HOME
*





Mahlo Cardinal
In mathematics, a Mahlo cardinal is a certain kind of large cardinal number. Mahlo cardinals were first described by . As with all large cardinals, none of these varieties of Mahlo cardinals can be proven to exist by ZFC (assuming ZFC is consistent). A cardinal number \kappa is called strongly Mahlo if \kappa is strongly inaccessible and the set U = \ is stationary in κ. A cardinal \kappa is called weakly Mahlo if \kappa is weakly inaccessible and the set of weakly inaccessible cardinals less than \kappa is stationary in \kappa. The term "Mahlo cardinal" now usually means "strongly Mahlo cardinal", though the cardinals originally considered by Mahlo were weakly Mahlo cardinals. Minimal condition sufficient for a Mahlo cardinal * If κ is a limit ''ordinal'' and the set of regular ordinals less than κ is stationary in κ, then κ is weakly Mahlo. The main difficulty in proving this is to show that κ is regular. We will suppose that it is not regular and construct a ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  


picture info

Mathematics
Mathematics is an area of knowledge that includes the topics of numbers, formulas and related structures, shapes and the spaces in which they are contained, and quantities and their changes. These topics are represented in modern mathematics with the major subdisciplines of number theory, algebra, geometry, and analysis, respectively. There is no general consensus among mathematicians about a common definition for their academic discipline. Most mathematical activity involves the discovery of properties of abstract objects and the use of pure reason to prove them. These objects consist of either abstractions from nature orin modern mathematicsentities that are stipulated to have certain properties, called axioms. A ''proof'' consists of a succession of applications of deductive rules to already established results. These results include previously proved theorems, axioms, andin case of abstraction from naturesome basic properties that are considered true starting points of ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  


picture info

Filter (mathematics)
In mathematics, a filter or order filter is a special subset of a partially ordered set (poset). Filters appear in order and lattice theory, but can also be found in topology, from which they originate. The dual notion of a filter is an order ideal. Filters on sets were introduced by Henri Cartan in 1937 and as described in the article dedicated to filters in topology, they were subsequently used by Nicolas Bourbaki in their book ''Topologie Générale'' as an alternative to the related notion of a net developed in 1922 by E. H. Moore and Herman L. Smith. Order filters are generalizations of this notion from sets to the more general setting of partially ordered sets. For information on order filters in the special case where the poset consists of the power set ordered by set inclusion, see the article Filter (set theory). Motivation 1. Intuitively, a filter in a partially ordered set (), P, is a subset of P that includes as members those elements that are large enoug ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  


Advances In Mathematics
''Advances in Mathematics'' is a peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research on pure mathematics. It was established in 1961 by Gian-Carlo Rota. The journal publishes 18 issues each year, in three volumes. At the origin, the journal aimed at publishing articles addressed to a broader "mathematical community", and not only to mathematicians in the author's field. Herbert Busemann writes, in the preface of the first issue, "The need for expository articles addressing either all mathematicians or only those in somewhat related fields has long been felt, but little has been done outside of the USSR. The serial publication ''Advances in Mathematics'' was created in response to this demand." Abstracting and indexing The journal is abstracted and indexed in:Abstracting and Indexing
*

Inner Model
In set theory, a branch of mathematical logic, an inner model for a theory ''T'' is a substructure of a model ''M'' of a set theory that is both a model for ''T'' and contains all the ordinals of ''M''. Definition Let L = \langle \in \rangle be the language of set theory. Let ''S'' be a particular set theory, for example the ZFC axioms and let ''T'' (possibly the same as ''S'') also be a theory in L. If ''M'' is a model for ''S'', and ''N'' is an L-structure such that #''N'' is a substructure of ''M'', i.e. the interpretation \in_N of \in in ''N'' is \cap N^2 #''N'' is a model for ''T'' #the domain of ''N'' is a transitive class of ''M'' #''N'' contains all ordinals of ''M'' then we say that ''N'' is an inner model of ''T'' (in ''M''). Usually ''T'' will equal (or subsume) ''S'', so that ''N'' is a model for ''S'' 'inside' the model ''M'' of ''S''. If only conditions 1 and 2 hold, ''N'' is called a standard model of ''T'' (in ''M''), a standard submodel of ''T'' (if ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  


Stationary Set
In mathematics, specifically set theory and model theory, a stationary set is a set that is not too small in the sense that it intersects all club sets, and is analogous to a set of non-zero measure in measure theory. There are at least three closely related notions of stationary set, depending on whether one is looking at subsets of an ordinal, or subsets of something of given cardinality, or a powerset. Classical notion If \kappa is a cardinal of uncountable cofinality, S \subseteq \kappa, and S intersects every club set in \kappa, then S is called a stationary set.Jech (2003) p.91 If a set is not stationary, then it is called a thin set. This notion should not be confused with the notion of a thin set in number theory. If S is a stationary set and C is a club set, then their intersection S \cap C is also stationary. This is because if D is any club set, then C \cap D is a club set, thus (S \cap C) \cap D = S \cap (C \cap D) is non empty. Therefore, (S \cap C) must be stati ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  




Inaccessible Cardinal
In set theory, an uncountable cardinal is inaccessible if it cannot be obtained from smaller cardinals by the usual operations of cardinal arithmetic. More precisely, a cardinal is strongly inaccessible if it is uncountable, it is not a sum of fewer than cardinals smaller than , and \alpha < \kappa implies 2^ < \kappa. The term "inaccessible cardinal" is ambiguous. Until about 1950, it meant "weakly inaccessible cardinal", but since then it usually means "strongly inaccessible cardinal". An uncountable cardinal is weakly inaccessible if it is a regular weak limit cardinal. It is strongly inaccessible, or just inaccessible, if it is a regular strong limit cardinal (this is equivalent to the definition given above). Some authors do not require weakly and strongly ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  


Reflecting Cardinal
In set theory, a mathematical discipline, a reflecting cardinal is a cardinal number κ for which there is a normal ideal ''I'' on κ such that for every ''X''∈''I''+, the set of α∈κ for which ''X'' reflects at α is in ''I''+. (A stationary subset ''S'' of κ is said to reflect at α<κ if ''S''∩α is stationary in α.) Reflecting cardinals were introduced by . Every is a reflecting cardinal, and is also a limit of reflecting cardinals. The consistency strength of an inaccessible reflecting cardinal is strictly greater than a greatly Mahlo cardinal, where a cardinal κ is called greatly Mahlo if it is κ+-Mahlo . An inaccessible reflecting cardinal is not in general Mahlo however, see https://mathoverflow.n ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  


Inner Model
In set theory, a branch of mathematical logic, an inner model for a theory ''T'' is a substructure of a model ''M'' of a set theory that is both a model for ''T'' and contains all the ordinals of ''M''. Definition Let L = \langle \in \rangle be the language of set theory. Let ''S'' be a particular set theory, for example the ZFC axioms and let ''T'' (possibly the same as ''S'') also be a theory in L. If ''M'' is a model for ''S'', and ''N'' is an L-structure such that #''N'' is a substructure of ''M'', i.e. the interpretation \in_N of \in in ''N'' is \cap N^2 #''N'' is a model for ''T'' #the domain of ''N'' is a transitive class of ''M'' #''N'' contains all ordinals of ''M'' then we say that ''N'' is an inner model of ''T'' (in ''M''). Usually ''T'' will equal (or subsume) ''S'', so that ''N'' is a model for ''S'' 'inside' the model ''M'' of ''S''. If only conditions 1 and 2 hold, ''N'' is called a standard model of ''T'' (in ''M''), a standard submodel of ''T'' (if ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  


Diagonal Intersection
Diagonal intersection is a term used in mathematics, especially in set theory. If \displaystyle\delta is an ordinal number and \displaystyle\langle X_\alpha \mid \alpha<\delta\rangle is a of subsets of \displaystyle\delta, then the ''diagonal intersection'', denoted by :\displaystyle\Delta_ X_\alpha, is defined to be :\displaystyle\. That is, an ordinal \displaystyle\beta is in the diagonal intersection \displaystyle\Delta_ X_\alpha if and only if it is contained in the first \displaystyle\beta members of the sequence. This is the same as :\displaystyle\bigcap_ ( , \alpha\cup X_\alpha ), wh ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  




Large Cardinal
In the mathematical field of set theory, a large cardinal property is a certain kind of property of transfinite cardinal numbers. Cardinals with such properties are, as the name suggests, generally very "large" (for example, bigger than the least α such that α=ωα). The proposition that such cardinals exist cannot be proved in the most common axiomatization of set theory, namely ZFC, and such propositions can be viewed as ways of measuring how "much", beyond ZFC, one needs to assume to be able to prove certain desired results. In other words, they can be seen, in Dana Scott's phrase, as quantifying the fact "that if you want more you have to assume more". There is a rough convention that results provable from ZFC alone may be stated without hypotheses, but that if the proof requires other assumptions (such as the existence of large cardinals), these should be stated. Whether this is simply a linguistic convention, or something more, is a controversial point among distinct philo ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  


Club Set
In mathematics, particularly in mathematical logic and set theory, a club set is a subset of a limit ordinal that is closed under the order topology, and is unbounded (see below) relative to the limit ordinal. The name ''club'' is a contraction of "closed and unbounded". Formal definition Formally, if \kappa is a limit ordinal, then a set C\subseteq\kappa is ''closed'' in \kappa if and only if for every \alpha < \kappa, if \sup(C \cap \alpha) = \alpha \neq 0, then \alpha \in C. Thus, if the limit of some sequence from C is less than \kappa, then the limit is also in C. If \kappa is a limit ordinal and C \subseteq \kappa then C is unbounded in \kappa if for any \alpha < \kappa, there is some \beta \in C such that \alpha < \be ...
[...More Info...]       [...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]  


Stationary Set
In mathematics, specifically set theory and model theory, a stationary set is a set that is not too small in the sense that it intersects all club sets, and is analogous to a set of non-zero measure in measure theory. There are at least three closely related notions of stationary set, depending on whether one is looking at subsets of an ordinal, or subsets of something of given cardinality, or a powerset. Classical notion If \kappa is a cardinal of uncountable cofinality, S \subseteq \kappa, and S intersects every club set in \kappa, then S is called a stationary set.Jech (2003) p.91 If a set is not stationary, then it is called a thin set. This notion should not be confused with the notion of a thin set in number theory. If S is a stationary set and C is a club set, then their intersection S \cap C is also stationary. This is because if D is any club set, then C \cap D is a club set, thus (S \cap C) \cap D = S \cap (C \cap D) is non empty. Therefore, (S \cap C) must be stati ...
[...More Info...]      
[...Related Items...]     OR:     [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Baidu]