Unsimulated sex

In the film industry, unsimulated sex is the presentation of sex scenes in which actors genuinely perform the depicted sex acts, rather than simulating them. Although it is ubiquitous in films intended as pornographic, it is very uncommon in other films. At one time in the United States, such scenes were restricted by law and self-imposed industry standards such as the Motion Picture Production Code. Films showing explicit sexual activity were confined to privately distributed underground films, such as stag films or "porn loops". In the 1960s, social attitudes about sex began to shift, and sexually explicit films were decriminalized in many countries.

With movies such as '' Blue Movie'' by Andy Warhol, mainstream movies began pushing the boundaries of what was presented on screen. Notable examples include two of the eight ''Bedside''-films and the six ''Zodiac''-films from the 1970s, all of which were produced in Denmark and had many pornographic sex scenes, but were nevertheless considered mainstream films, all having mainstream casts and crews and premiering in mainstream cinemas. The last of these films, ''Agent 69 Jensen i Skyttens tegn'', was made in 1978. From the end of the 1970s until the late 1990s it was rare to see hardcore scenes in mainstream cinema, but this changed with the success of Lars von Trier's '' The Idiots'' (1998), which heralded a wave of art-house films with explicit content, such as '' Romance'' (1999), '' Baise-moi'' (2000), ''Intimacy'' (2001), Vincent Gallo's '' The Brown Bunny'' (2003), and Michael Winterbottom's '' 9 Songs'' (2004). Some simulated sex scenes are sufficiently realistic that critics mistakenly believe they are real, such as the cunnilingus scene in the 2006 film '' Red Road''.

Terminology

Although it is common to discuss films for which the actors had sex on set using terms such as "real sex" or "unsimulated sex", some film scholars prefer to speak of "visible sex", "explicit sex", or "hard-core sex". Linda Williams, for instance, proposes that "we eliminate the awkward term 'unsimulated sex' entirely". This is also because most film censors have predominantly focused on whether sex acts (penetration, fellatio, cunnilingus) or aroused genitals are visible when deciding whether a film should be classified as pornographic or be distributed on general release. For instance, it was not uncommon for two versions of pornographic films to be released: a hardcore version subject to restrictions, and a softcore version passed at "18" level. In both cases, the actors performed sex acts on set, but they were visible only in the hardcore version. Moreover, there has been a huge blurring of the distinctions between the use of prostheses (in '' Trouble Every Day, Blue is the Warmest Colour, Battle in Heaven'', ''Holiday''), actual genital contact between actors (''Intimacy, Baise-moi, The Brown Bunny, 9 Songs'') and genitals added in post-production ('' Irreversible''). The visibility of penetration/fellatio/cunnilingus on the screen is more important to the experience of watching the film, and often to the concerns of censors and critics, than exactly what took place on set.

The idea of simulation also relates to questions about acting, unnecessarily denigrating pornography, and is too vague about what is being simulated. For instance, while an actor's penis may enter an actress's vagina on a porn set, this does not mean that each of their actions, emotions, noises, and so on, are not performed quite differently than they would be in the privacy of their own home: "it is both real—something that actually happens between people—and a fake, staged for the camera and sound equipment. Neither the directors of pornography nor the directors of hard-core art, from Warhol forward, document 'real sex' in the sense of what people do alone, in private."

Rationales

In an interview after the release of his film '' Love'' (2015), when asked why audiences want to see realistic portrayals of sex, Gaspar Noé suggested it is about power structures: "In most societies, whether they're Western or not, people want to control the sexual behaviour or to organise it in a precise context. Sex is like a danger zone. Sometimes class barriers fall down and it scares a lot of people. It's about states controlling their systems, like religion."

James Franco has cited "aesthetics and personal reasons" for working on '' Interior. Leather Bar.'' (2013):

Production issues

A few directors have openly discussed or written about the technical problems inherent in filming of sexual acts, particularly with actors or actresses who have never performed such acts on film. In an interview with ''BlackBook'', Gaspar Noé acknowledges that it is difficult for several reasons: an actor may not be able to get or maintain an erection in the presence of even a small crew, or on camera; either of the participants may have a current partner. "So I've decided that the best way to show real sex is to cast two single people who used to be a couple."

Pornographic films reedited for mainstream release

Before the advent of home video, several hardcore pornography films were released to mainstream cinemas. In most cases, scenes of penetration were either cut or replaced by alternate shots. One exception to this was '' Deep Throat'', which was released uncensored.

Examples of this type of hybrid release include '' Café Flesh'' (1982)—the R-rated version of this science fiction porn film was released to mainstream cinemas; '' Stocks and Blondes'' (1984), originally available as ''Wanda Whips Wall Street''; and '' Droid'' (1988), originally released as ''Cabaret Sin'' in 1987.

In films

The following mainstream films have scenes with verified real sexual activity, meaning actors or actresses are filmed engaging in actual coitus or performing related sexual acts such as fellatio and cunnilingus. This list does not include documentaries about pornography, which may contain unsimulated sexual activity.

In music videos

See also

* Exploitation film
* Art house film
* Film censorship in the United States

References

General references

* McNair, Brian. (2013) Porno? Chic!: how pornography changed the world and made it a better place. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203134153
* Coleman, Lindsay. (ed.) (2016) ''Sex and Storytelling in Modern Cinema: Explicit Sex, Performance and Cinematic Technique''. London ; New York, NY: I.B.Tauris.
* Frey, Mattias. (2016) ''Extreme Cinema: The Transgressive Rhetoric of Today’s Art Film Culture''. London: Rutgers University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813576527
* Kenny, Oliver. (2022) ‘Breaking Conventions? Political Ideology of Films With Explicit Sex’, ''Open Screens'', 5(1), pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.16995/OS.8008.
* Krzywinska, Tanya. (2006) Sex and the cinema. London: Wallflower.
* Lewis, Jon. (2009) ‘Real sex: aesthetics and economics of art-house porn’, ''Jump Cut: A Review of Contemporary Media'', 51. https://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/jc51.2009/LewisRealsex/text.html
* Villadsen, Ebbe (2005): ''Danish Erotic Film Classics''.
* Williams, Linda. (2008) ''Screening sex''. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.* Williams, Linda Ruth (2005): ''The Erotic Thriller in Contemporary Cinema''. Indiana University Press. .

Inline citations

{{reflist

Lists of films by common content
Sexuality in popular culture
Sexuality-related lists
Sexuality in fiction