Names
Until ca. 1950, the endonym ''Lolo'' was written with derogatory characters in Chinese, and for this reason has sometimes been avoided. Shafer (1966–1974) used the term "Burmic" for the Lolo-Burmese languages. The Chinese term is ''Mian–Yi'', after the Chinese name for Burmese and one of several words for Tai, reassigned to replace ''Lolo'' by the Chinese government after 1950.Possible languages
The position of Naxi (Moso) within the family is unclear, and it is often left as a third branch besides Loloish and Burmish. Lama (2012) considers it to be a branch of Loloish, while Guillaume Jacques has suggested that it is a Qiangic language. The Pyu language that preceded Burmese in Burma is sometimes linked to the Lolo-Burmese family, but there is no good evidence for any particular classification, and it is best left unclassified within Sino-Tibetan. Löffler (1966) and Bradley (1997) consider the Mru language to be closely related to or part of Lolo-Burmese, while Matisoff includes Mruic in theExternal relationships
Guillaume Jacques & Alexis Michaud (2011) argue for a Burmo-Qiangic branch with two primary subbranches, Na- Qiangic (i.e. Naxi-Qiangic) and Lolo-Burmese. Similarly, David Bradley (2008) also proposes an Eastern Tibeto-Burman branch that includes the two subbranches of Burmic ( Lolo-Burmese) and Qiangic.Internal classification
Bradley (1997, quoted in Peiros 1997) gives the following classification for the Lolo-Burmese languages. In later publications, in place of ''Loloish'', David Bradley instead uses the term ''Ngwi'' based on a conservative autonym in the Sanie language. *Lolo-Burmese ** Mru **Core Lolo-Burmese ***Ugong–Burmish **** Ugong **** Burmish *** Loloish (Ngwi) Lama (2012), in a study of 36 languages, finds the Mondzish cluster ( Mondzi– Maang, Mantsi–Mo'ang) to be divergent. He did not include Mru or Ugong. *Lolo-Burmese (Niso-Burmic) ** Mondzish **Core Lolo-Burmese *** Burmish (Burmic) *** Loloish (Nisoic, Ngwi) Lama (2012) recognizes 9 unambiguous coherent groups of Lolo-Burmese languages, whereas Bradley considers there to be 5 groups (Burmish, Southern Ngwi, Northern Ngwi, Southeastern Ngwi, and Central Ngwi). # Mondzish # Burmish # Hanoish # Lahoish # Naxish # Nusoish # Kazhuoish # Lisoish # NisoishSee also
* Proto-Loloish languageReferences
Bibliography
* * * *Huang, Bufan ��布凡 ed. (1992). ''A Tibeto-Burman Lexicon'' (''TBL'') ��缅语族语言词汇 Beijing: Minzu University Press ��央民族学院出版社 * *Satterthwaite-Phillips, Damian. 2011. ''Phylogenetic inference of the Tibeto-Burman languages or On the usefulness of lexicostatistics (and "Megalo"-comparison) for the subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman''. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University. * *Yunnan Province Geography Gazetteer Committee ��南省地方志编纂委员会(1998). ''Yunnan Province Gazetteer, volume 59: ethnic minority languages and orthographies gazetteer'' ��南省志卷59: 少数民族语言文字志 Kunming: Yunnan People's Press ��南人民出版社 *''Zangmian yuyin he cihui'' (''ZMYYC'') ��缅语语音和词汇(1991). Beijing: Social Sciences Press ��国社会科学出版社 {{Lolo-Burmese languages Languages of India Languages of Myanmar