Hélène Landemore is Professor of Political Science at Yale University. She has a PhD from Harvard University. Her subfield is political theory and she is known for her works on democratic theory.

Biography

After a childhood spent in Normandy, Landemore began higher studies in Paris at the age of 18. She joined the ''École Normale Supérieure'' and ''Sciences Po Paris''. In 2008 she received a Ph.D. from Harvard University with a thesis on the idea of collective intelligence applied to the justification of democracy.

Public life

She researched the 2010 participatory constituent process in Iceland and directly observed the 2019-20 French’s Citizen Convention for Climate. In September 2022 she was appointed to the governance committee of th
French Citizens' Convention on end of life
She regularly presents her ideas and proposals in French and American newspapers.

Theories

Hélène Landemore’s research focuses on deliberative democracy and collective intelligence.

Criticism of electoral democracy

Like David Van Reybrouck and Brett Hennig, she observes that elections are more aristocratic than democratic, as they empower a tiny social elite. Elected parliaments are never representative of the entire population. In particular, women, working-class people, and social minorities are systematically underrepresented. Money provided by rich donors to political campaigns have an important impact on electoral politics, particularly in the United States of America. As a result, the United States more closely resembles a plutocracy, in which the economic elite has more influence on politics than the vast majority of the population.

Sortition and Citizen’s Assembly

Hélène Landemore sees a new institution as the "key" to a new form of democracy. She calls it the "open mini-public". It is a citizen’s assembly of a few hundreds of people chosen by lot.

Cognitive Diversity

The diversity of the members of an assembly is a strength for deliberation. Reflection will be more rich and nuanced if it involves different perspectives, life experiences, and knowledge. That is why an assembly chosen by lot is generally preferable to an assembly of experts. We cannot predict in advance what knowledge and experiences will be useful to face a political problem. Reason then commands that we choose maximum diversity over the specialized ability. It is an epistemic and probabilist argument in favour of democratic inclusion and sortition.

"Open Democracy"

Hélène Landemore proposes a new paradigm, "Open Democracy," which rests on five principles: # ''Participation rights'': the rights of expression and association, to which are added the rights of petition and citizen’s initiative. These rights would enable the convocation of a

referendum A referendum, plebiscite, or ballot measure is a Direct democracy, direct vote by the Constituency, electorate (rather than their Representative democracy, representatives) on a proposal, law, or political issue. A referendum may be either bin ...

on a law voted by the Parliament. # ''Deliberation'': the decisions must come from discussion between equal citizens. The floor must not be monopolized by few gifted orators. # ''Majoritarian principle'': instead of super-majorities rules, which produce blocking minorities, the vote must integrate new and fairer methods, such as the

Majority Judgment Majority judgment (MJ) is a single-winner voting system proposed in 2010 by Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki. It is a kind of highest median rule, a cardinal voting system that elects the candidate with the highest median rating. Voting proce ...

. # ''Democratic representation'': thanks to

sortition In governance, sortition is the selection of public officer, officials or jurors at random, i.e. by Lottery (probability), lottery, in order to obtain a representative sample. In ancient Athenian democracy, sortition was the traditional and pr ...

and, to a lesser extent, voluntary participation. # ''Transparency'': of the process and of the results of the deliberations, in real-time or afterwards. Transparency is a means of control, which requires that information be made public and legible to citizens.

Works

Books in English

* Hélène Landemore, Jon Elster et al. ''Edited volume: Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms'', Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012. * Hélène Landemore, ''Democratic reason: Politics, collective intelligence, and the rule of the many'', Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2017. * Hélène Landemore, ''Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century'', Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2020. * Hélène Landemore, Jason Brennan. ''Debating Democracy: Do We Need More or Less?'', Oxford University Press, 2021. * Lucy Bernholz, Hélène Landemore, and Rob Reich. ''Edited volume: Digital Technology and Democratic Theory'', Chicago, Chicago University Press, 2021.

Books in French

* Hélène Landemore, ''Hume. Probabilité et choix raisonnable'', Paris, PUF, 2004.

References

External links

* * {{DEFAULTSORT:Landemore, Hélène French political scientists Yale University faculty Harvard University alumni Living people 1976 births French women political scientists