St. Mark

Citations

1. ^ 2012.
2. ^
3. ^
4. ^
5. ^ 59. ISBN . Proto-orthodox Christians of the second century, some decades after most of the New Testament books had been written, claimed that their favorite Gospels had been penned by two of Jesus' disciples—Matthew, the tax collector, and John, the beloved disciple—and by two friends of the apostles—Mark, the secretary of Peter, and Luke, the travelling companion of Paul. Scholars today, however, find it difficult to accept this tradition for several reasons.
6. ^ 2023. 10. Just as historical critical scholars deny the Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch, so they also deny the authorship of the four Gospels by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. [...] But today, these persons are not thought to have been the actual authors.
7. ^
8. ^
9. ^ 59. ISBN .
10. ^
11. ^
12. ^
13. ^
14. ^ 3. ISBN .
15. ^
16. ^
17. ^
18. ^
19. ^
20. ^
21. ^
22. ^
23. ^
24. ^
25. ^
26. ^
27. ^
28. ^
29. ^ 2011. See drop-down essay on "Islamic Conquest and the Ottoman Empire"
30. ^ 2018.
31. ^
32. ^
33. ^ 2013.
34. ^
35. ^
36. ^
37. ^
38. ^
39. ^ 2023. Mark's knowledge even of Palestine's geography is likewise defective. [...] Kümmel (1975, p. 97) writes of Mark's "numerous geographical errors"
40. ^ 2023. Like the other synoptics, Mark's Gospel is anonymous. Whether it was originally so is, however, difficult to know. Nevertheless, we can be fairly certain that it was written by someone named Mark. [...] The difficulty is ascertaining the identity of Mark. Scholars debate [...] or another person simply named Mark who was not native to the region. Many scholars have opted for the latter option due to the Gospel's lack of understanding of Jewish laws (1:40–45; 2:23–28; 7:1–23), incorrect Palestinian geography (5:1–2, 12–13; 7:31), and concern for Gentiles (7:24–28:10) (e.g. Marcus 1999: 17–21)
41. ^ [...] Is it likely that a native of Palestine, as John Mark was, would have made such errors?" [...] Also, certain passages in the Gospel contain erroneous statements about Palestinian or Jewish practices."
42. ^ 110. ISBN .
43. ^ 87. ISBN . The insinuation that the evangelist was a dilettante on the geography and customs of Palestine is unwarranted. The Jerusalem John Mark may still be in the running as a candidate for authorship.
44. ^ 2023. suggest that the evangelist was a Hellenized Jew who lived outside of Palestine.
45. ^
46. ^
47. ^
48. ^
49. ^
50. ^ . Archived from the original(PDF) on 2016-07-05.
51. ^ . Ante-Nicene Christian Library, Volume I. Translated by Alexander Roberts; James Donaldson. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
52. ^
53. ^
54. ^
55. ^
56. ^
57. ^
58. ^
59. ^ 2009.
60. ^
61. ^.
62. ^.
63. ^.
64. ^.
65. ^
66. ^