Topic summary
Anti-feminism

Extracted from the Wikipedia article Antifeminism.
References
- ^
- ^ 310. doi:10.1353/rap.2005.0012. S2CID 143856522.
- ^ . WorldViews. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 21 March 2019 2018.
- ^ 'Anti-feminist' YouTuber Sydney Watson launches March for Men in Melbourne". News hub. Archived from the original on 25 October 2018 2018.
- ^ 224. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.692.9151. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01491.x. ISSN 1471-6402. S2CID 144704304.
{{}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter|citeseerx=() - ^ . In Köttig, M.; Bitzan, R.; Petö, A. (eds.). Gender and Far Right Politics in Europe. Springer International Publishing. pp. 273–288. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43533-6_18. ISBN .
- ^ 2021 – via Google Books.
- ^ . ISSN 2246-3755.
- ^ 433. ISBN .
The concept of men's rights embraces a variety of points of view that are overwhelmingly hostile to feminism or pro-feminism.
- Maddison, Sarah (1999). "Private Men, Public Anger: The Men's Rights Movement in Australia"(PDF). Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies. 4 (2): 39–52. Archived from the original(PDF) on 20 October 2013.
- Doyle, Ciara (2004). "The Fathers' Rights Movement: Extending Patriarchal Control Beyond the Marital Family". In Herrman, Peter (ed.). Citizenship Revisited: Threats or Opportunities of Shifting Boundaries. New York: Nova Publishers. pp. 61–62. ISBN .
- Flood, Michael (2005). "Men's Collective Struggles for Gender Justice: The Case of Antiviolence Activism". In Kimmel, Michael S.; Hearn, Jeff; Connell, Raewyn (eds.). Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications. p. 459. ISBN .
- Finocchiaro, Peter (29 March 2011). "Is the men's rights movement growing?". Salon 2013.
- Messner, Michael (2000). Politics of Masculinities: Men in Movements. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 41. ISBN .
- Solinger, Rickie (2013). Reproductive Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press. p. 130. ISBN .
- Menzies, Robert (2007). "Virtual Backlash: Representation of Men's 'Rights' and Feminist 'Wrongs' in Cyberspace". In Boyd, Susan B (ed.). Reaction and Resistance: Feminism, Law, and Social Change. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press. pp. 65–97. ISBN .
- Dunphy, Richard (2000). Sexual Politics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. p. 88. ISBN .
- Mills, Martin (2003). "Shaping the boys' agenda: the backlash blockbusters". International Journal of Inclusive Education. 7 (1): 57–73. doi:10.1080/13603110210143644. S2CID 144875158.
Another example of contractual model rhetoric is in the language of the Men's Rights movement. As a countermovement to the feminist movement, it has concentrated on areas generally thought of as family law—especially divorce and child custody laws. The movement charges that maternal preference in child custody decisions is an example of gender prejudice, with men the ones who are systematically disadvantaged [...] Men's Rights groups [...] have adopted much of the rhetoric of the early liberal feminist movement [...] Similarly, along with the appeal to 'equal rights for fathers' [...] the Men's Rights movement also uses a rhetoric of children's 'needs' [...] The needs rhetoric helps offset charges that their rights language is motivated by self-interest alone.
{{}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |citeseerx= ()The two major waves of antifeminist activity coincide with the two waves of the women's rights movement: the campaign to secure female suffrage in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and the feminist movement of the late twentieth century. In both periods, those holding a traditional view of women's place in the home and family tried to advance their cause by joining with other conservative groups to forestall efforts to extend women's rights.
Antifeminism, then, repudiates critiques of male supremacy and resists efforts to eliminate it (often accompanied by dismissal of the idea that change is possible). Note that this definition of antifeminism limits its reference to reactions against critiques of gender-based hierarchies and efforts to relieve the oppression of women.
The men's rights movement is distinct from other explorations of masculinity insofar as the movement itself is fundamentally situated in opposition to feminist theory and activism.
{{}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |citeseerx= ()