Background
Vehicle testing ahead of launch
Booster 15 underwent cryogenic testing on December 29, 2024. Ship 34 was moved toImpact of flight test 7
During Starship flight test 7 on January 16, 2025, initial data indicated that a fire broke out mid-flight, leading to the destruction of the vehicle. SpaceX suspects the fire was caused by an issue with the propellant system, that led to excess pressure in the cavity above the engine firewall. The FAA ordered SpaceX to perform a mishap investigation into the breakup, grounding Starship until the inquiry was complete. Elon Musk described the event as "barely a bump in the road," indicating that the issues would be resolved quickly. Musk suggested that a subsequent launch could occur the following month, depending on testing progress. On February 24, 2025, SpaceX announced that they had completed their mishap investigation into Flight 7. Subsequently on February 26, 2025, the FAA approved the launch license with modifications based on the results of the mishap investigation.Mission profile
The mission profile for flight test 8 was similar to the previous launch's plan, targeting a splashdown in the Indian Ocean and a catch of the booster. The ship was scheduled to deploy four intentionally destructible Starlink " simulators" which were also expected to reenter over the Indian Ocean.Flight timeline
March 3, 2025, attempt
On March 3, 2025, Starship and Super Heavy began propellant loading, with SpaceX targeting a launch at 23:45 UTC (5:45 pm CST). However, after propellant loading, undisclosed issues arose with both vehicles and the count was held at T−40 seconds. SpaceX was able to resolve the issue and resume the countdown, flight computers detected additional problems, automatically resetting the count to T−40 seconds. After additional attempts at troubleshooting, flight controllers scrubbed (discontinued) the launch attempt.Launch
After the scrub of the launch attempt on March 3rd, Starship and Super Heavy launched from Starbase on March 6, with the booster completing its ascent burn nominally. Starship continued to ascend after stage separation from the booster, with the Super Heavy completing its boostback burn with two engines less than planned. Despite this, SpaceX gave the go ahead for booster catch, and the booster was successfully caught by the chopstick arms on the launch pad after a landing burn with 12 out of 13 center engines. The double Raptor engine relighting failure was linked to engine ignition issues caused by unfavorable thermal conditions. Starship continued its ascent burn, but 4 engines (1 RVac, 3 sea level Raptors) started to shut down at T+8:04, roughly 30 seconds before the planned SECO. Starship lost attitude control, and SpaceX mission control confirmed during the flight that they lost contact with the ship. The ship was observed breaking up and reentering the atmosphere over Florida and the Bahamas several minutes after contact was lost. The most likely cause of the mishap was the failure of a Raptor sea level engine part, which caused propellant to mix and ignite, leading to a fire in the engine bay. This failure was distinct from the one that prematurely ended Flight 7. Following this anomaly, the Autonomous Flight Safety System onboard the Ship was thought to have taken measures in order to ensure that none of its remains left the predetermined safety corridor.Aftermath
Similar to what happened after Flight 7, the FAA again ordered SpaceX to perform a mishap investigation into the breakup. On June 12, the FAA announced that the mishap investigation into Flight 8 was closed. The report highlighted 8 corrective actions to prevent reoccurrence of the issues, and the FAA verified that these corrective actions were implemented prior to Flight 9.References
{{Orbital launches in 2025 2025 in spaceflight 2025 in Texas March 2025 in the United States SpaceX Starship test flights Cameron County, Texas