|
Carr V. Saul
''Carr v. Saul'', 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court concerning the Appointments Clause. References External links * 2021 in United States case law Appointments Clause case law United States administrative case law United States separation of powers case law United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court {{SCOTUS-case-stub ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Exhaustion Of Remedies
The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents a litigant from seeking a remedy in a new court or jurisdiction until all claims or remedies have been exhausted (pursued as fully as possible) in the original one. The doctrine was originally created by case law based on the principles of comity. In the United States, exhaustion of remedies is applied extensively in administrative law. Many cases are handled first by independent agencies of the United States government which have primary responsibility for cases involving the statutes or regulations which the agency administers. A person's specific rights and duties depend on the federal statute involved, but here is an outline of how the doctrine works in practice. "Exhaustion of administrative remedies" requires a person to first go to the agency which administers the statute; this process usually involves filing a petition, then going to a hearing, and finally using the agency's internal appeal process. Once the agency's ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |