CONTACT MECHANICS is the study of the deformation of solids that
touch each other at one or more points. The physical and
mathematical formulation of the subject is built upon the mechanics of
materials and continuum mechanics and focuses on computations
involving elastic , viscoelastic , and plastic bodies in static or
dynamic contact. Central aspects in contact mechanics are the
pressures and adhesion acting perpendicular to the contacting bodies'
surfaces (known as the normal direction ) and the frictional stresses
acting tangentially between the surfaces. This page focuses mainly on
the normal direction, i.e. on frictionless contact mechanics.
The original work in contact mechanics dates back to 1882 with the
publication of the paper "On the contact of elastic solids" ("Ueber
die Berührung fester elastischer Körper") by
CONTENTS * 1 History * 2 Classical solutions for non-adhesive elastic contact * 2.1 Contact between a sphere and a half-space * 2.2 Contact between two spheres * 2.3 Contact between two crossed cylinders of equal radius R {displaystyle R} * 2.4 Contact between a rigid cylinder with flat-ended and an elastic half-space * 2.5 Contact between a rigid conical indenter and an elastic half-space * 2.6 Contact between two cylinders with parallel axes * 2.7 Bearing contact * 2.8 The Method of Dimensionality Reduction * 3 Hertzian theory of non-adhesive elastic contact * 3.1 Assumptions in Hertzian theory * 3.2 Analytical solution techniques * 3.2.1 Point contact on a (2D) half-plane * 3.2.2 Line contact on a (2D) half-plane * 3.2.2.1 Normal loading over a region ( a , b ) {displaystyle (a,b)} * 3.2.2.2 Shear loading over a region ( a , b ) {displaystyle (a,b)} * 3.2.3 Point contact on a (3D) half-space * 3.3 Numerical solution techniques * 4 Contact between rough surfaces * 5
* 5.1 Bradley model of rigid contact * 5.2 Johnson-Kendall-Roberts (JKR) model of elastic contact * 5.3 Derjaguin-Muller-Toporov (DMT) model of elastic contact * 5.4 Tabor parameter * 5.5 Maugis-Dugdale model of elastic contact * 5.6 Carpick-Ogletree-Salmeron (COS) model * 6 See also * 7 References * 8 External links HISTORY When a sphere is pressed against an elastic material, the contact area increases. Classical contact mechanics is most notably associated with Heinrich Hertz. In 1882, Hertz solved the contact problem of two elastic bodies with curved surfaces. This still-relevant classical solution provides a foundation for modern problems in contact mechanics. For example, in mechanical engineering and tribology , _Hertzian contact stress_ is a description of the stress within mating parts. The Hertzian contact stress usually refers to the stress close to the area of contact between two spheres of different radii. It was not until nearly one hundred years later that Johnson ,
Kendall, and Roberts found a similar solution for the case of adhesive
contact. This theory was rejected by
Further advancement in the field of contact mechanics in the mid-twentieth century may be attributed to names such as Bowden and Tabor . Bowden and Tabor were the first to emphasize the importance of surface roughness for bodies in contact. Through investigation of the surface roughness, the true contact area between friction partners is found to be less than the apparent contact area. Such understanding also drastically changed the direction of undertakings in tribology. The works of Bowden and Tabor yielded several theories in contact mechanics of rough surfaces. The contributions of Archard (1957) must also be mentioned in discussion of pioneering works in this field. Archard concluded that, even for rough elastic surfaces, the contact area is approximately proportional to the normal force . Further important insights along these lines were provided by Greenwood and Williamson (1966), Bush (1975), and Persson (2002). The main findings of these works were that the true contact surface in rough materials is generally proportional to the normal force, while the parameters of individual micro-contacts (i.e., pressure, size of the micro-contact) are only weakly dependent upon the load. CLASSICAL SOLUTIONS FOR NON-ADHESIVE ELASTIC CONTACT The theory of contact between elastic bodies can be used to find contact areas and indentation depths for simple geometries. Some commonly used solutions are listed below. The theory used to compute these solutions is discussed later in the article. CONTACT BETWEEN A SPHERE AND A HALF-SPACE Contact of an elastic sphere with an elastic half-space An elastic sphere of radius R {displaystyle R} indents an elastic half-space to depth d {displaystyle d} , and thus creates a contact area of radius a = R d {displaystyle a={sqrt {Rd}}} The applied force F {displaystyle F} is related to the displacement d {displaystyle d} by F = 4 3 E R 1 / 2 d 3 / 2 {displaystyle F={tfrac {4}{3}}E^{*}R^{1/2}d^{3/2}} where 1 E = 1 1 2 E 1 + 1 2 2 E 2 {displaystyle {frac {1}{E^{*}}}={frac {1-nu _{1}^{2}}{E_{1}}}+{frac {1-nu _{2}^{2}}{E_{2}}}} and E 1 {displaystyle E_{1}} , E 2 {displaystyle E_{2}} are the elastic moduli and 1 {displaystyle nu _{1}} , 2 {displaystyle nu _{2}} the Poisson\'s ratios associated with each body. The distribution of normal pressure in the contact area as a function of distance from the center of the circle is p ( r ) = p 0 ( 1 r 2 a 2 ) 1 / 2 {displaystyle p(r)=p_{0}left(1-{frac {r^{2}}{a^{2}}}right)^{1/2}} where p 0 {displaystyle p_{0}} is the maximum contact pressure given by p 0 = 3 F 2 a 2 = 1 ( 6 F E 2 R 2 ) 1 / 3 {displaystyle p_{0}={cfrac {3F}{2pi a^{2}}}={cfrac {1}{pi }}left({cfrac {6F{E^{*}}^{2}}{R^{2}}}right)^{1/3}} The radius of the circle is related to the applied load F {displaystyle F} by the equation a 3 = 3 F R 4 E {displaystyle a^{3}={cfrac {3FR}{4E^{*}}}} The depth of indentation d {displaystyle d} is related to the maximum contact pressure by d = a 2 R = ( 9 F 2 16 E 2 R ) 1 / 3 {displaystyle d={cfrac {a^{2}}{R}}=left({cfrac {9F^{2}}{16{E^{*}}^{2}R}}right)^{1/3}} The maximum shear stress occurs in the interior at z 0.49 a {displaystyle zapprox 0.49a} for = 0.33 {displaystyle nu =0.33} . CONTACT BETWEEN TWO SPHERES Contact between two spheres. Contact between two crossed cylinders of equal radius. For contact between two spheres of radii R 1 {displaystyle R_{1}} and R 2 {displaystyle R_{2}} , the area of contact is a circle of radius a {displaystyle a} . The equations are the same as for a sphere in contact with a half plane except that the effective radius R {displaystyle R} is defined as 1 R = 1 R 1 + 1 R 2 {displaystyle {frac {1}{R}}={frac {1}{R_{1}}}+{frac {1}{R_{2}}}} CONTACT BETWEEN TWO CROSSED CYLINDERS OF EQUAL RADIUS R {DISPLAYSTYLE R} This is equivalent to contact between a sphere of radius R {displaystyle R} and a plane . CONTACT BETWEEN A RIGID CYLINDER WITH FLAT-ENDED AND AN ELASTIC HALF-SPACE Contact between a rigid cylindrical indenter and an elastic half-space. If a rigid cylinder is pressed into an elastic half-space, it creates a pressure distribution described by p ( r ) = p 0 ( 1 r 2 a 2 ) 1 / 2 {displaystyle p(r)=p_{0}left(1-{frac {r^{2}}{a^{2}}}right)^{-1/2}} where a {displaystyle a} is the radius of the cylinder and p 0 = 1 E d a {displaystyle p_{0}={frac {1}{pi }}E^{*}{frac {d}{a}}} The relationship between the indentation depth and the normal force is given by F = 2 a E d {displaystyle F=2aE^{*}d,} CONTACT BETWEEN A RIGID CONICAL INDENTER AND AN ELASTIC HALF-SPACE Contact between a rigid conical indenter and an elastic half-space. In the case of indentation of an elastic half-space of Young's modulus E {displaystyle E} using a rigid conical indenter, the depth of the contact region {displaystyle epsilon } and contact radius a {displaystyle a} are related by = a tan {displaystyle epsilon =atan theta } with {displaystyle theta } defined as the angle between the plane and the side surface of the cone. The total indentation depth d {displaystyle d} is given by: d = 2 {displaystyle d={frac {pi }{2}}epsilon } The total force is F = E 2 ( 1 2 ) a 2 tan = 2 E ( 1 2 ) d 2 tan {displaystyle F={frac {pi E}{2left(1-nu ^{2}right)}}a^{2}tan theta ={frac {2E}{pi left(1-nu ^{2}right)}}{frac {d^{2}}{tan theta }}} The pressure distribution is given by p ( r ) = E d a ( 1 2 ) ln ( a r + ( a r ) 2 1 ) = E d a ( 1 2 ) cosh 1 ( a r ) {displaystyle p{left(rright)}={frac {Ed}{pi aleft(1-nu ^{2}right)}}ln left({frac {a}{r}}+{sqrt {left({frac {a}{r}}right)^{2}-1}}right)={frac {Ed}{pi aleft(1-nu ^{2}right)}}cosh ^{-1}left({frac {a}{r}}right)} The stress has a logarithmic singularity at the tip of the cone. CONTACT BETWEEN TWO CYLINDERS WITH PARALLEL AXES Contact between two cylinders with parallel axes In contact between two cylinders with parallel axes, the force is linearly proportional to the length of cylinders _L_ and to the indentation depth _d_: F = 4 E L d {displaystyle F={frac {pi }{4}}E^{*}Ld} The radii of curvature are entirely absent from this relationship. The contact radius is described through the usual relationship a = R d {displaystyle a={sqrt {Rd}}} with 1 R = 1 R 1 + 1 R 2 {displaystyle {frac {1}{R}}={frac {1}{R_{1}}}+{frac {1}{R_{2}}}} as in contact between two spheres. The maximum pressure is equal to p 0 = ( E F L R ) 1 / 2 {displaystyle p_{0}=left({frac {E^{*}F}{pi LR}}right)^{1/2}} BEARING CONTACT Main article:
The contact in the case of bearings is often a contact between a convex surface (male cylinder or sphere) and a concave surface (female cylinder or sphere: bore or hemispherical cup ). THE METHOD OF DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION Contact between a sphere and an elastic half-space and one-dimensional replaced model. Some contact problems can be solved with the Method of Dimensionality Reduction (MDR). In this method, the initial three-dimensional system is replaced with a contact of a body with a linear elastic or viscoelastic foundation (see Fig). The properties of one-dimensional systems coincide exactly with those of the original three-dimensional system, if the form of the bodies is modified and the elements of the foundation are defined according to the rules of the MDR. However, for exact analytical results, it is required that the contact problem is axisymmetric and the contacts are compact. HERTZIAN THEORY OF NON-ADHESIVE ELASTIC CONTACT The classical theory of contact focused primarily on non-adhesive contact where no tension force is allowed to occur within the contact area, i.e., contacting bodies can be separated without adhesion forces. Several analytical and numerical approaches have been used to solve contact problems that satisfy the no-adhesion condition. Complex forces and moments are transmitted between the bodies where they touch, so problems in contact mechanics can become quite sophisticated. In addition, the contact stresses are usually a nonlinear function of the deformation. To simplify the solution procedure, a frame of reference is usually defined in which the objects (possibly in motion relative to one another) are static. They interact through surface tractions (or pressures/stresses) at their interface. As an example, consider two objects which meet at some surface S {displaystyle S} in the ( x {displaystyle x} , y {displaystyle y} )-plane with the z {displaystyle z} -axis assumed normal to the surface. One of the bodies will experience a normally-directed pressure distribution p z = p ( x , y ) = q z ( x , y ) {displaystyle p_{z}=p(x,y)=q_{z}(x,y)} and in-plane surface traction distributions q x = q x ( x , y ) {displaystyle q_{x}=q_{x}(x,y)} and q y = q y ( x , y ) {displaystyle q_{y}=q_{y}(x,y)} over the region S {displaystyle S} . In terms of a Newtonian force balance, the forces: P z = S p ( x , y ) d A ; Q x = S q x ( x , y ) d A ; Q y = S q y ( x , y ) d A {displaystyle P_{z}=int _{S}p(x,y)~mathrm {d} A~;~~Q_{x}=int _{S}q_{x}(x,y)~mathrm {d} A~;~~Q_{y}=int _{S}q_{y}(x,y)~mathrm {d} A} must be equal and opposite to the forces established in the other body. The moments corresponding to these forces: M x = S y p ( x , y ) d A ; M y = S x p ( x , y ) d A ; M z = S d A {displaystyle M_{x}=int _{S}y~p(x,y)~mathrm {d} A~;~~M_{y}=int _{S}x~p(x,y)~mathrm {d} A~;~~M_{z}=int _{S}~mathrm {d} A} are also required to cancel between bodies so that they are kinematically immobile. ASSUMPTIONS IN HERTZIAN THEORY The following assumptions are made in determining the solutions of HERTZIAN contact problems: * The strains are small and within the elastic limit. * The surfaces are continuous and non-conforming (implying that the area of contact is much smaller than the characteristic dimensions of the contacting bodies). * Each body can be considered an elastic half-space. * The surfaces are frictionless. Additional complications arise when some or all these assumptions are violated and such contact problems are usually called NON-HERTZIAN. ANALYTICAL SOLUTION TECHNIQUES Contact between two spheres. Analytical solution methods for non-adhesive contact problem can be classified into two types based on the geometry of the area of contact. A CONFORMING CONTACT is one in which the two bodies touch at multiple points before any deformation takes place (i.e., they just "fit together"). A NON-CONFORMING CONTACT is one in which the shapes of the bodies are dissimilar enough that, under zero load, they only touch at a point (or possibly along a line). In the non-conforming case, the contact area is small compared to the sizes of the objects and the stresses are highly concentrated in this area. Such a contact is called _concentrated_, otherwise it is called _diversified_. A common approach in linear elasticity is to superpose a number of
solutions each of which corresponds to a point load acting over the
area of contact. For example, in the case of loading of a half-plane ,
the
Point Contact On A (2D) Half-plane Main article:
A starting point for solving contact problems is to understand the effect of a "point-load" applied to an isotropic, homogeneous, and linear elastic half-plane, shown in the figure to the right. The problem may be either plane stress or plane strain . This is a boundary value problem of linear elasticity subject to the traction boundary conditions : x z ( x , 0 ) = 0 ; z ( x , z ) = P ( x , z ) {displaystyle sigma _{xz}(x,0)=0~;~~sigma _{z}(x,z)=-Pdelta (x,z)} where ( x , z ) {displaystyle delta (x,z)} is the Dirac delta function . The boundary conditions state that there are no shear stresses on the surface and a singular normal force P is applied at (0,0). Applying these conditions to the governing equations of elasticity produces the result x x = 2 P x 2 z ( x 2 + z 2 ) 2 z z = 2 P z 3 ( x 2 + z 2 ) 2 x z = 2 P x z 2 ( x 2 + z 2 ) 2 {displaystyle {begin{aligned}sigma _{xx}&=-{frac {2P}{pi }}{frac {x^{2}z}{(x^{2}+z^{2})^{2}}}\sigma _{zz}&=-{frac {2P}{pi }}{frac {z^{3}}{(x^{2}+z^{2})^{2}}}\sigma _{xz} width:24.052ex; height:19.843ex;" alt="{begin{aligned}sigma _{{xx}}&=-{frac {2P}{pi }}{frac {x^{2}z}{(x^{2}+z^{2})^{2}}}\sigma _{{zz}}&=-{frac {2P}{pi }}{frac {z^{3}}{(x^{2}+z^{2})^{2}}}\sigma _{{xz}}"> ( x , y ) {displaystyle (x,y)} , in the half-plane. The circle shown in the figure indicates a surface on which the maximum shear stress is constant. From this stress field, the strain components and thus the displacements of all material points may be determined. Line Contact On A (2D) Half-plane Normal Loading Over A Region ( a , b ) {displaystyle (a,b)} Suppose, rather than a point load P {displaystyle P} , a distributed load p ( x ) {displaystyle p(x)} is applied to the surface instead, over the range a 2 z a b p ( x ) ( x x ) 2 d x 2 ; z z = 2 z 3 a b p ( x ) d x 2 x z = 2 z 2 a b p ( x ) ( x x ) d x 2 {displaystyle {begin{aligned}sigma _{xx}~~sigma _{zz}=-{frac {2z^{3}}{pi }}int _{a}^{b}{frac {p(x'),dx'}{^{2}}}\sigma _{xz} width:71.628ex; height:13.509ex;" alt="{begin{aligned}sigma _{{xx}}&=-{frac {2z}{pi }}int _{a}^{b}{frac {p(x)(x-x)^{2},dx}{^{2}}}~;~~sigma _{{zz}}=-{frac {2z^{3}}{pi }}int _{a}^{b}{frac {p(x),dx}{^{2}}}\sigma _{{xz}}&=-{frac {2z^{2}}{pi }}int _{a}^{b}{frac {p(x)(x-x),dx}{^{2}}}end{aligned}}" /> Shear Loading Over A Region ( a , b ) {displaystyle (a,b)} The same principle applies for loading on the surface in the plane of the surface. These kinds of tractions would tend to arise as a result of friction. The solution is similar the above (for both singular loads Q {displaystyle Q} and distributed loads q ( x ) {displaystyle q(x)} ) but altered slightly: x x = 2 a b q ( x ) ( x x ) 3 d x 2 ; z z = 2 z 2 a b q ( x ) ( x x ) d x 2 x z = 2 z a b q ( x ) ( x x ) 2 d x 2 {displaystyle {begin{aligned}sigma _{xx}~~sigma _{zz}=-{frac {2z^{2}}{pi }}int _{a}^{b}{frac {q(x')(x-x'),dx'}{^{2}}}\sigma _{xz} width:70.736ex; height:13.509ex;" alt="{begin{aligned}sigma _{{xx}}&=-{frac {2}{pi }}int _{a}^{b}{frac {q(x)(x-x)^{3},dx}{^{2}}}~;~~sigma _{{zz}}=-{frac {2z^{2}}{pi }}int _{a}^{b}{frac {q(x)(x-x),dx}{^{2}}}\sigma _{{xz}}&=-{frac {2z}{pi }}int _{a}^{b}{frac {q(x)(x-x)^{2},dx}{^{2}}}end{aligned}}" /> These results may themselves be superposed onto those given above for normal loading to deal with more complex loads. Point Contact On A (3D) Half-space Analogously to the
NUMERICAL SOLUTION TECHNIQUES Distinctions between conforming and non-conforming contact do not have to be made when numerical solution schemes are employed to solve contact problems. These methods do not rely on further assumptions within the solution process since they base solely on the general formulation of the underlying equations . Besides the standard equations describing the deformation and motion of bodies two additional inequalities can be formulated. The first simply restricts the motion and deformation of the bodies by the assumption that no penetration can occur. Hence the gap h {displaystyle h} between two bodies can only be positive or zero h 0 {displaystyle hgeq 0} where g N = 0 {displaystyle g_{N}=0} denotes contact. The second assumption in contact mechanics is related to the fact, that no tension force is allowed to occur within the contact area (contacting bodies can be lifted up without adhesion forces). This leads to an inequality which the stresses have to obey at the contact interface. It is formulated for the normal stress n = t n {displaystyle sigma _{n}=mathbf {t} cdot mathbf {n} } . At locations where there is contact between the surfaces the gap is zero, i.e. h = 0 {displaystyle h=0} , and there the normal stress is different than zero, indeed, n 0 , n 0 , n h = 0 . {displaystyle hgeq 0,,quad sigma _{n}leq 0,,quad sigma _{n},h=0,.} These conditions are valid in a general way. The mathematical formulation of the gap depends upon the kinematics of the underlying theory of the solid (e.g., linear or nonlinear solid in two- or three dimensions, beam or shell model). By restating the normal stress n {displaystyle sigma _{n}} in terms of the contact pressure, p {displaystyle p} , i.e., p = n {displaystyle p=-sigma _{n}} the Kuhn-Tucker problem can be restated as in standard complementarity form, i.e. h 0 , p 0 , p h = 0 . {displaystyle hgeq 0,,quad pgeq 0,,quad p,h=0,.} In the linear elastic case the gap can be formulated as h = h 0 + g + u , {displaystyle {h}=h_{0}+{g}+u,} where h 0 {displaystyle h_{0}} is the rigid body separation, g {displaystyle g} is the geometry/topography of the contact (cylinder and roughness) and u {displaystyle u} is the elastic deformation/deflection. If the contacting bodies are approximated as linear elastic half spaces, the Boussinesq-Cerruti integral equation solution can be applied to express the deformation ( u {displaystyle u} ) as a function of the contact pressure ( p {displaystyle p} ), i.e., u = K ( x s ) p ( s ) d s , {displaystyle u=int _{infty }^{infty }K(x-s)p(s)ds,} where K ( x s ) = 2 E ln x s {displaystyle K(x-s)={frac {2}{pi E^{*}}}ln x-s} for line loading of an elastic half space and K ( x s ) = 1 E 1 ( x 1 s 1 ) 2 + ( x 2 s 2 ) 2 {displaystyle K(x-s)={frac {1}{pi E^{*}}}{frac {1}{sqrt {(x_{1}-s_{1})^{2}+(x_{2}-s_{2})^{2}}}}} for point loading of an elastic half-space. After discretization the linear elastic contact mechanics problem can be stated in standard Linear Complementarity Problem (LCP) form. h = h 0 + g + C p , h p = 0 , p 0 , h 0 , {displaystyle {begin{array}{c}mathbf {h} =mathbf {h_{0}+g+Cp} ,\mathbf {hcdot p=0} ,,,,mathbf {pgeq 0,,,,hgeq 0} ,\end{array}}} where C {displaystyle mathbf {C} } is a matrix, whose elements are so called influence coefficients relating the contact pressure and the deformation. The strict LCP formulation of the CM problem presented above, allows for direct application of well-established numerical solution techniques such as Lemke\'s pivoting algorithm . The Lemke algorithm has the advantage that it finds the numerically exact solution within a finite number of iterations. The MATLAB implementation presented by Almqvist et al. is one example that can be employed to solve the problem numerically. In addition, an example code for an LCP solution of a 2D linear elastic contact mechanics problem has also been made public at MATLAB file exchange by Almqvist et al. CONTACT BETWEEN ROUGH SURFACES When two bodies with rough surfaces are pressed into each other, the true contact area A {displaystyle A} is much smaller than the apparent contact area A 0 {displaystyle A_{0}} . The mechanics of contacting rough surfaces are discussed in terms of normal contact mechanics and static frictional interactions. Natural and engineering surfaces typically exhibit roughness features, known as aperities, across a broad range of length scales down to the molecular level, with surface structures exhibiting self affinity, also known as surface fractality . It is recognized that the self affine structure of surfaces is the origin of the linear scaling of true contact area with applied pressure and the consequent linearity of the relationship between static friction and applied normal force. In contact between a "random rough" surface and an elastic half-space, the true contact area is related to the normal force F {displaystyle F} by A = E h F {displaystyle A={frac {kappa }{E^{*}h'}}F} with h {displaystyle h'} equal to the root mean square (also known as the quadratic mean) of the surface slope and 2 {displaystyle kappa approx 2} . The median pressure in the true contact surface p a v = F A 1 2 E h {displaystyle p_{mathrm {av} }={frac {F}{A}}approx {frac {1}{2}}E^{*}h'} can be reasonably estimated as half of the effective elastic modulus E {displaystyle E^{*}} multiplied with the root mean square of the surface slope h {displaystyle h'} . For the situation where the asperities on the two surfaces have a Gaussian height distribution and the peaks can be assumed to be spherical, the average contact pressure is sufficient to cause yield when p a v = 1.1 y 0.39 0 {displaystyle p_{mathrm {av} }=1.1sigma _{y}approx 0.39sigma _{0}} where y {displaystyle sigma _{y}} is the uniaxial yield stress and 0 {displaystyle sigma _{0}} is the indentation hardness. Greenwood and Williamson defined a dimensionless parameter {displaystyle Psi } called the PLASTICITY INDEX that could be used to determine whether contact would be elastic or plastic. The Greenwood-Williamson model requires knowledge of two statistically dependent quantities; the standard deviation of the surface roughness and the curvature of the asperity peaks. An alternative definition of the plasticity index has been given by Mikic. Yield occurs when the pressure is greater than the uniaxial yield stress. Since the yield stress is proportional to the indentation hardness 0 {displaystyle sigma _{0}} , Micic defined the plasticity index for elastic-plastic contact to be = E h 0 > 2 3 . {displaystyle Psi ={frac {E^{*}h'}{sigma _{0}}}>{tfrac {2}{3}}~.} In this definition {displaystyle Psi } represents the micro-roughness in a state of complete plasticity and only one statistical quantity, the rms slope, is needed which can be calculated from surface measurements. For |

Time at 25056882.85, Busy percent: -84.679217209605

***************** NOT Too Busy at 25056882.85 3logs/periodic-service_log.txt