; 1996
Amphibians and reptiles of North Africa: biology, systematics, field guide
Koeltz Scientific Books, 630 pp. 
* Schmidt, K. P.; 1945
A new name for a Brazilian ''Mabuya''
''Copeia'' 1945(1):45
* Silva, J. M., Jr.; Péres, A. K., Jr.; and Sazima, I.; 2005. ''Euprepis atlanticus'' (Noronha Skink). Predation. ''Herpetological Review'' 36:62–63
* Travassos, H.; 1946. Estudo da variação de ''Mabuya punctata'' (Gray, 1839). ''Boletim do Museu Nacional (Zoologia)'' 60:1–56 (in Portuguese)
* Travassos, H.; 1948. Nota sobre a "Mabuya" da Ilha Fernando de Noronha (Squamata, Scincidae). ''Revista Brasileira de Biologia'' 8:201–208 (in Portuguese)
* Whiting, A. S.; Sites, J. W.; Pellegrino, K. C. M.; and Rodrigues, M. T.; 2006
Comparing alignment methods for inferring the history of the new world lizard genus ''Mabuya'' (Squamata: Scincidae)
(subscription required). ''Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution'' 38:719–730

{{Taxonbar, from=Q1938546

Trachylepis
Reptiles of Brazil
Endemic fauna of Brazil
Fernando de Noronha
Reptiles described in 1945
Taxa named by Karl Patterson Schmidt