Import duty

References

1. ^
2. ^ 366. JSTOR 2117691.
3. ^. Economists are famous for disagreeing with one another.... But economists reach near unanimity on some topics, including international trade.
4. ^ . Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review. 86 (5): 1. doi:10.20955/r.86.1-6. Archived(PDF) from the original on 2017-12-07. most observers agree that '[t]he consensus among mainstream economists on the desirability of free trade remains almost universal.'
5. ^.
6. ^ – via PBS News.
7. ^.
8. ^ . Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review. 86 (5): 2. doi:10.20955/r.86.1-6. Archived(PDF) from the original on 2017-12-07. One set of reservations concerns distributional effects of trade. Workers are not seen as benefiting from trade. Strong evidence exists indicating a perception that the benefits of trade flow to businesses and the wealthy, rather than to workers, and to those abroad rather than to those in the United States.
9. ^ 2021.
10. ^
11. ^ . The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2024: 1–45. doi:10.1162/rest_a_01498.
12. ^ 546. doi:10.1257/pandp.20201018. ISSN 2574-0768.
13. ^ . American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 17 (1): 208–238. doi:10.1257/app.20210051. ISSN 1945-7782.
14. ^ . American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 17 (4): 292–330. doi:10.1257/pol.20220472. ISSN 1945-7731.
15. ^
16. ^ 2025.
17. ^
18. ^
19. ^ . Development Theory at the Threshold of the Twenty-first Century. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. Archived from the original(PDF) on 2021-03-08.
20. ^
21. ^ 2007.
22. ^ 156. doi:10.1016/0014-4983(90)90007-L.
23. ^ 64.
24. ^ 203. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521820363.008. ISBN .
25. ^ . The Economic Journal. 131 (640): 3322–3337. doi:10.1093/ej/ueab029. ISSN 0013-0133.
26. ^
27. ^.
28. ^.
29. ^ 2018.
30. ^ . Financial Times.
31. ^.
32. ^.
33. ^.
34. ^ . Annual Review of Economics. 12 (1): 23–44.
35. ^
36. ^ 2025.
37. ^ 645. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9396.2005.00527.x.
38. ^ 2017.
39. ^ 2025.
40. ^ 665. ProQuest 905851675 2025.
41. ^
42. ^ Alice Fulwood is Wall Street editor of the Economist
43. ^.
44. ^.
45. ^
46. ^.
47. ^.
48. ^
49. ^ . Legislative Studies Quarterly. 28 (2): 147–177. doi:10.3162/036298003X200845.
50. ^ . American Economic Review. 108 (10): 2830–2867. doi:10.1257/aer.20161413.
51. ^
52. ^.
53. ^ 27. JSTOR 1910538.
54. ^
55. ^
56. ^
57. ^
58. ^
59. ^ 99. doi:10.1257/aer.89.3.379. ISSN 0002-8282.
60. ^.
61. ^
62. ^ . The World Bank Economic Review. 36 (2): 361–381. doi:10.1093/wber/lhab016. hdl:10986/36630. ISSN 0258-6770.
63. ^ (reviewed and summarized in Smith, Tyler. "Tariffs and local labor markets". American Economic Association.)
64. ^ 2023.
65. ^.
66. ^ 2023.
67. ^ . Archived(PDF) from the original on 2017-02-14.
68. ^
69. ^ . NBER Working Paper Series (21768). doi:10.3386/w21768.
70. ^ . OECD. 2005.
71. ^ . Globalization and Poverty. University of Chicago Press: 291–336.
72. ^ .
73. ^ 2017.
74. ^ 305. doi:10.1086/259517. JSTOR 1828905. S2CID 154784307.
75. ^
76. ^ 53. doi:10.2307/3867624. JSTOR 3867624.
77. ^ .
78. ^ . The Review of Economics and Statistics. 77 (4): 622–633. doi:10.2307/2109811. hdl:2142/29917. JSTOR 2109811.
79. ^ 2017.
80. ^ 2025.{{}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service ()
81. ^ 2025.
82. ^ 2025.
83. ^ 2025.
84. ^ 2025.
85. ^ 2017.
86. ^.
87. ^.
88. ^.
89. ^
90. ^{{}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service ()
91. ^ 2019.
92. ^ 2019.
93. ^ 2019.
94. ^ 2019.
95. ^ 2019.
96. ^ 2019.
97. ^.
98. ^.
99. ^
100. ^.
101. ^.
102. ^.
103. ^.
104. ^.
105. ^ 2018.
106. ^ 2018.
107. ^ 2018.
108. ^
109. ^ 2018.
110. ^.
111. ^ 2025.{{}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service ()
112. ^
113. ^.
114. ^{{}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service ()
115. ^
116. ^.
117. ^ 2007.
118. ^.
119. ^Primeros movimientos sociales chileno (1890–1920). Memoria Chilena. Archived 2012-03-08 at the Wayback Machine
120. ^
121. ^ , Sugars and Sugar Confectionery, U.S. Census Bureau, 2025, archived(PDF) from the original on 2025-02-03
122. ^
123. ^
124. ^ 4): 295–318. doi:10.1007/s10842-008-0036-z. ISSN 1566-1679.
125. ^