|
Maschke's Theorem
In mathematics, Maschke's theorem, named after Heinrich Maschke, is a theorem in group representation theory that concerns the decomposition of representations of a finite group into irreducible pieces. Maschke's theorem allows one to make general conclusions about representations of a finite group ''G'' without actually computing them. It reduces the task of classifying all representations to a more manageable task of classifying irreducible representations, since when the theorem applies, any representation is a direct sum of irreducible pieces (constituents). Moreover, it follows from the Jordan–Hölder theorem that, while the decomposition into a direct sum of irreducible subrepresentations may not be unique, the irreducible pieces have well-defined multiplicities. In particular, a representation of a finite group over a field of characteristic zero is determined up to isomorphism by its character. Formulations Maschke's theorem addresses the question: when is a gene ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Heinrich Maschke
Heinrich Maschke (24 October 1853 in Breslau, Germany (now Wrocław, Poland) – 1 March 1908 Chicago, Illinois, USA) was a German mathematician who proved Maschke's theorem. Maschke earned his Ph.D. degree from the University of Göttingen in 1880. He came to the United States in 1891, and took up an Assistant Professor position at the University of Chicago The University of Chicago (UChicago, Chicago, or UChi) is a Private university, private research university in Chicago, Illinois, United States. Its main campus is in the Hyde Park, Chicago, Hyde Park neighborhood on Chicago's South Side, Chic ... in 1892. References * * * 1853 births 1908 deaths 19th-century German mathematicians 20th-century German mathematicians Emigrants from the German Empire to the United States Scientists from Wrocław University of Göttingen alumni University of Chicago faculty {{Germany-mathematician-stub ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Vector Space
In mathematics and physics, a vector space (also called a linear space) is a set (mathematics), set whose elements, often called vector (mathematics and physics), ''vectors'', can be added together and multiplied ("scaled") by numbers called scalar (mathematics), ''scalars''. The operations of vector addition and scalar multiplication must satisfy certain requirements, called ''vector axioms''. Real vector spaces and complex vector spaces are kinds of vector spaces based on different kinds of scalars: real numbers and complex numbers. Scalars can also be, more generally, elements of any field (mathematics), field. Vector spaces generalize Euclidean vectors, which allow modeling of Physical quantity, physical quantities (such as forces and velocity) that have not only a Magnitude (mathematics), magnitude, but also a Orientation (geometry), direction. The concept of vector spaces is fundamental for linear algebra, together with the concept of matrix (mathematics), matrices, which ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Semisimple Algebra
In ring theory, a branch of mathematics, a semisimple algebra is an associative Artinian algebra over a field which has trivial Jacobson radical (only the zero element of the algebra is in the Jacobson radical). If the algebra is finite-dimensional this is equivalent to saying that it can be expressed as a Cartesian product of simple subalgebras. Definition The Jacobson radical of an algebra over a field is the ideal consisting of all elements that annihilate every simple left-module. The radical contains all nilpotent ideals, and if the algebra is finite-dimensional, the radical itself is a nilpotent ideal. A finite-dimensional algebra is then said to be ''semisimple'' if its radical contains only the zero element. An algebra ''A'' is called ''simple'' if it has no proper ideals and ''A''2 = ≠ . As the terminology suggests, simple algebras are semisimple. The only possible ideals of a simple algebra ''A'' are ''A'' and . Thus if ''A'' is simple, then ''A'' is not nilpote ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Semisimple Module
In mathematics, especially in the area of abstract algebra known as module theory, a semisimple module or completely reducible module is a type of module that can be understood easily from its parts. A ring that is a semisimple module over itself is known as an Artinian semisimple ring. Some important rings, such as group rings of finite groups over fields of characteristic zero, are semisimple rings. An Artinian ring is initially understood via its largest semisimple quotient. The structure of Artinian semisimple rings is well understood by the Artin–Wedderburn theorem, which exhibits these rings as finite direct products of matrix rings. For a group-theory analog of the same notion, see ''Semisimple representation''. Definition A module over a (not necessarily commutative) ring is said to be semisimple (or completely reducible) if it is the direct sum of simple (irreducible) submodules. For a module ''M'', the following are equivalent: # ''M'' is semisimple; i.e., a ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Simple Module
In mathematics, specifically in ring theory, the simple modules over a ring ''R'' are the (left or right) modules over ''R'' that are non-zero and have no non-zero proper submodules. Equivalently, a module ''M'' is simple if and only if every cyclic submodule generated by a element of ''M'' equals ''M''. Simple modules form building blocks for the modules of finite length, and they are analogous to the simple groups in group theory. In this article, all modules will be assumed to be right unital modules over a ring ''R''. Examples Z-modules are the same as abelian groups, so a simple Z-module is an abelian group which has no non-zero proper subgroups. These are the cyclic groups of prime order. If ''I'' is a right ideal of ''R'', then ''I'' is simple as a right module if and only if ''I'' is a minimal non-zero right ideal: If ''M'' is a non-zero proper submodule of ''I'', then it is also a right ideal, so ''I'' is not minimal. Conversely, if ''I'' is not mini ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Category Of Representations
In representation theory, the category of representations of some algebraic structure has the representations of as objects and equivariant maps as morphisms between them. One of the basic thrusts of representation theory is to understand the conditions under which this category is semisimple; i.e., whether an object decomposes into simple objects (see Maschke's theorem for the case of finite groups). The Tannakian formalism gives conditions under which a group ''G'' may be recovered from the category of representations of it together with the forgetful functor to the category of vector spaces. The Grothendieck ring of the category of finite-dimensional representations of a group ''G'' is called the representation ring of ''G''. Definitions Depending on the types of representations one wants to consider, it is typical to use slightly different definitions. For a finite group and a field , the category of representations of over has * Objects: Pairs (, ) of ve ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Isomorphism Of Categories
In category theory, two categories ''C'' and ''D'' are isomorphic if there exist functors ''F'' : ''C'' → ''D'' and ''G'' : ''D'' → ''C'' that are mutually inverse to each other, i.e. ''FG'' = 1''D'' (the identity functor on ''D'') and ''GF'' = 1''C''. This means that both the objects and the morphisms of ''C'' and ''D'' stand in a one-to-one correspondence to each other. Two isomorphic categories share all properties that are defined solely in terms of category theory; for all practical purposes, they are identical and differ only in the notation of their objects and morphisms. Isomorphism of categories is a very strong condition and rarely satisfied in practice. Much more important is the notion of equivalence of categories; roughly speaking, for an equivalence of categories we don't require that FG be ''equal'' to 1_D, but only ''naturally isomorphic'' to 1_D, and likewise that GF be naturally isomorphic to 1_C. Properties As is true for any notion of isomorphism, we hav ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Group Ring
In algebra, a group ring is a free module and at the same time a ring, constructed in a natural way from any given ring and any given group. As a free module, its ring of scalars is the given ring, and its basis is the set of elements of the given group. As a ring, its addition law is that of the free module and its multiplication extends "by linearity" the given group law on the basis. Less formally, a group ring is a generalization of a given group, by attaching to each element of the group a "weighting factor" from a given ring. If the ring is commutative then the group ring is also referred to as a group algebra, for it is indeed an algebra over the given ring. A group algebra over a field has a further structure of a Hopf algebra; in this case, it is thus called a group Hopf algebra. The apparatus of group rings is especially useful in the theory of group representations. Definition Let G be a group, written multiplicatively, and let R be a ring. The group ring of G ove ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Module Theory
In mathematics, a module is a generalization of the notion of vector space in which the field of scalars is replaced by a (not necessarily commutative) ring. The concept of a ''module'' also generalizes the notion of an abelian group, since the abelian groups are exactly the modules over the ring of integers. Like a vector space, a module is an additive abelian group, and scalar multiplication is distributive over the operations of addition between elements of the ring or module and is compatible with the ring multiplication. Modules are very closely related to the representation theory of groups. They are also one of the central notions of commutative algebra and homological algebra, and are used widely in algebraic geometry and algebraic topology. Introduction and definition Motivation In a vector space, the set of scalars is a field and acts on the vectors by scalar multiplication, subject to certain axioms such as the distributive law. In a module, the scalars ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Orthogonal Complement
In the mathematical fields of linear algebra and functional analysis, the orthogonal complement of a subspace W of a vector space V equipped with a bilinear form B is the set W^\perp of all vectors in V that are orthogonal to every vector in W. Informally, it is called the perp, short for perpendicular complement. It is a subspace of V. Example Let V = (\R^5, \langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle) be the vector space equipped with the usual dot product \langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle (thus making it an inner product space), and let W = \, with \mathbf = \begin 1 & 0\\ 0 & 1\\ 2 & 6\\ 3 & 9\\ 5 & 3\\ \end. then its orthogonal complement W^\perp = \ can also be defined as W^\perp = \, being \mathbf = \begin -2 & -3 & -5 \\ -6 & -9 & -3 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end. The fact that every column vector in \mathbf is orthogonal to every column vector in \mathbf can be checked by direct computation. The fact that the spans of these vectors are orthogonal then follows by bilinearity ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Mathematical Proof
A mathematical proof is a deductive reasoning, deductive Argument-deduction-proof distinctions, argument for a Proposition, mathematical statement, showing that the stated assumptions logically guarantee the conclusion. The argument may use other previously established statements, such as theorems; but every proof can, in principle, be constructed using only certain basic or original assumptions known as axioms, along with the accepted rules of inference. Proofs are examples of exhaustive deductive reasoning that establish logical certainty, to be distinguished from empirical evidence, empirical arguments or non-exhaustive inductive reasoning that establish "reasonable expectation". Presenting many cases in which the statement holds is not enough for a proof, which must demonstrate that the statement is true in ''all'' possible cases. A proposition that has not been proved but is believed to be true is known as a conjecture, or a hypothesis if frequently used as an assumption for ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Schur Orthogonality Relations
In mathematics, the Schur orthogonality relations, which were proven by Issai Schur through Schur's lemma, express a central fact about representations of finite groups. They admit a generalization to the case of compact groups in general, and in particular compact Lie groups, such as the rotation group SO(3). Finite groups Intrinsic statement The space of complex-valued class functions of a finite group ''G'' has a natural inner product: :\left\langle \alpha, \beta \right\rangle := \frac\sum_ \alpha(g) \overline where \overline denotes the complex conjugate of the value of \beta on ''g''. With respect to this inner product, the irreducible characters form an orthonormal basis for the space of class functions, and this yields the orthogonality relation for the rows of the character table: :\left\langle \chi_i, \chi_j \right\rangle = \begin 0& \mbox i \ne j, \\ 1& \mbox i=j. \end For g, h \in G, applying the same inner product to the columns of the character table yields: ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
