Lepidodendron

''Lepidodendron'' is an extinct genus of primitive vascular plants belonging to the family Lepidodendraceae, part of a group of Lycopodiopsida known as scale trees or arborescent lycophytes, related to quillworts and lycopsids (club mosses). They were part of the coal forest flora. They sometimes reached heights of , and the trunks were often over in diameter. They thrived during the Carboniferous Period (358.9 to 298.9 million years ago). Sometimes erroneously called "giant club mosses", the genus was actually more closely related to modern quillworts than to modern club mosses. Within the form classification system used within paleobotany, ''Lepidodendron'' is both used for the whole plant as well as specifically the stems and leaves.

Etymology

The name ''Lepidodendron'' comes from the Greek λεπίς ', scale, and δένδρον ''dendron'', tree.

Growth

During the early stages of growth, ''Lepidodendron'' grew as single, unbranched trunk, with leaves growing out of the scale leaf bases (cushions). Towards the end of the trees growth, the leaves on the lower part of the trunk were shed, and in ''Lepidodendron'', the upper part of the trunk dichotomously branched into a crown.

Description and biology

''Lepidodendron'' species were comparable in size to modern trees. The plants had tapering trunks as wide as at their base that rose to about
and even ,
arising from an underground system of horizontally spreading branches that were covered with many rootlets. Though the height of the trees make the plants similar to modern trees, the constant dichotomy of branches created a habit that contrasts with that of modern trees. At the ends of branches were oval-shaped cones that had a similar shape to modern cones of a spruce or fir.

The stem of the trees had a unifacial vascular cambium, contrasting with the bifacial vascular cambium of modern trees. Though the bifacial cambium of modern trees produces both secondary phloem and xylem, the unifacial cambium of ''Lepidodendron'' trees produced only secondary xylem. As the trees aged, the wood produced by the unifacial cambium decreased towards the top of the plant such that terminal twigs resembled young ''Lepidodendron'' stems. Compared to modern trees, the stems and branches of the trees contained little wood with the majority of mature stems consisting of a massive cortical meristem. The nearly-uniform growth of this cortical tissue indicates no difference in growth during changing seasons, and the absence of dormant buds further indicates the lack of seasonality in ''Lepidodendron'' species. The outermost cortex of oldest stems developed into the bark-like lycopodiopsid periderm. The bark of the trees was somewhat similar to that of ''Picea'' species, as leaf scars formed peg-like projections that stretched and tore as the bark stretched. To resist the bending force of wind, ''Lepidodendron'' trees depended on their outer bark rather than their vascular tissues, as compared to modern trees that rely mostly on their central mass of wood.

The leaves of the trees were needle-like and were densely spiraled about young shoots, each possessing only a single vein. The leaves were similar to those of a fir in some species and similar to those of '' Pinus roxburghii'' in others, though in general the leaves of ''Lepidodendron'' species are indistinguishable from those of '' Sigillaria'' species. The decurrent leaves formed a cylindrical shell around branches. The leaves were only present on thin and young branches, indicating that, though the trees were evergreen, they did not retain their needles for as long as modern conifers. The leaf-cushions were fusiform and elongated, growing at most to a length of and a width of . The middle of leaf-cushions were smooth, where leaf scars were created when an abscission layer cut a leaf from its base. Each leaf scar was composed of a central circular or triangular scar and two lateral scars that were smaller and oval-shaped. This central scar marks where the main vascular bundle of the leaf connected to the vascular system of the stem. This xylem bundle was composed only of primary trachea. The two outer scars mark the forked branches of a strand of vascular tissue that passed from the cortex of the stem into the leaf. This forked strand is sometimes referred to as the "parichnos". Surrounding this strand were parenchyma cells and occasionally thick-walled elements. Surrounding both conducting tissues was a broad sheath of transfusion tracheids. Below the leaf scar the leaf-cushion tapered to a basal position. In this tapering area, circular impressions with fine pits were present. These impressions were continuous with the parichnos scars near the top of the tapering portion. This is because the impressions are formed by aerenchyma tissue that developed in closely with the parichnos. Above the leaf scar was a deep triangular impression known as the "ligular pit" for its similarities to the ligule of '' Isoetes''. In some leaf-cushions a second depression was present above the ligular pit. Though its purpose is unclear, it has been suggested that the depression may mark the position of a sporangium. As the branch of a ''Lepidodendron'' tree grew the leaf-cushion only grew to a certain extent, past which the leaf-cushion stretched. This stretching widened the groove that separated the leaf-cushions, creating a broad, flat channel.

Hyphae are occasionally present in the tissues of ''Lepidodendron'' trees, indicating the presence of mycorrhizal associations.

Different fossil genera have been described to name the various levels of decay in ''Lepidodendron'' bark fossils. The name ''Bergeria'' describes stems that have lost their epidermises, ''Aspidiariu'' is used when cushions have been removed by deep decay, and ''Knorria'' is used when the leaf cushions and the majority of cortical tissues has decayed, with a shallow "fluted" surface remaining. However, it has been suggested that these are more likely growth forms than preserved bark types, as entire fossilized trunks have been discovered with dissimilar forms; if decay is assumed to be constant throughout the trunk, then different forms indicate growth rather than levels of decay. It is likely that the trunk of ''Lepidodendron'' trees were subject to the growth forms ''Knorria'', ''Aspidiaria'', and ''Bergeria'' progressing up the trunk, respectively.

Reproduction

''Lepidodendron'' species had a life cycle of 10 to 15 years composed of a growth cycle, in which the trees grew to a predetermined height, and a subsequent reproductive cycle, in which the trees produced reproductive organs, after which the trees died, similar to the life cycle of a Mauna Kea silversword.

Rather than reproduce with seeds, ''Lepidodendron'' trees reproduced with spores. The spores were stored in sporangia situated on fertile stems that grew on or near the main trunk. The fertile stems grew together in cone-like structures that clustered at the tips of branches.

Distribution

The lack of growth rings and of dormant buds indicate no seasonal growth patterns and modern plants with similar characteristics tend to grow in tropical conditions, but ''Lepidodendron'' species were distributed throughout subtropical conditions. The trees inhabited an extensive area compared to tropical flora of the same time period, with trees growing as far north as Spitsbergen and as far south as South America, in a latitudinal range of 120°.

Decline and extinction

By the Mesozoic era, the giant lycopsids had died out and were replaced by conifers as well as smaller quillworts.
This may have been the result of competition from the emerging woody gymnosperms. ''Lepidodendron'' is one of the more common plant fossils found in Pennsylvanian-age (Late Carboniferous) rocks. They are closely related to other extinct lycopsid genera, '' Sigillaria'' and '' Lepidendropsis''.

See also

* Archaeopteris
* Evolutionary history of plants
* Fossil Grove
* Glossopteris
* Stigmaria

References

Further reading

*
*
* "Plant fossils of the British Coal Measures" by Christopher J.Cleal and Barry A.Thomas, publ. The Palaeontological Association, London, 1994, 222 pages,
* J. M. Anderson and H. M. Anderson. 1985. Palaeoflora of Southern Africa. Prodromus of South African Megafloras Devonian to Lower Cretaceous 1-423

{{Taxonbar, from=Q576530

Prehistoric lycophytes
Prehistoric trees
Pennsylvanian plants
Carboniferous life of North America
Fossils of Georgia (U.S. state)
Paleozoic life of New Brunswick
Paleozoic life of Newfoundland and Labrador
Paleozoic life of the Northwest Territories
Paleozoic life of Nova Scotia
Paleozoic life of Nunavut
Paleozoic life of Quebec
Permian Africa
Fossils of South Africa
Paleozoic life of Oceania
Permian life of Australia
Fossils of Australia
Paleozoic life of Asia
Permian China
Fossils of China
Fossils of Indonesia
Fossils of North Korea
Fossils of Oman
Fossils of South Korea
Paleozoic life of Europe
Fossils of Italy
Fossil taxa described in 1820
Prehistoric lycophyte genera