HOME
The Info List - Prabhākara


--- Advertisement ---



Vedanta

Advaita Vishishtadvaita Dvaita Vedanta Bhedabheda Dvaitadvaita Achintya Bheda Abheda Shuddhadvaita

Heterodox

Charvaka Ājīvika Buddhism Jainism

Other schools

Vaishnava Smarta Shakta Īśvara

Shaiva: Pratyabhijña Pashupata Siddhanta

Tantra

Teachers (Acharyas)

Nyaya

Akṣapāda Gotama Jayanta Bhatta Raghunatha Siromani

Mīmāṃsā

Jaimini Kumārila Bhaṭṭa Prabhākara

Advaita Vedanta

Gaudapada Adi Shankara Vācaspati Miśra Vidyaranya Sadananda Madhusūdana Sarasvatī Vijnanabhiksu Ramakrishna Vivekananda Ramana Maharshi Siddharudha Chinmayananda Nisargadatta

Vishishtadvaita

Nammalvar Alvars Yamunacharya Ramanuja Vedanta
Vedanta
Desika Pillai Lokacharya Manavala Mamunigal

Dvaita

Madhvacharya Jayatirtha Vyasatirtha Sripadaraja Vadirajatirtha Vijayendra Tirtha Raghavendra Swami Padmanabha Tirtha Naraharitirtha

Achintya Bheda Abheda

Chaitanya Mahaprabhu Jiva Goswami Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Prabhupada

Tantra Shakta

Abhinavagupta Nigamananda Paramahansa Ramprasad Sen Bamakhepa Kamalakanta Bhattacharya Anandamayi Ma

Others

Samkhya

Kapila

Yoga

Patanjali

Vaisheshika

Kanada, Prashastapada

Dvaitadvaita

Nimbarka

Shuddhadvaita

Vallabha
Vallabha
Acharya

Major texts

Sruti Smriti

Vedas

Rigveda Yajurveda Samaveda Atharvaveda

Upanishads

Principal Upanishads Minor Upanishads

Other scriptures

Bhagavat Gita Agama (Hinduism)

Shastras and Sutras

Brahma Sutras Samkhya
Samkhya
Sutras Mimamsa Sutras Nyāya Sūtras Vaiśeṣika Sūtra Yoga
Yoga
Sutras

Pramana
Pramana
Sutras

Puranas Dharma Shastra Artha Śastra Kamasutra Tirumurai Shiva Samhita

Hinduism Other Indian philosophies

v t e

Prabhākara (active c. 7th century) was an Indian philosopher-grammarian in the Mīmāṃsā
Mīmāṃsā
tradition. His views and his debate with Kumārila Bhaṭṭa
Kumārila Bhaṭṭa
led to the Prābhākara school within Mīmāṃsā. Śālikanātha wrote commentaries on Prabhākara in the 8th century.[1]

Contents

1 Sentence vs Word meaning 2 See also 3 Notes 4 References

Sentence vs Word meaning[edit] One of the views of the prābhākaras is that words do not directly designate meaning; any meaning that arises is because it is connected with other words (anvitābhidhāna, anvita = connected; abhidhā = denotation). We know or learn the meaning of a word only by considering the sentential context which it appears; we learn such word meanings together with their possible semantic connections with other words. Sentence meanings are grasped directly, from perceptual and contextual cues, skipping the stage of grasping singly the individual word meanings (Matilal 1990:108). This is very similar to the modern view of linguistic underspecification, and relates to the Dynamic Turn in Semantics, which opposes the purely compositional view of arriving at sentence meaning. The prābhākarakas were opposed by the bhāṭṭakas, who argued for a compositional view of semantics (called abhihitānvaya). In this view, the meaning of a sentence was understood only after understanding first the meanings of individual words. Words were independent, complete objects, a view that is close to the Fodorian view of language. See also[edit]

Triputipratyaksavada (Prabhakara's Doctrine of Triple Perception) Khyativada Anubhava (Hindu thought)

Notes[edit]

^ Paolo Visigalli 2014, p. 47.

References[edit]

Matilal, Bimal Krishna (1990). The word and the world: India's contribution to the study of language. Oxford University Press.  Giovanni Ciotti; Alastair Gornall; Paolo Visigalli (31 January 2014). Puspika: Tracing Ancient India Through Texts and Traditions. Oxbow Books. ISBN 978-1-

.