History
Electronic quantum numbers
In the era of the old quantum theory, starting from Max Planck's proposal of quanta in his model of blackbody radiation (1900) and Albert Einstein's adaptation of the concept to explain the photoelectric effect (1905), and until Erwin Schrödinger published his eigenfunction equation in 1926, the concept behind quantum numbers developed based on atomic spectroscopy and theories from classical mechanics with extra ad hoc constraints. Many results from atomic spectroscopy had been summarized in the Rydberg formula involving differences between two series of energies related by integer steps. The model of the atom, first proposed by Niels Bohr in 1913, relied on a single quantum number. Together with Bohr's constraint that radiation absorption is not classical, it was able to explain the Balmer series portion of Rydberg's atomic spectrum formula. As Bohr notes in his subsequent Nobel lecture, the next step was taken by Arnold Sommerfeld in 1915. Sommerfeld's atomic model added a second quantum number and the concept of quantized phase integrals to justify them. Sommerfeld's model was still essentially two dimensional, modeling the electron as orbiting in a plane; in 1919 he extended his work to three dimensions using 'space quantization' in place of the quantized phase integrals. Karl Schwarzschild and Sommerfeld's student, Paul Epstein, independently showed that adding third quantum number gave a complete account for the Stark effect results. A consequence of space quantization was that the electron's orbital interaction with an external magnetic field would be quantized. This seemed to be confirmed when the results of the Stern-Gerlach experiment reported quantized results for silver atoms in an inhomogeneous magnetic field. The confirmation would turn out to be premature: more quantum numbers would be needed. The fourth and fifth quantum numbers of the atomic era arose from attempts to understand the Zeeman effect. Like the Stern-Gerlach experiment, the Zeeman effect reflects the interaction of atoms with a magnetic field; in a weak field the experimental results were called "anomalous", they diverged from any theory at the time. Wolfgang Pauli's solution to this issue was to introduce another quantum number taking only two possible values, . This would ultimately become the quantized values of the projection of spin, an intrinsic angular momentum quantum of the electron. In 1927 Ronald Fraser demonstrated that the quantization in the Stern-Gerlach experiment was due to the magnetic moment associated with the electron spin rather than its orbital angular momentum. Pauli's success in developing the arguments for a spin quantum number without relying on classical models set the stage for the development of quantum numbers for elementary particles in the remainder of the 20th century. Bohr, with his Aufbau or "building up" principle, and Pauli with his exclusion principle connected the atom's electronic quantum numbers in to a framework for predicting the properties of atoms. When Schrödinger published his wave equation and calculated the energy levels of hydrogen, these two principles carried over to become the basis of atomic physics.Nuclear quantum numbers
With successful models of the atom, the attention of physics turned to models of the nucleus. Beginning with Heisenberg's initial model of proton-neutron binding in 1932, Eugene Wigner introduced isospin in 1937, the first 'internal' quantum number unrelated to a symmetry in real space-time.Connection to symmetry
As quantum mechanics developed, abstraction increased and models based on symmetry and invariance played increasing roles. Two years before his work on the quantum wave equation, Schrödinger applied the symmetry ideas originated byGeneral properties
Good quantum numbers correspond to eigenvalues of operators that commute with the Hamiltonian, quantities that can be known with precision at the same time as the system's energy. Specifically, observables that commute with the Hamiltonian are simultaneously diagonalizable with it and so the eigenvalues and the energy (eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian) are not limited by an uncertainty relation arising from non-commutativity. Together, a specification of all of the quantum numbers of a quantum system fully characterize a basis state of the system, and can in principle be measured together. Many observables have discrete spectra (sets of eigenvalues) in quantum mechanics, so the quantities can only be measured in discrete values. In particular, this leads to quantum numbers that take values in discrete sets of integers or half-integers; although they could approachElectron in a hydrogen-like atom
Four quantum numbers can describe an electron energy level in a hydrogen-like atom completely: * Principal quantum number () * Azimuthal quantum number () * Magnetic quantum number () * Spin quantum number () These quantum numbers are also used in the classical description of nuclear particle states (e.g. protons and neutrons). A quantum description of molecular orbitals requires other quantum numbers, because the symmetries of the molecular system are different.Principal quantum number
The principal quantum number describes the electron shell of an electron. The value of ranges from 1 to the shell containing the outermost electron of that atom, that is For example, inAzimuthal quantum number
The azimuthal quantum number, also known as the ''orbital angular momentum quantum number'', describes the subshell, and gives the magnitude of the orbital angular momentum through the relation In chemistry and spectroscopy, is called s orbital, , p orbital, , d orbital, and , f orbital. The value of ranges from 0 to , so the first p orbital () appears in the second electron shell (), the first d orbital () appears in the third shell (), and so on: A quantum number beginning in , describes an electron in the s orbital of the third electron shell of an atom. In chemistry, this quantum number is very important, since it specifies the shape of an atomic orbital and strongly influences chemical bonds and bond angles. The azimuthal quantum number can also denote the number of angular nodes present in an orbital. For example, for p orbitals, and thus the amount of angular nodes in a p orbital is 1.Magnetic quantum number
The magnetic quantum number describes the specific orbital within the subshell, and yields the ''projection'' of the orbital angular momentum ''along a specified axis'': The values of range from to , with integer intervals. The s subshell () contains only one orbital, and therefore the of an electron in an s orbital will always be 0. The p subshell () contains three orbitals, so the of an electron in a p orbital will be −1, 0, or 1. The d subshell () contains five orbitals, with values of −2, −1, 0, 1, and 2.Spin magnetic quantum number
The spin magnetic quantum number describes the intrinsic spin angular momentum of the electron within each orbital and gives the projection of the spin angular momentum along the specified axis: In general, the values of range from to , where is the spin quantum number, associated with the magnitude of particle's intrinsic spin angular momentum: An electron state has spin number , consequently will be + ("spin up") or − "spin down" states. Since electron are fermions they obey the Pauli exclusion principle: each electron state must have different quantum numbers. Therefore, every orbital will be occupied with at most two electrons, one for each spin state.The Aufbau principle and Hund's Rules
A multi-electron atom can be modeled qualitatively as a hydrogen like atom with higher nuclear charge and correspondingly more electrons. The occupation of the electron states in such an atom can be predicted by the Aufbau principle and Hund's empirical rules for the quantum numbers. The Aufbau principle fills orbitals based on their principal and azimuthal quantum numbers (lowest first, with lowest breaking ties; Hund's rule favors unpaired electrons in the outermost orbital). These rules are empirical but they can be related to electron physics.Spin-orbit coupled systems
When one takes the spin–orbit interaction into consideration, the and operators no longer commute with the Hamiltonian, and the eigenstates of the system no longer have well-defined orbital angular momentum and spin. Thus another set of quantum numbers should be used. This set includes # The total angular momentum quantum number: which gives the total angular momentum through the relation # The projection of the total angular momentum along a specified axis: analogous to the above and satisfies both and # ParityAtomic nuclei
In nuclei, the entire assembly of protons and neutrons ( nucleons) has a resultant angular momentum due to the angular momenta of each nucleon, usually denoted . If the total angular momentum of a neutron is and for a proton is (where for protons and neutrons happens to be again (''see note'')), then the nuclear angular momentum quantum numbers are given by: ''Note: ''The orbital angular momenta of the nuclear (and atomic) states are all integer multiples of ħ while the intrinsic angular momentum of the neutron and proton are half-integer multiples. It should be immediately apparent that the combination of the intrinsic spins of the nucleons with their orbital motion will always give half-integer values for the total spin, , of any odd-A nucleus and integer values for any even-A nucleus. Parity with the number is used to label nuclear angular momentum states, examples for some isotopes of hydrogen (H),Elementary particles
Elementary particles contain many quantum numbers which are usually said to be intrinsic to them. However, it should be understood that the elementary particles are quantum states of the standard model ofMultiplicative quantum numbers
Most conserved quantum numbers are additive, so in an elementary particle reaction, the ''sum'' of the quantum numbers should be the same before and after the reaction. However, some, usually called a ''parity'', are multiplicative; i.e., their ''product'' is conserved. All multiplicative quantum numbers belong to a symmetry (like parity) in which applying the symmetry transformation twice is equivalent to doing nothing ( involution).See also
* Electron configurationReferences
Further reading
* * * * {{Authority control Physical quantities Quantum numbers Dimensionless numbers of physics