Milner–Rado Paradox
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
set theory Set theory is the branch of mathematical logic that studies Set (mathematics), sets, which can be informally described as collections of objects. Although objects of any kind can be collected into a set, set theory – as a branch of mathema ...
, a branch of mathematics, the Milner – Rado paradox, found by , states that every
ordinal number In set theory, an ordinal number, or ordinal, is a generalization of ordinal numerals (first, second, th, etc.) aimed to extend enumeration to infinite sets. A finite set can be enumerated by successively labeling each element with the leas ...
\alpha less than the
successor Successor may refer to: * An entity that comes after another (see Succession (disambiguation)) Film and TV * ''The Successor'' (1996 film), a film including Laura Girling * The Successor (2023 film), a French drama film * ''The Successor'' ( ...
\kappa^ of some
cardinal number In mathematics, a cardinal number, or cardinal for short, is what is commonly called the number of elements of a set. In the case of a finite set, its cardinal number, or cardinality is therefore a natural number. For dealing with the cas ...
\kappa can be written as the union of sets X_1, X_2,... where X_n is of
order type In mathematics, especially in set theory, two ordered sets and are said to have the same order type if they are order isomorphic, that is, if there exists a bijection (each element pairs with exactly one in the other set) f\colon X \to Y su ...
at most ''κ''''n'' for ''n'' a positive integer.


Proof

The proof is by
transfinite induction Transfinite induction is an extension of mathematical induction to well-ordered sets, for example to sets of ordinal numbers or cardinal numbers. Its correctness is a theorem of ZFC. Induction by cases Let P(\alpha) be a property defined for a ...
. Let ''\alpha'' be a limit ordinal (the induction is trivial for successor ordinals), and for each ''\beta<\alpha'', let ''\_n'' be a partition of ''\beta'' satisfying the requirements of the theorem. Fix an increasing sequence \_ cofinal in \alpha with \beta_0=0. Note \mathrm\,(\alpha)\le\kappa. Define: :X^\alpha _0 = \;\ \ X^\alpha_ = \bigcup_\gamma X^_n\setminus \beta_\gamma Observe that: :\bigcup_X^\alpha_n = \bigcup _n \bigcup _\gamma X^_n\setminus \beta_\gamma = \bigcup_\gamma \bigcup_n X^_n\setminus \beta_\gamma = \bigcup_\gamma \beta_\setminus \beta_\gamma = \alpha \setminus \beta_0 and so ''\bigcup_nX^\alpha_n = \alpha''. Let \mathrm\,(A) be the
order type In mathematics, especially in set theory, two ordered sets and are said to have the same order type if they are order isomorphic, that is, if there exists a bijection (each element pairs with exactly one in the other set) f\colon X \to Y su ...
of ''A''. As for the order types, clearly \mathrm(X^\alpha_0) = 1 = \kappa^0. Noting that the sets \beta_\setminus\beta_\gamma form a consecutive sequence of ordinal intervals, and that each X^_n\setminus\beta_\gamma is a tail segment of X^_n, then: :\mathrm(X^\alpha_) = \sum_\gamma \mathrm(X^_n\setminus\beta_\gamma) \leq \sum_\gamma \kappa^n = \kappa^n \cdot \mathrm(\alpha) \leq \kappa^n\cdot\kappa = \kappa^


References

*
How to prove Milner-Rado Paradox? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Set theory Paradoxes {{mathlogic-stub