Language decline
Many Indigenous languages, like SecwepemctsÃn, experienced rapid decline with the institution of the residential schools. These schools prohibited the use of Indigenous languages in speech and in writing, resulting in two to three generations of students who were severely punished for not using English. Although some children forced to attend these residential schools can still speak their mother tongue, they have experienced much trauma which has great negative consequences on the future generations. After residential schools were shut down, Aboriginal children entered the mainstream schooling system which is dominated by English. Inter-generational transmission of Indigenous languages was severely disrupted due to the dominance of English in education and in the workplace. This further contributed to the drastic decline of Indigenous languages. For example, the number of fluent speakers of SecwepemctsÃn had dwindled to 3.5 per cent by the mid-1990s.Language revitalization and technology
An interface toPhonology
The Shuswap language has many consonants which the Roman alphabet is typically not used to represent. Two systems of representing Shuswap sounds are in use. One is the system used in Kuipers’ 298-page monograph on the language. It uses some letters which are not part of the Roman alphabet. The other system is based on one devised by Randy Bouchard of the British Columbia Language Project. It is based entirely on the Roman alphabet. The one exception is the symbol 7, which is used to represent a glottal stop. The Bouchard style system appears to be the one in use among Shuswap people themselves. Aside from the different symbols used, other differences exist between the two systems. The Kuipers’ system makes extensive use of automatic alternations. For example, the letter n is sometimes pronounced , sometimes , and sometimes . The choice of pronunciation is based on automatically applied rules. The reader is expected to know these rules. The rules cover three classes of changes: (1) automatic darkening of vowels (Non-automatic darkening of vowels is covered under Phonological Processes.), (2) automatic alternation of sonorants between consonantal and vocalic pronunciation, and (3) alternation of plain velars, uvulars, and laryngeals with the corresponding rounded sounds. The Bouchard style system does not appear to require the reader to know so many alternation rules. Examples of words written in the Bouchard style can be seen on two websites. These websites do not contain enough examples to show how all the automatic alternations are handled in the Bouchard style system. Therefore the Kuipers’ system of spelling is used in this article.Vowels
The Shuswap language has five full vowels, , , , , , and one reduced vowel, . An additional vowel, , is rare and often replaced by or . Its description is ambiguous. Kuipers gave its phonetic value as , indicating a mid unrounded back vowel, but described it in words as a mid central vowel. There are restrictions on the distribution of vowels. The vowel is restricted to unstressed syllables. The vowels and also occur in unstressed syllables, but only in a few words. Vowels and are restricted to stressed syllables.Automatic vowel darkening
The previous table shows the normal pronunciation of the vowels. Three of the full vowels, , , and , are subject to an automatic process called darkening, which changes how these vowels are pronounced. Automatic darkening is predictable; it occurs before uvular obstruents and before or after uvularized sonorants. It is not reflected in the Kuipers spelling system. ::Example: ''e'' in ‘he shoots it’ ''qemns'' , but ''e'' in ‘I shoot it’ ''qeqmn''Consonants
Consonants are divided into two classes,Consonantal-vocalic variation of sonorants
The variation of sonorants between consonantal and vocalic pronunciations is automatic, and is not indicated in the Kuipers’ spelling system. The rule for determining this as follows: :*To start, all sonorants in a word are to be considered vocalic. :*Then, beginning from the right hand side of the word, a sonorant in any one of the following situations is changed to consonantal: ::*a vowel on its right side; ::*a vocalic sonorant on its right side; or ::*a vowel on its left side. ::Example 1: l , m and m in variants of ‘go ahead!’ xÌŒÃlme and xÌŒÃlmxe ::Example 2: w in ‘downstream’ wtemtk ::Example 3: l and É£ in ‘waterfall’ k’°əλlɣʔép ::Example 4: l , w , y and n in ‘I catch something in a trap’ lélwyn-knWriting system
Kuipers (1974) uses the alphabet shown in the Phonology section. The Shuswap Language Department uses a different alphabet:Syllable structure
A Shuswap word consists of a stem, to which can be added various affixes. Very few words contain two roots. Any stressed root can have an unstressed alternative, where the vowel is replaced by � Most roots have the form CVC or CC (the latter only if unstressed). Other roots are CVCC or CCVC. Suffixes begin either with a stressed vowel (dropped in forms where the root is stressed) or a consonant. Prefixes generally have the form C- or CC-.Stress
Stress in Shuswap is not very prominent, and occurs only in longer words. Since and are always stressed and never is, stress is usually fairly simple to predict.Phonological processes
Although Kuipers (1974) does not specify, in many cases the glottalized or rounded version of a consonant seems to represent an allophonic variation. For example, consonants which have a rounded form are rounded before and after . However, glottalization can be contrastive (the root q’ey-, "set up a structure," versus q’ey’-, "write") or allophonic (the root q’ey- appears with a glottalized final consonant in s-t-q‘ey’-qn, "shed"). Consonant reduplication can also have an effect on glottalization. There are a number of ways in which sounds are affected by their environments. Resonants in the vocalic position are preceded by an automatic schwa, for example the word ("daughter"), pronounced . The darkening of vowels, as described below, is another case. The distribution of vowels is quite complex. The vowels have the following main variants: * i = * u = * o = * e = . and are unchanged. The environment around uvulars and velars produces a different set of variants, including occasional slight diphthongs. Additionally, some roots cause darkened vowels to appear in suffixes; one example is the prefix -ekst ("hand, arm"), which is darkened in x°əl’-akst. The darkened vowels are as follows: * e = * u = * i = .Morphology
Affixes
Shuswap's affixation system is robust. A nominalizingMorphological processes
Shuswap makes extensive use of reduplication. Some examples of simple reduplication are: * Initial reduplication: -tÃq’m(bitterroot) to É™tÃq’m(prepare bitterroots) * Final reduplication: uxÊ·-m(blow) to É™xÊ·'úxÊ·(swell up) * Total reduplication: iq(white) to É™q-'piq(flour) * Consonant reduplication In addition, there are several types of complex reduplication, involving patterns such as 11V12, 112V23, and 1123V34 (where 1 represents C1, etc.). Not all types of reduplication are productive and functional. Total reduplication indicates plurality and consonant reduplication is diminutive, but most other reduplications are difficult to explain. In addition to reduplication, root morphemes can be modified by interior glottalization, such that a root CVC appears as CÊ”VC. Although the process is not productive, many recorded forms refer to a state, for example Ê”eÉ£(cooled off) from eÉ£ns(he cools it off). Consonant reduplication can proceed as usual with interior glottalization.Syntax
Word order
Word order in Shuswap is relatively free; syntactical relationships are easily conveyed by the case marking system. However, it is common but not necessary for the predicate to head the sentence. Sentences with predicate first: * wist ɣ-citx ''the house is high'' * cut l-nx̌peʔe ''my grandfather said'' Sentences with subject first (rare): * ɣ-sq°yic m-cunsəs ɣx̌°ʕ°elmx ''Rabbit was told by fox''Case marking
Shuswap uses two cases: the absolutive, for theOther forms
Nouns and verbs appear in for different forms, depending on their syntactic surroundings. * The plain form: nouns and intransitive verbs, conjugated for person. Additionally, a distinction is made between object-centered and subject-centered words; compare -m-wiwktn"the one I saw" with -m-wiwkcms"the one that saw me." * The suffixal form: for intransitive verbs, and also transitive verbs and nouns (third person singular only). This form is sometimes optional and sometimes obligatory. Examples of use include as an imperative substitute ( wislxəx° wl meʔ kicx-k "run till you get there") and in "if" and "when" sentences ( -twiwtwn "when I grew up"). * The nominalized form: for nouns and intransitive verbs. A nominalized intransitive verb refers to the goal object of the action, as in ʔen t’-sq°iʔq°e l-nstix°C’e l-pəxyewtəs"this is the groundhog I shot yesterday." Nominalization is also used in questions, either yes-or-no or introduced with "what". * The ʔs- form: refers to a fact, with overtones of goal-directedness. For example: uct-kn ʔnsʔiʔλn"I want to eat."Sample lexicon
The following is a list of roots (listed separately or as their simplest derivatives), and a selection of words derived from these roots byWords borrowed into English
The wordReferences
External links