Murder In The Mews

''Murder in the Mews and Other Stories'' is a short story collection by British writer Agatha Christie, first published in the UK by Collins Crime Club on 15 March 1937. In the US, the book was published by Dodd, Mead and Company under the title ''Dead Man's Mirror'' in June 1937. with one story missing (''The Incredible Theft''); the 1987 Berkeley Books edition of the same title has all four stories. All of the tales feature Hercule Poirot. The UK edition retailed at seven shillings and sixpence (7/6). and the first US edition at $2.00.

Plot summaries

Murder in the Mews

Japp asks Poirot to join him at a house in Bardsley Garden Mews where a Mrs Barbara Allen shot herself the previous evening – Guy Fawkes Night – the moment of death being disguised by the noise of fireworks. Once there, they find that the doctor thinks there is something strange about the death of the fine lady, a young widow. Mrs Allen was found by a housemate, Miss Jane Plenderleith, who had been away in the country the previous night. The victim was locked in her room and was shot through the head with an automatic, the weapon being found in her hand. However, the doctor points out that the gun is in her right hand while the wound is above the left ear – an impossible position to shoot with the right hand. It looks as if this is a murder made to look like suicide – and by an unusually incompetent murderer with a very low estimation of the intelligence of police investigators. They interview Miss Plenderleith and find out that Mrs Allen was engaged to be married to Charles Laverton-West, an up-and-coming young MP but, although the pistol was the dead lady's, she cannot think of a reason why she should use it to commit suicide.

Japp and Poirot find further clues: the gun has been wiped clean of fingerprints, and large sums of money have been withdrawn from Mrs Allen's bank account on several occasions, but there is no trace of money in the house. They also learn from a neighbour that Mrs Allen had a gentleman caller the previous evening whose description doesn't match her fiancé. Feeling that Miss Plenderleith is keeping something back, they ask her about this male visitor, and she suggests that it was Major Eustace – a man that Mrs Allen had known in India and whom she has seen on several occasions in the past year. She felt that Mrs Allen was afraid of the man, and Japp and Poirot suggest that Major Eustace was blackmailing her – an idea that meets with approval from Miss Plenderleith. Poirot points out that it is unusual for blackmailers to kill their victims: normally, it's the opposite way round. As part of his look around the house, Japp searches a cupboard under the stairs which contains items such as umbrellas, walking sticks, tennis racquets, a set of golf clubs, and a small attaché-case which Miss Plenderleith hurriedly claims is hers. The two men sense Miss Plenderleith's heightened tension.

Miss Plenderleith proves to have an impeccable alibi for the time of the death, and Poirot and Japp interview Charles Laverton-West. He is stunned to find out that a murder investigation is taking place and admits that he himself has no sound alibi. They also try to see Major Eustace and hear that he has gone off to play golf. The mention of this suddenly makes Poirot see everything clearly. Managing to get hold of Eustace later, they notice that he smokes a brand of Turkish cigarette whose stubs were found in the mews house, even though Mrs Allen smoked a different kind. They also prove that he wore a set of cufflinks, a damaged part of which was found in the room where Mrs Allen died, and Japp arrests him for murder.

On a pretext, Poirot makes Japp call at the mews house. While they are there, Poirot sneaks another look at the cupboard under the stairs and sees that the attaché-case is gone. As Miss Plenderleith has just come back from playing golf at Wentworth, they go there and learn that she was seen on the links with the case. Later investigations show that she was seen to throw the item in the lake there. The police retrieve it but find nothing in it. Poirot asks Japp and Miss Plenderleith to call at his flat, and they tell her of Eustace's arrest. Poirot then tells her of his real conclusions. From clues concerning missing blotting paper, Poirot deduces that Mrs Allen had written a letter just before she died, which, if she killed herself, would indicate a suicide note. He postulates that Miss Plenderleith came home, found her friend dead, driven to kill herself by the actions of her blackmailer, and was determined to avenge her – this wasn't a murder made to look like suicide but a suicide made to look like murder, thereby entrapping the blackmailer. Miss Plenderleith placed the gun in Mrs Allen's right hand, even though she was left-handed, and the purpose of her trip to Wentworth was to hide there the dead lady's golf clubs – left-handed clubs, the attaché-case being a red herring to put the police off the trail. Convinced by Poirot that Major Eustace will be imprisoned for his other crimes, she agrees to tell the truth and save the man from the gallows.

The Incredible Theft

A house party is underway at the home of Lord Mayfield, a rising politician and a millionaire whose riches came from his engineering prowess. With him are Air Marshal Sir George Carrington, his wife and son (Lady Julia and Reggie); Mrs Vanderlyn, a beautiful brunette American; and Mrs Macatta, a forthright MP. Mr Carlile, Lord Mayfield's secretary, joins them for dinner. The reason for the house party becomes obvious when all but Lord Mayfield and Sir George leave the dinner table, as they will discuss the plans for a new fighter aircraft that would give Britain supremacy in the air. They discuss Mrs Vanderlyn, who is involved in espionage. Lord Mayfield invited her to tempt her with something big – the plans for the new fighter – to trap her once and for all.

All guests retire for bed except Lord Mayfield and Sir George. Carlile is sent to get the plans for the fighter from the safe, so he set off for the study, colliding with Mrs Vanderlyn who wants to retrieve her handbag. The two men walk along the terrace, when Lord Mayfield is startled by a figure leaving the study by the French window, although Sir George sees nothing. When they enter the study, Carlile has the papers out but Lord Mayfield quickly sees that the plans of the fighter itself are gone. Carlile is adamant that they were in the safe and he put them on the table. He was distracted when he heard a woman's scream in the hallway and ran out to find Leonie, Mrs Vanderlyn's maid, who claimed that she had seen a ghost. Carlile had not otherwise left the study. Sir George suggests calling in Hercule Poirot immediately.

Poirot arrives in the middle of the night. They tell him the sequence of events and their suspicions regarding Mrs Vanderlyn. Investigating the grass leading off the terrace, Poirot confirms that there are no footprints, which means that someone in the house committed the theft and the papers are still there. He questions each person in turn. He understands that Leonie saw no ghost; she screamed because Reggie sneaked up on her to snatch a kiss. Poirot suggests to Lord Mayfield that he end the party so that his guests will leave the house. The next morning the guests begin to leave. Lady Julia believes that her son Reggie stole the plans since he is very short of money and was not in his room for a period the previous evening. She promises Poirot that they will be returned within twelve hours if no further action is taken. Poirot agrees to this and they all depart.

Poirot tells Lord Mayfield of Lady Julia's offer but that she is mistaken, as she does not know that her son was busy with Leonie at the time in question. Poirot explains that Mrs Macatta was heard snoring in her room, Mrs Vanderlyn was heard to call for Leonie from upstairs, and Sir George was with Lord Mayfield on the terrace. Everyone is accounted except for Carlile and Lord Mayfield. As Carlile has access to the safe at all times and could have taken tracings at his leisure, only Lord Mayfield is left. Poirot has no doubts that Lord Mayfield put the plans in his own pocket. His motive is linked back to a denial given some years earlier that he was involved in negotiations with a belligerent foreign power. As he was indeed involved in such activities he must now have been blackmailed to hand over the plans via Mrs. Vanderlyn. Poirot has no doubt that the plans she holds are subtly altered so as to make the design unworkable. Lord Mayfield confesses to the deception but insists that his motive, refusing to be derailed from leading Britain through the coming world crisis, is pure.

Dead Man's Mirror

When Sir Gervase Chevenix-Gore writes to Hercule Poirot to unceremoniously summon him down to the Chevenix-Gore ancestral pile, Poirot is initially reluctant to go. However, there is something that intrigues him and so he catches the train that Sir Gervase wanted him to. On arrival at the Chevenix-Gore's house, Poirot meets the latter's wife Vanda, an eccentric who believes she is a reincarnation of an Egyptian woman, his adopted daughter Ruth and her cousin Hugo, and Miss Lingard, a secretary helping Sir Gervase research the family history. It is clear that no-one was expecting Poirot, and for the first time in memory, Sir Gervase himself, who is always punctual, is missing. Poirot and guests go to his study and find him dead, apparently having shot himself. Poirot is not convinced, however, and soon starts to prove that Sir Gervase was murdered because of various suspicious factors surrounding the death, including the position at which the bullet is believed to have struck a mirror.

It is revealed that before Poirot arrives, all the guests and family were dressing for dinner, and after they heard the dinner gong, a shot rang out. No one suspected that anything is wrong, believing that either a car had backfired or champagne was being served. As Chevenix-Gore was not a popular man, there are any number of suspects, including his own daughter and nephew. It is revealed that Hugo is engaged to Susan (another guest at the house) and Ruth has already married Lake (Chevenix-Gore's agent) in secret.

In the end, Poirot assembles everyone in the study. He reveals that Chevenix-Gore intended to disinherit Ruth if she did not marry Hugo Trent. However, it was too late, as she was already married to Lake. Poirot accuses Ruth of killing Chevenix-Gore, but Miss Lingard confesses to the murder. She is Ruth's real mother and killed Chevenix-Gore to prevent him from disinheriting her daughter.

The bullet which killed Chevenix-Gore hit the gong (as the door to the study was open), which made Susan think that she heard the first gong (dinner was usually served after the butler would strike the gong twice). It was Miss Lingard who smashed the mirror and made the whole affair look like suicide. She blew a paper bag to fake a shot. Poirot pretended to accuse Ruth because he suspected Miss Lingard would save her daughter and confess, and he had no evidence against Miss Lingard. After everyone leaves, Miss Lingard asks Poirot not to tell Ruth that she is her real mother. Poirot agrees as Miss Lingard is terminally ill, and does not reveal anything to Ruth who wonders why Miss Lingard committed the murder.

Triangle at Rhodes

Wishing for a quiet holiday free from crime, Poirot goes to Rhodes during the low season in October where there are but a few guests. Aside from the young Pamela Lyall and Sarah Blake there is Valentine Chantry, a consciously beautiful woman who seems to swoon under the attentions of Douglas Gold. This is done at the expense of his own wife, Marjorie, a mildly attractive seemingly mousy woman, and Valentine's husband, Tony Chantry. This is the "triangle" that everyone observes, and it gets rather absurd with the two men vying for Valentine's favour. She seems to delight in the attention.

Marjorie Gold soon wins the sympathy of many of the guests of the hotel as her husband is frequently in the company of Valentine. She seeks out Poirot's counsel. He warns her to leave the island immediately if she values her life. She says she cannot leave her husband. Poirot shakes his head, sadly. The event comes to a head one evening, beginning when Gold and Chantry have a loud argument. Valentine and Marjorie return from a drive, and the former is found poisoned by the cocktail her husband gave her.

Gold is immediately suspected, as the strophanthin that killed Valentine is found in the pocket of his dinner jacket. Poirot noticed, however, that Chantry puts it in Gold's pocket just when everyone's attention was on his dying wife. Poirot gives this information to the police.

He tells Pamela Lyall that she was focusing on the wrong triangle. The real triangle was between Douglas, Marjorie and Chantry. Chantry and Marjorie were having an affair and Chantry, bored with his wife but wanting her fortune, conspired with Marjorie to kill her and ensure that Douglas was blamed for the murder. Poirot's warning to Marjorie Gold was not because he feared she was a victim at risk of being murdered, but the opposite. He was warning her she would be caught, tried, and convicted as one of the culprits, and hanged for murder. He emphasises, "She understood."

Literary significance and reception

Simon Nowell-Smith of ''The Times Literary Supplements issue of 27 March 1937 wrote: "It would seem nowadays – it was not true of Sherlock Holmes, when the rules were less rigid – the shorter the detective story the less good it will be. The least effective of the stories in this book occupies 32 pages; the most 96; and there are two of intermediate length and merit. All are of quite a high standard as long-short stories, but none is as good as any of Mrs Christie's full-length detective novels. The fact is that the reader of today demands to participate in a detective story, and no living writer, unless occasionally Miss Sayers, can find room in a short story for this extra detective." The reviewer felt that the title story was the strongest and that ''Triangle at Rhodes'' the weakest because, "the psychology of the characters is insufficiently developed to make the solution either predictable or plausible".

Isaac Anderson of ''The New York Times Book Review'' of 27 June 1937 said, "The four stories in this book are all fully up to the Agatha Christie-Hercule Poirot standard, and are about as varied in plot and in the characters involved as it is possible for detective stories to be."

''The Scotsman'' of 1 April 1937 said "To the ingenuity of Mrs Agatha Christie there is no end. She writes with Spartan simplicity, presents her clues fairly, and nearly always succeeds in simultaneously mystifying and satisfying her reader. This is no mean achievement in an art which is popularly supposed to be rapidly exhausting a limited stock of deception devices."

In ''The Observers issue of 18 April 1937, "Torquemada" (Edward Powys Mathers) wrote: "It is rather for herself than for the four awkwardly shaped Poirot stories which make up ''Murder in the Mews'' that I give Agatha Christie first place n his columnthis week. There is sufficient in the latest exploits of the little Belgian to remind us that his creator is our queen of detective writers, but by no means enough to win her that title if she had not already won it. The last and shortest tale, ''Triangle at Rhodes'', is just the one which should have been made the longest, since it is a problem depending entirely on the unfolding of the characters of four people. Mrs Christie has not given herself room for such unfolding, and is therefore constrained to tear the buds brutally apart. This plot would, I think, have furnished forth a whole novel. In the other three stories, each of that long-short form which used to be sacred to the penny detective adventure story, Poirot is but palely himself, and in each case the plot, though clever, is not brilliant. In the name piece the motive of the second crime is legitimately baffling; in ''The Incredible Theft'' I kept pace with Poirot; in ''Dead Man's Mirror'', feeling a little cheated, I myself cheated by backing the most exterior of outsiders."

E. R. Punshon of ''The Guardian'' reviewed the collection in the 9 April 1937 issue when he wrote that it was "perhaps enough to say that they are all good, but not outstanding, Christie, and that in all of them Monsieur Poirot... is given full opportunity to display his accustomed acumen." Punshon stated that the title story was, "the best, and Mrs Christie is least successful when she enters into the international spy field. The last story is disappointing in that it presents an interesting psychological situation that seems to cry aloud for the fuller treatment. Mrs Christie could well have given it."

Mary Dell in the ''Daily Mirror'' of 1 April 1937 said: "Agatha Christie is keeping her famous detective, Poirot, busy. Here he is the murderer-chaser in four short stories which show that this author can keep you as "on edge" in shorter thrillers as in full-length ones. And another good thing is that you can come to the last untying of all the knots in one sitting.

Robert Barnard: "Four very good long short stories. No duds, but perhaps the most interesting is ''Triangle at Rhodes'', with its 'double-triangle' plot, very familiar from other Christies."

References to other works

*The plot device in "Murder in the Mews" is a rewrite of " The Market Basing Mystery", which first appeared in issue 1603 of ''The Sketch'' magazine on 17 October 1923 before appearing in book form in the US first in '' The Under Dog and Other Stories'' in 1951 and in the UK in ''Thirteen for Luck!'' in 1966 (later appearing in ''Poirot's Early Cases'' in 1974). The similarities between the two stories are in the eventual solution and motive but the setting, characters and the sex of the victim is different between the two versions.
* "Dead Man's Mirror" uses a similar (almost identical) device to "The Second Gong", with a number of almost point-for-point matches; as well, Mr Satterthwaite, who is known from the Harley Quin Stories has a small appearance, where he refers to the "Crow's nest business", i.e. the novel ''Three Act Tragedy''.
* In "Murder in the Mews", Poirot refers to Sherlock Holmes and "the curious incident of the dog in the night-time". This refers to a statement made by Holmes in the 1892 story "The Adventure of Silver Blaze".
* "Triangle at Rhodes" uses similar settings as '' Evil Under the Sun''. The beautiful but foolish married woman flirting with a younger man and then getting killed is one such similarity.
*"The Incredible Theft" is an almost verbatim reworking of " The Submarine Plans", which was later collected in ''Poirot's Early Cases''.

Film, TV or theatrical adaptations

All four stories featured as one-hour episodes in the ITV series ''Agatha Christie's Poirot'' with David Suchet in the title role. The characters of Hastings (as played by Hugh Fraser) and Felicity Lemon (as played by Pauline Moran) appear in all the televised stories except for "Triangle at Rhodes", even though they make no appearance in the published versions. As well as appearing in "Murder in the Mews", the televised versions of "The Incredible Theft" and "Dead Man's Mirror" also feature Philip Jackson as Inspector Japp.

Murder in the Mews

This was broadcast on 15 January 1989 as the second episode of series one.

Adaptor: Clive Exton

HOME


Content is Copyleft
Website design, code, and AI is Copyrighted (c) 2014-2017 by Stephen Payne


Consider donating to Wikimedia



As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases