Şeyh Muslihiddin

Şeyh Muslihiddin Nureddinzade (1502 – 1574) was a Sufi saint and scholar of the Ottoman Empire who belonged to the Khalvati order. He was born near the city of Plovdiv in Ottoman Bulgaria. He went to Istanbul after being initiated as a Sufi, and gained many prominent followers, including Sokollu Mehmed Pasha, Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent and Aziz Mahmud Hudayi, among others. He was very influential in getting Sultan Suleiman to join the campaign for the Siege of Szigetvár. He died a few years later and was buried in Edirnekapı, but his grave was lost forever during the construction of the Edirnekapı Martyr's Cemetery.

Life and career

According to the Ottoman chronicler , Mustafa Muslihuddin was born in 1502 (A. H. 908) in Anbarlı village (now Zhitnitsa, Plovdiv Province), located near the city of Filibe in Ottoman Bulgaria. His father was Nureddin Ahmed Efendi, who is said to have been a Sayyid (a descendant of prophet Muhammad). Mustafa was therefore known by the ''nisba'' (toponyms/patronym) of el-Filibevi, el-Konstantini, er-Rumi and Nureddinzade. He was tutored by Mehmed Efendi, also known as Mîrim Kösesi, an Anatolian kazasker (chief judge). He received his education in Edirne, probably during the 1520s.

Mustafa then became a student of in Sofia. After finishing his (Sufi journey), Mustafa was sent to Tatarpazarı (now Pazardzhik) as a Sheikh, during either the 1530s or the 1540s. He worked there for some years as a ''vaiz'' (preacher) and ''murshid'' (Sufi teacher). He gained many followers after he opened his Sufi lodge there. As part of the Khalvati quest to establish the supremacy of the Ottoman state and Sunni Islam, he probably clashed with the heterodox dervishes and abdals (saints) of the Zawiya built by Malkoçoğlu Bali Bey, and this Zawiya therefore disappears from recorded history after 1530. Mustafa received a daily allowance of three akçes from the Waqf (endowment) of Hadım Şehabeddin in Plovdiv, where had been living at least since 1556. Complaints were sent to the capital Istanbul about Mustafa having political ambitions, and there were demands for his arrest. Mustafa consulted the Zeyniyye sheikh Şeyh Ali bin Sinan, who advised him to go to Istanbul, which he did before he could be legally prosecuted or arrested. The Bosnian chronicler says Mustafa went to Istanbul because of rumors against his teacher, Sofyali Bali Efendi. He probably arrived in the city in the year 1562/1563.

In Istanbul, Mustafa was hosted by the imam of the Zeyrek Mosque. He attended the discourses on tafsir (Quranic exegesis) given by Ebussuud Efendi after every week’s Friday prayers. An explanation given by Mustafa during a discussion was noticed by Ebussuud, and the latter asked the former about his background. When he came to know about the accusations against Mustafa, Ebussuud talked to the grand vizier and had the charges retracted. Mustafa later met the grand vizier himself, who was impressed by him. Heeding the advice of the grand vizier, he brought his family to Istanbul and received an appointment as the sheikh of the Sufi lodge at the Küçük Ayasofya Mosque (the Little Hagia Sophia). Şeyh Muslihiddin held this appointment till his death. Aziz Mahmud Hudayi, another Ottoman Sufi, attended his talks as a student. He was also followed by many powerful people, chief among them Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent and Sokollu Mehmed Pasha. Şeyh Muslihiddin was also patronized and followed by the Ottoman princess Ismihan Sultan, the wife of Sokollu Mehmed Pasha.

, one of his disciples, completed his Seyru Süluk under his guidance. Both Şeyh Muslihiddin and Ali Dede belonged to the Cemaliyye branch of the Khalvati order, which was formed by those who followed the teachings of . The relationship between the Khalvati order and the Ottoman dynasty continued to grow during the lifetimes of both Şeyh Muslihiddin and Ali Dede. The Ottoman historian Gelibolulu Mustafa Ali had sent his historical accounts to Sokollu Mehmed Pasha through Şeyh Muslihiddin, and had requested an appointment as a ''katib'' (secretary), but he was rejected. Şeyh Muslihiddin was reportedly part of a group of scholars which met regularly and debated under the leadership of Ebussuud Efendi. Some other members of this group were Aşık Çelebi, Bâkî, Kınalızâde Hasan Çelebi, , Hoca Sadeddin Efendi, , , Merkez Efendi and .

Siege of Szigetvár

According to historical accounts, Şeyh Muslihiddin and Sokollu Mehmed Pasha had persuaded Sultan Suleiman to participate in the siege of Szigetvár, in order to discharge his obligation of a last campaign of ''jihad''. According to a legend, Sultan Suleiman decided he had to go to Szigetvár after he had a dream of Şeyh Muslihiddin telling him to do so. The ''Süleymannâme'', written by the Ottoman historian , states that Şeyh Muslihiddin had a dream where Prophet Mohammad had condemned Sultan Suleiman for not joining the ''jihad'' campaign. When he told the Sultan about this dream, the Sultan decided to join the campaign. The 18th-century Ottoman historian Joseph von Hammer-Purgstall says Şeyh Muslihiddin had criticized Sultan Suleiman for not participating in the ''jihad''. It is probable that Şeyh Muslihiddin was expressing the discontent of the general public or the janissaries at the Sultan not participating, as a member of a group the grand vizier was actually leading.

As such, Şeyh Muslihiddin was one of the few sheikhs who gave ''dhikr'' (reminder of God) to Sultan Suleiman. The Ottoman chronicler Mustafa Selaniki says Şeyh Muslihiddin was present along with his dervishes on the front lines of the siege. Şeyh Muslihiddin accompanied Sokollu Mehmed Pasha and Sultan Suleiman on the campaign. When the sultan died, Şeyh Muslihiddin helped bring his body back to Istanbul. According to the Ottoman chronicler , Şeyh Muslihiddin went back to Belgrade with the sultan's body, took part in the funeral prayers there, and was part of the entourage which accompanied the body to Istanbul. Ali Dede was appointed the sheikh of the Sufi lodge built near the Sultan's tomb in Turbék. The execution of Arslan Pasha, the Beylerbey (governor) of Buda, was probably orchestrated by Şeyh Muslihiddin along with Kurd Efendi, who was also a student of his teacher Bali Efendi.

Later life and death

Sultan Suleiman probably gave his 1000-bead rosary to Şeyh Muslihiddin sometime before his death, who in turn gifted it to Şeyh Ahmed Şernûbî. Şeyh Muslihiddin also had a close relationship with Sultan Selim II, the successor of Sultan Suleiman. Sultan Selim II had asked Şeyh Muslihiddin to pray for him when he was going to campaign in Cyprus in 1570 during the Ottoman–Venetian War (1570–1573). Şeyh Muslihiddin is highly likely to have been involved in the persecution of the dervishes of the Seyyid Battal Gazi Complex in Anatolia. He also moved the Ottoman administration to act against heretic Sufis in the Balkans. Şeyh Muslihiddin was one of the Sufis who complained against the Bosnian Sufi leader Hamza Bali to the state authorities sometime around this period. The complaints against Hamza Bali were probably based on his contrarian understanding of the primacy of sharia laws. Hamza Bali was captured in 1573 from Tuzla in Bosnia by a Çavuş, and later executed in June that same year; Şeyh Muslihiddin was the person who ordered both the arrest and execution.

Sokollu Mehmed Pasha had commissioned the architect Mimar Sinan to build the Sokollu Mehmed Pasha Mosque in Kadırga, which also had a lodge built for Şeyh Muslihiddin. However, the Şeyh died before the mosque was completed, and the lodge was entrusted to Kurd Mehmed Efendi. Şeyh Muslihiddin died on 3 March 1574 (22 Dhu al-Qadah, A. H. 981). He was buried at Hayrettepe in Edirnekapı, but his grave was lost forever during the construction of the Edirnekapı Martyr's Cemetery. According to Mehmed Süreyya, Şeyh Muslihiddin was buried near the Amir Sultan Cemetery, the tomb of Amir Sultan Bukhari. In 1584, Aziz Mahmud Hudayi succeeded Şeyh Muslihiddin as the sheikh of the Sufi lodge at the Küçük Ayasofya.

Legacy

A mosque and a Zawiya (Sufi monastery) were built in Plovdiv in the name of Şeyh Muslihiddin. Both the mosque and the Zawiya were probably located in the Mecca Mescidi neighbourhood of the city. A cash Waqf (endowment) was also set up for both institutions. A 1596 document by the Waqf administrator records that the Waqf was established with an amount of 70,000 akçes lent at 10% interest. The Zawiya had a soup kitchen, and had a minimum staff size of one imam and one muezzin. A document records that the mosque was located near the Maritsa river. It is possible that the Zawiya had previously been a lodge built for the followers of Otman Baba. This document also says that both the mosque and the Zawiya were located in the Haci Ömer area, which was located in the northwestern part of the city. The Zawiya was abolished sometime during the 18th or 19th centuries.

Views

Şeyh Muslihiddin, in his commentary on Sheikh Bedreddin Simavi’s work, says the Sheikh had espoused blasphemous views if he had argued against universal resurrection from the dead and argued for the creation of new spirits after Judgement Day. Şeyh Muslihiddin also criticises Sheikh Bedreddin for arguing that angels, ''jinns'' and Satan were not real and instead claiming they were esoteric spirits. The ideas of Sheikh Bedreddin and his commentators like and on fundamental Sufi principles like ''Kashf'' (revelations), ''Dhawq'' (spiritual experience), ''Taqlid'' (conformity to a teacher), and the bodily death of Jesus were heavily disparaged by Şeyh Muslihiddin. Şeyh Muslihiddin was also critical of their views on fundamental Islamic beliefs like Akhirah (the afterlife) and Jannah and Jahannam (heaven and hell).

Şeyh Muslihiddin argued that Sheikh Bedreddin had taken a very Batiniyya (allegorical) approach for the exegesis of the Quran. Şeyh Muslihiddin also argued that Sheikh Bedreddin was hypocritical, because the latter had said the seekers of truth should not get involved in worldly affairs like politics, yet he himself participated in politics and started an uprising where many faithful Muslims had been killed. Among the many commentators on Sheikh Bedreddin, Şeyh Muslihiddin was the only one who believed he was the leader of this uprising. However, Şeyh Muslihiddin did not criticise Sheikh Bedreddin’s work entirely, he just commented on the most controversial sections of it.

Şeyh Muslihiddin’s criticism of Simaviism was based on the theology and jurisprudence of Sunni Islam. His understanding of Sufism was opposed to Shia, Batini and Ibahi ideologies; and he believed real Sufism should only be experienced and understood along with sharia law. Wahdat al-wujūd, or the unity of being, was important to his version of Sufism, and he believed its propounder Ibn Arabi hadn’t contradicted sharia law. However, he believed the Simavis hadn’t understood Ibn Arabi completely, and had instead arrived at incorrect interpretations. Şeyh Muslihiddin had claimed the Simavis were heretics and blasphemers because of their views on universal resurrection and Islamic cosmology. He was also opposed to the Uşşaki Sufis and the followers of . In his work on the exegesis of the Al-Qadr chapter of the Quran, Şeyh Muslihiddin does not adopt the traditional approach for Quranic interpretation. He instead uses a liberal and more mystical approach, and discusses the chapter’s interpretations using Sufi methods, Quranic verses and the Hadith. In this work, he also expounds on the importance of Iʿtikāf (religious seclusion).

Analysis

Şeyh Muslihiddin had close relationships with powerful Ottoman figures, just like Bali Efendi and Aziz Mahmud Hudayi. Şeyh Muslihiddin also had views on Simaviism which were very similar to those of Ebussuud Efendi, Bali Efendi and Aziz Mahmud Hudayi. As such, these Sufis made many efforts to protect the Sunni Islamic nature of Sufism, and to safeguard the Ottoman state against newly developed Sufi ideologies which were separatist and did not conform to Sunni Islam. Also, during this period, Ottoman–Safavid relations were worsening and the Celali rebellions in Anatolia were in full swing. Safavid Iran had recently converted from Sunni Islam to Shia Islam, and was trying to similarly convert and conquer the Ottomans through the use of the , Hurufi and Işık orders of Sufism. In this environment, the Sufi orders which were more Sunni in nature, especially the Khalvatis, were fighting back against this Safavid religious propaganda. Şeyh Muslihiddin’s understanding of Sufism is, therefore, highly likely to have been shaped by the times he lived in.

Şeyh Muslihiddin is said to have been a 16th-century version of Al-Ghazali. He was also called the Hasan al-Basri of his times by the Ottoman chronicler . Belgradi also says the Khalvati order in Rumelia was affiliated with him and thus came to be known as the Nureddinzade order. The Ottoman historian and poet , in an analogy, says Şeyh Muslihiddin is like “Yusuf-u Misr-i Irfan”, like Yusuf in Egypt but armed with Irfan (spiritual knowledge). According to Islamic scholar Mehmet Tabakoğlu, Şeyh Muslihiddin can be understood as a person who blended Abdullah Ansari’s brand of Sufism; Al-Ghazali’s understanding of Sunni Islam; Ibn Arabi and Sadr al-Din al-Qunawi’s interpretation of the Wahdat al-wajud; Bali Efendi’s interpretation of Tariqa, and the knowledge he had accumulated of Islam to become a Sufi who maintained absolute conformity to the Quran and Sunnah.

Şeyh Muslihiddin was himself criticized by many Sufis for his close relationships with powerful political figures, allowing many followers to become his disciples and making them his Khalifa (successor). These acts of his were called Bid'ah (heretical innovations). Şeyh Muslihiddin believed he could benefit more people if he could guide the ruling class directly. However, Şeyh Muslihiddin was well known for following the ascetic life of a Sufi by preferring simplicity in eating, drinking and clothing.

Works

Some of the works by Şeyh Muslihiddin, mostly written in Arabic, are:

* ''Başından En'am suresine kadar Kur'an tefsiri'' (The interpretation of the Qur'an from the beginning to the Surah An'am).
* ''Şerhü'n-Nüsûs li Sadreddin Konev''î (A Commentary on the Nusus (laws) of Sadreddin Konevi).
* ''Menâzilü's-Sâirin Tercümesi'' (A Translation of the Menâzilü's-Sâirin by Abdullah Ansari).
* ''Risâletü'l-Mi'râci'n-Nebi aleyhisselam'' ( Risalah (treatise) on the ascension to heaven of Prophet Muhammad).
* ''Risâle-i Vahdet-i Vücûd'' (Risalah on the Wahdat al-wujūd, or the Unity of Being).
* ''Fezailu'l-jihad'' (The virtue of jihad).
* ''Makale fi'l-avâlimi'l-külliyye'' (Article on the subject of the whole).
* ''Şerḥu'l-Vâridât: Risâle fî îżâḥi ma vaḳaʿa fi's-sırri'lleẕî ebânehû Maḥmûd es-Simâvî'' (A Commentary on Varidat. Risalah explaining, in detail, the case of the secret or whispered interpretation of Mahmud Simavi). A critical commentary on Sheikh Bedreddin's work.
* ''Tercüme-i Fıkhü'l-Keydânî'' (Translation of the ''Fıkhü'l-Keydânî'' by Lutfullah en-Nasafi el-Keydânî).
* ''Fukarâya Nasîhat'' (Advice to the Poor).
* ''Tafsir'' (exegesis) of the Al-Qadr, Al-Asr and Al-Ikhlas chapters of the Quran.
* ''Hakikatü’l-Hakaik fî Keşfi Esrâri’d-Dekâ’ik'' (The truth of truth according to the ''Keşfi Esrâr'' by Rashidduin Meybudi). This work was, however, not written by Şeyh Muslihiddin but by .
* ''Risâle fi rüyeti Mustafa b. Nureddin fi menâmihî Resûllüllah (s.a.v.)'' (Risalah by Mustafa son of Nureddin on his vision of the name of the Prophet (PBUH)).
* ''Lailahe İllallah, Allah, Hû, Hakk, Hayy, Kayyûm, Kahhâr ism-i şerifleriyle zikir usulü hakkında Risâle'' (Risalah about the methods of dhikr with the honorable names of Lailahe Illallah, Allah, Hu, Hakk, Hayy, Kayyum, Kahhar).
* ''Risale-i Müteallika fi’l-hukmi ve’l-mahkûm (''Risalah on the mutuality of the judge and the condemned).
Other works attributed to Şeyh Muslihiddin are the ''Risale-i Vakıa'' (Risalah on facts) and the ''Tercüme-i Keşfi’l-Umur'' (translation of the ''Keşfi’l-Umur''). A commentary on the first 40 verses of the Al-Fatiha and Al-Baqara chapters of the Quran is often attributed to Şeyh Muslihiddin, however, this commentary was written by Jami. A commentary on the Qasidat al-Burda by Al-Busiri is also attributed to Şeyh Muslihiddin, but it was written by Muhyiddin Kocevi. Şeyh Muslihiddin had, however, written a commentary on which was in the possession of Muhyiddin Kocevi. The ''Risâle fi’t-tasavvuf'' (Risalah on Sufism), which expounds on how a sultan should rule, is often attributed to Şeyh Muslihiddin.

References

Bibliography

Books and book chapters

*
*
*
*
*

Journals and theses

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* {{Cite journal , last=Yörükân , first=Yusuf Ziya , date=1952 , title=Bir Fetva Münasebetiyle Fetva Müessesesi, Ebussuud Efendi ve Sarı Saltuk , trans-title=The Fatwa Institution on the Occasion of a Fatwa, Ebussuud Efendi and Sarı Saltuk , url=https://isamveri.org/pdfdrg/D00001/1952_2-3/1952_2-3_YORUKANYZ2.pdf , journal=Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi , language=tr , volume=1 , issue=2-3 , pages=137-160

1574 deaths
Sufi saints from the Ottoman Empire
16th-century Muslim scholars of Islam
Islamic scholars from the Ottoman Empire
Khalwati order
People from Plovdiv Province
16th-century people from the Ottoman Empire
16th-century writers from the Ottoman Empire
Translators to Turkish
16th-century Muslim theologians
1502 births