Logos (Montréal Newspaper)

''Logos'' (, ; grc, λόγος, lógos, lit=word, discourse, or reason) is a term used in Western philosophy, psychology and rhetoric and refers to the appeal to reason that relies on logic or reason, inductive and deductive reasoning. Aristotle first systemised the usage of the word, making it one of the three principles of rhetoric. This specific use identifies the word closely to the structure and content of text itself. This specific usage has then been developed through the history of western philosophy and rhetoric.

The word has also been used in different senses along with ''rhema''. Both Plato and Aristotle used the term ''logos'' along with ''rhema'' to refer to sentences and propositions. It is primarily in this sense the term is also found in religion.

Background

grc, λόγος, lógos, lit=word, discourse, or reason is related to grc, λέγω, légō, lit=I say, label=Ancient Greek which is cognate with la, Legus, lit=law. The word derives from a Proto-Indo-European root, *leǵ-, which can have the meanings "I put in order, arrange, gather, I choose, count, reckon, I say, speak".

The primary meaning of logos is "account" or "measure" or "discourse".Henry George Liddell and Robert Scott
''An Intermediate Greek–English Lexicon''
logos, 1889.Entr

at LSJ online.. It is occasionally used in other contexts, such as for "ratio" in mathematics.

The Purdue Online Writing Lab clarifies that ''logos'' is the appeal to reason that relies on logic or reason, inductive and deductive reasoning. In the context of Aristotle's Rhetoric, logos is one of the three principles of rhetoric and in that specific use it more closely refers to the structure and content of the text itself.

Origins of the term

Logos became a technical term in Western philosophy beginning with Heraclitus (), who used the term for a principle of order and knowledge. Ancient Greek philosophers used the term in different ways. The sophists used the term to mean discourse. Aristotle applied the term to refer to "reasoned discourse" or "the argument" in the field of rhetoric, and considered it one of the three modes of persuasion alongside ''ethos'' and ''pathos''. Pyrrhonist philosophers used the term to refer to dogmatic accounts of non-evident matters. The Stoics spoke of the ''logos spermatikos'' (the generative principle of the Universe) which foreshadows related concepts in Neoplatonism.

Within Hellenistic Judaism, Philo () integrated the term into Jewish philosophy.''Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy'' (2nd ed): Philo Judaeus, (1999).
Philo distinguished between ''logos prophorikos'' ("the uttered word") and the ''logos endiathetos'' ("the word remaining within").

The Gospel of John identifies the Christian Logos, through which all things are made, as divine (''theos''),May, Herbert G. and Bruce M. Metzger. ''The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha''. 1977. and further identifies Jesus Christ as the ''incarnate Logos''. Early translators of the Greek New Testament, such as Jerome (in the 4th century AD), were frustrated by the inadequacy of any single Latin word to convey the meaning of the word ''logos'' as used to describe Jesus Christ in the Gospel of John. The Vulgate Bible usage of was thus constrained to use the (perhaps inadequate) noun for "word"; later Romance language translations had the advantage of nouns such as in French. Reformation translators took another approach. Martin Luther rejected (verb) in favor of (word), for instance, although later commentators repeatedly turned to a more dynamic use involving ''the living word'' as used by Jerome and Augustine. The term is also used in Sufism, and the analytical psychology of Carl Jung.

Despite the conventional translation as "word", ''logos'' is not used for a word in the grammatical sense—for that, the term ''lexis'' (, ) was used.Henry George Liddell and Robert Scott
''An Intermediate Greek–English Lexicon''
lexis, 1889. However, both ''logos'' and ''lexis'' derive from the same verb (), meaning "(I) count, tell, say, speak".Henry George Liddell and Robert Scott
''An Intermediate Greek–English Lexicon''
legō, 1889.

Ancient Greek philosophy

Heraclitus

The writing of Heraclitus () was the first place where the word ''logos'' was given special attention in ancient Greek philosophy, although Heraclitus seems to use the word with a meaning not significantly different from the way in which it was used in ordinary Greek of his time. For Heraclitus, ''logos'' provided the link between rational discourse and the world's rational structure.

What ''logos'' means here is not certain; it may mean "reason" or "explanation" in the sense of an objective cosmic law, or it may signify nothing more than "saying" or "wisdom". Yet, an independent existence of a universal ''logos'' was clearly suggested by Heraclitus.

Aristotle's rhetorical logos

Following one of the other meanings of the word, Aristotle gave ''logos'' a different technical definition in the ''Rhetoric'', using it as meaning argument from reason, one of the three modes of persuasion. The other two modes are ''pathos'' (, ), which refers to persuasion by means of emotional appeal, "putting the hearer into a certain frame of mind";Aristotle, ''Rhetoric'', in Patricia P. Matsen, Philip B. Rollinson, and Marion Sousa,
Readings from Classical Rhetoric
', SIU Press }) is a name or title of Jesus Christ, seen as the pre-existent second person of the Trinity. The concept derives from John 1:1, which in the Douay–Rheims, King James, New International, and other versions of the Bible, reads:

Gnosticism

According to the Gnostic scriptures recorded in the Holy Book of the Great Invisible Spirit, the Logos is an emanation of the great spirit that is merged with the spiritual Adam called Adamas.

Neoplatonism

Neoplatonist philosophers such as Plotinus (270 AD) used ''logos'' in ways that drew on Plato and the Stoics, but the term ''logos'' was interpreted in different ways throughout Neoplatonism, and similarities to Philo's concept of ''logos'' appear to be accidental. The ''logos'' was a key element in the meditations of Plotinus regarded as the first neoplatonist. Plotinus referred back to Heraclitus and as far back as Thales in interpreting ''logos'' as the principle of meditation, existing as the interrelationship between the hypostases—the soul, the intellect (''nous''), and the One.

Plotinus used a trinity concept that consisted of "The One", the "Spirit", and "Soul". The comparison with the Christian Trinity is inescapable, but for Plotinus these were not equal and "The One" was at the highest level, with the "Soul" at the lowest. For Plotinus, the relationship between the three elements of his trinity is conducted by the outpouring of ''logos'' from the higher principle, and ''eros'' (loving) upward from the lower principle. Plotinus relied heavily on the concept of ''logos'', but no explicit references to Christian thought can be found in his works, although there are significant traces of them in his doctrine. Plotinus specifically avoided using the term ''logos'' to refer to the second person of his trinity. However, Plotinus influenced Gaius Marius Victorinus, who then influenced Augustine of Hippo. Centuries later, Carl Jung acknowledged the influence of Plotinus in his writings.

Victorinus differentiated between the ''logos'' interior to God and the ''logos'' related to the world by creation and salvation.

Augustine of Hippo, often seen as the father of medieval philosophy, was also greatly influenced by Plato and is famous for his re-interpretation of Aristotle and Plato in the light of early Christian thought. A young Augustine experimented with, but failed to achieve ecstasy using the meditations of Plotinus. In his '' Confessions'', Augustine described ''logos'' as the ''Divine Eternal Word'', by which he, in part, was able to motivate the early Christian thought throughout the Hellenized world (of which the Latin speaking West was a part) Augustine's ''logos'' ''had taken body'' in Christ, the man in whom the ''logos'' (i.e. or ) was present as in no other man.

Islam

The concept of the ''logos'' also exists in Islam, where it was definitively articulated primarily in the writings of the classical Sunni mystics and Islamic philosophers, as well as by certain Shi'a thinkers, during the Islamic Golden Age.Boer, Tj. de and Rahman, F., "ʿAḳl", in: ''Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition'', Edited by: P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, W.P. Heinrichs. In Sunni Islam, the concept of the ''logos'' has been given many different names by the denomination's metaphysicians, mystics, and philosophers, including ''ʿaql'' ("Intellect"), ''al-insān al-kāmil'' ("Universal Man"), ''kalimat Allāh'' ("Word of God"), ''haqīqa muḥammadiyya'' ("The Muhammadan Reality"), and ''nūr muḥammadī'' ("The Muhammadan Light").

''ʿAql''

One of the names given to a concept very much like the Christian Logos by the classical Muslim metaphysicians is ''ʿaql'', which is the "Arabic equivalent to the Greek (intellect)." In the writings of the Islamic neoplatonist philosophers, such as al-Farabi () and Avicenna (d. 1037), the idea of the ''ʿaql'' was presented in a manner that both resembled "the late Greek doctrine" and, likewise, "corresponded in many respects to the Logos Christology."

The concept of ''logos'' in Sufism is used to relate the "Uncreated" (God) to the "Created" (humanity). In Sufism, for the Deist, no contact between man and God can be possible without the ''logos''. The ''logos'' is everywhere and always the same, but its personification is "unique" within each region. Jesus and Muhammad are seen as the personifications of the ''logos'', and this is what enables them to speak in such absolute terms.

One of the boldest and most radical attempts to reformulate the neoplatonic concepts into Sufism arose with the philosopher Ibn Arabi, who traveled widely in Spain and North Africa. His concepts were expressed in two major works ''The Ringstones of Wisdom'' (''Fusus al-Hikam'') and ''The Meccan Illuminations'' (''Al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyya''). To Ibn Arabi, every prophet corresponds to a reality which he called a ''logos'' (''Kalimah''), as an aspect of the unique divine being. In his view the divine being would have for ever remained hidden, had it not been for the prophets, with ''logos'' providing the link between man and divinity.

Ibn Arabi seems to have adopted his version of the ''logos'' concept from neoplatonic and Christian sources, although (writing in Arabic rather than Greek) he used more than twenty different terms when discussing it. For Ibn Arabi, the ''logos'' or "Universal Man" was a mediating link between individual human beings and the divine essence.

Other Sufi writers also show the influence of the neoplatonic ''logos''. In the 15th century Abd al-Karīm al-Jīlī introduced the ''Doctrine of Logos and the Perfect Man''. For al-Jīlī, the "perfect man" (associated with the ''logos'' or the Prophet) has the power to assume different forms at different times and to appear in different guises.

In Ottoman Sufism, Şeyh Gâlib (d. 1799) articulates Sühan (''logos''-''Kalima'') in his ''Hüsn ü Aşk'' (''Beauty and Love'') in parallel to Ibn Arabi's Kalima. In the romance, ''Sühan'' appears as an embodiment of Kalima as a reference to the Word of God, the Perfect Man, and the Reality of Muhammad.

Jung's analytical psychology

Carl Jung contrasted the critical and rational faculties of ''logos'' with the emotional, non-reason oriented and mythical elements of ''eros''. In Jung's approach, ''logos'' vs ''eros'' can be represented as "science vs mysticism", or "reason vs imagination" or "conscious activity vs the unconscious".

For Jung, ''logos'' represented the masculine principle of rationality, in contrast to its feminine counterpart, ''eros'':

Jung attempted to equate ''logos'' and ''eros'', his intuitive conceptions of masculine and feminine consciousness, with the alchemical Sol and Luna. Jung commented that in a man the lunar anima and in a woman the solar animus has the greatest influence on consciousness. Jung often proceeded to analyze situations in terms of "paired opposites", e.g. by using the analogy with the eastern yin and yang and was also influenced by the neoplatonists.

In his book ''Mysterium Coniunctionis'' Jung made some important final remarks about anima and animus:

And in this book Jung again emphasized that the animus compensates ''eros'', while the anima compensates ''logos''.

Rhetoric

Author and professor Jeanne Fahnestock describes ''logos'' as a "premise". She states that, to find the reason behind a rhetor's backing of a certain position or stance, one must acknowledge the different "premises" that the rhetor applies via his or her chosen diction. The rhetor's success, she argues, will come down to "certain objects of agreement...between arguer and audience". "Logos is logical appeal, and the term logic is derived from it. It is normally used to describe facts and figures that support the speaker's topic." Furthermore, ''logos'' is credited with appealing to the audience's sense of logic, with the definition of "logic" being concerned with the thing as it is known.

Furthermore, one can appeal to this sense of logic in two ways. The first is through inductive reasoning, providing the audience with relevant examples and using them to point back to the overall statement. The second is through deductive enthymeme, providing the audience with general scenarios and then indicating commonalities among them.

Rhema

The word ''logos'' has been used in different senses along with ''rhema''. Both Plato and Aristotle used the term ''logos'' along with ''rhema'' to refer to sentences and propositions.''General linguistics'' by Francis P. Dinneen (1995). p. 11

/ref>

The Septuagint translation of the Hebrew Bible into Greek uses the terms ''rhema'' and ''logos'' as equivalents and uses both for the Hebrew word ''dabar'', as the Word of God.

Some modern usage in Christian theology distinguishes ''rhema'' from ''logos'' (which here refers to the written scriptures) while ''rhema'' refers to the revelation received by the reader from the Holy Spirit when the Word (''logos'') is read,''What Every Christian Ought to Know''. Adrian Rogers (2005). p. 16

/ref> although this distinction has been criticized.James T. Draper and Kenneth Keathley,
Biblical Authority
', Broadman & Holman (2001), , p. 113.John F. MacArthur,
Charismatic Chaos
', Zondervan (1993), , pp. 45–46.

See also

* -logy
* Dabar
* Dharma
* Epeolatry
* Imiaslavie
* Logic
* Logocracy
* Logos (Christianity)
* Logotherapy
* Nous
* Om
* Parmenides
* Ṛta
* Shabda
* Sophia (wisdom)

References

External links

The Apologist's Bible Commentary


Logos definition and example

*

{{Authority control

Concepts in ancient Greek metaphysics
Christianity and Hellenistic philosophy
Conceptions of God
Critical thinking
Concepts in ancient Greek epistemology
Hellenistic philosophy
Hellenistic religion
Heraclitus
Language and mysticism
Logic
Metaphilosophy
Metaphysical theories
Metaphysics of mind
Neoplatonism
Ontology
Philosophical anthropology
Philosophical theories
Philosophy of mind
Philosophy of psychology
Philosophy of religion
Rhetoric
Theories in ancient Greek philosophy
Thought
Truth