Principles
According to the Basic Law of Hungary, every citizen is entitled to universal and equal suffrage, and voting is always direct and secret. The right to vote in Hungary is voluntary and free,voting is not mandatory. Parliamentary and local government elections can be general elections or by-elections (which may be held for non-list elections). General parliamentary elections must be held every four years and local government elections every five years. The date of the parliamentary election is set by the President of the Republic no later than 72 days before the election.National Assembly elections
General elections
In the general elections held every 4 years, all members of parliament are reelected. In the election, voter may vote for an individual representative candidate in one of the 106Constituencies
In the 106 individual constituencies, representatives are elected by plurality ("relative majority") voting, i.e. each voter can vote for one candidate and the candidate with the most votes wins (List votes
The 93 national list mandates are allocated as follows * The number of votes representing the electoral threshold is established, which is 5% in the case of party lists (10% in the case of a joint list of two parties, and 15% in the case of three or more parties), and in the case of minority lists (this is called a preferential quota) it is the number of votes divided by the list mandates divided by the number (93) by another four (so approx. 0.27%). Mandates cannot be obtained from party lists and national lists below the threshold. * Minority list mandates, which can be obtained with a preferential quota, are distributed first. * The votes cast for the losing candidates in the individual branch and the surplus votes cast for the winning candidate (result of the winning candidate - (result of the losing candidate + 1 vote)) shall be considered fractional votes and will be added (in the case of lists achieving a result above the threshold) to the list votes. * The remaining list mandates (after the distribution of preferential minority mandates) are distributed among the lists using theMinority speakers
Those minorities that submitted a list that did not achieve the number of votes required for the preferential mandate have the opportunity to send a minority nationality advocate to the National Assembly. The Nationality Advocate will be the 1st person on their list.Filling vacant seats, by-elections
By-elections must be called in individual constituencies if * there are no candidates in the election, * the most votes are obtained by two or more candidates with an equal number of votes, * the mandate of the elected individual constituency representative is terminated (e.g. death). In the case of a mandate obtained on a national list, the party or ethnic self-government may nominate someone from the list, otherwise the next representative fills the mandate. If there are no more representatives on the list, the mandate remains vacant. This is also how the position of national advocate will be filled.Criticisms
According to critics, the new electoral system essentially makes it impossible for parties with separate lists to nominate common individual candidates, because in this case the fractional votes are lost, and this is an indefensible provision specifically aimed at hindering the unity of the opposition. Kovács and Stumpf pointed out in their study that the current system shows a greater tendency towards disproportionality. In search of the source of the disproportionality, three internal and one external factor were identified in the model. The internal factors are: 1. the change in the proportions of individual and list mandates, 2. the introduction of "premiumization" for the winner, 3. the termination of the independent compensation list; external factor: the evolution of the power relations of the parties at national and district level. Although Századvég and Nézőpont tried in vain to refute the gerrymandering effect, the data from the 2014 elections showed a significant correlation between the popularity of Fidesz and the number of constituency voters. Thus, the votes of Fidesz were 3-4% stronger due to the inequality of the constituencies alone, and in addition, in terms of distribution, there was an apparently strong disproportion in favor of Fidesz (it represented 96/106 individual mandates) in the party structure at that time.http://mek.oszk.hu/16000/16042/16042.pdf Körösényi András (szerk.) - A magyar politikai rendszer - negyedszázad után (2015), Budapest: Osiris, Another criticism arises that the fractional votes to be included in the national party list are formed from the votes cast for the representative who won the individual mandate. Legislators respond to this by ensuring that there are no wasted votes. However, since these votes were already partially valid in the individual category, and moreover with greater weight, this means further overcompensation of the winners, making the already disproportional system even more disproportional.Legal framework
As a significant change to the laws defining election rules, the Basic Law effective from January 1, 2012 prohibited the holding of referendums on the content of election laws. The proponents did not justify the need to introduce the ban.Primary elections
In 2021, six Hungarian opposition parties (DK, Jobbik, LMP, MSZP, Momentum, Párbeszéd) held nationalLocal government and minority elections
Local governments
Mayors
Mayors and the mayor of Budapest can be elected everywhere from individual mayoral candidates by voting for one of the candidates. The Mayor is the candidate with the most votes (single round, plurality voting).Councils
In settlements with more than 10,000 inhabitants (and capital districts) mandates can be obtained in individual constituencies and from compensation lists in the mixed election system. In the individual constituencies, one representative is elected in a plurality voting system, similar to the rules of the mayoral election, without a participation limit, that is, regardless of the number of participants and the distribution of votes among the candidates, the candidate who received the most votes wins the mandate. In the individual constituency, the election is indecisive only if several candidates obtain an equal number of votes (including the case where no candidate receives a vote), in which case no candidate is elected and a by-election must be held. Holding the election is not an obstacle if only one candidate is running in the constituency. A compensation list can be submitted by the organization that nominates candidates in more than half of the individual constituencies. During the compensation, the fractional votes cast by each nominating organization for the unelected candidates in the individual constituencies must be taken into account. Only the list of the organization whose candidates received at least 5% of the aggregated compensation votes at the settlement level can receive a compensation mandate. In the case of a joint list, the limit is 10%, and in the case of a joint list of more than two organizations, it is 15%. The distribution of mandates among the compensation lists is prescribed by law according to a modified version of the D'Hont method, which makes it easier for smaller organizations to obtain their first mandate. However, since the number of mandates that can be distributed is very small in most settlements (for example, only 3 up to 25,000 inhabitants), this solution leaves the distribution of mandates highly disproportionate. In settlements with no more than ten thousand inhabitants, the so-called "individual list" election system (County assemblies, Budapest Assembly
The composition of the county assemblies (or the capital assembly before 2014) can be voted on by voting on one of the lists established by parties and social organizations. The lists are allocated seats in the general assembly in proportion to the total votes obtained in the entire county (or in the capital before 2014). Mandates can only be obtained in the general assemblies from those lists for which the votes cast exceed 5% of all valid votes. In the case of a joint list, the limit is 10%, and in the case of a joint list of more than two organizations, it is 15%. Since 2014, the 33-member capital assembly has been composed of the Lord Mayor (elected directly), 23 district mayors (elected directly) and 9 representatives from the compensation list. Only mayoral candidates and district mayor candidates may appear on the compensation list.Minority local governments
In the settlements (and districts of Budapest) where minority elections have been initiated, no more than five candidates of one of the minorities can be elected. The vote is valid even if the voter marks fewer names than possible; representatives will be the candidates with the most votes. A minority local government can be formed by the minority for whose candidates at least one hundred voters cast valid votes in settlements with a population greater than ten thousand, and at least fifty voters in those with a population smaller than this. Minority municipalities of settlements with fewer than 1,300 inhabitants may consist of a maximum of three representatives, and those of more than five may consist of a maximum of five representatives. A minority that can form a self-government in at least one district in the capital can also establish a minority self-government in the capital, and minorities can also form a national minority self-government.European Parliament elections
The election, as in most EU member states, takes place in Hungary in a party-list proportional election system (in one round), which takes place every 5 years, and only parties can participate. The entire country is one multi-member constituency. The electoral system in Hungary usesReferendums and other initiatives
National referendums
A national referendum can be mandatory or discretionary (facultative referendum). In both cases, the result of the referendum is decisive and binding. The National Assembly - if the referendum gives rise to a legislative obligation - is obliged to create a law corresponding to the decision of the valid and successful referendum within one hundred and eighty days from the day of the vote, which decision is binding on the Parliament for three years from the promulgation of the law. The referendum must be scheduled for a date beyond 50 days after its order, so that it does not fall on the days specified in the law. At the initiative of at least two hundred thousand voters, the National Assembly orders a national referendum. At the initiative of the President of the Republic, the Government or one hundred thousand voters, the Parliament can order a national referendum. forrás?''.html" ;"title="Wikipedia:Citing_sources.html" ;"title="'Wikipedia:Citing sources">forrás?''">Wikipedia:Citing_sources.html" ;"title="'Wikipedia:Citing sources">forrás?''/sup> The decision made in a valid and decisive referendum is binding on the National Assembly. The referendum is valid if at least half of all voters voted validly, and it is decisive if more than half of those who voted validly gave the same answer to the formulated question. The subject of a national referendum may be an issue within the tasks and powers of the Parliament.Local referendums
A local referendum is the direct participation of the population of the village, the city, the capital district, the capital, or the county in the government of local affairs under the jurisdiction of the local government. A local referendum can be initiated by at least a quarter of the members of the local representative body, the committee of the municipality, and also a number of voters specified in the municipal decree (at least 10, maximum 25 percent of the voters). forrás?''.html" ;"title="Wikipedia:Citing_sources.html" ;"title="'Wikipedia:Citing sources">forrás?''">Wikipedia:Citing_sources.html" ;"title="'Wikipedia:Citing sources">forrás?''/sup> Similar to the national referendum, the legislation distinguishes between compulsory and optional local referendums; in the latter case, the representative body may reconsider scheduling a local referendum. forrás?''.html" ;"title="Wikipedia:Citing_sources.html" ;"title="'Wikipedia:Citing sources">forrás?''">Wikipedia:Citing_sources.html" ;"title="'Wikipedia:Citing sources">forrás?''/sup>Recognition of a native ethnic group
If a nationality living in Hungary wants to gain recognition, at least a thousand Hungarian citizens who claim to belong to this nationality and have the right to vote in the elections of local government representatives and mayors can initiate the declaration of the nationality as a native ethnic group in Hungary. During the procedure, the provisions regarding the initiative of the national referendum must be applied, with the exception that the organizer of the initiative can only be a voter with Hungarian citizenship who is eligible to be elected in the election of local government representatives and mayors. In the course of its procedure, the National Election Commission is obliged to request the opinion of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences on the existence of the legal conditions. At the end of the procedure, the Parliament decides on the recognition of a native ethnic group.European citizens' initiative
At least one million EU citizens can initiate that the European Commission - within its competence - present a suitable proposal in those cases in which, according to the citizens' opinion, the adoption of an EU legal act is necessary for the implementation of the Treaties.Historical electoral systems
Diet
In Hungary, by the end of the 15th century, three orders (nobility, clergy, burghers) were created, and with the disintegration of the noble order, four orders (nobility, common nobility, clergy, burghers) were created by the 16th century, and these orders survived until 1848. The legislature of the State was the Diet (''Országgyűlés'' in Hungarian, meaning Country Assembly), which was convened by the monarch, and they had the right to dissolve it. The Diet did not mean an institution that meets continuously every year. Depending on the political situation, their interests, and the pressure of the orders, the rulers called or did not call a parliament, often there was no parliament for years. In the parliaments of the Hungarian order, among the orders, the nobility played a decisive role, the role of the clergy and especially the bourgeoisie was more complementary. The Diets held during the 17th-18th century consisted of about 500 people. The parliamentary system was also based on the noble county, the county self-governing institution of the nobility, whose members were elected from the 13th century. In 1608, the two-chamber system was introduced in the parliament of royal Hungary, separating the upper table (Magnates) and the lower table (Delegates). The members of the upper table (which later became the House of Magnates) were the nobles and high priests, by birth or office. At the meetings of the lower table (which later became the House of Representatives), delegates selected by election represented the other orders.Diet (1608–1848)
The election of the delegates of the lower table took place in the elections taking place in the noble counties (the county self-governing institution of the nobility) that emerged from the 13th century. About 10% of the entire population of voting age could vote for the elected delegates of the lower table (5% county nobility, 5% residents of free royal cities). Even within this, the number of representative seats was not proportional: from the county nobility, each county was entitled to one vote, while the representatives of the free royal cities, the clergy, and the districts had only one vote each. Thus, most of the members of the lower table of the Diet were delegates of the county nobility. They were elected in the county elections, by the county nobility at the county hall, after a campaign of courtesies. The candidates were accompanied and assisted by professional courtiers. For the final decision, the crowd of nobles supporting the candidates gathered at the County Hall: most of them listened to the noise from outside, through the open windows, and cheered their candidate from time to time in accordance with the signals of the courtiers standing in the window. The noble crowd that entered the assembly hall engaged in a loud debate, which was accompanied by cheers and shouts led by the courtiers. According to the traditional rule, the final decision on the candidates was made on the basis of the opinion of the majority: there was no vote counting, but the majority was estimated based on the volume of the shouting of the crowd supporting the candidates. The elected county delegate was provided with instructions and could be recalled.Representative parliamentary system (from 1848)
Act V of 1848 introduced the individual, single-round, plurality election system, in which Hungarian men who had reached the age of twenty and who met the financial threshold had the right to vote. The age limit for eligibility was 24, and the conditions were Hungarian citizenship and knowledge of the Hungarian language. In the age of Austria-Hungary, an 1874 law tied the right to vote to taxation, and in 1899 those who did not pay their tax arrears were excluded from those entitled to vote. Act XIV of 1913. ordered non-secret voting ( open ballot) and tied the right to vote to a wealth and literacy test. General and secret suffrage, which also extends to women, was first introduced by the Károlyi government in 1918. All men over 21 and women over 24 who could read and write in any Hungarian language were given the right to vote. In modern-day Hungary, free, democratic elections were held for the first time in 1920. ource?According to a 1925 law of the Horthy era, voting was secret, but mandatory, only in Budapest and in cities with legislative authority, for which everyone over the age of 24 and men who completed four years of schooling and women over 30 who completed six years of schooling were eligible. Voting was made secret and compulsory everywhere in 1938, and the system of recommendations (for candidatures) was then introduced. In 1945, after the Second World War, the Provisional National Assembly adopted the law which established general and equal suffrage and secret and direct voting with party-list proportional system, but at the same time excluded traitors, for example, from the right to vote. In 1947, hundreds of thousands were disenfranchised based on political considerations. Free elections were finally abolished by the 1949 law, which gave the right of nomination to the National Council of the People's Front and limited the possibility of voting to a single, fixed (closed) list. In 1953, the law set the voting age at 18 years, abolished the exclusions introduced between 1945 and 1947, and ordered the nomination of representatives by open ballot voting. The right to nominate came into the hands of the Patriotic People's Front in 1966, and the individual district system was also introduced at that time. From 1970, the participants of the nomination assemblies could nominate candidates themselves, then Act III. of 1983 made double nomination mandatory. According to the law, in addition to the two official candidates of the Patriotic People's Front, the participants of the nomination meetings could also propose another person. The candidate was the one who was supported by at least one third of all the participants of the minimum two nomination meetings. In the 1985 elections, as a result, 32 of the 74 so-called spontaneous candidates entered parliament, including the MSZMP memberNational Assembly elections between 1989 and 2011
In the electoral system used from 1990 until the 2010 election, the National Assembly had 386 members,See also
*Further reading
* Alkotmányos Tanok (2018), Bodnár Eszter - Pozsár Szentmiklósy Zoltán - in Hungarian (''Constitutional Studies'')Further information
References
{{reflist Multi-winner electoral systems Semi-proportional electoral systems Mixed electoral systems Electoral systems Elections in Hungary Law