In mathematics, a set is a well-defined collection of distinct objects, considered as an object in its own right.[1][2] The arrangement of the objects in the set does not matter. A set may be denoted by placing its objects between a pair of curly braces. For example, the numbers 2, 4, and 6 are distinct objects when considered separately; when considered collectively, they form a single set of size three, written as {2, 4, 6}, which could also be written as {2, 6, 4}, {4, 2, 6}, {4, 6, 2}, {6, 2, 4} or {6, 4, 2}.[3] Sets can also be denoted using capital roman letters in italic such as , , .[4][5]
The concept of a set is one of the most fundamental in mathematics.[6] Developed at the end of the 19th century,[7] the theory of sets is now a ubiquitous part of mathematics, and can be used as a foundation from which nearly all of mathematics can be derived.[6]
The German word Menge, rendered as "set" in English, was coined by Bernard Bolzano in his work The Paradoxes of the Infinite.[8][9][10]
A set is a well-defined collection of distinct objects.[1][2] The objects that make up a set (also known as the set's elements or members)[6] Developed at the end of the 19th century,[7] the theory of sets is now a ubiquitous part of mathematics, and can be used as a foundation from which nearly all of mathematics can be derived.[6]
The German word Menge, rendered as "set" in English, was coined by Bernard Bolzano in his work The Paradoxes of the Infinite.[8][9][10]
A set is a well-defined collection of distinct objects.[1][2] The objects that make up a set (also known as the set's elements or members)[11] can be anything: numbers, people, letters of the alphabet, other sets, and so on.[12] Georg Cantor, one of the founders of set theory, gave the following definition of a set at the beginning of his Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre:[13]
A set is a gathering together into a whole of definite, distinct objects of our perception [Anschauung] or of our thought—which are called elements of the set.
Sets are conventionally denoted with capital letters.[14][15][4] Sets A and B are equal if and only if they have precisely the same elements.[16]
For technical reasons, Cantor's definition turned out to be inadequate; today, in contexts where more rigor is required, one can use axiomatic set theory, in which the notion of a "set" is taken as a primitive notion, and the properties of sets are defined by a collection of axioms.[17] The most basic properties are that a set can have elements, and that two sets are equal (one and the same) if and only if every element of each set is an element of the other; this prop
A set is a well-defined collection of distinct objects.[1][2] The objects that make up a set (also known as the set's elements or members)[11] can be anything: numbers, people, letters of the alphabet, other sets, and so on.[12] Georg Cantor, one of the founders of set theory, gave the following definition of a set at the beginning of his Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre:[13]
A set is a gathering together into a whole of definite, distinct objects of our perception [Anschauung] or of our thought—which are called elements of the set.
Sets are conventionally denoted with capital letters.[14][15][4] Sets A and B are equal if and only if they have precisely the same elements.[16]
For technical reasons, Cantor's definition turned out to be inadequate; today, in contexts where more rigor is required, one can use axiomatic set theory, in which the notion of a "set" i
A set is a gathering together into a whole of definite, distinct objects of our perception [Anschauung] or of our thought—which are called elements of the set.
Sets are conventionally denoted with capital letters.[14]capital letters.[14][15][4] Sets A and B are equal if and only if they have precisely the same elements.[16]
For technic
For technical reasons, Cantor's definition turned out to be inadequate; today, in contexts where more rigor is required, one can use axiomatic set theory, in which the notion of a "set" is taken as a primitive notion, and the properties of sets are defined by a collection of axioms.[17] The most basic properties are that a set can have elements, and that two sets are equal (one and the same) if and only if every element of each set is an element of the other; this property is called the extensionality of sets.[18]
There are two common ways of describing or specifying the members of a set: roster notation and set builder notation.[19][20] These are examples of extensional and intensional definitions of sets, respectively.[21]
The Roster notation (or enumeration notation) method of defining a set consist of listing each member of the set.[19][22][23] More specifically, in roster notation (an example of extensional definition),[21] the set is denoted by enclosing the list of members in curly brackets:
For sets with many elements, the enumeration of members can be abbreviated.[24]For sets with many elements, the enumeration of members can be abbreviated.[24][25] For instance, the set of the first thousand positive integers may be specified in roster notation as
where the ellipsis ("...") indicates that the list continues in according to the demonstrated pattern.[24]
In roster notation, listing a member r
In roster notation, listing a member repeatedly does not change the set, for example, the set {11, 6, 6} is identical to the set {11, 6}.[26][failed verification] Moreover, the order in which the elements of a set are listed is irrelevant (unlike for a sequence or tuple), so {6, 11} is yet again the same set.[26][5]
In set-builder notation, the set is specified as a selection from a larger set, determined by a condition involving the elements.[27][28] For example, a set F can be specified as follows: