Gödel's Loophole

Gödel's Loophole is a supposed "inner contradiction" in the Constitution of the United States which Austrian-American logician, mathematician, and analytic philosopher Kurt Gödel postulated in 1947. The loophole would permit America's republican structure to be legally turned into a dictatorship. Gödel told his friend Oskar Morgenstern about the existence of the flaw and Morgenstern told Albert Einstein about it at the time, but Morgenstern, in his recollection of the incident in 1971, never mentioned the exact problem as Gödel saw it. This has led to speculation about the precise nature of what has come to be called "Gödel's Loophole." It has been called "one of the great unsolved problems of constitutional law" by American constitutional law scholar John Nowak.

History

When Gödel was studying to take his American citizenship test in 1947, he came across what he called an "inner contradiction" in the U.S. Constitution. At the time, he was at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, where he was good friends with Albert Einstein and Oskar Morgenstern. Gödel told Morgenstern about the flaw in the constitution, which, he said, would allow the U.S. to legally become a fascist state. Morgenstern tried to convince Gödel that this was very unlikely, but Gödel remained very concerned about it. He was an Austrian by birth and, having lived through the 1933 coup d'état and escaped from Nazi Germany after the ''Anschluss'', had reason to be concerned about living in a fascist dictatorship. Morgenstern had secret discussions with Gödel about his concerns and told Einstein about them.

On the day of the examination some months later, Gödel was driven to the courthouse in Trenton, New Jersey, by Morgenstern and Einstein, who were to be his witnesses. Both had already taken the test and become naturalized U.S. citizens. At one point during the drive, Einstein, in the front seat, turned to Gödel in the back and—knowing of Gödel's concerns–asked, "Now, Gödel, are you ''really'' well prepared for this examination?" According to Morgenstern, Einstein's purpose in asking this was to rattle Gödel, whose reaction amused him.

At the courthouse, witnesses normally remained outside of the room during citizenship examinations, but because Einstein, a celebrity, was involved, and because the judge, Phillip Forman, had administered the oath of citizenship to Einstein, all three men were invited in. During the examination, Forman asked Gödel what the government of Austria was, to which he replied: "It was a republic, but the constitution was such that it finally was changed into a dictatorship." The judge commented that this could not happen in the U.S., and Gödel responded, "Oh, yes, I can prove it"; but the judge declined to pursue the matter.

Nature of the loophole

Since the exact nature of Gödel's Loophole has never been published, what it is, precisely, is not known. In his 2012 paper "Gödel's Loophole" F. E. Guerra-Pujol speculates that the problem involves Article V, which describes the process by which the Constitution can be amended. The loophole is that Article V's procedures can be applied to Article V itself. It can therefore be altered in a "downward" direction, making it easier to alter the article again in the future. So even if, as is now the case, amending the Constitution is difficult to bring about, once Article V is downwardly amended, the next attempt to do so will be easier, and the one after that easier still.

Other writers have speculated that Gödel may have had other aspects of the Constitution in mind as well, including the abuse of gerrymandering, prorogation of Congress, the Electoral College, and the presidential pardon.Rockmore, Dan (August 6, 2018
"Is There a Logical Inconsistency in the Constitution?
''Slate''

Aftermath and reception

Morgenstern's notes on the incident were published only in 2019, so no accounts before that take advantage of his recollections. Morgenstern is obviously incorrect in some details, such as the year of Gödel's citizenship test, which is established as 1947, not 1946, as Morgenstern remembers it. Many versions of the story were published before the release of Morgenstern's notes, and they vary in their details. For instance, in mathematician and science fiction author Rudy Rucker's telling of the story in his 2008 novel '' Mathematicians in Love'', Gödel runs to Einstein with the news and Einstein calms Gödel down.

Versions of the story can also be found in ''Logical Dilemmas: The Life and Work of Kurt Gödel'' (1997) by John W. Dawson; ''E: His Life, His Thought and His Influence on Our Culture'' (2006), edited by Donald Goldsmith and Marcia Bartusiak; ''Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt Gödel'' (2006) by Rebecca Goldstein; ''Godel: A Life Of Logic, The Mind, And Mathematics'' (2009) by John L. Casti and Werner DePauli; ''Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers'' (2017) by Yaniv Roznai; and ''When Einstein Walked with Gödel: Excursions to the Edge of Thought'' (2018) by Jim Holt, among other books.

References

{{reflist

Constitution of the United States
Democracy
Dictatorship
American political philosophy