Historical development
The time period for the split of Northwest Semitic fromPhonology
Sound changes
Vowels
Proto-Northwest Semitic had three contrastive vowel qualities and a length distinction, resulting in six vocalic phonemes: *a, *ā, *i, *ī, *u, and *ū. While *aw, *ay, *iw, *iy, *uw, and *uy are often referred to as diphthongs, they do not seem to have had a different status as such, rather being a normal sequence of a short vowel and a glide.Consonants
Suchard proposes that: "*s, both from original *s and original *ṯ, then shifted further back to a postalveolar *š, while deaffrication of *ts and *dz to *s and *z gave these phonemes their Hebrew values, as well as merging original *dz with original *ḏ. In fact, original *s may have been realized as anything between and ; both values are attested in foreign transcriptions of early Northwest Semitic languages".Emphatics
In Proto-Northwest Semitic the emphatics were articulated with pharyngealization. Its shift to backing (as opposed to Proto-Semitic glottalization of emphatics) has been considered a Central Semitic innovation. According to Faber, the assimilation *-ṣt->-ṣṭ- in the Dt stem in Hebrew (hiṣṭaddēḳ ‘he declared himself righteous’) suggests backing rather than glottalization. The same assimilation is attested in Aramaic (yiṣṭabba ‘he will be moistened’).Grammar
Nouns
Three cases can be reconstructed for Proto-Northwest Semitic nouns (Pronouns
Proto-Northwest Semitic pronouns had 2 genders and 3Numerals
Reconstruction of Proto-Northwest Semitic numbers.Verbs
The G fientive or G-stem (Hebrew ''qal'') is the basic, most common, unmarked stem. The G-stem expresses events. The vowel of the prefix of the prefix conjugations in Proto-Northwest Semitic was *-a- and the stem was *-qṭul- or *-qṭil-, as in *ya-qṭul-u 'he will kill', while the stem of the suffix conjugation had two *a vowels, as in *qaṭal-a 'he has killed'. The G stative is like the fientive but expressing states instead of events. For the prefix conjugation of stative roots, the vowel of the prefix was *-i- and it contained an *a vowel, e.g. *yi-kbad-u 'he will become heavy', while the second vowel of the suffix conjugation was either *-i-, as in *kabid-a 'he is/was/will be heavy', or *-u-, as in *ʕamuq-a 'it is/was/will be deep'. Whether the G-stem stative suffix conjugation has *i or *u in the stem is lexically determined. The N-stem (Hebrew ''nip̄ʕal'') is marked by a prefixed *n(a)-. It is mediopassive which is a grammatical voice that subsumes the meanings of both the middle voice and the passive voice. In other words, it expresses a range of meanings where the subject is the patient of the verb, e.g. passive, medial, and reciprocal. The stem of the suffix conjugation is *naqṭal-, and the stem of the prefix conjugations is *-nqaṭil-; as is the case with stative G-stem verbs, the prefix vowel is *-i-, resulting in forms like *yi-nqaṭil-u 'he will be killed'. The D-stem (Hebrew ''piʕel'') is marked by gemination of the second radical in all forms. It has a range of different meanings, mostly transitive. The stem of the suffix conjugation is *qaṭṭil-, and the same stem is used for the prefix conjugations. It is not clear whether the Proto-Northwest-Semitic prefix vowel should be reconstructed as *-u-, the form inherited from Proto-Semitic (i.e. *yuqaṭṭil-u), or as *-a-, which is somewhat supported by evidence from Ugaritic and Hebrew (*yaqaṭṭil-u). The C-stem (Hebrew ''hip̄ʕil'') more often than not expresses a causative meaning. The most likely reconstructions are *haqṭil- (from older *saqṭil-) for the stem of the suffix conjugation and *-saqṭil- for the stem of the prefix conjugations. The reconstructed prefix vowel is the same as that of the D-stem, and similarly, the participle is to be reconstructed as *musaqṭilum. All of the stems listed here, except the N-stem, could bring forth further derivation. The "internal passive stems" (Gp, Dp, and Cp; Hebrew passive ''qal'', ''puʕal'', and ''hɔp̄ʕal'') aren't marked by affixes, but express their passivity through a different vowel pattern. The Gp prefix conjugation can be reconstructed as *yu-qṭal-u 'he will be killed'. Reflexive or reciprocal meanings can be expressed by the t-stems, formed with a *t which was either infixed after the first radical (Gt, Ct) or prefixed before it (tD). The precise reconstruction are uncertain.Conjunctions and Prepositions
* *wa, 'and' * *pa/ʔap, 'and then, and so' * *ʔaw, 'or' * *huʼāti and *hiʼāti, direct object markers * *ha, 'to, for' * *ka also *kī, (and *kaj?) 'like, as' * *bal, 'without, non-' * *bi, 'in, with' * *la, 'to, for' (dat/dir) * *min(V), 'from' * *ʕad(aj), 'up to, until' * *ʕal(aj), 'on, against' * *jiθ, 'there is/are'Notes
Bibliography
*Blau, J. 1968. "Some Difficulties in the Reconstruction of 'Proto-Hebrew' and 'Proto-Canaanite'," in In Memoriam Paul Kahle. ''BZAW'', 103. pp. 29–43 *Cross, F. M. 1965. “The Development of the Jewish Scripts,” in ''The Bible and the Ancient Near East: Essays in Honor of W. F. Albright'', ed. G. E. Wright. New York. Reprinted 1965, Anchor Book Edition; New York, pp. 133–202. *Cross, F. M. 1967. “The Origin and Early Evolution of the Alphabet,” ''EI'' 5: 8*-24*. *Cross, F. M. 1982. “Alphabets and pots: Reflections on typological method in the dating of human artifacts,” ''MAARAV'' 3: 121–136. *Cross, F. M. 1989. “The Invention and Development of the Alphabet,” in ''The Origins of Writing'' (ed. W. M. Senner; Lincoln: University of Nebraska), pp. 77–90. *Cross, F. M. and Freedman, D. N. 1952. ''Early Hebrew Orthography: A Study of the Epigraphic Evidence'' New Haven: American Oriental Society. *Daniels, Peter. 1996. ''The World’s Writing Systems''. New York: Oxford. *de Moor, Johannes C. 1988. "Narrative Poetry in Canaan," ''UF'' 20:149–171. *Donner, H. and Rollig, W. 1962–64. ''Kanaanäische und aramäische Inschriften''. 3 volumes. Wiesbaden. (5th ed.) * Driver, G. R. 1976. ''Semitic Writing: From Pictograph to Alphabet''. 3rd edition. London. *Garbini, G. 1960. ''Il Semitico di nord-ovest''. (And a critique by E.Y. Kutscher, ''JSS'' 10 (1965):21–51.) * *Garr, R. 1985. ''Dialect Geography of Syria-Palestine, 1000-586 B.C.E.'' Philadelphia: UPenn. *Gelb, I. J. 1961. “The Early History of the West Semitic Peoples,” ''JCS'' 15:27-47. *Gelb, I. J. 1963. ''A Study of Writing''. 2nd edition. Chicago. *Gibson, J. C. L. 1971–87. ''Textbook of Syrian Semitic Inscriptions''. 3 Vols. Oxford: Clarendon. *Ginsberg, H. L. 1970. “The Northwest Semitic Languages,” in ''The World History of the Jewish People'', volume 1/2: Patriarches. Tel Aviv. *Greenfield, J. C. 1969. “Amurrite, Ugaritic and Canaanite,” in ''Proceedings of the International Conference of Semitic Studies''. Jerusalem. pp. 92–101. *Halpern, B. 1987. “Dialect Distribution in Canaan and the Deir Alla Inscriptions,” in ''“Working with No Data”: Semitic and Egyptian Studies Presented to Thomas O. Lambdin''. Ed. D. M. Golomb. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns. pp. 119–39. *Harris, Z. 1939. ''Development of the Canaanite Dialects''. AOS, 16. New Haven: AOS. *Herr, Larry G. 1980. "The Formal Scripts of Iron Age Transjordan," ''BASOR'' 238:21–34. * Hoftijzer, J. and Jongeling, K. 1995. ''Dictionary of the North-West Semitic inscriptions''. 2 volumes. Leiden/New York: Brill. Not including Ugaritic. *Huehnergard, J. 1990. "Remarks on the Classification of the Northwest Semitic Languages," in ''The Balaam Text from Deir Alla Re-evaluated: proceedings of the international symposium held at Leiden, 21–24 August 1989''. pp. 282–93. *Kaufman, S. A. 1988. “The Classification of North West Semitic Dialects of the Biblical Period and Some Implications Thereof,” in ''Proceedings of the Ninth World Congress of Jewish Studies (Panel Sessions: Hebrew and Aramaic Languages)''. Jerusalem: World Union of Jewish Studies. pp. 41–57. *Moran, William L. 1961. “The Hebrew Language in its Northwest Semitic Background,” in ''The Bible and the Ancient Near East: Essays in Honor of W. F. Albright'', ed. G. E. Wright. New York. Reprinted 1965, Anchor Book Edition; New York, pp. 59–84. *Moran, William L. 1975. “The Syrian Scribe of the Jerusalem Amarna Letters,” in ''Unity and Diversity: Essays in the History, Literature, and Religion of the Ancient Near East'' (ed. H. Goedicke and J. J. M. Roberts; Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press) 146–166. *Moscati, Sabatino, ed. 1969. ''An Introduction to the Comparative Grammar of the Semitic Languages: Phonology and Morphology''. Porta Linguarum Orientalium, ns, 6. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. *Naveh, J. 1987. ''Early History of the Alphabet: An Introduction to West Semitic Epigraphy and Palaeography''. 2nd edition. Jerusalem: Magnes. Especially sections on West Semitic. *Parker, Simon B. 1997. ''Stories in Scripture and Inscriptions: Comparative Studies on Narratives in Northwest Semitic Inscriptions and the Hebrew Bible''. Oxford: Oxford University Press. * Rabin, C. 1971. "Semitic Languages," ''Encyclopaedia Judaica'', volume 14, pp. 1149–57. *Rabin, C. 1991. ''Semitic Languages'' (Jerusalem: Bialik). n Hebrew*Rainey, A. F. 1986 “The Ancient Hebrew Prefix Conjugation in the Light of Amarnah Canaanite,” ''Hebrew Studies'' 27:1–19. *Rainey, A. F. 1990. “The Prefix Conjugation Patterns of Early Northwest Semitic,” pp. 407–420 in Abusch, Tz., Huehnergard, J. and Steinkeller, P., eds. ''Lingering over Words, Studies in Ancient Near Eastern Literature in Honor of William L. Moran''. Atlanta: Scholars. *Renz, J. 1995. ''Handbuch der althebräischen Epigraphik''. 3 volumes. Darmstadt. *Suchard, B. 2019. "The Development of the Biblical Hebrew Vowels: Including a Concise Historical Morphology". Brill, pp. 37–50, 232–252 *Vaughn, A. 1999. "Palaeographic Dating of Judean Seals and Its Significance for Biblical Research", ''BASOR'', 313:43–64. {{Authority control Languages attested from the 14th century BC 1908 introductions 1900s neologisms Central Semitic languages