HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
set theory Set theory is the branch of mathematical logic that studies sets, which can be informally described as collections of objects. Although objects of any kind can be collected into a set, set theory, as a branch of mathematics, is mostly conce ...
, a branch of mathematics, the Milner – Rado paradox, found by , states that every
ordinal number In set theory, an ordinal number, or ordinal, is a generalization of ordinal numerals (first, second, th, etc.) aimed to extend enumeration to infinite sets. A finite set can be enumerated by successively labeling each element with the least n ...
\alpha less than the successor \kappa^ of some
cardinal number In mathematics, cardinal numbers, or cardinals for short, are a generalization of the natural numbers used to measure the cardinality (size) of sets. The cardinality of a finite set is a natural number: the number of elements in the set. Th ...
\kappa can be written as the union of sets X_1, X_2,... where X_n is of
order type In mathematics, especially in set theory, two ordered sets and are said to have the same order type if they are order isomorphic, that is, if there exists a bijection (each element pairs with exactly one in the other set) f\colon X \to Y such ...
at most ''κ''''n'' for ''n'' a positive integer.


Proof

The proof is by transfinite induction. Let ''\alpha'' be a limit ordinal (the induction is trivial for successor ordinals), and for each ''\beta<\alpha'', let ''\_n'' be a partition of ''\beta'' satisfying the requirements of the theorem. Fix an increasing sequence \_ cofinal in \alpha with \beta_0=0. Note \mathrm\,(\alpha)\le\kappa. Define: :X^\alpha _0 = \;\ \ X^\alpha_ = \bigcup_\gamma X^_n\setminus \beta_\gamma Observe that: :\bigcup_X^\alpha_n = \bigcup _n \bigcup _\gamma X^_n\setminus \beta_\gamma = \bigcup_\gamma \bigcup_n X^_n\setminus \beta_\gamma = \bigcup_\gamma \beta_\setminus \beta_\gamma = \alpha \setminus \beta_0 and so ''\bigcup_nX^\alpha_n = \alpha''. Let \mathrm\,(A) be the
order type In mathematics, especially in set theory, two ordered sets and are said to have the same order type if they are order isomorphic, that is, if there exists a bijection (each element pairs with exactly one in the other set) f\colon X \to Y such ...
of ''A''. As for the order types, clearly \mathrm(X^\alpha_0) = 1 = \kappa^0. Noting that the sets \beta_\setminus\beta_\gamma form a consecutive sequence of ordinal intervals, and that each X^_n\setminus\beta_\gamma is a tail segment of X^_n, then: :\mathrm(X^\alpha_) = \sum_\gamma \mathrm(X^_n\setminus\beta_\gamma) \leq \sum_\gamma \kappa^n = \kappa^n \cdot \mathrm(\alpha) \leq \kappa^n\cdot\kappa = \kappa^


References

*
How to prove Milner-Rado Paradox? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Set theory Paradoxes {{mathlogic-stub