In mathematics, the closure of a subset ''S'' of points in a topological space consists of all points in ''S'' together with all limit points of ''S''. The closure of ''S'' may equivalently be defined as the union of ''S'' and its boundary, and also as the intersection of all closed sets containing ''S''. Intuitively, the closure can be thought of as all the points that are either in ''S'' or "near" ''S''. A point which is in the closure of ''S'' is a point of closure of ''S''. The notion of closure is in many ways dual to the notion of interior.


Point of closure

For S a subset of a Euclidean space, x is a point of closure of S if every open ball centered at x contains a point of S (this point may be x itself). This definition generalizes to any subset S of a metric space X. Fully expressed, for X a metric space with metric d, x is a point of closure of S if for every r > 0 there exists some s \in S such that the distance d(x, s) < r (again, x = s is allowed). Another way to express this is to say that x is a point of closure of S if the distance d(x, S) := \inf_ d(x, s) = 0. This definition generalizes to topological spaces by replacing "open ball" or "ball" with "neighbourhood". Let S be a subset of a topological space X. Then x is a or of S if every neighbourhood of x contains a point of S. Note that this definition does not depend upon whether neighbourhoods are required to be open.

Limit point

The definition of a point of closure is closely related to the definition of a limit point. The difference between the two definitions is subtle but important – namely, in the definition of limit point, every neighbourhood of the point x in question must contain a point of the set . The set of all limit points of a set S is called the Thus, every limit point is a point of closure, but not every point of closure is a limit point. A point of closure which is not a limit point is an isolated point. In other words, a point x is an isolated point of S if it is an element of S and if there is a neighbourhood of x which contains no other points of S other than x itself. For a given set S and point x, x is a point of closure of S if and only if x is an element of S or x is a limit point of S (or both).

Closure of a set

The of a subset S of a topological space (X, \tau), denoted by \operatorname_ S or possibly by \operatorname_X S (if \tau is understood), where if both X and \tau are clear from context then it may also be denoted by \operatorname S, \overline, or S ^ (moreover, \operatorname is sometimes capitalized to \operatorname) can be defined using any of the following equivalent definitions:
  1. \operatorname S is the set of all points of closure of S.
  2. \operatorname S is the set S together with all of its limit points.
  3. \operatorname S is the intersection of all closed sets containing S.
  4. \operatorname S is the smallest closed set containing S.
  5. \operatorname S is the union of S and its boundary \partial(S).
  6. \operatorname S is the set of all x \in X for which there exists a net (valued) in S that converges to x in (X, \tau).
The closure of a set has the following properties. * \operatorname S is a closed superset of S * The set S is closed if and only if S = \operatorname S * If S \subseteq T then \operatorname S is a subset of \operatorname T. * If A is a closed set, then A contains S if and only if A contains \operatorname S. Sometimes the second or third property above is taken as the of the topological closure, which still make sense when applied to other types of closures (see below). In a first-countable space (such as a metric space), \operatorname S is the set of all limits of all convergent sequences of points in S. For a general topological space, this statement remains true if one replaces "sequence" by "net" or "filter". Note that these properties are also satisfied if "closure", "superset", "intersection", "contains/containing", "smallest" and "closed" are replaced by "interior", "subset", "union", "contained in", "largest", and "open". For more on this matter, see closure operator below.


Consider a sphere in 3 dimensions. Implicitly there are two regions of interest created by this sphere; the sphere itself and its interior (which is called an open 3-ball). It is useful to be able to distinguish between the interior of 3-ball and the surface, so we distinguish between the open 3-ball, and the closed 3-ball – the closure of the 3-ball. The closure of the open 3-ball is the open 3-ball plus the surface. In topological space: * In any space, \varnothing = \operatorname \varnothing. * In any space X, X = \operatorname X. Giving \mathbb and \mathbb the standard (metric) topology: * If X is the Euclidean space \mathbb of real numbers, then \operatorname_X ((0, 1)) = , 1 * If X is the Euclidean space \mathbb then the closure of the set \mathbb of rational numbers is the whole space \mathbb. We say that \mathbb is dense in \mathbb. * If X is the complex plane \mathbb = \mathbb^2, then \operatorname_X \left( \ \right) = \. * If S is a finite subset of a Euclidean space X, then \operatorname_X S = S. (For a general topological space, this property is equivalent to the T1 axiom.) On the set of real numbers one can put other topologies rather than the standard one. * If X = \mathbb is endowed with the lower limit topology, then \operatorname_X ((0, 1)) = , 1). * If one considers on X = \mathbb the [[discrete topology in which every set is closed (open), then \operatorname_X ((0, 1)) = (0, 1). * If one considers on X = \mathbb the [[trivial topology]] in which the only closed (open) sets are the empty set and \mathbb itself, then \operatorname_X ((0, 1)) = \mathbb. These examples show that the closure of a set depends upon the topology of the underlying space. The last two examples are special cases of the following. * In any discrete space, since every set is closed (and also open), every set is equal to its closure. * In any indiscrete space X, since the only closed sets are the empty set and X itself, we have that the closure of the empty set is the empty set, and for every non-empty subset A of X, \operatorname_X A = X. In other words, every non-empty subset of an indiscrete space is dense. The closure of a set also depends upon in which space we are taking the closure. For example, if X is the set of rational numbers, with the usual relative topology induced by the Euclidean space \mathbb, and if S = \, then S is both closed and open in \mathbb because neither S nor its complement can contain \sqrt2, which would be the lower bound of S, but cannot be in S because \sqrt2 is irrational. So, S has no well defined closure due to boundary elements not being in \mathbb. However, if we instead define X to be the set of real numbers and define the interval in the same way then the closure of that interval is well defined and would be the set of all greater than \sqrt2.

Closure operator

A on a set X is a mapping of the power set of X, \mathcal(X), into itself which satisfies the Kuratowski closure axioms. Given a topological space (X, \tau), the topological closure induces a function \operatorname_X : \wp(X) \to \wp(X) that is defined by sending a subset S \subseteq X to \operatorname_X S, where the notation \overline or S^ may be used instead. Conversely, if \mathbb is a closure operator on a set X, then a topological space is obtained by defining the closed sets as being exactly those subsets S \subseteq X that satisfy \mathbb(S) = S (so complements in X of these subsets form the open sets of the topology). The closure operator \operatorname_X is dual to the interior operator, which is denoted by \operatorname_X, in the sense that :\operatorname_X S = X \setminus \operatorname_X (X \setminus S), and also :\operatorname_X S = X \setminus \operatorname_X (X \setminus S). Therefore, the abstract theory of closure operators and the Kuratowski closure axioms can be readily translated into the language of interior operators by replacing sets with their complements in X. In general, the closure operator does not commute with intersections. However, in a complete metric space the following result does hold:

Facts about closures

A subset S is closed in X if and only if \operatorname_X S = S. In particular: * The closure of the empty set is the empty set; * The closure of X itself is X. * The closure of an intersection of sets is always a subset of (but need not be equal to) the intersection of the closures of the sets. * In a union of finitely many sets, the closure of the union and the union of the closures are equal; the union of zero sets is the empty set, and so this statement contains the earlier statement about the closure of the empty set as a special case. * The closure of the union of infinitely many sets need not equal the union of the closures, but it is always a superset of the union of the closures. If A is a subspace of X containing S, then the closure of S computed in A is equal to the intersection of A and the closure of S computed in X: \operatorname_A S = A \cap \operatorname_X S. In particular, S is dense in A if and only if A is a subset of \operatorname_X S.

Categorical interpretation

One may elegantly define the closure operator in terms of universal arrows, as follows. The powerset of a set X may be realized as a partial order category P in which the objects are subsets and the morphisms are inclusions A \to B whenever A is a subset of B. Furthermore, a topology T on X is a subcategory of P with inclusion functor I : T \to P. The set of closed subsets containing a fixed subset A \subseteq X can be identified with the comma category (A \downarrow I). This category — also a partial order — then has initial object \operatorname A. Thus there is a universal arrow from A to I, given by the inclusion A \to \operatorname A.. Similarly, since every closed set containing X \setminus A corresponds with an open set contained in A we can interpret the category (I \downarrow X \setminus A) as the set of open subsets contained in A, with terminal object \operatorname(A), the interior of A. All properties of the closure can be derived from this definition and a few properties of the above categories. Moreover, this definition makes precise the analogy between the topological closure and other types of closures (for example algebraic), since all are examples of universal arrows.

See also

* * * * *



* * * * * * * *

External links

* {{DEFAULTSORT:Closure (Topology) Category:General topology Category:Closure operators