Optical theorem

In physics, the optical theorem is a general law of wave scattering theory, which relates the forward scattering amplitude of the scatterer. It is usually written in the form
:$\sigma_\mathrm=\frac~\mathrm\,f(0),$
where (0) is the scattering amplitude in the incident direction.

Because the optical theorem is derived using only conservation of energy, or in quantum mechanics from conservation of probability, the optical theorem is widely applicable and, in quantum mechanics, $\sigma_\mathrm$ includes both elastic and inelastic scattering.

The generalized optical theorem, first derived by Werner Heisenberg, allows for arbitrary outgoing directions ''k:
:$\int f(\mathbf',\mathbf'')f(\mathbf'',\mathbf)~d\mathbf''=\frac\mathrm~f(\mathbf', \mathbf).$
The original optical theorem is recovered by letting $\mathbf'=\mathbf$.

History

The optical theorem was originally developed independently by Wolfgang Sellmeier and Lord Rayleigh in 1871.Strutt, J. W. (1871). XV. On the light from the sky, its polarization and colour. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 41(271), 107-120. Lord Rayleigh recognized the forward scattering amplitude as
:$n = 1 + 2\pi \frac$
(where is the number density of scatterers),
which he used in a study of the color and polarization of the sky.

The equation was later extended to quantum scattering theory by several individuals, and came to be known as the Bohr–Peierls–Placzek relation after a 1939 paper. It was first referred to as the "optical theorem" in print in 1955 by Hans Bethe and Frederic de Hoffmann, after it had been known as a "well known theorem of optics" for some time.

Derivation

The theorem can be derived rather directly from a treatment of a scalar wave. If a plane wave is incident along positive z axis on an object, then the wave scattering amplitude gives us

:$r=\sqrt\approx z+\frac.$

We would now like to use the fact that the intensity is proportional to the square of the amplitude $\psi$. Approximating $1/r$ as $1/z$, we have

:$\begin , \psi, ^2 &\approx \left, e^+\frace^e^\^2 \\ &= 1+\frace^+\frace^+\frac. \end$

If we drop the $1/z^2$ term and use the fact that $c+c^*=2\operatorname$, we have

:$, \psi, ^2 \approx 1+2\operatorname.$

Now suppose we integrate over a screen far away in the ''xy'' plane, which is small enough for the small-angle approximations to be appropriate, but large enough that we can integrate the intensity over $-\infty$ to $\infty$ in ''x'' and ''y'' with negligible error. In optics, this is equivalent to summing over many fringes of the diffraction pattern. To further simplify matters, let's approximate $f(\theta)=f(0)$. We obtain

:\int , \psi, ^2\,dx\,dy \approx A +2\operatorname\left frac\int_^ e^dx\int_^ e^dy\right

where ''A'' is the area of the surface integrated over. Although these are improper integrals, by suitable substitutions the exponentials can be transformed into complex Gaussians and the definite integrals evaluated resulting in:

:\begin
\int , \psi, ^2\,da &= A + 2\operatorname\left frac\,\frac\right\\
&= A - \frac\,\operatorname (0)\end

This is the probability of reaching the screen if none were scattered, lessened by an amount (4\pi/k)\operatorname (0)/math>, which is therefore the effective scattering cross section of the scatterer.

See also

* S-matrix

References

*
* {{cite book , author=John David Jackson , author-link=John David Jackson (physicist) , title=Classical Electrodynamics , publisher=Hamilton Printing Company , year=1999 , isbn=0-471-30932-X

Scattering theory
Scattering, absorption and radiative transfer (optics)
Physics theorems