Lenna (test image)

Lenna (or Lena) is a standard test image used in the field of digital image processing, starting in 1973. It is a picture of the Swedish model Lena Forsén, shot by photographer Dwight Hooker and cropped from the centerfold of the November 1972 issue of ''Playboy'' magazine. The image has attracted controversy in recent years because of its subject matter, and many journals have deemed it inappropriate and discouraged its use, while others have banned it from publication outright. Forsén herself has called for it to be retired, saying "It's time I retired from tech."

The spelling "Lenna" came from the model's desire to encourage the proper pronunciation of her name. "I didn't want to be called ''Lee''na []," she explained. IPA pronunciation of ''Lee''na inserted into the quotation in brackets for clarity. is a common English pronunciation of the name ''Lena''. The quotation reads, "At her suggestion, the editors f Playboyspelled her first name with an extra 'n,' to encourage proper pronunciation. 'I didn't want to be called Leena," she explained.'

History

Before Lenna, the first use of a ''Playboy'' magazine image to illustrate image processing algorithms was in 1961. Lawrence G. Roberts used two cropped six-bit grayscale facsimile scanned images from ''Playboy''s July 1960 issue featuring Playmate Teddi Smith, in his master's thesis on image dithering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

The Lenna image was originally intended for high resolution color image processing study. Its history was described in the May 2001 newsletter of the IEEE Professional Communication Society, in an article by Jamie Hutchinson:

The image's reach was limited in the 1970s and 80s, which is reflected in it initially only appearing in .org domains, but in July 1991, the image featured on the cover of ''Optical Engineering'' alongside Peppers, another popular test image. This drew the attention of ''Playboy'' to the potential copyright infringement. The peak of image hits on the internet was in 1995. The scan became one of the most used images in computer history.
The use of the photo in electronic imaging has been described as "clearly one of the most important events in tshistory". The image spread to over 100 different domains, particularly .com and .edu.

In a 1999 issue of '' IEEE Transactions on Image Processing'' "Lena" was used in three separate articles, and the picture continued to appear in scientific journals throughout the beginning of the 21st century.

Lenna is so widely accepted in the image processing community that Forsén was a guest at the 50th annual Conference of the Society for Imaging Science and Technology (IS&T) in 1997. In 2015, Lena Forsén was also guest of honor at the banquet of IEEE ICIP 2015. After delivering a speech, she chaired the best paper award ceremony.

To explain why the image became a standard in the field, David C. Munson, editor-in-chief of ''IEEE Transactions on Image Processing'', stated that it was a good test image because of its detail, flat regions, shading, and texture. He also noted that "the Lena image is a picture of an attractive woman. It is not surprising that the (mostly male) image processing research community gravitated toward an image that they found attractive."

While ''Playboy'' often cracks down on illegal uses of its material and did initially send a notice to the publisher of ''Optical Engineering'' about its unauthorized use in that publication, over time it has decided to overlook the wide use of Lena. Eileen Kent, VP of new media at ''Playboy'', said, "We decided we should exploit this, because it is a phenomenon."

Criticism

The use of the image has produced controversy because ''Playboy'' is "seen (by some) as being degrading to women". In a 1999 essay on reasons for the male predominance in computer science, applied mathematician Dianne P. O'Leary wrote:

A 2012 paper on compressed sensing used a photo of the model Fabio Lanzoni as a test image to draw attention to this issue.

The use of the test image at the magnet school Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology in Fairfax County, Virginia, provoked a guest editorial by a senior in ''The Washington Post'' in 2015 about its detrimental impact on aspiring female students in computer science.

In 2017, the '' Journal of Modern Optics'' published an editorial titled "On alternatives to Lenna" suggesting three images (Pirate, Cameraman, and Peppers) that "are reasonably close to Lenna in feature space".

In 2018, the '' Nature Nanotechnology'' journal announced that they would no longer consider articles using the Lenna image. In the same year SPIE, the publishers of ''Optical Engineering'', also announced that they "strongly discourage" the use of the Lenna image, and would no longer consider new submissions containing the image "without convincing scientific justification for its use". They noted that aside from the copyright and ethical issues, that it was also no longer useful as a standard image: "In today's age of high-resolution digital image technology, it seems difficult to argue that a 512 × 512 image produced with a 1970s-era analog scanner is the best we have to offer as an image quality test standard".

Forsén stated in the 2019 documentary film ''Losing Lena'', "I retired from modeling a long time ago. It's time I retired from tech, too... Let's commit to losing me."

The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) announced that, starting April 1, 2024, it will no longer allow use of the Lena image in its publications.

See also

* Carole Hersee
* China Girl (filmmaking)
* Lorem ipsum
* Shirley cards
* Stanford bunny
* Suzanne (3D model)
* '' Textures: A Photographic Album for Artists and Designers''
* Utah teapot

References

Sources

*
*

Further reading

* image used numerous times in chapter 6

External links

Lenna 97: A Complete Story of Lenna

The Lenna Story
the original story of Lenna and an un-cropped scan of the original ''Playboy'' photograph

{{Standard test item

1970s photographs
1972 in art
1972 works
Color photographs
Image processing
Playboy
Test items
Obscenity controversies in photography