Srinivasacharya (; 7th century) also known as Srinivasa, was a
vedantic philosopher
Philosophy ('love of wisdom' in Ancient Greek) is a systematic study of general and fundamental questions concerning topics like existence, reason, knowledge, Value (ethics and social sciences), value, mind, and language. It is a rational an ...
and
theologian
Theology is the study of religious belief from a religious perspective, with a focus on the nature of divinity. It is taught as an academic discipline, typically in universities and seminaries. It occupies itself with the unique content of ...
. He was a disciple of
Nimbārkacārya and an acharya of
Nimbārka Sampradāya. Srinivasacharya composed ''Vedānta-Kaustubha'' (a commentary on the
Brahma Sūtra) at the request of Nimbārkacārya. Srinivasacharya's philosophical framework, known as ''
Svabhāvika Bhedābheda'', emphasizes the natural distinction and similarity between the individual soul and the supreme being.
Works
Srinivasacharya was the author of:
*''Vedānta Kaustubha'', which is a commentary on
Nimbārkācārya’s ''Vedānta Pārijāta Saurabha''. Though ''Vedānta Parijāta Saurabha'' is itself a commentary on the
Brahma Sūtras
The ''Brahma Sūtras'' (), also known as the Vedanta Sūtra (Sanskrit: वेदान्त सूत्र), Shariraka Sūtra, and Bhikshu-sūtra, are a Sanskrit text which criticizes the metaphysical dualism of the influential Samkhya philos ...
.
Keśava Kāśmīrī Bhaṭṭācārya wrote a commentary on ''Vedānta Kaustubha'', titled ''Vedānta Kaustubha Prabhā''.
*''Laghustavarājastotram'', which is a 41-verse hymn dedicated to his preceptor, Nimbārka. Puruṣottamaprasāda Vaiṣṇava II wrote a commentary on ''Laghustavarājastotram'', under the title: ''Gurubhaktimandākinī''.
*''Khyātinirnaya'', is a lost work but it is referenced in Sundarabhaṭṭa's Siddhāntasetukātīkā.
Life
Traditionally, Srinivasacharya is regarded as an incarnation of
Pañcajanya, the divine conch-shell of
Viṣṇu (''Śaṅkhāvatāra''), and is believed to have lived during the reign of Vajranābha, the great grandson of Kṛṣṇa, in
Mathura
Mathura () is a city and the administrative headquarters of Mathura district in the states and union territories of India, Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. It is located south-east of Delhi; and about from the town of Vrindavan. In ancient ti ...
.
Srinivasacharya is said to have been born in the hermitage of Nimbārkācārya on the fifth day of the bright half of the month of Māgha. His father was Ācāryapāda, and his mother was Lokamatī, both known for their learning and piety. According to tradition, Ācāryapāda, while on a mission to conquer the world through his scholarship, visited the hermitage of Nimbārka. As it was nearing sunset, he refused to accept any refreshment. In response, Nimbārka caused the setting sun to remain above a Nimba tree, allowing Ācāryapāda and his companions to complete their meal. Struck by this act, Ācāryapāda became Nimbārkācārya’s disciple and continued to reside in the hermitage.
It is said that Nimbārkācārya personally taught Srinivasacharya the scriptures, dedicating his ''Vedānta pārijāta-saurabha'' to him and composing the ''Daśaślokī'' for his instruction. Nimbārka also taught him the ''Rādhāṣṭaka'' and ''Kṛṣṇāṣṭaka''—eight verses each in praise of
Rādhā and
Kṛṣṇa, respectively. Tradition holds that, by reciting these verses under Nimbārkācārya’s guidance, Srinivasacharya was granted a vision of
Rādhā and Kṛṣṇa.
Accompanied by his disciple Viśvācārya, Srinivasacharya traveled extensively, spreading the
Vaiṣṇava teachings and reportedly converting many people to the faith.
Dating
The traditional view, as outlined in the ''Ācāryacaritam'' by Nārāyaṇaśaraṇa Deva (1643–1679 CE), holds that Srinivasacharya lived during the reign of Vajranābha, the great grandson of
Kṛṣṇa. But modern scholars such as Madan Mohan Agarwal and Vijay Ramnarace, through a comparative analysis of his ''Brahma Sūtra'' commentary with those of other prominent commentators like
Śaṅkarācārya,
Bhāskarācārya, and
Rāmānujācārya, concluded that Srinivasacharya lived around 7th Century. Scholars such as Professor R.V. Joshi, Swami Vrajavallabha Sharan, A.P. Bhattacharya, Baladeva dasa and Swami Lalit Krishna Goswami Maharaj holds similar perspective.
Philosophy
Srinivasacharya’s philosophy,
Svābhāvika Bhedābheda
Dvaitadvaita Vedanta, also known as Svabhavika Bhedabheda and as Svabhavika Bhinnabhinna,() is the philosophical doctrine of "natural identity-in-difference" or "natural difference cum-non-difference." It was propagated by the medieval Vedānta ...
, articulates a threefold reality that consists of:
*
Brahman
In Hinduism, ''Brahman'' (; IAST: ''Brahman'') connotes the highest universal principle, the ultimate reality of the universe.P. T. Raju (2006), ''Idealistic Thought of India'', Routledge, , page 426 and Conclusion chapter part XII In the ...
: The metaphysical
ultimate reality
Ultimate reality is "the supreme, final, and fundamental power in all reality". It refers to the most fundamental fact about reality, especially when it is seen as also being the most valuable fact. This may overlap with the concept of the Absolut ...
and supreme controller.
*
Cit: The sentient individual soul (
Jivātman), which is the enjoyer.
*Acit: The non-sentient
universe
The universe is all of space and time and their contents. It comprises all of existence, any fundamental interaction, physical process and physical constant, and therefore all forms of matter and energy, and the structures they form, from s ...
; or the object to be enjoyed.
In this framework, Brahman is the only ''svatantra tattva'' (independent reality), while the existence and activities of the individual soul and the universe are dependent on Brahman, and are regarded as ''paratantra tattva'' (dependent reality). However, this dependency does not imply complete dualism (
dvaita
Dvaita Vedanta (); (originally known as Tattvavada; IAST: ''Tattvavāda''), is a sub-school in the Vedanta
''Vedanta'' (; , ), also known as ''Uttara Mīmāṃsā'', is one of the six orthodox (Āstika and nāstika, ''āstika'') trad ...
), as in the philosophy of
Madhvācārya, and should not be confused with it.
Brahman
Srinivasacharya regards Brahman as the universal soul, both transcendent and immanent, referred to by various names such as
Śrī Kṛṣṇa,
Viṣnu,
Vāsudeva
Vāsudeva (; ), later incorporated as Vāsudeva-Krishna (, "Krishna, son of Vasudeva Anakadundubhi, Vasudeva"),"While the earliest piece of evidence do not yet use the name Krsna...." in At the time of the Heliodorus pillar dedication to Vāsu ...
,
Purushottama,
Nārāyaņa,
Paramatman
''Paramatman'' (Sanskrit: परमात्मन्, IAST: Paramātman) or ''Paramātmā'' is the absolute '' Atman'', or supreme Self, in various philosophies such as the Vedanta and Yoga schools in Hindu theology, as well as other Indian r ...
,
Bhagawan and so on. Similarly,
Nimbārkācārya, in his ''Vedanta Kamadhenu Daśaślokī'', refers to Śrī Kṛṣṇa alongside his consort Rādhā.
Brahman is the supreme being, the source of all auspicious qualities, and possesses unfathomable attributes. It is
omnipresent
Omnipresence or ubiquity is the property of being present anywhere and everywhere. The term omnipresence is most often used in a religious context as an attribute of a deity or supreme being, while the term ubiquity is generally used to describ ...
,
omniscient
Omniscience is the property of possessing maximal knowledge. In Hinduism, Sikhism and the Abrahamic religions, it is often attributed to a divine being or an all-knowing spirit, entity or person. In Jainism, omniscience is an attribute that any ...
, the lord of all, and greater than all. None can be equal to or superior to Brahman. He is the creator, cause of creation, maintenance and destruction of the universe.
Srinivasacharya asserts that Brahman is ''saguṇa'' (with qualities). Therefore, he interprets scriptural passages that describe Brahman as ''nirguṇa'' (without qualities) differently as he argues that ''nirguṇa'', when applied to Brahman, signifies the absence of inauspicious qualities, rather than the complete negation of all attributes.
Similarly, terms like ''nirākāra'' (formless) are understood to denote the absence of an undesirable or inauspicious form. Srinivasacharya upheld the view that Śrī Kṛṣṇa possesses all auspicious attributes and that relative qualities such as virtue and vice, or auspiciousness and inauspiciousness, do not affect him.
Relationship
According to Srinivasacharya, the individual soul is neither entirely distinct (''atyanta bheda'') from Brahman nor completely identical (''atyanta abheda'') with it, but is instead considered a part of Brahman (''aṃśā-aṃśī bhāva),'' using the part-whole analogy. However, this "part" should not be interpreted as a literal fragment, but rather as a manifestation of Brahman's power (''śakti'').
References
Bibliography
*
*
*
*
*
*
* {{Cite book , last=Bhandarkar , first=R. G. , url=https://archive.org/details/VaishnavismShaivismAndOtherMinorReligiousSystemsR.G.Bhandarkar/mode/1up , title=Vaisnavism, Saivism and Minor Religious Systems (Routledge Revivals) , date=2014 , publisher=Routledge , isbn=978-1-317-58933-4 , language=en
Hindu philosophers and theologians
Nimbarka Sampradaya
7th-century Indian philosophers
8th-century Indian philosophers
7th-century Indian scholars
8th-century Indian scholars
7th-century Indian writers
8th-century Indian writers
Vaishnava saints
Vaishnavism
Bhakti movement
Medieval Hindu religious leaders
Indian Vaishnavites
Indian Hindu spiritual teachers
Indian Hindu religious leaders