HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
mathematics Mathematics is a field of study that discovers and organizes methods, Mathematical theory, theories and theorems that are developed and Mathematical proof, proved for the needs of empirical sciences and mathematics itself. There are many ar ...
, Wedderburn's little theorem states that every finite
division ring In algebra, a division ring, also called a skew field (or, occasionally, a sfield), is a nontrivial ring in which division by nonzero elements is defined. Specifically, it is a nontrivial ring in which every nonzero element has a multiplicativ ...
is a field; thus, every finite domain is a field. In other words, for finite rings, there is no distinction between domains,
division ring In algebra, a division ring, also called a skew field (or, occasionally, a sfield), is a nontrivial ring in which division by nonzero elements is defined. Specifically, it is a nontrivial ring in which every nonzero element has a multiplicativ ...
s and fields. The Artin–Zorn theorem generalizes the theorem to alternative rings: every finite alternative division ring is a field.


History

The original proof was given by Joseph Wedderburn in 1905,Lam (2001), p. 204/ref> who went on to prove the theorem in two other ways. Another proof was given by
Leonard Eugene Dickson Leonard Eugene Dickson (January 22, 1874 – January 17, 1954) was an American mathematician. He was one of the first American researchers in abstract algebra, in particular the theory of finite fields and classical groups, and is also rem ...
shortly after Wedderburn's original proof, and Dickson acknowledged Wedderburn's priority. However, as noted in , Wedderburn's first proof was incorrect – it had a gap – and his subsequent proofs appeared only after he had read Dickson's correct proof. On this basis, Parshall argues that Dickson should be credited with the first correct proof. A simplified version of the proof was later given by Ernst Witt. Witt's proof is sketched below. Alternatively, the theorem is a consequence of the Skolem–Noether theorem by the following argument. Let D be a finite division algebra with center k. Let :kn^ and q denote the cardinality of k. Every maximal subfield of D has q^ elements; so they are isomorphic and thus are conjugate by Skolem–Noether. But a finite group (the multiplicative group of D in our case) cannot be a union of conjugates of a proper subgroup; hence, n = 1. A later " group-theoretic" proof was given by Ted Kaczynski in 1964. This proof, Kaczynski's first published piece of mathematical writing, was a short, two-page note which also acknowledged the earlier historical proofs.


Relationship to the Brauer group of a finite field

The theorem is essentially equivalent to saying that the
Brauer group In mathematics, the Brauer group of a field ''K'' is an abelian group whose elements are Morita equivalence classes of central simple algebras over ''K'', with addition given by the tensor product of algebras. It was defined by the algebraist ...
of a finite field is trivial. In fact, this characterization immediately yields a proof of the theorem as follows: let ''K'' be a finite field. Since the Herbrand quotient vanishes by finiteness, \operatorname(K) = H^2(K^/K) coincides with H^1(K^/K), which in turn vanishes by Hilbert 90. The triviality of the Brauer group can also be obtained by direct computation, as follows. Let , K, = q, and let L/K be a finite extension of degree n, so that , L, =q^n. Then \mathrm(L/K) is a cyclic group of order n, and the standard method of computing cohomology of finite cyclic groups shows that H^2(L/K) = K^/N_(L^), where the norm map N_:L^ \to K^ is given by N_(\alpha) = \prod_ \sigma(\alpha) = \alpha \cdot \alpha^ \cdot \alpha^ \cdots \alpha^ = \alpha^. Taking \alpha to be a generator of the cyclic group L^, we find that N_(\alpha) has order q-1, and therefore it must be a generator of K^. This implies that N_ is surjective, and therefore H^(L/K) is trivial.


Proof

Let ''A'' be a finite domain. For each nonzero ''x'' in ''A'', the two maps :a \mapsto ax, a \mapsto xa: A \to A are injective by the cancellation property, and thus, surjective by counting. It follows from elementary group theorye.g., Exercise 1-9 in Milne, group theory, http://www.jmilne.org/math/CourseNotes/GT.pdf that the nonzero elements of A form a group under multiplication. Thus, A is a
division ring In algebra, a division ring, also called a skew field (or, occasionally, a sfield), is a nontrivial ring in which division by nonzero elements is defined. Specifically, it is a nontrivial ring in which every nonzero element has a multiplicativ ...
. Since the center Z(A) of A is a field, A is a vector space over Z(A) with finite dimension n. Our objective is then to show n = 1. If q is the order of Z(A), then A has order ^. Note that because Z(A) contains the distinct elements 0 and 1, q>1. For each x in A that is not in the center, the centralizer _ of x is a vector space over Z(A), hence it has order ^ where d is less than n. Viewing ^, A^, and ^_ as groups under multiplication, we can write the
class equation In mathematics, especially group theory, two elements a and b of a Group (mathematics), group are conjugate if there is an element g in the group such that b = gag^. This is an equivalence relation whose equivalence classes are called conjugacy c ...
:q^n - 1 = q - 1 + \sum where the sum is taken over the conjugacy classes not contained within ^, and the d are defined so that for each conjugacy class, the order of ^_ for any x in the class is ^ - 1. In particular, the fact that ^_ is a subgroup of A^ implies that q^d-1 divides q^n-1, whence d divides n by elementary algebra. ^ - 1 and q^ - 1 both admit polynomial factorization in terms of
cyclotomic polynomial In mathematics, the ''n''th cyclotomic polynomial, for any positive integer ''n'', is the unique irreducible polynomial with integer coefficients that is a divisor of x^n-1 and is not a divisor of x^k-1 for any Its roots are all ''n''th prim ...
s \Phi_f(q). The cyclotomic polynomials on \Q are in \Z /math>, and satisfy the identities :x^n-1 = \prod_ \Phi_m(x) and x^d-1 = \prod_ \Phi_m(x). Since each d is a proper divisor of n, :\Phi_n(x) divides both ^ - 1 and each in \Z /math>, thus by the class equation above, \Phi_n(q) must divide q - 1, and therefore by taking the norms, :, \Phi_n(q), \leq q-1. To see that this forces n to be 1, we will show :, \Phi_n(q), > q-1 for n>1 using factorization over the complex numbers. In the polynomial identity :\Phi_n(x) = \prod (x - \zeta), where \zeta runs over the primitive n-th roots of unity, set x to be q and then take absolute values :, \Phi_n(q), = \prod , q - \zeta, . For n>1, we see that for each primitive n-th root of unity \zeta, :, q-\zeta, > , q-1, because of the location of q, 1, and \zeta in the complex plane. Thus :, \Phi_n(q), > q-1.


Notes


References

* * {{cite book , last1=Lam , first1=Tsit-Yuen , title=A first course in noncommutative rings , edition=2 , series=
Graduate Texts in Mathematics Graduate Texts in Mathematics (GTM) () is a series of graduate-level textbooks in mathematics published by Springer-Verlag. The books in this series, like the other Springer-Verlag mathematics series, are yellow books of a standard size (with va ...
, volume=131 , year=2001 , publisher=Springer , isbn=0-387-95183-0


External links


Proof of Wedderburn's Theorem at Planet Math
* Mizar system proof: http://mizar.org/version/current/html/weddwitt.html#T38 Theorems in ring theory