HOME
The Info List - Monism


--- Advertisement ---



Monism
Monism
is the view that attributes oneness or singleness (Greek: μόνος) to a concept (e.g., existence). Various kinds of monism can be distinguished:

Priority monism states that all existing things go back to a source that is distinct from them (e.g., in Neoplatonism
Neoplatonism
everything is derived from The One).[1] In this view only one thing is ontologically basic or prior to everything else. Existence monism posits that, strictly speaking, there exists only a single thing (e.g., the universe), which can only be artificially and arbitrarily divided into many things.[2] Substance monism ("stuff monism") asserts that a variety of existing things can be explained in terms of a single reality or substance.[3] Substance monism posits that only one kind of stuff (e.g., matter or mind) exists, although many things may be made out of this stuff.

Contents

1 Definitions 2 History 3 Philosophy

3.1 Types 3.2 Monistic philosophers

3.2.1 Pre-Socratic 3.2.2 Post-Socrates 3.2.3 Modern

4 Religion

4.1 Pantheism 4.2 Panentheism 4.3 Pandeism 4.4 Asian traditions

4.4.1 Characteristics 4.4.2 Hinduism

4.4.2.1 Vedanta 4.4.2.2 Advaita Vedanta 4.4.2.3 Vaishnava 4.4.2.4 Tantra 4.4.2.5 Modern Hinduism

4.4.3 Buddhism

4.4.3.1 Levels of truth

4.4.4 Sikhism

4.5 Abrahamic faiths

4.5.1 Judaism 4.5.2 Christianity

4.5.2.1 Creator–creature distinction 4.5.2.2 Rejection of radical dualism 4.5.2.3 Theosis 4.5.2.4 Christian Monism

4.5.3 Islam

4.5.3.1 Quran 4.5.3.2 Sufism

4.6 Bahá'í 4.7 Non-dualism

5 See also 6 Notes 7 References 8 Sources 9 External links

Definitions[edit] There are two sorts of definitions for monism:

The wide definition: a philosophy is monistic if it postulates unity of origin of all things; all existing things return to a source that is distinct from them.[1] The restricted definition: this requires not only unity of origin but also unity of substance and essence.[1]

Although the term "monism" is derived from Western philosophy
Western philosophy
to typify positions in the mind–body problem, it has also been used to typify religious traditions. In modern Hinduism, the term "absolute monism" is being used for Advaita Vedanta.[4][5] History[edit] The term "monism" was introduced in the 18th century by Christian von Wolff[6] in his work Logic
Logic
(1728),[7] to designate types of philosophical thought in which the attempt was made to eliminate the dichotomy of body and mind[8] and explain all phenomena by one unifying principle, or as manifestations of a single substance.[6] The mind–body problem in philosophy examines the relationship between mind and matter, and in particular the relationship between consciousness and the brain. The problem was addressed by René Descartes
Descartes
in the 17th century, resulting in Cartesian dualism, and by pre-Aristotelian philosophers,[9][10] in Avicennian philosophy,[11] and in earlier Asian and more specifically Indian traditions. It was later also applied to the theory of absolute identity set forth by Hegel
Hegel
and Schelling.[12] Thereafter the term was more broadly used, for any theory postulating a unifying principle.[12] The opponent thesis of dualism also was broadened, to include pluralism.[12] According to Urmson, as a result of this extended use, the term is "systematically ambiguous".[12] According to Jonathan Schaffer, monism lost popularity due to the emergence of Analytic philosophy
Analytic philosophy
in the early twentieth century, which revolted against the neo-Hegelians. Carnap and Ayer, who were strong proponents of positivism, "ridiculed the whole question as incoherent mysticism".[13] The mind–body problem has reemerged in social psychology and related fields, with the interest in mind–body interaction[14] and the rejection of Cartesian mind–body dualism in the identity thesis, a modern form of monism.[15] Monism
Monism
is also still relevant to the philosophy of mind,[12] where various positions are defended.[16][17] Philosophy[edit] Types[edit]

A diagram with neutral monism compared to Cartesian dualism, physicalism and idealism.

Different types of monism include:[12][18]

Substance monism, "the view that the apparent plurality of substances is due to different states or appearances of a single substance"[12] Attributive monism, "the view that whatever the number of substances, they are of a single ultimate kind"[12] Partial monism, "within a given realm of being (however many there may be) there is only one substance"[12] Existence monism, "the view that there is only one concrete object token (The One, "Τὸ Ἕν" or the Monad)"[19] Priority monism, "the whole is prior to its parts" or "the world has parts, but the parts are dependent fragments of an integrated whole"[18] Property monism, "the view that all properties are of a single type (e.g., only physical properties exist)" Genus monism, "the doctrine that there is a highest category; e.g., being"[18]

Views contrasting with monism are:

Metaphysical dualism, which asserts that there are two ultimately irreconcilable substances or realities such as Good and Evil, for example, Manichaeism,[1] Metaphysical pluralism, which asserts three or more fundamental substances or realities.[1] Metaphysical nihilism, negates any of the above categories (substances, properties, concrete objects, etc.).

Monism
Monism
in modern philosophy of mind can be divided into three broad categories:

Idealist, mentalistic monism, which holds that only mind or spirit exists. [1] Neutral monism, which holds that one sort of thing fundamentally exists,[20] to which both the mental and the physical can be reduced[8] Material monism (also called Physicalism and materialism), which holds that the material world is primary, and consciousness arises through the interaction with the material world[21][20]

a. Eliminative Materialism, according to which everything is physical and mental things do not exist[20] b. Reductive physicalism, according to which mental things do exist and are a kind of physical thing[20][note 1]

Certain positions do not fit easily into the above categories, such as functionalism, anomalous monism, and reflexive monism. Moreover, they do not define the meaning of "real". Monistic philosophers[edit] Pre-Socratic[edit] While the lack of information makes it difficult in some cases to be sure of the details, the following pre-Socratic philosophers thought in monistic terms:[22]

Thales: Water. Anaximander: Apeiron (meaning 'the undefined infinite'). Reality
Reality
is some, one thing, but we cannot know what. Anaximenes: Air. Heraclitus: Change, symbolized by fire (in that everything is in constant flux). Parmenides
Parmenides
argued that Being
Being
or Reality
Reality
is an unmoving perfect sphere, unchanging, undivided.[23]

Post-Socrates[edit]

Neopythagorians such as Apollonius of Tyana
Apollonius of Tyana
centered their cosmologies on the Monad or One. Stoics
Stoics
taught that there is only one substance, identified as God.[citation needed] Middle Platonism
Platonism
under such works as those by Numenius taught that the Universe
Universe
emanates from the Monad or One. Neoplatonism
Neoplatonism
is monistic. Plotinus
Plotinus
taught that there was an ineffable transcendent god, 'The One,' of which subsequent realities were emanations. From The One emanates the Divine Mind
Mind
(Nous), the Cosmic Soul
Soul
(Psyche), and the World (Cosmos).

Modern[edit]

Giordano Bruno[24][25] Baruch de Spinoza Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Alexander Bogdanov Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel F. H. Bradley Arthur Schopenhauer Ernst Haeckel[26][27] Jonathan Schaffer Georgi Plekhanov Friedrich Engels Karl Marx

Religion[edit] Pantheism[edit] Main article: Pantheism Pantheism
Pantheism
is the belief that everything composes an all-encompassing, immanent God,[28] or that the universe (or nature) is identical with divinity.[29] Pantheists thus do not believe in a personal or anthropomorphic god, but believe that interpretations of the term differ. Pantheism
Pantheism
was popularized in the modern era as both a theology and philosophy based on the work of the 17th century philosopher Baruch Spinoza,[30] whose Ethics
Ethics
was an answer to Descartes' famous dualist theory that the body and spirit are separate.[31] Spinoza held that the two are the same, and this monism is a fundamental quality of his philosophy. He was described as a "God-intoxicated man," and used the word God
God
to describe the unity of all substance.[31] Although the term pantheism was not coined until after his death, Spinoza is regarded as its most celebrated advocate.[32] H. P. Owen claimed that

Pantheists are "monists" ... they believe that there is only one Being, and that all other forms of reality are either modes (or appearances) of it or identical with it.[33]

Pantheism
Pantheism
is closely related to monism, as pantheists too believe all of reality is one substance, called Universe, God
God
or Nature. Panentheism, a slightly different concept (explained below), however is dualistic.[34] Some of the most famous pantheists are the Stoics, Giordano Bruno
Giordano Bruno
and Spinoza. Panentheism[edit] Main article: Panentheism Panentheism (from Greek πᾶν (pân) "all"; ἐν (en) "in"; and θεός (theós) "God"; "all-in-God") is a belief system that posits that the divine (be it a monotheistic God, polytheistic gods, or an eternal cosmic animating force) interpenetrates every part of nature, but is not one with nature. Panentheism differentiates itself from pantheism, which holds that the divine is synonymous with the universe.[35] In panentheism, there are two types of substance, "pan" the universe and God. The universe and the divine are not ontologically equivalent. God
God
is viewed as the eternal animating force within the universe. In some forms of panentheism, the cosmos exists within God, who in turn "transcends", "pervades" or is "in" the cosmos. While pantheism asserts that 'All is God', panentheism claims that God animates all of the universe, and also transcends the universe. In addition, some forms indicate that the universe is contained within God,[35] like in the concept of Tzimtzum. Much Hindu thought
Hindu thought
is highly characterized by panentheism and pantheism.[36][37] Hasidic Judaism merges the elite ideal of nullification to paradoxical transcendent Divine Panentheism, through intellectual articulation of inner dimensions of Kabbalah, with the populist emphasis on the panentheistic Divine immanence
Divine immanence
in everything and deeds of kindness. Paul Tillich
Paul Tillich
has argued for such a concept within Christian theology, as has liberal biblical scholar Marcus Borg
Marcus Borg
and mystical theologian Matthew Fox, an Episcopal priest.[note 2] Pandeism[edit] Main article: Pandeism Pandeism
Pandeism
or pan-deism (from Ancient Greek: πᾶν, translit. pan, lit. 'all' and Latin: deus meaning "god" in the sense of deism), is a term describing beliefs coherently incorporating or mixing logically reconcilable elements of pantheism (that "God", or a metaphysically equivalent creator deity, is identical to Nature) and classical deism (that the creator-god who designed the universe no longer exists in a status where it can be reached, and can instead be confirmed only by reason). It is therefore most particularly the belief that the creator of the universe actually became the universe, and so ceased to exist as a separate entity.[38][39] Through this synergy pandeism claims to answer primary objections to deism (why would God
God
create and then not interact with the universe?) and to pantheism (how did the universe originate and what is its purpose?). Asian traditions[edit] Characteristics[edit] The central problem in Asian (religious) philosophy is not the body-mind problem, but the search for an unchanging Real or Absolute beyond the world of appearances and changing phenomena,[40] and the search for liberation from dukkha and the liberation from the cycle of rebirth.[41] In Hinduism, substance-ontology prevails, seeing Brahman as the unchanging real beyond the world of appearances.[42] In Buddhism
Buddhism
process ontology is prevalent,[42] seeing reality as empty of an unchanging essence.[43][44] Characteristic for various Asian religions is the discernment of levels of truth,[45] an emphasis on intuitive-experiential understanding of the Absolute[46][47][48][49] such as jnana, bodhi and kensho, and an emphasis on the integration of these levels of truth and its understanding.[50][51] Hinduism[edit] Main articles: Hinduism, Hindu philosophy, and Hindu denominations Vedanta[edit]

Adi Shankara
Adi Shankara
with Disciples, by Raja Ravi Varma
Raja Ravi Varma
(1904)

Main article: Vedanta Vedanta
Vedanta
is the inquiry into and systematisation of the Vedas and Upanishads, to harmonise the various and contrasting ideas that can be found in those texts. Within Vedanta, different schools exist:[52]

Advaita Vedanta, absolute monism, of which Adi Shankara
Adi Shankara
is the best-known representative;[53] Vishishtadvaita, qualified monism, is from the school of Ramanuja;[54] Shuddhadvaita, in-essence monism, is the school of Vallabha; Dvaitadvaita, differential monism, is a school founded by Nimbarka; Dvaita, dualism, is a school founded by Madhvacharya
Madhvacharya
is probably the only Vedantic System that is opposed to all types of monism. It believes that God
God
is eternally different from souls and matter in both form and essence. Achintya Bheda Abheda, a school of Vedanta
Vedanta
representing the philosophy of inconceivable one-ness and difference.

Advaita Vedanta[edit] Main article: Advaita Vedanta Monism
Monism
is most clearly identified in Advaita Vedanta,[55] though Renard points out that this may be a western interpretation, bypassing the intuitive understanding of a nondual reality.[56] In Advaita Vedanta, Brahman
Brahman
is the eternal, unchanging, infinite, immanent, and transcendent reality which is the Divine Ground of all matter, energy, time, space, being, and everything beyond in this Universe. The nature of Brahman
Brahman
is described as transpersonal, personal and impersonal by different philosophical schools.[57] Advaita Vedanta
Advaita Vedanta
gives an elaborate path to attain moksha. It entails more than self-inquiry or bare insight into one's real nature. Practice, especially Jnana
Jnana
Yoga, is needed to "destroy one’s tendencies (vAasanA-s)" before real insight can be attained.[58] Advaita took over from the Madhyamika the idea of levels of reality.[59] Usually two levels are being mentioned,[60] but Shankara uses sublation as the criterion to postulate an ontological hierarchy of three levels:[61][62]

Pāramārthika (paramartha, absolute), the absolute level, "which is absolutely real and into which both other reality levels can be resolved".[62] This experience can't be sublated by any other experience.[61] Vyāvahārika (vyavahara), or samvriti-saya[60] (empirical or pragmatical), "our world of experience, the phenomenal world that we handle every day when we are awake".[62] It is the level in which both jiva (living creatures or individual souls) and Iswara
Iswara
are true; here, the material world is also true. Prāthibhāsika (pratibhasika, apparent reality, unreality), "reality based on imagination alone".[62] It is the level in which appearances are actually false, like the illusion of a snake over a rope, or a dream.

Vaishnava[edit] Main article: Vaishnavism All Vaishnava
Vaishnava
schools are panentheistic and view the universe as part of Krishna
Krishna
or Narayana, but see a plurality of souls and substances within Brahman. Monistic theism, which includes the concept of a personal god as a universal, omnipotent Supreme Being
Supreme Being
who is both immanent and transcendent, is prevalent within many other schools of Hinduism
Hinduism
as well. Tantra[edit] Main article: Tantra Tantra
Tantra
sees the Divine as both immanent and transcendent. The Divine can be found in the concrete world. Practices are aimed at transforming the passions, instead of transcending them. Modern Hinduism[edit] Main article: Hindu reform movements The colonisation of India by the British had a major impact on Hindu society.[63] In response, leading Hindu intellectuals started to study western culture and philosophy, integrating several western notions into Hinduism.[63] This modernised Hinduism, at its turn, has gained popularity in the west.[46] A major role was played in the 19th century by Swami Vivekananda
Swami Vivekananda
in the revival of Hinduism,[64] and the spread of Advaita Vedanta
Advaita Vedanta
to the west via the Ramakrishna Mission. His interpretation of Advaita Vedanta
Vedanta
has been called Neo-Vedanta.[65] In Advaita, Shankara suggests meditation and Nirvikalpa Samadhi are means to gain knowledge of the already existing unity of Brahman
Brahman
and Atman,[66] not the highest goal itself:

[Y]oga is a meditative exercise of withdrawal from the particular and identification with the universal, leading to contemplation of oneself as the most universal, namely, Consciousness. This approach is different from the classical Yoga
Yoga
of complete thought suppression.[66]

Vivekananda, according to Gavin Flood, was "a figure of great importance in the development of a modern Hindu self-understanding and in formulating the West's view of Hinduism."[67] Central to his philosophy is the idea that the divine exists in all beings, that all human beings can achieve union with this "innate divinity",[68] and that seeing this divine as the essence of others will further love and social harmony.[68] According to Vivekananda, there is an essential unity to Hinduism, which underlies the diversity of its many forms.[68] According to Flood, Vivekananda's view of Hinduism
Hinduism
is the most common among Hindus today.[69] This monism, according to Flood, is at the foundation of earlier Upanishads, to theosophy in the later Vedanta
Vedanta
tradition and in modern Neo-Hinduism.[70] Buddhism[edit] Main article: Buddhism According to the Pāli Canon, both pluralism (nānatta) and monism (ēkatta) are speculative views. A Theravada
Theravada
commentary notes that the former is similar to or associated with nihilism (ucchēdavāda), and the latter is similar to or associated with eternalism (sassatavada).[71] See middle way. In the Madhyamaka
Madhyamaka
school of Mahayana
Mahayana
Buddhism, the ultimate nature of the world is described as Śūnyatā
Śūnyatā
or "emptiness", which is inseparable from sensorial objects or anything else. That appears to be a monist position, but the Madhyamaka
Madhyamaka
views - including variations like rangtong and shentong - will refrain from asserting any ultimately existent entity. They instead deconstruct any detailed or conceptual assertions about ultimate existence as resulting in absurd consequences. The Yogacara
Yogacara
view, a minority school now only found among the Mahayana, also rejects monism. Levels of truth[edit] Within Buddhism, a rich variety of philosophical[72] and pedagogical models[73] can be found. Various schools of Buddhism
Buddhism
discern levels of truth:

The Two truths doctrine
Two truths doctrine
of the Madhyamaka The Three Natures of the Yogacara Essence-Function, or Absolute-relative in Chinese and Korean Buddhism The Trikaya-formule, consisting of

The Dharmakāya
Dharmakāya
or Truth
Truth
body which embodies the very principle of enlightenment and knows no limits or boundaries; The Sambhogakāya or body of mutual enjoyment which is a body of bliss or clear light manifestation; The Nirmāṇakāya or created body which manifests in time and space.[74]

The Prajnaparamita-sutras and Madhyamaka
Madhyamaka
emphasize the non-duality of form and emptiness: "form is emptiness, emptiness is form", as the heart sutra says.[75] In Chinese Buddhism
Buddhism
this was understood to mean that ultimate reality is not a transcendental realm, but equal to the daily world of relative reality. This idea fitted into the Chinese culture, which emphasized the mundane world and society. But this does not tell how the absolute is present in the relative world:

To deny the duality of samsara and nirvana, as the Perfection of Wisdom does, or to demonstrate logically the error of dichotomizing conceptualization, as Nagarjuna does, is not to address the question of the relationship between samsara and nirvana -or, in more philosophical terms, between phenomenal and ultimate reality [...] What, then, is the relationship between these two realms?[75]

This question is answered in such schemata as the Five Ranks of Tozan,[76] the Oxherding Pictures, and Hakuin's Four ways of knowing.[77] Sikhism[edit] Main article: God
God
in Sikhism Sikhism complies with the concept of Priority Monism. Sikh philosophy advocates that all that our senses comprehend is an illusion; God
God
is the sole reality. Forms being subject to time shall pass away. God's Reality
Reality
alone is eternal and abiding.[78] The thought is that Atma (soul) is born from, and a reflection of, ParamAtma (Supreme Soul), and "will again merge into it", in the words of the Tenth guru of Sikhs, Guru Gobind Singh, "just as water merges back into the water."[79]

ਜਿਉ ਜਲ ਮਹਿ ਜਲੁ ਆਇ ਖਟਾਨਾ ॥ Jio Jal Mehi Jal Aae Khattaanaa As water comes to blend with water,

ਤਿਉ ਜੋਤੀ ਸੰਗਿ ਜੋਤਿ ਸਮਾਨਾ ॥ Thio Jothee Sang Joth Samaanaa His light blends into the Light. — SGGS. Pg 278, https://www.searchgurbani.com/guru-granth-sahib/ang-by-ang

God
God
and Soul
Soul
are fundamentally the same; identical in the same way as Fire and its sparks. "Atam meh Ram, Ram meh Atam" which means "The Ultimate Eternal reality resides in the Soul
Soul
and the Soul
Soul
is contained in Him". As from one stream, millions of waves arise and yet the waves, made of water, again become water; in the same way all souls have sprung from the Universal Being
Being
and would blend again into it.[80] Abrahamic faiths[edit] Judaism[edit] Main article: Judaism Jewish thought considers God
God
as separate from all physical, created things (transcendent) and as existing outside of time (eternal).[note 3][note 4] According to Chasidic Thought
Thought
(particularly as propounded by the 18th century, early 19th century founder of Chabad, Shneur Zalman of Liadi), God
God
is held to be immanent within creation for two interrelated reasons:

A very strong Jewish belief is that "[t]he Divine life-force which brings [the universe] into existence must constantly be present ... were this life-force to forsake [the universe] for even one brief moment, it would revert to a state of utter nothingness, as before the creation ..."[81] Simultaneously, Judaism
Judaism
holds as axiomatic that God
God
is an absolute unity, and that he is Perfectly Simple—thus, if his sustaining power is within nature, then his essence is also within nature.

The Vilna Gaon
Vilna Gaon
was very much against this philosophy, for he felt that it would lead to pantheism and heresy. According to some this is the main reason for the Gaon's ban on Chasidism. According to Maimonides,[82] God
God
is an incorporeal being that caused all other existence. In fact, God
God
is defined as the necessary existent that caused all other existence. According to Maimonides, to admit corporeality to God
God
is tantamount to admitting complexity to God, which is a contradiction to God
God
as the First Cause and constitutes heresy. While Hasidic mystics considered the existence of the physical world a contradiction to God's simpleness, Maimonides
Maimonides
saw no contradiction.[note 5] Christianity[edit] See also: Christian anthropology Creator–creature distinction[edit]

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Christianity
Christianity
strongly maintains the creator–creature distinction as fundamental. Christians maintain that God
God
created the universe ex nihilo and not from his own substance, so that the creator is not to be confused with creation, but rather transcends it (metaphysical dualism) (cf. Genesis). Although, there is growing movement to have a "Christian Panentheism".[83] Even more immanent concepts and theologies are to be defined together with God's omnipotence, omnipresence and omniscience, due to God's desire for intimate contact with his own creation (cf. Acts 17:27). Another use of the term "monism" is in Christian anthropology
Christian anthropology
to refer to the innate nature of humankind as being holistic, as usually opposed to bipartite and tripartite views. Rejection of radical dualism[edit] In On Free Choice
Choice
of the Will, Augustine argued, in the context of the problem of evil, that evil is not the opposite of good, but rather merely the absence of good, something that does not have existence in itself. Likewise, C. S. Lewis
C. S. Lewis
described evil as a "parasite" in Mere Christianity, as he viewed evil as something that cannot exist without good to provide it with existence. Lewis went on to argue against dualism from the basis of moral absolutism, and rejected the dualistic notion that God
God
and Satan
Satan
are opposites, arguing instead that God
God
has no equal, hence no opposite. Lewis rather viewed Satan
Satan
as the opposite of Michael the archangel. Due to this, Lewis instead argued for a more limited type of dualism.[84] Other theologians, such as Greg Boyd, have argued in more depth that the Biblical authors held a "limited dualism", meaning that God
God
and Satan
Satan
do engage in real battle, but only due to free will given by God, for the duration God
God
allows.[85] Isaiah 45:5-7 5 I am the Lord, and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me: 6 That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am the Lord, and there is none else. 7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things. Theosis[edit] In Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, while human beings are not ontologically identical with the Creator, they are nonetheless capable with uniting with his Divine Nature
Nature
via theosis, and especially, through the devout reception of the Holy Eucharist.[citation needed] This is a supernatural union, over and above that natural union, of which St. John of the Cross
St. John of the Cross
says, "it must be known that God
God
dwells and is present substantially in every soul, even in that of the greatest sinner in the world, and this union is natural." Julian of Norwich, while maintaining the orthodox duality of Creator and creature, nonetheless speaks of God
God
as "the true Father and true Mother" of all natures; thus, he indwells them substantially and thus preserves them from annihilation, as without this sustaining indwelling everything would cease to exist.[citation needed] Christian Monism[edit] Some Christian theologians are avowed monists, such as Paul Tillich. Since God
God
is he "in whom we live and move and have our being" ( Book
Book
of Acts 17.28), it follows that everything that has being partakes in God.[citation needed] Islam[edit] Quran[edit]

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Although Vincent J. Cornell argue that the Quran also provides a monist image of God
God
by describing the reality as a unified whole, with God
God
being a single concept that would describe or ascribe all existing things. But most argue that Semitic religious scriptures especially Quran see Creation and God
God
as two separate existence. It explains everything been created by God
God
and under his control, but at the same time distinguishes God
God
and creation as having independent existence from each other. Sufism[edit] Main article: Sufism Sufi mystics advocate monism. One of the most notable being the 13th-century Persian poet Rumi
Rumi
(1207–73) in his didactic poem Masnavi
Masnavi
espoused monism.[86][87] Rumi
Rumi
says in the Masnavi,

In the shop for Unity (wahdat); anything that you see there except the One is an idol.[86]

The most influential of the Islamic monists was the Sufi philosopher Ibn Arabi
Ibn Arabi
(1165–1240). He developed the concept of 'unity of being' (Arabic: waḥdat al-wujūd), a pantheistic monoist philosophy. Born in al-Andalus, he made an enormous impact on the Muslim world, where he was crowned "the great Master". In the centuries following his death, his ideas became increasingly controversial. Bahá'í[edit] Main article: Bahá'í Faith
Faith
and the unity of religion Although the Bahá'í teachings have a strong emphasis on social and ethical issues, there exist a number of foundational texts that have been described as mystical.[88] Some of these include statements of a monist nature (e.g., The Seven Valleys and the Hidden Words). The differences between dualist and monist views are reconciled by the teaching that these opposing viewpoints are caused by differences in the observers themselves, not in that which is observed. This is not a 'higher truth/lower truth' position. God
God
is unknowable. For man it is impossible to acquire any direct knowledge of God
God
or the Absolute, because any knowledge that one has, is relative.[89] Non-dualism[edit] Main article: Nondualism According to nondualism, many forms of religion are based on an experiential or intuitive understanding of "the Real".[90] Nondualism, a modern reinterpretation of these religions, prefers the term "nondualism", instead of monism, because this understanding is "nonconceptual", "not graspable in an idea".[90][note 6][note 7] To these nondual traditions belong Hinduism
Hinduism
(including Vedanta, some forms of Yoga, and certain schools of Shaivism), Taoism, Pantheism, Rastafari and similar systems of thought.[citation needed] See also[edit]

Cosmic pluralism Dialectical monism Henosis Holism Indefinite monism Material monism Monistic idealism Ontological pluralism

Notes[edit]

^ Such as Behaviourism,[8] Type-identity theory[8] and Functionalism[8] ^ See Creation Spirituality ^ For a discussion of the resultant paradox, see Tzimtzum. ^ See also Negative theology. ^ See the "Guide for the Perplexed", especially chapter I:50. ^ In Dutch: "Niet in een denkbeeld te vatten".[90] ^ According to Renard, Alan Watts
Alan Watts
has explained the difference between "non-dualism" and "monism" in The Supreme Identity, Faber and Faber 1950, p.69 and 95; The Way of Zen, Pelican-edition 1976, p.59-60.[91] According to Renard, Alan Watts
Alan Watts
has been one of the main contributors to thepopularisation of the notion of "nondualism".[90]

References[edit]

^ a b c d e f Brugger 1972. ^ Strawson, G. (2014 in press): "Nietzsche's metaphysics?". In: Dries, M. & Kail, P. (eds): "Nietzsche on Mind
Mind
and Nature". Oxford University Press. PDF of draft[dead link] ^ Cross & Livingstone 1974. ^ Chande 2000, p. 277. ^ Dasgupta 1992, p. 70. ^ a b "monism", Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th Edition. Retrieved 29 October 2014. ^ jrank.org, Monism ^ a b c d e Luke Mastin (2008), "Monism" ^ Robert M. Young (1996). "The mind-body problem". In RC Olby; GN Cantor; JR Christie; MJS Hodges. Companion to the History of Modern Science (Paperback reprint of Routledge 1990 ed.). Taylor and Francis. pp. 702–11. ISBN 0415145783.  ^ Robinson, Howard (Nov 3, 2011). Edward N. Zalta, ed. "Dualism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
(Winter 2011 Edition).  ^ Henrik Lagerlund (2010). "Introduction". In Henrik Lagerlund. Forming the Mind: Essays on the Internal Senses and the Mind/Body Problem from Avicenna
Avicenna
to the Medical Enlightenment (Paperback reprint of 2007 ed.). Springer Science+Business Media. p. 3. ISBN 9048175305.  ^ a b c d e f g h i Urmson 1991, p. 297. ^ Schaffer 2010. ^ Fiske 2010, p. 195. ^ Fiske 2010, p. 195-196. ^ Mandik 2010. ^ McLaughlin 2009. ^ a b c Schaffer, Jonathan, Monism: The Priority of the Whole, http://www.jonathanschaffer.org/monism.pdf ^ Schaffer, Jonathan, "Monism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Philosophy
(Summer 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta
Edward N. Zalta
(ed.), URL=http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/monism/ ^ a b c d Mandik 2010, p. 76. ^ Lenin, Vladimir (1909). Materialism
Materialism
and Empirio-criticism. World Socialist Web Site: Foreign Languages Publishing House.  ^ Abernethy, Langford & pp.1-7. ^ Abernethy, Langford & pp.8,9. ^ De la causa, principio e Uno, London, 1584 ^ De monade (De monade, numero et figura liber consequens quinque de minimo magno et mensura), Frankfurt, 1591 ^ Wonders of Life by Ernst Haeckel. ^ The Evolution of Man: A Popular Scientific Study, Volume 2 by Ernst Heinrich Philipp August Haeckel. ^ Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Philosophy
ed. Paul Edwards. New York: Macmillan and Free Press. 1967. p. 34.  ^ The New Oxford Dictionary Of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1998. p. 1341. ISBN 0-19-861263-X.  ^ Picton, James Allanson (1905). Pantheism: its story and significance. Chicago: Archibald Constable & CO LTD. ISBN 978-1419140082.  ^ a b Plumptre, Constance (1879). General sketch of the history of pantheism, Volume 2. London: Samuel Deacon and Co. pp. 3–5, 8, 29. ISBN 9780766155022.  ^ Shoham, Schlomo Giora (2010). To Test the Limits of Our Endurance. Cambridge Scholars. p. 111. ISBN 1443820687.  ^ H. P. Owen, 1971, p.65 ^ Crosby, Donald A. (2008). Living with Ambiguity: Religious Naturalism and the Menace of Evil. New York: State University of New York Press. pp. 124. ISBN 0-7914-7519-0. ^ a b Erwin Fahlbusch; Geoffrey William Bromiley; David B. Barrett (1999). The Encyclopedia of Christianity
Christianity
pg. 21. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 0-8028-2416-1.  ^ [1] Britannica - Pantheism
Pantheism
and Panentheism in non-Western cultures ^ Whiting, Robert. Religions for Today Stanley Thomes (Publishers) Ltd. P. VIII. ISBN 0-7487-0586-4. ^ Sean F. Johnston (2009). The History of Science: A Beginner's Guide p. 90. ISBN 1-85168-681-9.  ^ Alex Ashman, BBC News, "Metaphysical Isms". ^ Nakamura 1991. ^ Puligandla 1997. ^ a b Puligandla 1997, p. 50. ^ Kalupahana 1992. ^ Kalupahana 1994. ^ Loy 1988, p. 9-11. ^ a b Rambachan 1994. ^ Hawley 2006. ^ Sharf 1995. ^ renard 2010, p. 59. ^ Renard 2010, p. 31. ^ Maezumi 2007. ^ Wilhelm Halbfass (1995), Philology and Confrontation: Paul Hacker on Traditional and Modern Vedanta, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0791425824, pages 137-143 ^ Flood 1996, p. 239. ^ Jeaneane Fowler (2012), The Bhagavad Gita: A Text and Commentary for Students, Sussex Academic Press, ISBN 978-1845193461, page xxviii ^ Momen 2009, p. 191. ^ renard 2010. ^ Brodd, Jefferey (2003). World Religions. Winona, MN: Saint Mary's Press. ISBN 978-0-88489-725-5. ^ James Swartz, What is Neo-Advaita? ^ Renard 2010, p. 130. ^ a b Renard 2010, p. 131. ^ a b Puligandla 1997, p. 232. ^ a b c d advaita-vision.org, Discrimination ^ a b Michaels 2004. ^ Dense 1999, p. 191. ^ Mukerji 1983. ^ a b Comans 1993. ^ Flood 1996, p. 257. ^ a b c Flood 1996, p. 258. ^ Flood 1996, p. 259. ^ Flood 1996, p. 85. ^ David Kalupahana, Causality: The Central Philosophy
Philosophy
of Buddhism. The University Press of Hawaii, 1975, page 88. The passage is SN 2.77. ^ Williams 1994. ^ Buswell 1994. ^ Welwood, John (2000). The Play of the Mind: Form, Emptiness, and Beyond, accessed January 13, 2007 ^ a b Liang-Chieh 1986, p. 9. ^ Kasulis 2003, p. 29. ^ Low 2006. ^ User, Super. "The Idea
Idea
Of The Supreme Being
Supreme Being
(God) In Sikhism - Sikhism Articles - Gateway to Sikhism". Gateway to Sikhism. Retrieved 2017-12-14.  ^ Gujral, Maninder S. "ATMA,". The Sikh Encyclopedia -ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਕੋਸ਼. Retrieved 2017-12-14.  ^ Singh, Jagraj (2009). A Complete Guide to Sikhism. Unistar Books. p. 266. ISBN 9788171427543.  ^ http://www.chabad.org/library/archive/LibraryArchive2.asp?AID=7988 ^ See Foundations of the Law, Chapter 1 ^ 1956-, Clayton, Philip,; Robert), Peacocke, A. R. (Arthur (2004). In whom we live and move and have our being : panentheistic reflections on God's presence in a scientific world. William B. Eerdmans Pub. ISBN 0802809782. OCLC 53880197.  ^ Lewis, C.S, " God
God
and Evil" in " God
God
in the Dock: Essays in Theology and Ethics", ed. W. Hooper (Grand Rapids, Mich, Eerdsmans, 1970), p. 21-24 ^ Boyd, Gregory. A, " God
God
at War" (Downers Grove, IL, InterVarsity Press, 1971) p. 185 ^ a b Reynold Nicholson Rumi
Rumi
Archived 2006-10-17 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Cyprian Rice (1964) The Persian Sufism
Sufism
George Allen, London ^ Daphne Daume; Louise Watson, eds. (1992). "The Bahá'í Faith". Britannica Book
Book
of the Year. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica. ISBN 0-85229-486-7.  ^ Momen, Moojan (1988). Studies in the Bábí and Bahá’í Religions vol. 5, chapter: A Basis For Bahá’í Metaphysics. Kalimat Press. pp. 185–217. ISBN 0-933770-72-3.  ^ a b c d Renard 2010, p. 59. ^ Renard 2010, p. 59, p.285 note 17.

Sources[edit]

Abernethy, George L; Langford, Thomas A. (1970), Introduction to Western Philosophy:Pre-Socratics to Mill, Belmont, CA: Dickenson  Brugger, Walter (ed) (1972), Diccionario de Filosofía, Barcelona: Herder, art. dualismo, monismo, pluralismo CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link) Buswell, Robert E. JR; Gimello, Robert M. (editors) (1994), Paths to Liberation. The Marga and its Transformations in Buddhist Thought, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link) Chande, M.B. (2000), Indian Philosophy
Philosophy
In Modern Times, Atlantic Publishers & Dist  Cross, F.L.; Livingstone, E.A. (1974), The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, OUP, art. monism  Dasgupta, Surendranath (1992), A history of Indian philosophy
Indian philosophy
part 1, Motilall Banarsidass  Dense, Christian D. Von (1999), Philosophers and Religious Leaders, Greenwood Publishing Group  Fiske, Susan T.; Gilbert, DanielT.; Lindzey, Gardner (2010), Handbook of Social Psychology, Volume 1, John Wiley & Sons  Flood, Gavin (1996), An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-43878-0  Fowler, Jeaneane D. (2002), Perspectives of Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy
Philosophy
of Hinduism, Sussex Academic Press  Hawley, michael (2006), Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (1888—1975)  Hori, Victor Sogen (1999), Translating the Zen
Zen
Phrase Book. In: Nanzan Bulletin 23 (1999) (PDF)  Kalupahana, David J. (1992), The Principles of Buddhist Psychology, Delhi: ri Satguru Publications  Kalupahana, David J. (1994), A history of Buddhist philosophy, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited  Kasulis, Thomas P. (2003), Ch'an Spirituality. In: Buddhist Spirituality. Later China, Korea, Japan and the Modern World; edited by Takeuchi Yoshinori, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass  Liang-Chieh (1986), The Record of Tung-shan, Kuroda Institute  Low, Albert (2006), Hakuin on Kensho. The Four Ways of Knowing, Boston & London: Shambhala  Maezumi, Taizan; Glassman, Bernie (2007), The Hazy Moon of Enlightenment, Wisdom Publications  Mandik, Pete (2010), Key Terms in Philosophy
Philosophy
of Mind, Continuum International Publishing Group  McLaughlin, Brian; Beckermann, Ansgar; Walter, Sven (2009), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy
Philosophy
of Mind, Oxford University Press  Michaels, Axel (2004), Hinduism. Past and present, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press  Momen, Moojan (2009) [Originally published as The Phenomenon of Religion
Religion
in 1999], Understanding Religion: A Thematic Approach, Oxford, UK: Oneworld Publications, ISBN 978-1-85168-599-8  Nakamura, Hajime (1991), Ways of Thinking of Eastern Peoples: India, China, Tibet, Japan, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited, hdl:10125/23054  Puligandla, Ramakrishna (1997), Fundamentals of Indian Philosophy, New Delhi: D.K. Printworld (P) Ltd.  Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli; Moore, Charles A. (1957), A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy
Philosophy
(12th Princeton Paperback ed.), Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-01958-4  Rambachan, Anatanand (1994), The Limits of Scripture: Vivekananda's Reinterpretation of the Vedas, University of Hawaii Press  Renard, Philip (1999), Ramana Upanishad, Utrecht: Servire  Schaffer, Jonathan (2010), "Monism: The Priority of the Whole" (PDF), Philosophical Review, 119 (1): 31–76)  Sehgal, Sunil (1999), Encyclopaedia of Hinduism: T-Z, Volume 5, Sarup & Sons  Sharf, Robert H. (1995), "Buddhist Modernism
Modernism
and the Rhetoric of Meditative Experience" (PDF), NUMEN, 42  Urmson, James Opie (1991), The Concise Encyclopedia of Western Philosophy
Philosophy
and Philosophers, Routledge  White (ed.), David Gordon (2000), Introduction. In: Tantra
Tantra
in practice, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link) Williams, Paul (1994), Mahayana
Mahayana
Buddhism, Routledge, ISBN 0-415-02537-0 

External links[edit]

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Monism

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Monism.

Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). "Monism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.  Monism
Monism
at PhilPapers Monism
Monism
at the Indiana Philosophy
Philosophy
Ontology
Ontology
Project Catholic Encyclopedia - Monism Hinduism's Online Lexicon - (search for Monism) The Monist

Links to related articles

v t e

Theism

Deity

Divinity Male Female List

God

Existence Gender

Agnostic theism Alatrism Animism Antitheism Apatheism Atheism

Agnostic Christian Evangelical Implicit/Explicit Jewish Negative/Positive Scientific or New atheism State atheism

Binitarianism Classical theism Deism

Ceremonial Christian Pandeism Polydeism

Dipolar theism Dystheism Egotheism Misotheism Henotheism Ietsism Kathenotheism Liberal theism Monolatry Monotheism

Ethical Post-monotheism

Mysticism Nontheism

Post-theism

Open theism Panentheism Pantheism

Classical Hylotheism Naturalistic

Philosophical theism Physitheism

Anthropotheism

Polytheism Skeptical theism Spiritualism Transtheism Trinitarianism Tritheism Unitarianism

Religion
Religion
portal

v t e

List of philosophies

Abrahamism Acosmism Agnosticism Animism Antireligion Atheism Deism Dharmism Dualism Esotericism Feminist theology Gnosticism Henotheism Immanence Monism Monolatry Monotheism Mysticism Neoplatonism New Age New Thought Nondualism Pandeism Pantheism Panentheism Polytheism Process theology Religious naturalism Shamanism Shramanism Taoic Theism Transcendence more

Religion
Religion
portal

v t e

Philosophy

Branches

Traditional

Metaphysics

Ontology

Epistemology Logic Ethics Aesthetics

Philosophy
Philosophy
of

Action Art

Culture Design Music Film

Business Color Cosmos Dialogue Education Environment Futility Happiness Healthcare History Human nature Humor Feminism Language Life Literature Mathematics Mind

Pain Psychology

Philosophy
Philosophy
of psychiatry Philosophy
Philosophy
of perception Philosophy Religion Science

Physics Chemistry Biology Geography

Sexuality Social science

Culture Economics Justice Law Politics Society

Space and time Sport Technology

Artificial intelligence Computer science Engineering Information

War

Schools of thought

By era

Ancient Western

Medieval Renaissance Early modern Modern Contemporary

Ancient

Chinese

Agriculturalism Confucianism Legalism Logicians Mohism Chinese naturalism Neotaoism Taoism Yangism Zen

Greco-Roman

Aristotelianism Atomism Cynicism Cyrenaics Eleatics Eretrian school Epicureanism Hermeneutics Ionian

Ephesian Milesian

Megarian school Neoplatonism Peripatetic Platonism Pluralism Presocratic Pyrrhonism Pythagoreanism Neopythagoreanism Sophistic Stoicism

Indian

Samkhya Nyaya Vaisheshika Yoga Mīmāṃsā Ājīvika Ajñana Cārvāka Jain

Anekantavada Syādvāda

Buddhist

Śūnyatā Madhyamaka Yogacara Sautrāntika Svatantrika

Persian

Mazdakism Zoroastrianism Zurvanism

Medieval

European

Christian philosophy Scholasticism Thomism Renaissance humanism

East Asian

Korean Confucianism Edo Neo-Confucianism Neo-Confucianism

Indian

Vedanta

Acintya bheda abheda Advaita Bhedabheda Dvaita Dvaitadvaita Shuddhadvaita Vishishtadvaita

Navya-Nyāya

Islamic

Averroism Avicennism Illuminationism ʿIlm al-Kalām Sufi

Jewish

Judeo-Islamic

Modern

People

Cartesianism Kantianism Neo-Kantianism Hegelianism Marxism Spinozism

0

Anarchism Classical Realism Liberalism Collectivism Conservatism Determinism Dualism Empiricism Existentialism Foundationalism Historicism Holism Humanism Idealism

Absolute British German Objective Subjective Transcendental

Individualism Kokugaku Materialism Modernism Monism Naturalism Natural law Nihilism New Confucianism Neo-Scholasticism Pragmatism Phenomenology Positivism Reductionism Rationalism Social contract Socialism Transcendentalism Utilitarianism

Contemporary

Analytic

Applied ethics Analytic feminism Analytical Marxism Communitarianism Consequentialism Critical rationalism Experimental philosophy Falsificationism Foundationalism / Coherentism Generative linguistics Internalism and Externalism Logical positivism Legal positivism Normative ethics Meta-ethics Moral realism Neo-Aristotelian Quinean naturalism Ordinary language philosophy Postanalytic philosophy Quietism Rawlsian Reformed epistemology Systemics Scientism Scientific realism Scientific skepticism Contemporary utilitarianism Vienna Circle Wittgensteinian

Continental

Critical theory Deconstruction Existentialism Feminist Frankfurt School New Historicism Hermeneutics Neo-Marxism Phenomenology Postmodernism Post-structuralism Social constructionism Structuralism Western Marxism

Other

Kyoto School Objectivism Russian cosmism more...

Positions

Aesthetics

Formalism Institutionalism Aesthetic response

Ethics

Consequentialism Deontology Virtue

Free will

Compatibilism Determinism Libertarianism

Metaphysics

Atomism Dualism Monism Naturalism

Epistemology

Constructivism Empiricism Idealism Particularism Fideism Rationalism / Reasonism Skepticism Solipsism

Mind

Behaviorism Emergentism Eliminativism Epiphenomenalism Functionalism Objectivism Subjectivism

Normativity

Absolutism Particularism Relativism Nihilism Skepticism Universalism

Ontology

Action Event Process

Reality

Anti-realism Conceptualism Idealism Materialism Naturalism Nominalism Physicalism Realism

Philosophy
Philosophy
by region Philosophy-related lists Miscellaneous

By region

African Ethiopian Aztec Native America Eastern Chinese Egyptian Czech Indian Indonesian Iranian Japanese Korean Vietnam Pakistani Western American Australian British Danish French German Greek Italian Polish Romanian Russian Slovene Spanish Turkish

Lists

Outline Index Years Problems Schools Glossary Philosophers Movements Publications

Miscellaneous

Women in philosophy Sage (philosophy)

Portal Category Book

v t e

Metaphysics

Metaphysicians

Parmenides Plato Aristotle Plotinus Duns Scotus Thomas Aquinas Francisco Suárez Nicolas Malebranche René Descartes John Locke David Hume Thomas Reid Immanuel Kant Isaac Newton Arthur Schopenhauer Baruch Spinoza Georg W. F. Hegel George Berkeley Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Henri Bergson Friedrich Nietzsche Charles Sanders Peirce Joseph Maréchal Ludwig Wittgenstein Martin Heidegger Alfred N. Whitehead Bertrand Russell Dorothy Emmet G. E. Moore Jean-Paul Sartre Gilbert Ryle Hilary Putnam P. F. Strawson R. G. Collingwood Adolph Stöhr Rudolf Carnap Saul Kripke Willard V. O. Quine G. E. M. Anscombe Donald Davidson Michael Dummett David Malet Armstrong David Lewis Alvin Plantinga Peter van Inwagen Derek Parfit more ...

Theories

Abstract object theory Action theory Anti-realism Determinism Dualism Enactivism Essentialism Existentialism Free will Idealism Libertarianism Liberty Materialism Meaning of life Monism Naturalism Nihilism Phenomenalism Realism Physicalism Pirsig's metaphysics of Quality Platonic idealism Relativism Scientific realism Solipsism Subjectivism Substance theory Type theory

Concepts

Abstract object Anima mundi Being Category of being Causality Choice Cogito ergo sum Concept Embodied cognition Entity Essence Existence Experience Hypostatic abstraction Idea Identity Identity and change Information Insight Intelligence Intention Linguistic modality Matter Meaning Memetics Mental representation Mind Motion Necessity Notion Object Pattern Perception Physical body Principle Property Qualia Quality Reality Soul Subject Substantial form Thought Time Truth Type–token distinction Universal Unobservable Value more ...

Related topics

Axiology Cosmology Epistemology Feminist metaphysics Interpretations of quantum mechanics Meta- Ontology Philosophy
Philosophy
of mind Philosophy
Philosophy
of psychology Philosophy
Philosophy
of self Philosophy
Philosophy
of space and time Teleology Theoretical physics

Category Portal

v t e

Philosophy
Philosophy
of mind

Theories

Behaviorism (Radical) Biological naturalism Cognitive psychology Mind–body dualism Eliminative materialism Emergent materialism Emergentism Epiphenomenalism Functionalism Idealism Interactionism Materialism Monism Naïve realism

Neurophenomenology

Neutral monism Occasionalism Psychoanalysis Parallelism Phenomenalism Phenomenology Physicalism

identity theory

Property dualism Representational Solipsism Substance dualism

Concepts

Abstract object Artificial intelligence Chinese room Cognition Cognitive closure Concept Concept
Concept
and object Consciousness Hard problem of consciousness Hypostatic abstraction Idea Identity Ingenuity Intelligence Intentionality Introspection Intuition Language of thought Materialism Mental event Mental image Mental process Mental property Mental representation Mind Mind–body problem

Non-physical entity

New mysterianism Pain Problem of other minds Propositional attitude Qualia Tabula rasa Understanding Zombie more...

Related topics

Metaphysics Philosophy
Philosophy
of artificial intelligence / information / perception / self

Portal Category Philosophers category Project Task Force

v t e

Philosophy
Philosophy
of religion

Concepts in religion

Afterlife Euthyphro dilemma Faith Intelligent design Miracle Problem of evil Religious belief Soul Spirit Theodicy Theological veto

Conceptions of God

Aristotelian view Brahman Demiurge Divine simplicity Egoism Holy Spirit Misotheism Pandeism Personal god Process theology Supreme Being Unmoved mover

God
God
in

Abrahamic religions Buddhism Christianity Hinduism Islam Jainism Judaism Mormonism Sikhism Bahá'í Faith Wicca

Existence of God

For

Beauty Christological Consciousness Cosmological

Kalam Contingency

Degree Desire Experience Fine-tuning of the Universe Love Miracles Morality Necessary existent Ontological Pascal's Wager Proper basis Reason Teleological

Natural law Watchmaker analogy

Transcendental

Against

747 gambit Atheist's Wager Evil Free will Hell Inconsistent revelations Nonbelief Noncognitivism Occam's razor Omnipotence Poor design Russell's teapot

Theology

Acosmism Agnosticism Animism Antireligion Atheism Creationism Dharmism Deism Demonology Divine command theory Dualism Esotericism Exclusivism Existentialism

Christian Agnostic Atheistic

Feminist theology

Thealogy Womanist theology

Fideism Fundamentalism Gnosticism Henotheism Humanism

Religious Secular Christian

Inclusivism Theories about religions Monism Monotheism Mysticism Naturalism

Metaphysical Religious Humanistic

New Age Nondualism Nontheism Pandeism Panentheism Pantheism Perennialism Polytheism Possibilianism Process theology Religious skepticism Spiritualism Shamanism Taoic Theism Transcendentalism more...

Religious language

Eschatological verification Language-game Logical positivism Apophatic theology Verificationism

Problem of evil

Augustinian theodicy Best of all possible worlds Euthyphro dilemma Inconsistent triad Irenaean theodicy Natural evil Theodicy

Philosophers of religion

(by date active)

Ancient and Medieval

Anselm of Canterbury Augustine of Hippo Avicenna Averroes Boethius Erasmus Gaunilo of Marmoutiers Pico della Mirandola Heraclitus King James VI and I Marcion of Sinope Thomas Aquinas Maimonides

Enlightenment

Augustin Calmet René Descartes Blaise Pascal Baruch Spinoza Nicolas Malebranche Gottfried W Leibniz William Wollaston Thomas Chubb David Hume Baron d'Holbach Immanuel Kant Johann G Herder

1800 1850

Friedrich Schleiermacher Karl C F Krause Georg W F Hegel

William Whewell Ludwig Feuerbach Søren Kierkegaard Karl Marx Albrecht Ritschl Afrikan Spir

1880 1900

Ernst Haeckel W. K. Clifford Friedrich Nietzsche Harald Høffding William James

Vladimir Solovyov Ernst Troeltsch Rudolf Otto Lev Shestov Sergei Bulgakov Pavel Florensky Ernst Cassirer Joseph Maréchal

1920 postwar

George Santayana Bertrand Russell Martin Buber René Guénon Paul Tillich Karl Barth Emil Brunner Rudolf Bultmann Gabriel Marcel Reinhold Niebuhr

Charles Hartshorne Mircea Eliade Frithjof Schuon J L Mackie Walter Kaufmann Martin Lings Peter Geach George I Mavrodes William Alston Antony Flew

1970 1990 2010

William L Rowe Dewi Z Phillips Alvin Plantinga Anthony Kenny Nicholas Wolterstorff Richard Swinburne Robert Merrihew Adams

Peter van Inwagen Daniel Dennett Loyal Rue Jean-Luc Marion William Lane Craig Ali Akbar Rashad

Alexander Pruss

Related topics

Criticism of religion Ethics
Ethics
in religion Exegesis History of religions Religion Religious language Religious philosophy Relationship between religion and science Political science of religion Faith
Faith
and rationality more...

Portal Category

Authority control

.