Geometric motivation
We can understand the motivation for the definition of the virtual fundamental classpg 10 by considering what situation should be emulated for a simple case (such as a smooth complete intersection). Suppose we have a variety (representing the coarse space of some moduli problem ) which is cut out from an ambient smooth space by a section of a rank- vector bundle . Then has "virtual dimension" (where is the dimension of ). This is the case if is a transverse section, but if is not, and it lies within a sub-bundle where it is transverse, then we can get a homology cycle by looking at the Euler class of the cokernel bundle over . This bundle acts as the normal bundle of in . Now, this situation dealt with in Fulton-MacPherson intersection theory by looking at the induced cone and looking at the intersection of the induced section on the induced cone and the zero section, giving a cycle on . If there is no obvious ambient space for which there is an embedding, we must rely upon deformation theory techniques to construct this cycle on the moduli space representing the fundamental class. Now in the case where we have the section cutting out , there is a four term exact sequencewhere the last term represents the "obstruction sheaf". For the general case there is an exact sequencewhere act similarly to and act as the tangent and obstruction sheaves. Note the construction of Behrend-Fantechi is a dualization of the exact sequence given from the concrete example abovepg 44.Remark on definitions and special cases
There are multiple definitions of virtual fundamental classes, all of which are subsumed by the definition for morphisms of Deligne-Mumford stacks using the intrinsic normal cone and a perfect obstruction theory, but the first definitions are more amenable for constructing lower-brow examples for certain kinds of schemes, such as ones with components of varying dimension. In this way, the structure of the virtual fundamental classes becomes more transparent, giving more intuition for their behavior and structure.Virtual fundamental class of an embedding into a smooth scheme
One of the first definitions of a virtual fundamental classpg 10 is for the following case: suppose we have an embedding of a scheme into a smooth scheme and a vector bundle (called the obstruction bundle)such that the normal cone embeds into over . One natural candidate for such an obstruction bundle if given byfor the divisors associated to a non-zero set of generators for the ideal . Then, we can construct the virtual fundamental class of using the generalized Gysin morphism given by the compositiondenoted , where is the map given byand is the inverse of the flat pullback isomorphism.Here we use the in the map since it corresponds to the zero section of vector bundle. Then, the virtual fundamental class of the previous setup is defined aswhich is just the generalized Gysin morphism of the fundamental class of .
Remarks on the construction
The first map in the definition of the Gysin morphism corresponds to specializing to the normal conepg 89, which is essentially the first part of the standard Gysin morphism, as defined in Fultonpg 90. But, because we are not working with smooth varieties, Fulton's cone construction doesn't work, since it would give , hence the normal bundle could act as the obstruction bundle. In this way, the intermediate step of using the specialization of the normal cone only keeps the intersection-theoretic data of relevant to the variety .See also
* Chow group of a stackReferences