Vedarthasamgraha
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

The ''Vedarthasamgraha'' (), also rendered ''Vedarthasangraha'', is a treatise by the
Hindu Hindus (; ) are people who religiously adhere to Hinduism.Jeffery D. Long (2007), A Vision for Hinduism, IB Tauris, , pages 35–37 Historically, the term has also been used as a geographical, cultural, and later religious identifier for ...
philosopher Ramanuja, comprising his exegesis of a number of ''Upanishad''ic texts. The first of his three major works, Ramanuja propounds the doctrine of the Vishishtadvaita philosophy in this work and offers a discourse on the concepts of '' Brahman,
bhakti ''Bhakti'' ( sa, भक्ति) literally means "attachment, participation, fondness for, homage, faith, love, devotion, worship, purity".See Monier-Williams, ''Sanskrit Dictionary'', 1899. It was originally used in Hinduism, referring to d ...
'', and '' moksha'' in '' Vedanta'' philosophy.


Etymology

''Vedarthasamgraha'' literally means "summary of the meaning of the ''Veda''" in Sanskrit.


Content

The ''Vedarthasamgraha'' begins with the exaltation of the deity Vishnu, traditional in Vaishnava works of his period.


Criticism of Advaita

The work is noteworthy for its criticism of Adi Shankara's Advaita philosophy. He offers a number of arguments to oppose the postulations of Advaita: * Ramanuja argues that since Advaita claims that all is ''mithya'' (illusory), there is nothing that is required to be known. He regards this to be incompatible with the Advaita notion that all things are known with the knowledge of Brahman; either the Brahman and its effect are both real or both unreal. Instead, he supports the ontology of Vishishtadvaita, which claims that everything in the world possesses Brahman as the central aspect of its self, making these two statements compatible. * He offers scriptural evidence from ''Shruti'' texts that Brahman possesses attributes such as knowledge rather than being a force of pure consciousness, rejecting the non-dualism of Advaita in favour of the qualified non-dualism of Vishishtadvaita. * He opposes the notion that the nature of Brahman is clouded by '' avidya'' (ignorance), positing that ''avidya'' as a concept would not be able to explain its illusory nature on its own; if ''avidya'' were real, the non-duality of the philosophy would no longer stand true. He uses the same argument to oppose the notion that ''avidya'' is eliminated with the knowledge of Brahman (''nivritti anupapatti'') or knowledge obtained from Vedanta (''nivartaka anupapatti''). * He attempts to refute the notion of a single '' Jiva'' (life force), called ''eka jiva vada'', arguing that since Advaitins hold that the individual self and all bodies as distinct from Brahman are illusory, the existence of a single Jiva would also be illusory. * He challenges the idea that knowledge of unity allows one to realise that Brahman alone is real, which dispels all illusion. He posits that since the ''Shruti'' texts are by definition illusory according to Advaita, as ''avidya'' themselves, they would be incapable of dispelling ''avidya''.


Criticism of Bhedabheda

Ramanuja also offers a critique of the school of Bhaskara called Bhedabheda. He contests the idea that Brahman assumes the form of many ''Jiva''s due to ''
upadhi Upādhi () is a term in Hindu philosophy meaning "imposition" or "limitation". In Hindu logic, an upādhi is the condition which accompanies the major term and must be supplied to limit the too general middle term. For instance, "the mountain has ...
''s (limitations), reasoning that the faults caused by the upadhis contradict the flawless nature of Brahman as described by the scriptures. He also opposes the belief that the essential nature of Brahman's ''svarupa'' (essence) evolves into ''achetana'' (non-sentient objects), which conflicts with the unchanging nature of Brahman. He also opposes the Bhedabheda school of Yadavaprakasa, one of his teachers, which posited that that the individual self and Brahman are both really different and non-different, arguing that the very concept is inherently contradictory.


Treatise on Vishishtadvaita

The author propounds the principles and concepts underlying the philosophy of Vishishtadvaita in the latter half of the work. He begins with the ontological basis of the philosophy, called '' tattva'', explaining the relationship between ''Brahman'', ''Jiva'', and ''Prakrti''. He then explores ''
upaya Upaya (Sanskrit: उपाय, , ''expedient means'', ''pedagogy'') is a term used in Buddhism to refer to an aspect of guidance along the Buddhist paths to liberation where a conscious, voluntary action "is driven by an incomplete reasoning" a ...
'', the means of achieving Brahman through ''parabhakti'' (supreme devotion). He offers assertions for the validity of ''pramanas'' (sources of knowledge) and arguments for the belief that Narayana (Vishnu) is the Para Brahman (Supreme Reality). This is followed by a discourse that seeks to prove that Brahman is both the ''upadana karana'' (material cause) and ''nimitta karana'' (instrumental cause) of creation. He criticises the Mimamsa philosophy for its opposition to the ''Upanishads'' as a valid source of knowledge. He affirms the existence of Vaikuntha, the celestial abode of Vishnu, referred to as Nitya Vibhuti and Paramapada, on scriptural basis. In the final chapter of the work, he offers a recapitulation and his interpretation of the ''Vedas''.{{Cite book , last=Ayyangar M. R. Rajagopala. , url=http://archive.org/details/dli.ernet.506168 , title=Vedartha Sangraha Of Sri Ramanuja (1956) , date=1956 , publisher=The Cauveri Colour Press. , pages=v–vi


See also

* '' Siddhitraya'' * ''Sri Bhashya'' * ''
Gita Bhashya The ''Gita Bhashya'' (), also rendered the ''Bhagavad Gita Bhashya'', is a commentary or treatise of the ''Bhagavad Gita'' by the Hindu philosopher Ramanuja. The work asserts the deity Vishnu to be the ''parat-tattva'' (supreme truth), and de ...
''


References

Medieval literature Vaishnava texts Hindu literature Vishishtadvaita Vedanta