|
Subcountable
In constructive mathematics, a collection X is subcountable if there exists a partial surjection from the natural numbers onto it. This may be expressed as \exists (I\subseteq).\, \exists f.\, (f\colon I\twoheadrightarrow X), where f\colon I\twoheadrightarrow X denotes that f is a surjective function from a I onto X. The surjection is a member of \rightharpoonup X and here the subclass I of is required to be a set. In other words, all elements of a subcountable collection X are functionally in the image of an indexing set of counting numbers I\subseteq and thus the set X can be understood as being dominated by the countable set . Note that nomenclature of countability and finiteness properties vary substantially, historically. The discussion here concerns the property defined in terms of surjections onto the set in question. Discussion Example An important case is where X denotes some subclass of a bigger class of functions as studied in computability theory. Consider the ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Constructive Set Theory
Constructive set theory is an approach to mathematical constructivism following the program of axiomatic set theory. The same first-order language with "=" and "\in" of classical set theory is usually used, so this is not to be confused with a constructive types approach. On the other hand, some constructive theories are indeed motivated by their interpretability in type theories. In addition to rejecting the principle of excluded middle (), constructive set theories often require some logical quantifiers in their axioms to be bounded, motivated by results tied to impredicativity. Introduction Constructive outlook Use of intuitionistic logic The logic of the set theories discussed here is constructive in that it rejects , i.e. that the disjunction \phi \lor \neg \phi automatically holds for all propositions. As a rule, to prove the excluded middle for a proposition P, i.e. to prove the particular disjunction P \lor \neg P, either P or \neg P needs to be explicitly prov ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Cantor's Diagonal Argument
In set theory, Cantor's diagonal argument, also called the diagonalisation argument, the diagonal slash argument, the anti-diagonal argument, the diagonal method, and Cantor's diagonalization proof, was published in 1891 by Georg Cantor as a mathematical proof that there are infinite sets which cannot be put into one-to-one correspondence with the infinite set of natural numbers. English translation: Such sets are now known as uncountable sets, and the size of infinite sets is now treated by the theory of cardinal numbers which Cantor began. The diagonal argument was not Cantor's first proof of the uncountability of the real numbers, which appeared in 1874. However, it demonstrates a general technique that has since been used in a wide range of proofs, including the first of Gödel's incompleteness theorems and Turing's answer to the '' Entscheidungsproblem''. Diagonalization arguments are often also the source of contradictions like Russell's paradox and Richard's paradox ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Constructive Mathematics
In the philosophy of mathematics, constructivism asserts that it is necessary to find (or "construct") a specific example of a mathematical object in order to prove that an example exists. Contrastingly, in classical mathematics, one can prove the existence of a mathematical object without "finding" that object explicitly, by assuming its non-existence and then deriving a contradiction from that assumption. Such a proof by contradiction might be called non-constructive, and a constructivist might reject it. The constructive viewpoint involves a verificational interpretation of the existential quantifier, which is at odds with its classical interpretation. There are many forms of constructivism. These include the program of intuitionism founded by Brouwer, the finitism of Hilbert and Bernays, the constructive recursive mathematics of Shanin and Markov, and Bishop's program of constructive analysis. Constructivism also includes the study of constructive set theories such as CZF ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Church's Thesis (constructive Mathematics)
In constructive mathematics, Church's thesis is an axiom stating that all total functions are computable functions. This principle has formalizations in various mathematical frameworks. The similarly named Church–Turing thesis states that every effectively calculable function is a computable function. The constructivist variant is stronger in the sense that with it any function is computable. For any property \exists y. \varphi(x,y) proven not to be validated for all x in a computable manner, the contrapositive of the axiom implies that this then not validated by a total functional at all. So adopting restricts the notion of ''function'' to that of ''computable function''. The axiom is clearly incompatible with systems that prove the existence of functions also proven not to be computable. For example, Peano arithmetic is such a system. Concretely, the constructive Heyting arithmetic with as an additional axiom is able to disprove some instances of variants of the princ ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Martin-Löf Type Theory
Intuitionistic type theory (also known as constructive type theory, or Martin-Löf type theory) is a type theory and an alternative Foundations of mathematics, foundation of mathematics. Intuitionistic type theory was created by Per Martin-Löf, a Sweden, Swedish mathematician and philosopher, who first published it in 1972. There are multiple versions of the type theory: Martin-Löf proposed both Intensional logic, intensional and extensionality, extensional variants of the theory and early impredicative versions, shown to be inconsistent by Girard's paradox, gave way to Predicativity, predicative versions. However, all versions keep the core design of constructive logic using dependent types. Design Martin-Löf designed the type theory on the principles of mathematical constructivism. Constructivism requires any existence proof to contain a "witness". So, any proof of "there exists a prime greater than 1000" must identify a specific number that is both prime and greater than ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Apartness Relation
In constructive mathematics, an apartness relation is a constructive form of inequality, and is often taken to be more basic than equality. It is often written as \# (⧣ in unicode) to distinguish from the negation of equality (the ''denial inequality'') \neq, which is weaker. Description An apartness relation is a symmetric irreflexive binary relation with the additional condition that if two elements are apart, then any other element is apart from at least one of them (this last property is often called ''co-transitivity'' or ''comparison''). That is, a binary relation \# is an apartness relation if it satisfies:. # \neg\;(x \# x) # x \# y \;\to\; y \# x # x \# y \;\to\; (x \# z \;\vee\; y \# z) The complement of an apartness relation is an equivalence relation, as the above three conditions become reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. If this equivalence relation is in fact equality, then the apartness relation is called ''tight''. That is, \# is a if it additionally s ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Ordinal Analysis
In proof theory, ordinal analysis assigns ordinals (often large countable ordinals) to mathematical theories as a measure of their strength. If theories have the same proof-theoretic ordinal they are often equiconsistent, and if one theory has a larger proof-theoretic ordinal than another it can often prove the consistency of the second theory. History The field of ordinal analysis was formed when Gerhard Gentzen in 1934 used cut elimination to prove, in modern terms, that the proof-theoretic ordinal of Peano arithmetic is ε0. See Gentzen's consistency proof. Definition Ordinal analysis concerns true, effective (recursive) theories that can interpret a sufficient portion of arithmetic to make statements about ordinal notations. The proof-theoretic ordinal of such a theory T is the supremum of the order types of all ordinal notations (necessarily recursive, see next section) that the theory can prove are well founded—the supremum of all ordinals \alpha for wh ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Negation Introduction
Negation introduction is a rule of inference, or transformation rule, in the field of propositional calculus. Negation introduction states that if a given antecedent implies both the consequent and its complement, then the antecedent is a contradiction. Formal notation This can be written as: (P \rightarrow Q) \land (P \rightarrow \neg Q) \rightarrow \neg P An example of its use would be an attempt to prove two contradictory statements from a single fact. For example, if a person were to state "Whenever I hear the phone ringing I am happy" and then state "Whenever I hear the phone ringing I am ''not'' happy", one can infer that the person never hears the phone ringing. Many proofs by contradiction use negation introduction as reasoning scheme: to prove ¬''P'', assume for contradiction ''P'', then derive from it two contradictory inferences ''Q'' and ¬''Q''. Since the latter contradiction renders ''P'' impossible, ¬''P'' must hold. Proof References {{DEFAULTSORT: ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Characteristic Function
In mathematics, the term "characteristic function" can refer to any of several distinct concepts: * The indicator function of a subset, that is the function ::\mathbf_A\colon X \to \, :which for a given subset ''A'' of ''X'', has value 1 at points of ''A'' and 0 at points of ''X'' − ''A''. * There is an indicator function for affine varieties over a finite field: given a finite set of functions f_\alpha \in \mathbb_q _1,\ldots,x_n/math> let V = \left\ be their vanishing locus. Then, the function P(x) = \prod\left(1 - f_\alpha(x)^\right) acts as an indicator function for V. If x \in V then P(x) = 1, otherwise, for some f_\alpha, we have f_\alpha(x) \neq 0, which implies that f_\alpha(x)^ = 1, hence P(x) = 0. * The characteristic function in convex analysis, closely related to the indicator function of a set: *:\chi_A (x) := \begin 0, & x \in A; \\ + \infty, & x \not \in A. \end * In probability theory, the characteristic function of any probability distribution on ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Power Set
In mathematics, the power set (or powerset) of a set is the set of all subsets of , including the empty set and itself. In axiomatic set theory (as developed, for example, in the ZFC axioms), the existence of the power set of any set is postulated by the axiom of power set. The powerset of is variously denoted as , , , \mathbb(S), or . The notation , meaning the set of all functions from S to a given set of two elements (e.g., ), is used because the powerset of can be identified with, equivalent to, or bijective to the set of all the functions from to the given two elements set. Any subset of is called a ''family of sets'' over . Example If is the set , then all the subsets of are * (also denoted \varnothing or \empty, the empty set or the null set) * * * * * * * and hence the power set of is . Properties If is a finite set with the cardinality (i.e., the number of all elements in the set is ), then the number of all the subsets of is . This fact as we ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Axiom Of Infinity
In axiomatic set theory and the branches of mathematics and philosophy that use it, the axiom of infinity is one of the axioms of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. It guarantees the existence of at least one infinite set, namely a set containing the natural numbers. It was first published by Ernst Zermelo as part of his set theory in 1908.Zermelo: ''Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Mengenlehre'', 1907, in: Mathematische Annalen 65 (1908), 261-281; Axiom des Unendlichen p. 266f. Formal statement In the formal language of the Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms, the axiom reads: :\exists \mathbf \, ( \empty \in \mathbf \, \land \, \forall x \in \mathbf \, ( \, ( x \cup \ ) \in \mathbf ) ) . In words, there is a set I (the set which is postulated to be infinite), such that the empty set is in I, and such that whenever any ''x'' is a member of I, the set formed by taking the union of ''x'' with its singleton is also a member of I. Such a set is sometimes called an inductive set. I ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Axiom Schema Of Predicative Separation
In axiomatic set theory, the axiom schema of predicative separation, or of restricted, or Δ0 separation, is a schema of axioms which is a restriction of the usual axiom schema of separation in Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. This name Δ0 stems from the Lévy hierarchy, in analogy with the arithmetic hierarchy. Statement The axiom asserts only the existence of a subset of a set if that subset can be defined without reference to the entire universe of sets. The formal statement of this is the same as full separation schema, but with a restriction on the formulas that may be used: For any formula φ, :\forall x \; \exists y \; \forall z \; (z \in y \leftrightarrow z \in x \wedge \phi(z)) provided that φ contains only bounded quantifiers and, as usual, that the variable ''y'' is not free in it. So all quantifiers in φ, if any, must appear in the forms : \exists u \in v \; \psi(u) : \forall u \in v \; \psi(u) for some sub-formula ψ and, of course, ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
