2025 United States–Iran Negotiations

On April 12, 2025, the United States and Iran started a series of negotiations aimed at reaching a nuclear peace agreement, following a letter from President Donald Trump to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. The letter set a two-month (60 day) deadline for Iran to reach an agreement. The first round of high level-meetings was held in Oman on April 12, 2025, led by U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. The discussions were described as constructive.

The second round of Omani-mediated talks took place in Rome on April 19, 2025, again with indirect discussions between Witkoff and Araghchi. This was followed by a third high-level round in Muscat round a week later, and an expert-level meeting to develop a framework for a possible nuclear agreement, led by Michael Anton for the U.S. and by Majid Takht-Ravanchi for Iran.

The US military has been building up its presence in the Middle East as the threat of war escalates. US bases throughout the region accommodate approximately 50,000 American troops. As part of the peace proposals, Iran offered to build at least 19 additional reactors, suggesting that contracts for these projects could help revive the struggling U.S. nuclear industry. Araghchi's planned speech announcing this, however, was cancelled.

On May 27, Trump claimed both sides were close to finalizing the talks, with strong inspections because "I don't trust anybody". Araghchi stated he was unsure whether a deal was imminent, while Khamenei advisor Shamkhani said Trump's desired control over the Iranian nuclear program was a "fantasy". Israel has reportedly threatened to preemptively attack Iranian nuclear installations with potential forewarning. On May 31, the IAEA reported that Iran had amassed a record amount of military-grade enriched uranium.

On June 11, US embassies in Iraq and other Arab states began to evacuate personnel in response to Iranian threats on American bases. The Houthis threatened retaliation against the United States should an attack be launched on Iran. President Trump was reportedly provided a range of options for an attack on Iran by CENTCOM. The UK issued a threat advisory for ships in the Persian Gulf. The IAEA declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations on June 12. The following day, Israel launched large-scale attacks on Iran, which are ongoing. Following the attacks, Iran pulled out and suspended nuclear talks indefinitely.

Background

Iran's nuclear program has been a focal point of international scrutiny for decades. While the country suspended its formal nuclear weapons program in 2003, and claims its nuclear activities are solely for peaceful purposes, it has continued weaponization efforts and enriched uranium to levels approaching the weapons-grade threshold. The program has received external assistance, including from Pakistan and North Korea, with the latter supplying both missiles and uranium. Iran has developed long-range missile technology under the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), with some designs based on North Korean models. Its latest developments could enable nuclear-capable missiles with a range of up to 3,000 km, capable of reaching targets in Europe.

Analysts and researchers say that a nuclear-armed Iran poses significant global security risks and undermines the stability of the Middle East. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi warns that an Iranian nuclear weapon could trigger broad nuclear proliferation, as other countries, particularly in the Middle East, may seek similar capabilities in response. Concerns also exist that Iran's nuclear assets could fall into the hands of extremist factions due to internal instability or regime change. Additionally, Iran's success in acquiring nuclear weapons could encourage other regional powers to seek their own nuclear arsenals. The potential transfer of nuclear technology or weapons to radical states and terrorist organizations heightens fears of nuclear terrorism. Scholars argue that a nuclear-armed Iran could feel emboldened to increase its support for terrorism and insurgency—core elements of its strategy—while deterring retaliation through its newfound nuclear leverage.

In response to Iran's nuclear program, the international community imposed sanctions that severely impacted its economy, restricting its oil exports and limiting access to global financial systems. In 2015, however, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was signed, imposing strict limitations on Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. In 2018, the United States withdrew from the agreement, with President Donald Trump stating that "the heart of the Iran deal was a giant fiction: that a murderous regime desired only a peaceful nuclear energy program". The US also contended that the agreement was inadequate because it did not impose limitations on Iran's ballistic missile program, and failed to curb its backing of proxy groups. Prior to the second Trump administration, the Biden administration held talks with Iran that were ultimately unsuccessful.In November 2024, Iranians reported that Trump advisor Elon Musk had met Iranian envoy.

In early 2025, reports stated that "Iran is closer to a bomb than ever before," as the country escalated its uranium enrichment activities, reaching levels of up to 60% purity. IAEA reported that Iran possesses approximately 250 kilograms of uranium enriched to this level, which could potentially yield multiple nuclear weapons if further refined. A report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence concluded that Iran had sufficient fissile material to produce more than a dozen nuclear weapons. The Institute for Science and International Security reports that Iran could enrich enough uranium for one nuclear bomb in just a week and accumulate enough for seven bombs within a month. Iranian officials have stated that while the country possesses the technical capability to develop nuclear weapons, they have also hinted that the current religious ruling forbidding it could change.

In February 2025, Trump reinstated the maximum pressure campaignto push Iran into a new nuclear deal, prevent its development of nuclear weapons, and counter its regional influence. He said he would not tolerate an "Iranian nuclear weapons capability" and did not rule out supporting military action if diplomacy failed, with his team stating that "all options are on the table" when it comes to Iran.

In April 2025 Atomic Energy Organization of Iran chief Mohammad Eslami declared Iran plans to build more nuclear power plants.

Trump's letter to Khamenei

On March 7, Trump announced that he had written a letter to Ali Khamenei, expressing his desire to initiate new nuclear negotiations with Iran. He warned that failure to accept the proposal could expose Iran to serious military consequences. Trump also imposed additional sanctions on the country and pledged to reduce Iran's oil exports to zero. According to Emirati political scientist Abdulkhaleq Abdullah, the letter included demands that Iran fully dismantle its nuclear program, halt all enrichment, and end support for regional proxy groups, with compliance required within two months. In exchange, the U.S. offered to lift sanctions and normalize relations, while warning that failure to negotiate would result in military strikes.

Initially, Khamenei did not acknowledge the letter, indicating that Iran would not meet the new expectations. During March 2025, Iran and the U.S. engaged in indirect exchanges over Trump’s letter, with both sides issuing threats. Khamenei reportedly changed his mind about the negotiations after his advisors warned that the threat of war with the United States and the deepening economic crisis could bring down the regime. By the end of March, the Iranian leadership sent a reply to the letter expressing readiness for nuclear negotiations.

Participants

Participants of the high-level negotiations:
* U.S.: Steve Witkoff - White House special envoy leading the American side of the negotiations with Iran.
* Iran: Abbas Araghchi - Iranian foreign minister who insisted on indirect talks and has published an op-ed in ''The Washington Post'' to appeal to Trump.

Participants of the expert-level negotiations:
* U.S.: Director of Policy Planning Michael Anton, and representatives from the Department of State and Department of Treasury.
* Iran: Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi, who was involved in the 2015 nuclear negotiations.

There are no European negotiators. France stated its intention to participate, but was not included in the talks.

Negotiation rounds and related developments

First round

The first round was held on April 12, 2025, in Oman, Muscat. The talks were led by U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi; each delegation was in separate rooms, with messages relayed through Omani mediators. The discussions were described as constructive. Afterwards, the leaders of both negotiating teams spoke briefly in person.

An Iranian news outlet reported that during the talks in Oman, Iran proposed a three-step plan to reach a deal with the United States:
# Iran would agree to temporarily lower its uranium enrichment to 3.67% in return for access to frozen financial assets in the United States and authorization to export its oil.
# Iran would permanently halt high-level uranium enrichment, restore inspections by the UN nuclear watchdog, and commit to implementing the Additional Protocol, allowing for surprise inspections at undeclared sites. These steps would be taken if the United States lifts further sanctions and persuades Britain, Germany, and France not to trigger the snapback of UN sanctions against Tehran.
# The U.S. Congress would approve the nuclear agreement and Washington would lift both primary and secondary sanctions, while Iran would transfer its stockpiles of highly enriched uranium to a third country.

Iran had reportedly also proposed steps to deescalate tensions, including a pledge to disarm and freeze the activities of Hamas, the Houthis, Hezbollah, and Hashd al-Shaabi.

U.S. envoy Witkoff reportedly welcomed the proposals presented by the Iranian delegation in Muscat, which was unexpected by the Iranian side.

Second round

The second round of Omani-mediated talks in Rome occurred on April 19, 2025, one week after the initial meeting in Muscat, the capital of Oman in four hours. Once again, the indirect discussions were led by Araghchi and Witkoff, with messages conveyed through Omani Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi. Afterwards, U.S. president Trump said that he was open to meet Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

Following the second round of talks, the Israeli Air Force reportedly conducted drills simulating an Iranian missile attack on Israeli airbases. Meanwhile, Iran was reported to be constructing a large security barrier around two underground tunnel complexes linked to its main nuclear facility. Russia promised to fund the construction of a nuclear reactor in Iran. China, Russia, and Iran held a joint meeting with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on April 24 to discuss Iran's nuclear program.

Third round

The third round of high-level negotiations took place on April 26, 2025, along with the first round of expert-level talks. The high-level talks were described as serious and productive, with both sides aiming for an agreement based on mutual respect. Araghchi reported progress but noted that key differences remained.

Trump's special envoy, Witkoff, aims to finalize the deal within 60 days; however, he is likely to encounter resistance from Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi due to the significant mistrust between the two parties. Another critical issue is Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium and its potential destruction, for which the US would agree to lift economic sanctions. While Iran intends to retain its enriched uranium stockpile within its borders, the US insists on transferring it to a third country. Additionally, Iran seeks guarantees to protect itself in the event that the US withdraws from or violates the agreement.

Post-third round developments

France warned that if no deal was reached on Iran's nuclear program, it is prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism to restore U.N. sanctions to reinstate the U.N. sanctions that were lifted under the JCPOA. Along with Britain and Germany, France can activate this process before the JCPOA expires in October, which would permanently cut Iran off from key technology, investment, and European markets, dealing a severe blow to its economy. However, Iranian foreign minister Araghchi later warned the European parties against initiating snapback sanctions, cautioning that such a move would severely harm the negotiations — a warning he repeated several times in the following weeks.

Iran has proposed holding further talks with European participation, while also offering investment opportunities.

On April 30, US Treasury sanctioned 6 Chinese chemical components companies connected to Iran.

On May 1, defense secretary Hegseth posted that Iran will pay for supporting Houthis attacks on merchant ships in Red Sea crisis. President Trump warned secondary sanctions on entities buying any oil and petrochemicals from Iran. Rubio warned to walk away from nuclear enrichment. Araghchi canceled the May 4 meeting on "technical reason". Trump called for full dismantling of nuclear enrichment. Iran then created a new ballistic missile and threatened to hit US military bases. Revolutionary Guard General Salami has warned that IRGC would open hell gates on invaders.

The fourth round of negotiations, originally scheduled for May 3, 2025, in Rome, was postponed amid rising tensions. Iranian officials cited U.S. sanctions, military action against the Houthis, and what they described as "contradictory behaviour and provocative statements" by Washington as contributing factors, while stating that a new date would depend on the U.S. approach. Oman, which has mediated previous rounds, referred to logistical reasons for the delay. A source familiar with the matter indicated that the United States had not confirmed its participation, and that the timing and venue for the next round remained unconfirmed.

The negotiations are taking place amid daily rolling blackouts across Iran due to ongoing electricity shortages. Supporters of Iran's nuclear program argue that the country requires nuclear energy for electricity generation.

On May 7, 2025, ahead of the 2025 visit by Donald Trump to the Middle East, U.S. officials reported that president Donald Trump had decided that United States federal agencies would refer to the Persian Gulf as the "Arabian Gulf" or the "Gulf of Arabia" and had plans to make it official during a planned visit to Saudi Arabia later in May. This plan received outrage and condemnation from Iranians and the Iranian government, and could harm the negotiations. The proposed change was opposed by Iranians across the political spectrum, who displayed rare unity in rejecting the possible American move. Later that day, however, Trump told reporters that he had yet to make a decision whether to use "Arabian Gulf", stating, "I don't want to hurt anybody's feelings," appearing to acknowledge Iran's fierce opposition to that name. He said he would decide while on his visit, yet no announcement was made.

That same day, JD Vance said that the deal would allow Iran to rejoin the global economy.

Republican Senators Lindsey Graham and Tom Cotton warned the next day that any future U.S.–Iran nuclear agreement would require Senate approval to be durable, and that such approval would only be possible if Iran fully dismantled its enrichment capabilities and addressed its missile and terrorism activities. A group of Senate Republicans called for the inclusion of a 123 Agreement, which would impose strict safeguards and require full dismantlement before any cooperation. While such agreements regulate peaceful nuclear cooperation, experts noted that applying one to Iran would be highly unusual due to its history of proliferation violations and ongoing IAEA investigations. According to a well-informed source, a 123 Agreement was included in the current talks with Iran.

Fox News released a video titled "Satellite images show alleged Iranian nuclear weapons facility" on May 9. The video allegedly revealed a previously unknown Iranian nuclear weapons site, a 2,500-acre facility referred to as the "Rainbow Site," in the Semnan province. According to Fox News, it has operated for over a decade under the cover of the chemical company "Diba Energy Siba", and is involved in tritium extraction, a process with almost no civilian or commercial uses but known to enhance nuclear weapons. Araghchi rejected the report, calling it Israeli-driven propaganda aimed at disrupting the negotiations with the U.S. He accused the National Council of Resistance of Iran of spreading this "fabricated report".

The next day, Witkoff stated that Iran's uranium enrichment facilities must be dismantled for Washington to believe its claim of not seeking nuclear weapons. He added that Iran must permanently end its enrichment program, stressing that this requires dismantling its facilities at Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan, and ensuring there is no weaponization. He emphasized that if the next round of talks with Iran fail to yield results, they will end and the U.S. will pursue alternative options.

During his speech on May 10, Khamenei supported chants of "death to America".

Fourth round

The fourth round of talks were held on May 11 in Oman prior to Trump's visit to the Middle East. The talks were high-level only, focusing on a broader framework, with technical negotiators not participating. lasted for more than three hours, with both sides calling the discussions difficult but constructive and agreeing to continue. According to unnamed Iranian officials, Iran proposed a joint nuclear-enrichment project with regional Arab states and U.S. investment as an alternative to dismantling its nuclear program. U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff denied this was discussed. The plan's feasibility remains uncertain given regional tensions and the lack of diplomatic ties between Iran and the U.S. for 45 years.

On May 12 the U.S. imposed new sanctions targeting Iranian nuclear research with possible military applications, followed days later by sanctions on individuals and entities in China and Iran over support for Iran's ballistic missile program.

On May 14, 52 senators and 177 congressmen wrote a letter to Trump to reject any deal hat would allow Iran to continue uranium enrichment, stating that no agreement should leave open a path to nuclear weapons. On May 14, Iran ratified the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime as part of its efforts to meet the FATF Action Plan requirements for improving its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing system.

Trump's May 2025 proposal and Iranian response

During Donald Trump's trip to the Middle East in mid-May, he mentioned Iran on several occasions. In Saudi Arabia, he called Iran the most destructive force in the Middle East and stated that Iran's leaders had focused on stealing their people's wealth to fund terror and bloodshed, tearing the region down. During that same visit though, he offered an olive branch to Iran, expressing his strongest willingness so far to engage in negotiations. The move was seen as a shift in U.S. foreign policy, emphasizing that the U.S. does not see any nation as a permanent enemy. During his next stop, Trump appealed to Qatari's emir to use his influence to help persuade Iran to reach a deal with the U.S. over its nuclear program, calling the situation perilous and stressing the need for a solution.

Khamenei advisor Shamkhani responded to Trump's offer and said that the Iranian government was ready to sign the nuclear deal in exchange for the quick removal of all financial sanctions, at the same time criticizing Trump's rhetoric and ongoing threats, saying: “He speaks of an olive branch, but we see only barbed wire.” Trump confirmed that the U.S. was very close to reaching a nuclear deal with Iran and that he preferred a peaceful solution over military action. However, Iranian officials denied having received a new U.S. proposal and insisted they would not give up their right to enrich uranium. Although both countries expressed a preference for diplomacy, sharp disagreements persisted and continued to block progress toward an agreement, increasing the risk of military confrontation.

On May 16, Trump sent Iran a nuclear proposal and warned that swift progress was necessary to avoid serious consequences. The Trump administration increasingly demanded that Iran abandon uranium enrichment, making this a central issue. Khamenei rejected the proposal, dismissing this U.S. demand as "excessive and outrageous". He accused Trump of lying about seeking peace and declared him unworthy of a response. Khamenei also reiterated that Israel is "cancerous tumour" that must be uprooted.

The same day Trump urged Iran to "move quickly" toward a deal, Iran held talks with European powers in Istanbul about its nuclear negotiations with the U.S. Iranian foreign minister Araghchi cautioned that reinstating UN sanctions, which had been lifted under the 2015 nuclear agreement that expires in October this year, could lead to "irreversible" consequences.

On May 20, CNN reported Israel was preparing to strike Iranian nuclear facilities, an action that would mark a clear break with Trump s efforts Iran warned that any Israeli attack would be met with a “devastating and decisive response.” The day after, the U.S. imposed new measures targeting Iran's construction sector, linked to the IRGC, and restricted 10 materials tied to its nuclear and military programs.

Fifth round

The fifth round of talks, held on May 23 in Rome, ended without a breakthrough, though both sides agreed to continue discussions. U.S. officials described the talks as constructive but emphasized that significant differences remained, particularly over the demand from the U.S. that Iran dismantle its uranium enrichment program. Iran maintained that while it was open to limiting enrichment levels, giving up enrichment entirely was unacceptable and would collapse the negotiations. After these mixed signals, Trump was optimistic and said that progress had been made.

In the weeks leading up to the fifth round, tensions between Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu had increased over the U.S. decision to engage in nuclear talks with Iran, which Israel viewed as a serious threat to its security and regional interests. Israel strongly opposed the negotiations, lobbying against diplomatic efforts and threatening unilateral military action, including potential strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, a position critics warn could endanger diplomacy and heighten regional tensions. Iran had reportedly strengthened its air defense systems and increased military investments in preparation for a possible U.S. or Israeli attack if negotiations failed. Iran also ordered ordered a large amount of Chinese solid-fuel components for ballistic missiles. Iranian foreign minister Araghchi warned that any war against Iran would cause widespread destruction across the Middle East, and the entire region would suffer if conflict erupted.

On May 26, Austria's domestic intelligence service reported that Iran is pursuing an advanced nuclear weapons program with ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads over long distances. Iran rejected the intelligence report as "false and baseless," calling it an attempt to create "media hype" against Iran and lacking any credibility. Iran also denied having agreed to a three-year pause of its enrichment program.

On June 2, Reuters reported that Iran was preparing to decline the U.S. proposal. After speculation that Iran might be allowed limited uranium enrichment under a possible deal, Senator Schumer demanded that Witkoff testify before Congress to clarify whether any such side agreement exists. The administration publicly maintained that Iran would not be permitted to enrich uranium. Trump also declared firmly that the deal would prohibit it. Khamenei responded that uranium enrichment is central to Iran's nuclear program and he rejected U.S. demands to halt it.

Although the American government had suspended new sanctions on Iran on June 2, just four days later it imposed secondary sanctions on 10 individuals and 27 financial investment companies and trading firms.

Iran's rejection of the US proposal

On June 9, Iran rejected the Trump administration's proposal for a new nuclear deal but announced plans to present a counteroffer through Omani mediators. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei called the U.S. proposal unacceptable and not aligned with the ongoing negotiations. The main points of disagreement include Iran's right to continue domestic uranium enrichment, the handling of its current stockpiles of highly enriched uranium, and the conditions for lifting sanctions. While Trump has demanded the full dismantlement of Iran's enrichment program, Iranian leaders insist that enrichment is non-negotiable. The latest U.S. offer reportedly included assistance in building nuclear power reactors and allowed limited enrichment until a regional consortium facility becomes operational. A central demand from Iran is that sanctions relief must bring tangible economic benefits. Baghaei emphasized that this includes guarantees of restored banking and trade ties with other countries before any sanctions are lifted. He also urged the international community to address Israel's undeclared nuclear arsenal and prevent it from derailing negotiations.

On June 10, Trump stated in a Fox News interview that Iran was becoming "much more aggressive" in the negotiations. The following day, Iranian defense minister Aziz Nasirzadeh warned that if negotiations with the U.S. collapse and conflict erupts, Iran will target American bases in the region. He stated that all U.S. bases in nearby countries are within reach. Trump has also repeatedly threatened Iran with military action if no deal is reached. U.S. defense secretary Hegseth announced that the U.S. military was getting ready in case the talks fail.

On June 12, 2025, IAEA found Iran non-compliant with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years. The IAEA stated that Iran's repeated failure to fully address questions about undeclared nuclear material and activities amounts to non-compliance. It also raised concerns over Iran's enriched uranium stockpile, which could be used for both reactor fuel and nuclear weapons. Iran dismissed the resolution as politically motivated, and declared plans to build a new enrichment site and install advanced centrifuges.

2025 Israeli strikes

Beginning on June 13, 2025, Israel attacked targets at more than a dozen locations across Iran. With the stated goal of preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and Mossad damaged key nuclear sites and military installations and killed several of Iran's top military leaders. Among those targeted was Khamenei's political advisor Ali Shamkhani, who oversaw negotiations between the United States and Iran. Following the attack, the sixth round of negotiations between US and Iran which were scheduled to take place in Oman on June 15 were indefinitely suspended.

The plan to strike Iran’s missile and nuclear programs was set in motion after Iran attacked Israel in October 2024, leading Israeli prime minister Netanyahu to order military preparations. Trump initially opposed Israeli military action, preferring negotiations over conflict. He also faced private pressure from some allies who urged him to avoid deeper U.S. involvement. However, in the days leading up to the strikes, he came to see Israel’s growing concerns as justified. Intelligence reports about Iran’s expanding missile arsenal, possible nuclear weaponization, and the imminent opening of a heavily fortified enrichment facility heightened the urgency. After a key briefing from Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine on Israel’s plans and possible U.S. support, Trump gave tacit approval for the operation and agreed to limited U.S. assistance. According to U.S. officials, Trump prohibited an Israeli plan to kill Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei, arguing it was premature since no American lives had been lost. Despite his condonement of the Israeli plans, Trump continued to hope his envoy Steve Witkoff could still achieve a diplomatic agreement. Just hours before the Israeli attack, he had expressed his desire to avoid such a strike, warning it could undermine his diplomatic efforts to curb Iran’s nuclear program.

In an initial response, Trump stated that the U.S. “of course” supported Israel, adding that the 60-day deadline for the negotiations had just expired. Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasized that the U.S. was not involved in the strikes, describing the operation as Israel’s unilateral action, although Israel had made extensive use of U.S. intelligence. Later, Trump again seemed to favor negotiations over military action. However, on June 17, he reportedly told Netanyahu to "keep going."

On June 17, the White House was reportedly considering a meeting between U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi to discuss a possible nuclear agreement and efforts to end the conflict between Israel and Iran. The meeting would be part of president Trump’s final attempt to shift from the path of war toward renewed negotiations. Israel does not possess the large bunker-busting bombs or the strategic bombers required to destroy Iran’s Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, while the U.S. has both capabilities within range of Iran. A senior U.S. official said Trump views the massive bunker-buster bombs as important leverage to pressure Iran into reaching a deal, describing the decision on their use as a critical moment in the negotiations.

Reactions

Iran

BBC reported that Araghchi stated he wanted to speak with Europeans in Berlin, Paris and London. Khamenei told his supporters not to protest and insult the talks and that the talks are just a delay until the Islamic Shiite state is established.
Mehdi Kouchakzadeh stated that the Iranian parliament had received no official information about the ongoing negotiations. He added that, although the outcome was unfavorable, they would not oppose it. The Iranian Rial slightly gained and the Tehran Stock Exchange rose 2.16%. Former Prince Reza Pahlavi called on the United States to take out the most vulnerable and unstable Iranian regime rather than talks. Iranian dissidents and social media users increasingly speculated that the former U.S. embassy in Tehran, seized in 1979 might be returned to American control. ''Kayhan London'' described the talks as a major failure of the Iranian regime while the Iranian-based newspaper ''Kayhan'' claimed Iran has the upper hand and called for assassinating Trump, calling nuclear disarmament impossible. The talks caused division and drift among members of the ultra extremist Front of Islamic Revolution Stability party. Iran charged two newspaper media executives for their coverage of the talks.

United States

In the national survey Rasmussen Reports reported 57% of Americans supported an attack on Iran. Former chief negotiator and Secretary of State John Kerry commended Trump's effort and compared the negotiations to " Khomeini poisoned chalice". White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has stated that should Iran develop nukes, there will be "all hell to pay". On April 18, Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged European countries to quickly decide on reimposing sanctions against Iran, warning that Iran is violating the existing agreement and nearing the capability to develop a nuclear weapon. Rubio later also said Iran can have a civilian nuclear energy program instead of a military WMD atomic weapons program. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and national security advisor Mike Waltz are reportedly divided on whether US military should attack Iran. Trump told reporters he is in no rush to attack Iran and it still has a chance to "live happily without death". He also said the US would lead the pack to possibly attack Iran and that only two alternatives there are bombing them viciously or nicely, that he is still undecided.

Former special representative for Iran Elliott Abrams argued that Trump does not seek war. However, should the talks fail, Iran's nuclear program should be destroyed by Israel and/or the US. Political commentator Tucker Carlson argued this to be the worst time for US military intervention in Iran.

International

Global gold prices grew given the reports of high chances of war. Initially oil futures prices dropped 1.4%. Saudi Arabia commended negotiations to restrain Iran more. Israel supported deweaponization of Iranian atomic energy establishments following a "Libya model" like that of the disarmament of Libya. Trump revealed Israel would lead a military attack on Iran if it failed to abandon its nuclear weapons program.
Al Monitor reported that China has also come to support the Iranian regime through strengthened relations.

Although the relationship between IAEA director Rafael Grossi and Trump's negotiating team is unclear, Grossi is scheduled to visit Iran in the third week of April 2025.
Iranian military advisor and security council politician Shamkhani has warned Iran will throw out IAEA inspectors.

See also

* 2025 Iranian protests
* 2025 U.S.–Houthi ceasefire
* Abraham Accords
* Iran Nuclear Achievements Protection Act
* Iran Prosperity Project
* Iranian financial crisis
* List of diplomatic missions of Iran
* Middle Eastern crisis (2023–present)
* Nuclear Command Corps
* Port of Shahid Rajaee explosion
* Supreme Nuclear Committee of Iran

References

External links

Long, fraught timeline of tensions between Iran and the US

Briefing

Video

* :File:14040126 66988 l.webm
* :File:14040204 67033 l.webm
*

{{DEFAULTSORT:2025 United States-Iran negotiations
2025 in American politics
2025 in Iran
2025 in international relations
April 2025 in the United States
April 2025 in Iran
Iran–United States relations
Second presidency of Donald Trump
Nuclear program of Iran
21st century in Muscat, Oman