Radical Line

In Euclidean geometry, the radical axis of two non-concentric circles is the set of points whose power with respect to the circles are equal. For this reason the radical axis is also called the power line or power bisector of the two circles. In detail:

For two circles with centers and radii the powers of a point with respect to the circles are
:$\Pi_1(P)=, PM_1, ^2 - r_1^2,\qquad \Pi_2(P)= , PM_2, ^2 - r_2^2.$
Point belongs to the radical axis, if
: $\Pi_1(P)=\Pi_2(P).$
If the circles have two points in common, the radical axis is the common secant line of the circles.

If point is outside the circles, has equal tangential distance to both the circles.

If the radii are equal, the radical axis is the line segment bisector of .

In any case the radical axis is a line perpendicular to $\overline.$

;On notations
The notation ''radical axis'' was used by the French mathematician M. Chasles as ''axe radical''.

J.V. Poncelet used .

J. Plücker introduced the term .

J. Steiner called the radical axis ''line of equal powers'' (german: Linie der gleichen Potenzen) which led to ''power line'' ().

Properties

Geometric shape and its position

Let $\vec x,\vec m_1,\vec m_2$ be the position vectors of the points $P,M_1,M_2$. Then the defining equation of the radical line can be written as:
:$(\vec x-\vec m_1)^2-r_1^2=(\vec x-\vec m_2)^2-r_2^2 \quad \leftrightarrow \quad 2\vec x\cdot(\vec m_2-\vec m_1)+\vec m_1^2-\vec m_2^2+r_2^2-r_1^2=0$

From the right equation one gets
* The pointset of the radical axis is indeed a ''line'' and is ''perpendicular'' to the line through the circle centers.
($\vec m_2-\vec m_1$ is a normal vector to the radical axis !)

Dividing the equation by $2, \vec m_2-\vec m_1,$, one gets the Hessian normal form. Inserting the position vectors of the centers yields the distances of the centers to the radical axis:
:$d_1 = \frac\ ,\qquad d_2 = \frac$,
:with $d = , M_1 M_2,$.
($d_i$ may be negative if $L$ is not between $M_1,M_2$.)

If the circles are intersecting at two points, the radical line runs through the common points. If they only touch each other, the radical line is the common tangent line.

Special positions

* The radical axis of two intersecting circles is their common secant line.
:The radical axis of two touching circles is their common tangent.
:The radical axis of two ''non'' intersecting circles is the common secant of two convenient equipower circles (see below).

Orthogonal circles

*For a point $P$ outside a circle $c_i$ and the two tangent points $S_i,T_i$ the equation $, PS_i, ^2=, PT_i, ^2=\Pi_i(P)$ holds and $S_i,T_i$ lie on the circle $c_o$ with center $P$ and radius $\sqrt$. Circle $c_o$ intersects $c_i$ orthogonal. Hence:
:If $P$ is a point of the radical axis, then the four points $S_1,T_1, S_2,T_2$ lie on circle $c_o$, which intersects the given circles $c_1,c_2$ ''orthogonally''.
* The radical axis consists of all ''centers of circles'', which intersect the given circles orthogonally.

System of orthogonal circles

The method described in the previous section for the construction of a pencil of circles, which intersect two given circles orthogonally, can be extended to the construction of two orthogonally intersecting systems of circles:

Let $c_1,c_2$ be two apart lying circles (as in the previous section), $M_1,M_2,r_1,r_2$ their centers and radii and $g_$ their radical axis. Now, all circles will be determined with centers on line
$\overline$, which have together with $c_1$ line $g_$ as radical axis, too. If $\gamma_2$ is such a circle, whose center has distance $\delta$ to the center $M_1$ and radius $\rho_2$. From the result in the previous section one gets the equation
:$d_1=\frac \quad$, where $d_1>r_1$ are fixed.
With $\delta_2=\delta-d_1$ the equation can be rewritten as:
:$\delta_2^2=d_1^2-r_1^2+\rho_2^2$.

If radius $\rho_2$ is given, from this equation one finds the distance $\delta_2$ to the (fixed) radical axis of the new center. In the diagram the color of the new circles is purple. Any green circle (see diagram) has its center on the radical axis and intersects the circles $c_1,c_2$ orthogonally and hence all new circles (purple), too. Choosing the (red) radical axis as y-axis and line $\overline$ as x-axis, the two pencils of circles have the equations:
:purple: $\ \ \ (x-\delta_2)^2+y^2=\delta_2^2+r_1^2-d_1^2$
:green: $\ x^2+(y-y_g)^2=y_g^2+d_1^2-r_1^2\ .$
($\; (0,y_g)$ is the center of a green circle.)

Properties:

a) Any two green circles intersect on the x-axis at the points $P_=\big(\pm\sqrt,0\big)$, the ''poles'' of the orthogonal system of circles. That means, the x-axis is the radical line of the green circles.

b) The purple circles have no points in common. But, if one considers the real plane as part of the complex plane, then any two purple circles intersect on the y-axis (their common radical axis) at the points $Q_=\big(0,\pm i \sqrt\big)$.


Special cases:

a) In case of $d_1=r_1$ the green circles are touching each other at the origin with the x-axis as common tangent and the purple circles have the y-axis as common tangent. Such a system of circles is called ''coaxal parabolic circles'' (see below).

b) Shrinking $c_1$ to its center $M_1$, i. e. $r_1=0$, the equations turn into a more simple form and one gets $M_1=P_1$.

Conclusion:

a) For any real $w$ the pencil of circles
:$\;c(\xi):\; (x-\xi)^2+y^2-\xi^2-w=0\ :$
:has the property: The y-axis is the ''radical axis'' of $c(\xi_1),c(\xi_2)$.
:In case of $w>0$ the circles $c(\xi_1),c(\xi_2)$ intersect at points $P_=(0,\pm\sqrt w)$.
:In case of $w<0$ they have no points in common.
:In case of $w=0$ they touch at $(0,0)$ and the y-axis is their common tangent.

b) For any real $w$ the two pencils of circles
:$c_1(\xi):\; (x-\xi)^2+y^2-\xi^2-w=0\ ,$
:$c_2(\eta):\; x^2+(y-\eta)^2-\eta^2 + w=0 \$
:form a ''system of orthogonal circles''. That means: any two circles $c_1(\xi),c_2(\eta)$ intersect orthogonally.
c) From the equations in b), one gets a coordinate free representation:

:For the given points $P_1,P_2$, their midpoint $O$ and their line segment bisector $g_$ the two equations
::$, XM, ^2=, OM, ^2-, OP_1, ^2\ ,$
::$, XN, ^2=, ON, ^2+, OP_1, ^2=, NP_1, ^2$
:with $M$ on $\overline$, but not between $P_1,P_2$, and $N$ on $g_$
:describe the orthogonal system of circles uniquely determined by $P_1,P_2$ which are the poles of the system.
:For $P_1=P_2=O$ one has to prescribe the axes $a_1,a_2$ of the system, too. The system is ''parabolic'':
::$, XM, ^2=, OM, ^2\ , \quad , XN, ^2=, ON, ^2$
:with $M$ on $a_1$ and $N$ on $a_2$.

Straightedge and compass construction:

A system of orthogonal circles is determined uniquely by its poles $P_1,P_2$:
#The axes (radical axes) are the lines $\overline$ and the Line segment bisector $g_$ of the poles.
#The circles (green in the diagram) through $P_1,P_2$ have their centers on $g_$. They can be drawn easily. For a point $N$ the radius is $\;r_N=, NP_1, \;$.
#In order to draw a circle of the second pencil (in diagram blue) with center $M$ on $\overline$, one determines the radius $r_M$ applying the theorem of Pythagoras: $\; r_M^2=, OM, ^2-, OP_1, ^2\;$ (see diagram).
In case of $P_1=P_2$ the axes have to be chosen additionally. The system is parabolic and can be drawn easily.

Coaxal circles

Definition and properties:

Let $c_1,c_2$ be two circles and $\Pi_1,\Pi_2$ their power functions. Then for any $\lambda\ne 1$
* $\Pi_1(x,y)-\lambda\Pi_2(x,y)=0$
is the equation of a circle $c(\lambda)$ (see below). Such a system of circles is called coaxal circles generated by the circles $c_1,c_2$.
(In case of $\lambda=1$ the equation describes the radical axis of $c_1,c_2$.)

The power function of $c(\lambda)$ is
:$\ \Pi(\lambda,x,y)=\frac$.
The ''normed'' equation (the coefficients of $x^2,y^2$ are $1$) of $c(\lambda)$ is $\ \Pi(\lambda,x,y)=0$.

A simple calculation shows:
* $c(\lambda),c(\mu),\ \lambda\ne\mu\ ,$ have the same radical axis as $c_1,c_2$.

Allowing $\lambda$ to move to infinity, one recognizes, that $c_1,c_2$ are members of the system of coaxal circles: $c_1=c(0),\; c_2=c(\infty)$.

(E): If $c_1,c_2$ ''intersect'' at two points $P_1,P_2$, any circle $c(\lambda)$ contains $P_1,P_2$, too, and line $\overline$ is their common radical axis. Such a system is called ''elliptic''.

(P): If $c_1,c_2$ are ''tangent'' at $P$, any circle is tangent to $c_1,c_2$ at point $P$, too. The common tangent is their common radical axis. Such a system is called ''parabolic''.

(H): If $c_1,c_2$ have ''no point in common'', then any pair of the system, too. The radical axis of any pair of circles is the radical axis of $c_1,c_2$. The system is called ''hyperbolic''.

In detail:

Introducing coordinates such that
:$c_1: (x-d_1)^2+y^2=r_1^2$
:$c_2: (x-d_2)^2+y^2= d_2^2+r_1^2-d_1^2$,
then the y-axis is their radical axis (see above).

Calculating the power function $\Pi(\lambda,x,y)$ gives the normed circle equation:
:$c(\lambda): \ x^2+y^2-2\tfrac\; x +d_1^2-r_1^2=0\ .$
Completing the square and the substitution
$\delta_2=\tfrac$ (x-coordinate of the center) yields the centered form of the equation
:$c(\lambda): \ (x-\delta_2)^2+y^2=\delta_2^2+r_1^2-d_1^2$.
In case of $r_1>d_1$ the circles $c_1,c_2,c(\lambda)$ have the two points
:$P_1=\big(0,\sqrt\big),\quad P_2=\big(0,-\sqrt\big)$
in common and the system of coaxal circles is ''elliptic''.

In case of $r_1=d_1$ the circles $c_1,c_2,c(\lambda)$ have point $P_0=(0,0)$ in common and the system is ''parabolic''.

In case of r_1 the circles $c_1,c_2,c(\lambda)$ have no point in common and the system is ''hyperbolic''.

Alternative equations:

1) In the defining equation of a coaxal system of circles there can be used multiples of the power functions, too.

2) The equation of one of the circles can be replaced by the equation of the desired radical axis. The radical axis can be seen as a circle with an infinitely large radius. For example:
:$(x-x_1)^2+y^2-r^2_1\ - \ \lambda\; 2(x-x_2)\ =0\ \Leftrightarrow$
:$(x-(x_1+\lambda))^2+y^2 =(x_1+\lambda)^2+r_1^2-x_1^2-2\lambda x_2$,
describes all circles, which have with the first circle the line $x=x_2$ as radical axis.

3) In order to express the equal status of the two circles, the following form is often used:
:$\mu\Pi_1(x,y)+\nu\Pi_2(x,y)=0\; .$
But in this case the representation of a circle by the parameters $\mu,\nu$ is ''not unique''.

Applications:

a) Circle inversions and Möbius transformations preserve angles and ''generalized'' circles. Hence orthogonal systems of circles play an essential role with investigations on these mappings.

b) In electromagnetism coaxal circles appear as field lines.

Radical center of three circles, construction of the radical axis

*For three circles $c_1,c_2,c_3$, no two of which are concentric, there are three radical axes $g_,g_,g_$. If the circle centers do not lie on a line, the radical axes intersect in a common point $R$, the ''radical center'' of the three circles. The orthogonal circle centered around $R$ of two circles is orthogonal to the third circle, too (''radical circle'').
:Proof: the radical axis $g_$ contains all points which have equal tangential distance to the circles $c_i,c_k$. The intersection point $R$ of $g_$ and $g_$ has the same tangential distance to all three circles. Hence $R$ is a point of the radical axis $g_$, too.
:This property allows one to ''construct'' the radical axis of two non intersecting circles $c_1,c_2$ with centers $M_1,M_2$: Draw a third circle $c_3$ with center not collinear to the given centers that intersects $c_1,c_2$. The radical axes $g_,g_$ can be drawn. Their intersection point is the radical center $R$ of the three circles and lies on $g_$. The line through $R$ which is perpendicular to $\overline$ is the radical axis $g_$.

Additional construction method:

All points which have the same power to a given circle $c$ lie on a circle concentric to $c$. Let us call it an ''equipower circle''. This property can be used for an additional construction method of the radical axis of two circles:

For two non intersecting circles $c_1,c_2$, there can be drawn two equipower circles $c'_1,c'_2$, which have the same power with respect to $c_1,c_2$ (see diagram). In detail: $\Pi_1(P_1)=\Pi_2(P_2)$. If the power is large enough, the circles $c'_1,c'_2$ have two points in common, which lie on the radical axis $g_$.

Relation to bipolar coordinates

In general, any two disjoint, non-concentric circles can be aligned with the circles of a system of bipolar coordinates. In that case, the radical axis is simply the $y$-axis of this system of coordinates. Every circle on the axis that passes through the two foci of the coordinate system intersects the two circles orthogonally. A maximal collection of circles, all having centers on a given line and all pairs having the same radical axis, is known as a pencil of coaxal circles.

Radical center in trilinear coordinates

If the circles are represented in trilinear coordinates in the usual way, then their radical center is conveniently given as a certain determinant. Specifically, let ''X'' = ''x'' : ''y'' : ''z'' denote a variable point in the plane of a triangle ''ABC'' with sidelengths ''a'' = , ''BC'', , ''b'' = , ''CA'', , ''c'' = , ''AB'', , and represent the circles as follows:

:(''dx + ey + fz'')(''ax + by + cz'') + ''g''(''ayz + bzx + cxy'') = 0

:(''hx + iy + jz'')(''ax + by + cz'') + ''k''(''ayz + bzx + cxy'') = 0

:(''lx + my + nz'')(''ax + by + cz'') + ''p''(''ayz + bzx + cxy'') = 0

Then the radical center is the point

:$\det \beging&k&p\\ e&i&m\\f&j&n\end : \det \beging&k&p\\ f&j&n\\d&h&l\end : \det \beging&k&p\\ d&h&l\\e&i&m\end.$

Radical plane and hyperplane

The radical plane of two nonconcentric spheres in three dimensions is defined similarly: it is the locus of points from which tangents to the two spheres have the same length.Se
Merriam–Webster online dictionary
The fact that this locus is a plane follows by rotation in the third dimension from the fact that the radical axis is a straight line.

The same definition can be applied to hyperspheres in Euclidean space of any dimension, giving the radical hyperplane of two nonconcentric hyperspheres.

Notes

References

*

Further reading

*
*
* Clark Kimberling, "Triangle Centers and Central Triangles," ''Congressus Numerantium'' 129 (1998) i–xxv, 1–295.

External links

*
* {{mathworld, ChordalTheorem, Chordal theorem

Animation
at Cut-the-knot

Circles
Elementary geometry
Analytic geometry