Mineralogy V Western Australia
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

''Mineralogy v Western Australia'' was a case heard by the
High Court of Australia The High Court of Australia is Australia's apex court. It exercises Original jurisdiction, original and appellate jurisdiction on matters specified within Constitution of Australia, Australia's Constitution. The High Court was established fol ...
at the same time as ''Palmer v Western Australia'' in 2020 and 2021, which held that the ''Iron Ore Processing (Mineralogy Pty Ltd) Agreement Amendment Act 2020'' was not invalid or inoperative in its entirety.


Background

In 2002, the Western Australian government and Clive Palmer entered into an agreement—the ''Iron Ore Processing (Mineralogy Pty Ltd) Agreement Act 2002,'' as permitted under the ''Government Agreements Act 1979''—which established the mining rights of Palmer and seven of his companies in Western Australia. In 2012, the WA government declined to assess
Mineralogy Mineralogy is a subject of geology specializing in the scientific study of the chemistry, crystal structure, and physical (including optical) properties of minerals and mineralized artifacts. Specific studies within mineralogy include the proces ...
's Balmoral South iron ore mining proposal. Arbitration decisions in 2014 and 2018 were favourable to Palmer and Mineralogy, with the company initiating a third arbitration in July 2020 in which it claimed up to $30 billion in damages stemming from the WA Government's decision not to approve the Balmoral South proposal. In response to the claim, which the
Premier Premier is a title for the head of government in central governments, state governments and local governments of some countries. A second in command to a premier is designated as a deputy premier. A premier will normally be a head of governm ...
Mark McGowan said would be equivalent to "every man, woman, and child in the state owing $12,000 each" or the entire annual state budget, the WA introduced passed emergency legislation to block it. The ''Iron Ore Processing (Mineralogy Pty Ltd) Agreement Amendment Act 2020'' was passed on 13 August 2020 by the Upper House of the WA parliament after being argued for ten hours, with royal assent given by WA Governor Kim Beazley at 10.30pm. Shortly after it passed, Palmer said that he would take WA to the High Court. Writs of summons were issued on 14 September 2020 and 18 September 2020 for ''Palmer v Western Australia'' and ''Mineralogy v Western Australia'' respectively. At a hearing on 30 September 2020 before Kiefel CJ, it was decided that they were to be heard together, as they had "so many common issues".


Decision

The High Court's unanimous decision was handed down on 13 October 2021, with its reasons published the same day. The court found that the ''Iron Ore Processing (Mineralogy Pty Ltd) Agreement Amendment Act 2020'' was not invalid or inoperative in its entirety, and that sections 9(1), 9(2), and 10(4-7) were not invalid or inoperative to any extent. Sub-questions answered by the court, each of which were answered "No", were:


Consequences

As a result of the court's decision, the ''Iron Ore Processing (Mineralogy Pty Ltd) Agreement Amendment Act 2020'' continued in force, with WA shielded from the $28 billion damages claim. Premier McGowan said on Facebook that "Time and time again, Clive Palmer has attempted to bring our state down — first, by challenging the hard border that kept Western Australians safe through a pandemic, and then by launching an outrageous legal claim for damages", and "Today's win is proof that our government will never stop fighting for the people of Western Australia." McGowan also said that had the claim for damages been upheld, it would have bankrupted WA. Attorney-General John Quigley called the claim for damages "ridiculous" and that the legislation passed was to "stop this greedy grab for Western Australia's money which would have been doubling our debt". Palmer and Mineralogy were required to pay costs, which according to Quigley were $2 million on top of $1 million already incurred over the High Court challenge to the WA hard border in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. McGowan labelled Palmer an " enemy of the state".


See also

*
Palmer v Western Australia ''Palmer v Western Australia'' was a case heard by the High Court of Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic, which held that the ''Quarantine (Closing the Border) Directions'' and the authorising legislation, the ''Emergency Management Act 2005'' ...
– High Court challenge over the WA hard border


References

{{reflist


External links


Case B52/2020 : Palmer & Anor v. The State of Western Australia & Anor; Mineralogy Pty Ltd & Anor v. State of Western Australia
High Court of Australia cases 2020 in Australian law 2021 in Australian law 2020 in case law 2021 in case law