Dirichlet integral
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In mathematics, there are several
integral In mathematics, an integral assigns numbers to functions in a way that describes displacement, area, volume, and other concepts that arise by combining infinitesimal data. The process of finding integrals is called integration. Along wit ...
s known as the Dirichlet integral, after the German mathematician
Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet Johann Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet (; 13 February 1805 – 5 May 1859) was a German mathematician who made deep contributions to number theory (including creating the field of analytic number theory), and to the theory of Fourier series and ...
, one of which is the
improper integral In mathematical analysis, an improper integral is the limit of a definite integral as an endpoint of the interval(s) of integration approaches either a specified real number or positive or negative infinity; or in some instances as both endpoin ...
of the sinc function over the positive real line: : \int_0^\infty \frac \,dx = \frac. This integral is not
absolutely convergent In mathematics, an infinite series of numbers is said to converge absolutely (or to be absolutely convergent) if the sum of the absolute values of the summands is finite. More precisely, a real or complex series \textstyle\sum_^\infty a_n is s ...
, meaning \Biggl, \frac \Biggl, is not Lebesgue-integrable, and so the Dirichlet integral is undefined in the sense of
Lebesgue integration In mathematics, the integral of a non-negative function of a single variable can be regarded, in the simplest case, as the area between the graph of that function and the -axis. The Lebesgue integral, named after French mathematician Henri Leb ...
. It is, however, defined in the sense of the improper
Riemann integral In the branch of mathematics known as real analysis, the Riemann integral, created by Bernhard Riemann, was the first rigorous definition of the integral of a function on an interval. It was presented to the faculty at the University of GÃ ...
or the generalized Riemann or
Henstock–Kurzweil integral In mathematics, the Henstock–Kurzweil integral or generalized Riemann integral or gauge integral – also known as the (narrow) Denjoy integral (pronounced ), Luzin integral or Perron integral, but not to be confused with the more general wide ...
. This can be seen by using Dirichlet's test for improper integrals. Although the
sine integral In mathematics, trigonometric integrals are a family of integrals involving trigonometric functions. Sine integral The different sine integral definitions are \operatorname(x) = \int_0^x\frac\,dt \operatorname(x) = -\int_x^\infty\frac ...
, an
antiderivative In calculus, an antiderivative, inverse derivative, primitive function, primitive integral or indefinite integral of a function is a differentiable function whose derivative is equal to the original function . This can be stated symbolicall ...
of the sinc function, is not an
elementary function In mathematics, an elementary function is a function of a single variable (typically real or complex) that is defined as taking sums, products, roots and compositions of finitely many polynomial, rational, trigonometric, hyperbolic, and ...
, the value of the integral (in the Riemann or Henstock sense) can be derived using various ways, including the Laplace transform, double integration, differentiating under the integral sign, contour integration, and the Dirichlet kernel.


Evaluation


Laplace transform

Let f(t) be a function defined whenever t \geq 0. Then its
Laplace transform In mathematics, the Laplace transform, named after its discoverer Pierre-Simon Laplace (), is an integral transform that converts a function of a real variable (usually t, in the '' time domain'') to a function of a complex variable s (in the ...
is given by :\mathcal \ = F(s) = \int_^ e^ f(t) \,dt, if the integral exists. A property of the Laplace transform useful for evaluating improper integrals is : \mathcal \Biggl \frac \Biggl= \int_^ F(u) \,du, provided \lim_ \frac exists. In what follows, one needs the result \mathcal\ = \frac, which is the Laplace transform of the function \sin t (see the section 'Differentiating under the integral sign' for a derivation) as well as a version of
Abel's theorem In mathematics, Abel's theorem for power series relates a limit of a power series to the sum of its coefficients. It is named after Norwegian mathematician Niels Henrik Abel. Theorem Let the Taylor series G (x) = \sum_^\infty a_k x^k be a pow ...
(a consequence of the final value theorem for the Laplace transform). Therefore, : \begin \int_^ \frac \, dt &= \lim_ \int_^ e^\frac \, dt =\lim_\mathcal \Biggl \frac \Biggl\\ pt&= \lim_\int_^ \frac = \lim_ \arctan u \Biggl , _^ \\ pt&= \lim_ \Biggl \frac - \arctan (s)\Biggl= \frac. \end


Double integration

Evaluating the Dirichlet integral using the Laplace transform is equivalent to calculating the same double definite integral by changing the
order of integration In statistics, the order of integration, denoted ''I''(''d''), of a time series is a summary statistic, which reports the minimum number of differences required to obtain a covariance-stationary series. Integration of order ''d'' A time s ...
, namely, : \left( I_1 = \int_0^\infty \int _0^\infty e^ \sin t \,dt \,ds \right) = \left( I_2 = \int_0^\infty \int _0^\infty e^ \sin t \,ds \,dt \right), :\left( I_1 = \int_0^\infty \frac \,ds = \frac \right) = \left( I_2 = \int_0^\infty \frac \,dt \right), \text s > 0.


Differentiation under the integral sign (Feynman's trick)

First rewrite the integral as a function of the additional variable s, namely, the Laplace transform of \frac t. So let :f(s)=\int_0^\infty e^ \frac t \, dt. In order to evaluate the Dirichlet integral, we need to determine f(0). The continuity of f can be justified by applying the
dominated convergence theorem In measure theory, Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem provides sufficient conditions under which almost everywhere convergence of a sequence of functions implies convergence in the ''L''1 norm. Its power and utility are two of the primary t ...
after integration by parts. Differentiate with respect to s>0 and apply the Leibniz rule for differentiating under the integral sign to obtain : \begin \frac & = \frac\int_0^\infty e^ \frac \, dt = \int_0^\infty \frace^\frac t \, dt \\ pt& = -\int_0^\infty e^ \sin t \, dt. \end Now, using Euler's formula e^=\cos t + i\sin t, one can express the sine function in terms of complex exponentials: : \sin t = \frac \left( e^ - e^\right). Therefore, : \begin \frac & = -\int_0^\infty e^ \sin t \, dt = -\int_^ e^ \frac dt \\ pt&= -\frac \int_^ \left e^ - e^ \rightdt \\ pt&= -\frac \left \frac e^ - \frac e^\right\Biggl, _0^ \\ pt&= -\frac \left 0 - \left( \frac + \frac \right) \right= -\frac \left( \frac - \frac \right) \\ pt&= -\frac \left( \frac \right) = -\frac. \end Integrating with respect to s gives : f(s) = \int \frac = A - \arctan s, where A is a constant of integration to be determined. Since \lim_ f(s) = 0, A = \lim_ \arctan s = \frac, using the principal value. This means that for s>0 : f(s) = \frac - \arctan s. Finally, by continuity at s = 0, we have f(0) = \frac - \arctan(0) = \frac, as before.


Complex integration

The same result can be obtained by complex integration. Consider : f(z) = \frac z. As a function of the complex variable z, it has a simple pole at the origin, which prevents the application of Jordan's lemma, whose other hypotheses are satisfied. Define then a new function : g(z) = \frac. The pole has been moved away from the real axis, so g(z) can be integrated along the semicircle of radius R centered at z = 0 and closed on the real axis. One then takes the limit \varepsilon \rightarrow 0. The complex integral is zero by the residue theorem, as there are no poles inside the integration path : 0 = \int_\gamma g(z) \,dz = \int_^R \frac \, dx + \int_0^\pi \frac iR \, d\theta. The second term vanishes as R goes to infinity. As for the first integral, one can use one version of the
Sokhotski–Plemelj theorem The Sokhotski–Plemelj theorem (Polish spelling is ''Sochocki'') is a theorem in complex analysis, which helps in evaluating certain integrals. The real-line version of it (#Version for the real line, see below) is often used in physics, althoug ...
for integrals over the real line: for a
complex Complex commonly refers to: * Complexity, the behaviour of a system whose components interact in multiple ways so possible interactions are difficult to describe ** Complex system, a system composed of many components which may interact with each ...
-valued function defined and continuously differentiable on the real line and real constants a and b with a < 0 < b one finds : \lim_ \int_a^b \frac\,dx = \mp i \pi f(0) + \mathcal \int_a^b \frac \,dx, where \mathcal denotes the
Cauchy principal value In mathematics, the Cauchy principal value, named after Augustin Louis Cauchy, is a method for assigning values to certain improper integrals which would otherwise be undefined. Formulation Depending on the type of singularity in the integrand ...
. Back to the above original calculation, one can write : 0 = \mathcal \int \frac \, dx - \pi i. By taking the imaginary part on both sides and noting that the function \sin(x)/x is even, we get :\int_^ \frac \,dx = 2 \int_0^ \frac \,dx. Finally, : \lim_ \int_\varepsilon^\infty \frac \, dx = \int_0^\infty \frac \, dx = \frac \pi 2. Alternatively, choose as the integration contour for f the union of upper half-plane semicircles of radii \varepsilon and R together with two segments of the real line that connect them. On one hand the contour integral is zero, independently of \varepsilon and R; on the other hand, as \varepsilon \to 0 and R \to \infty the integral's imaginary part converges to 2 I + \Im\big(\ln 0 - \ln(\pi i)\big) = 2I - \pi (here \ln z is any branch of logarithm on upper half-plane), leading to I = \frac.


Dirichlet kernel

Let : D_n(x) = 1 + 2\sum_^n \cos(2kx) = \frac be the
Dirichlet kernel In mathematical analysis, the Dirichlet kernel, named after the German mathematician Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet, is the collection of periodic functions defined as D_n(x)= \sum_^n e^ = \left(1+2\sum_^n\cos(kx)\right)=\frac, where is any nonneg ...
. It immediately follows that \int_0^D_n(x) dx = \frac. Define :f(x) = \begin \frac - \frac & x \neq 0 \\ pt0 & x = 0 \end Clearly, f is continuous when x \in (0,\pi/2] , to see its continuity at 0 apply L'Hopital's Rule: : \lim_ \frac = \lim_ \frac = \lim_ \frac = 0. Hence, f fulfills the requirements of the Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma. This means : \lim_ \int_0^ f(x)\sin(\lambda x)dx = 0 \Rightarrow \lim_ \int_0^ \fracdx = \lim_ \int_0^ \fracdx. (The form of the Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma used here is proven in the article cited.) We would like to say that : \begin \int_0^\infty \fracdt = & \lim_ \int_0^ \fracdt \\ pt= & \lim_ \int_0^ \fracdx \\ pt= & \lim_ \int_0^ \fracdx \\ pt= & \lim_ \int_0^ \fracdx \\ pt= & \lim_ \int_0^ D_n(x) dx = \frac \end In order to do so, however, we must justify switching the real limit in \lambda to the integral limit in n. This is in fact justified if we can show the limit does exist, which we do now. Using
integration by parts In calculus, and more generally in mathematical analysis, integration by parts or partial integration is a process that finds the integral of a product of functions in terms of the integral of the product of their derivative and antiderivative. ...
, we have: : \int_a^b \fracdx = \int_a^b \fracdx = \left. \frac\_a^b + \int_a^b \fracdx Now, as a \to 0 and b \to \infty the term on the left converges with no problem. See the list of limits of trigonometric functions. We now show that \int_^\fracdx is absolutely integrable, which implies that the limit exists. First, we seek to bound the integral near the origin. Using the Taylor-series expansion of the cosine about zero, : 1 - \cos(x) = 1 - \sum_\frac = -\sum_\frac. Therefore, : \left, \frac\ = \left, -\sum_\frac\ \leq \sum_ \frac = e^. Splitting the integral into pieces, we have : \int_^\left, \frac\dx \leq \int_^ \fracdx + \int_^ e^dx + \int_^ \fracdx \leq K, for some constant K > 0. This shows that the integral is absolutely integrable, which implies the original integral exists, and switching from \lambda to n was in fact justified, and the proof is complete.


See also

*
Dirichlet distribution In probability and statistics, the Dirichlet distribution (after Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet), often denoted \operatorname(\boldsymbol\alpha), is a family of continuous multivariate probability distributions parameterized by a vector \bold ...
*
Dirichlet principle In mathematics, and particularly in potential theory, Dirichlet's principle is the assumption that the minimizer of a certain energy functional is a solution to Poisson's equation. Formal statement Dirichlet's principle states that, if the functio ...
* Sinc function *
Fresnel integral 250px, Plots of and . The maximum of is about . If the integrands of and were defined using instead of , then the image would be scaled vertically and horizontally (see below). The Fresnel integrals and are two transcendental functions n ...


References


External links

* {{Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet Special functions Integral calculus Mathematical physics