Convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide

References

1. ^ . United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law 2020.
2. ^ 2024.
3. ^
4. ^
5. ^ 2021.
6. ^
7. ^ 2021.
8. ^ 2023. The ICJ has also stated that the prohibition of genocide is a peremptory norm of international law (or ius cogens) and consequently, no derogation from it is allowed.
9. ^ 2022.
10. ^ 2026. And yet there are those who claim that the Armenians have no justiciable rights, because the Genocide Convention was only adopted [in] 1948, more than thirty years after the Armenian genocide, and because treaties are not normally applied retroactively. This, of course, is a fallacy, because the Genocide Convention was drafted and adopted precisely in the light of the Armenian genocide and in the light of the Holocaust.
11. ^
12. ^
13. ^ . Global Justice Center 2018. Archived from the original(PDF) on 17 June 2024.
14. ^
15. ^
16. ^ ; Fortify Rights; US Holocaust Memorial Museum (November 2017). 'They Tried to Kill Us All' Atrocity Crimes against Rohingya Muslims in Rakhine State, Myanmar (Report).
17. ^
18. ^ ; Human Rights Watch (24 September 1996). Shattered Lives: Sexual Violence during the Rwandan Genocide and its Aftermath (Report). p. 39. Archived from the original on 13 May 2024.
19. ^
20. ^ In practice, this could include deaths from the deliberate infection of Tutsi women with HIV/AIDS through rape in the Rwandan genocide or from the abuse and denial of food inflicted by ISIL on Yazidi sex slaves by ISIL's use of sexual slavery. To date, neither has been prosecuted as such.
21. ^
22. ^ 301.
23. ^ 29.
24. ^ 2021.
25. ^
26. ^
27. ^
28. ^
29. ^ 2016.
30. ^
31. ^
32. ^
33. ^
34. ^ 97.
35. ^ 290. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7093.1997.tb00032.x. S2CID 145335690.
36. ^ . University of Pennsylvania Law Review. doi:10.2139/SSRN.224298. S2CID 153350639. SSRN 224298. The United States attached a reservation to its ratification of the Genocide Convention, for example, stating that 'before any dispute to which the United States is a party may be submitted to the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice under [Article IX of the Convention], the specific consent of the United States is required in each case.'
37. ^ 2021.
38. ^
39. ^
40. ^
41. ^ 2022.
42. ^
43. ^
44. ^ 2008.
45. ^ . A copy of the ICJ judgement can be found hereArchived 28 February 2007 at the Wayback Machine
46. ^ 2021.
47. ^ 2021.
48. ^ 2021.
49. ^ . New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy; Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights. 27 May 2022. Archived(PDF) from the original on 16 June 2022 2022.
50. ^
51. ^
52. ^ 2022.
53. ^ 2024.
54. ^ . International Court of Justice 2024.
55. ^ 177. doi:10.4324/9781351157568-5 2025.
56. ^ . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 267. ISBN . where Stalin was presumably anxious to avoid his purges being subjected to genocidal scrutiny.
57. ^
58. ^
59. ^ 38.
60. ^ . J Paul Getty Trust. p. 24. Current or former colonial powers—Belgium, Denmark, France, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom—opposed the retention of references to cultural genocide in the draft convention. So did settler countries that had displaced indigenous peoples but otherwise were champions of the development of international human rights standards, including the United States, Canada, Sweden, Brazil, New Zealand, and Australia.
61. ^ . International Criminal Court.