Mitra

''Mitra'' (Proto-Indo-Iranian: ''*mitrás'') is the name of an Indo-Iranian divinity from which the names and some characteristics of Rigvedic Mitrá and Avestan Mithra derive.

The names (and occasionally also some characteristics) of these two older figures were subsequently also adopted for other figures:
* A vrddhi-derived form of Sanskrit ''mitra'' gives Maitreya, the name of a bodhisattva in Buddhist tradition.
* In Hellenistic-era Asia Minor, Avestan Mithra was conflated with various local and Greek figures leading to several different variants of Apollo-Helios-Mithras- Hermes- Stilbon.
* Via Greek and some Anatolian intermediate, the Avestan theonym also gave rise to Latin ''Mithras'', the principal figure of the first century Roman Mysteries of Mithras (also known as 'Mithraism').
* In Middle Iranian, the Avestan theonym evolved (among other Middle Iranian forms) into Sogdian ''Miši'', Middle Persian and Parthian ''Mihr'', and Bactrian Miuro (/mihru/). Aside from Avestan Mithra, these derivative names were also used for:
** Greco-Bactrian Mithro, Miiro, Mioro and Miuro;
** by the Manichaeans for one of their own deities.
* Additionally, the Manichaeans also adopted 'Maitreya' as the name of their "first messenger".

Indian Religious Texts

Both Vedic Mitra and Avestan Mithra derive from an Indo-Iranian common noun ''*mitra-'', generally reconstructed to have meant " covenant, treaty, agreement, promise." This meaning is preserved in Avestan ''miθra'' "covenant." In Sanskrit and modern Indo-Aryan languages, ' means "friend," one of the aspects of bonding and alliance.

The Indo-Iranian reconstruction is attributed (accessed April 2011) to Christian Bartholomae, (fasc., 1979, Berlin: de Gruyter), at column 1183. and was subsequently refined by A. Meillet (1907), who suggested derivation from the Proto-Indo-European root ''*mey-'' "to exchange."

A suggested alternative derivation was ''*meh'' "to measure" (Gray 1929). Pokorny ( IEW 1959) refined Meillet's ''*mei'' as "to bind." Combining the root ''*mei'' with the "tool suffix" ''-tra-'' "that which auses..." (also found in '' man-tra-'', "that which causes to think"), then literally means "that which binds," and thus "covenant, treaty, agreement, promise, oath" etc. Pokorny's interpretation also supports "to fasten, strengthen", which may be found in Latin ''moenia'' "city wall, fortification", and in an antonymic form, Old English ''(ge)maere'' "border, boundary-post".

Meillet and Pokorny's "contract" did however have its detractors. Lentz (1964, 1970) refused to accept abstract "contract" for so exalted a divinity and preferred the more religious "piety." Because present-day Sanskrit ''mitra'' means "friend," and New Persian ''mihr'' means "love" or "friendship," Gonda (1972, 1973) insisted on a Vedic meaning of "friend, friendship," not "contract".

Meillet's analysis also "rectified earlier interpretations" that suggested that the Indo-Iranian common noun ''*mitra-'' had anything to do with the light or the sun. When H. Lommel suggested that such an association was implied in the Younger Avesta (since the 6th century BCE), that too was conclusively dismissed. Today, it is certain that "(al)though Miθra is closely associated with the sun in the Avesta, he is not the sun" and "Vedic Mitra is not either."

Old Persian ''Miθra'' or ''Miθ^ra'' – both only attested in a handful of 4th-century BCE inscriptions of Artaxerxes II and III – "is generally admitted o bea borrowing from the Avesta," at p. 55. the genuine Old Persian form being reconstructed as ''*Miça''. (Kent initially suggested Sanskrit but later changed his mind). Middle Iranian ''myhr'' (Parthian, also in living Armenian usage) and ''mihr'' (Middle Persian), derive from Avestan ''Mithra''.

Greek/Latin "Mithras," the focal deity of the Greco-Roman cult of Mithraism is the nominative form of vocative Mithra. In contrast to the original Avestan meaning of "contract" or "covenant" (and still evident in post-Sassanid Middle Persian texts), the Greco-Roman Mithraists probably thought the name meant "mediator." In Plutarch's 1st-century discussion of dualistic theologies, ''Isis and Osiris'' (46.7) the Greek historiographer provides the following explanation of the name in his summary of the Zoroastrian religion: Mithra is a ''meson'' ("in the middle") between "the good Horomazdes and the evil Aremanius ..and this is why the ''Pérsai'' call the Mediator Mithra". Zaehner at pp. 101–102. attributes this false etymology to a role that Mithra (and the sun!) played in the now extinct branch of Zoroastrianism known as Zurvanism.

Indian Mitra

Vedic Mitra is a prominent deity of the Rigveda distinguished by a relationship to Varuna, the protector of '' rta'' as described in hymn 2, Mandala 1 of Rigveda. Together with Varuna, he counted among the Adityas, a group of solar deities, also in later Vedic texts. Vedic Mitra is the patron divinity of honesty, friendship, contracts and meetings.

The first extant record of Indo-Aryan Mitra, in the form ''mi-it-ra-'', is in the inscribed peace treaty of c. 1400 BC between Hittites and the Hurrian kingdom of the Mitanni in the area southeast of Lake Van in Asia Minor. Mitra appears there together with four other Indic divinities as witnesses and keepers of the pact.

Iranian Mithra

In Zoroastrianism, Mithra is a member of the trinity of '' ahuras'', protectors of '' asha/arta'', "truth" or "hat which isright". Mithra's standard appellation is "of wide pastures" suggesting omnipresence. Mithra is "truth-speaking, ... with a thousand ears, ... with ten thousand eyes, high, with full knowledge, strong, sleepless, and ever awake." (''Yasht'' 10.7). As preserver of covenants, Mithra is also protector and keeper of all aspects of interpersonal relationships, such as friendship and love.

Related to his position as protector of truth, Mithra is a judge (''ratu''), ensuring that individuals who break promises or are not righteous (''artavan'') are not admitted to paradise. As also in Indo-Iranian tradition, Mithra is associated with (the divinity of) the sun but originally distinct from it. Mithra is closely associated with the feminine yazata Aredvi Sura Anahita, the hypostasis of knowledge.

Mithra in Commagene

There is a deity Mithra mentioned on monuments in Commagene. According to the archaeologist Maarten Vermaseren, 1st century BC evidence from Commagene demonstrates the "reverence paid to Mithras" but does not refer to "the mysteries". In the colossal statuary erected by King