Glaisher's Theorem
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
number theory Number theory is a branch of pure mathematics devoted primarily to the study of the integers and arithmetic functions. Number theorists study prime numbers as well as the properties of mathematical objects constructed from integers (for example ...
, Glaisher's theorem is an identity useful to the study of
integer partition In number theory and combinatorics, a partition of a non-negative integer , also called an integer partition, is a way of writing as a summation, sum of positive integers. Two sums that differ only in the order of their summands are considered ...
s. Proved in 1883 by
James Whitbread Lee Glaisher James Whitbread Lee Glaisher (5 November 1848, in Lewisham — 7 December 1928, in Cambridge) was a prominent English mathematician and astronomer. He is known for Glaisher's theorem, an important result in the field of integer partitions, a ...
, it states that the number of partitions of an integer n into parts not divisible by d is equal to the number of partitions in which no part is repeated d or more times. This generalizes a result established in 1748 by
Leonhard Euler Leonhard Euler ( ; ; ; 15 April 170718 September 1783) was a Swiss polymath who was active as a mathematician, physicist, astronomer, logician, geographer, and engineer. He founded the studies of graph theory and topology and made influential ...
for the case d=2.


Statement

It states that the number of partitions of an integer n into parts not divisible by d is equal to the number of partitions in which no part is repeated ''d'' or more times, which can be written formally as partitions of the form n=\lambda_1+\cdots+\lambda_k where \lambda_i\geq \lambda_ and \lambda_i\geq \lambda_+1. When d=2 this becomes the special case known as Euler's theorem, that the number of partitions of n into distinct parts is equal to the number of partitions of n into odd parts. In the following examples, we use the multiplicity notation of partitions. For example, 1^4 2^1 3^2 is a notation for the partition 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 3.


Example for ''d'' = 2 (Euler's theorem case)

Among the 15 partitions of the number 7, there are 5, shown in bold below, that contain only ''odd parts'' (i.e. only odd numbers): \mathbf, 6^1 1^1, 5^1 2^1, \mathbf, 4^1 3^1, 4^1 2^1 1^1, 4^1 1^3, \mathbf, 3^1 2^2, 3^1 2^1 1^2, \mathbf, 2^3 1^1, 2^2 1^3, 2^1 1^5, \mathbf If we count now the partitions of 7 with distinct parts (i.e. where no number is repeated), we also obtain 5: \mathbf, \mathbf, \mathbf, 5^1 1^2, \mathbf, \mathbf, 4^1 1^3, 3^2 1^1, 3^1 2^2, 3^1 2^1 1^2, 3^1 1^4, 2^3 1^1, 2^2 1^3, 2^1 1^5, 1^7 The partitions in bold in the first and second case are not the same, and it is not obvious why their number is the same.


Example for ''d'' = 3

Among the 11 partitions of the number 6, there are 7, shown in bold below, that contain only parts not divisible by 3: 6, \mathbf, \mathbf, \mathbf, 3^2, 3^1 2^1 1^1, 3^1 1^3, \mathbf, \mathbf, \mathbf, \mathbf And if we count the partitions of 6 with no part that repeats more than 2 times, we also obtain 7: \mathbf, \mathbf, \mathbf, \mathbf, \mathbf, \mathbf, 3^1 1^3, 2^3, \mathbf, 2^1 1^4, 1^6


Proof

A proof of the theorem can be obtained with
generating function In mathematics, a generating function is a representation of an infinite sequence of numbers as the coefficients of a formal power series. Generating functions are often expressed in closed form (rather than as a series), by some expression invo ...
s. If we note p_d(n) the number of partitions with no parts divisible by ''d'' and q_d(n) the number of partitions with no parts repeated more than ''d-1'' times, then the theorem means that for all n p_d(n)=q_d(n). The uniqueness of ordinary generating functions implies that instead of proving that p_d(n)=q_d(n) for all n, it suffices to prove that the generating functions of p_d(n) and q_d(n) are equal, i.e. that \sum_^\infty p_d(n)x^n = \sum_^\infty q_d(n)x^n . Each generating function can be rewritten as infinite products (with a method similar to the infinite product of the partition function) : : \sum_^\infty p_d(n)x^n = \prod_^\infty\frac (i.e. the product of terms where ''n'' is not divisible by ''d''). : \sum_^\infty q_d(n)x^n = \prod_^\infty\frac If we expand the infinite product for q_d(n): :\prod_^\infty\frac =\frac\frac\dots\frac\dots we see that each term in the numerator cancels with the corresponding multiple of ''d'' in the denominator. What remains after canceling all the numerator terms is exactly the infinite product for p_d(n). Hence the generating functions for p_d(n) and q_d(n) are equal.


Rogers–Ramanujan identities

If instead of counting the number of partitions with distinct parts we count the number of partitions with parts differing by at least 2, a further generalization is possible. It was first discovered by Leonard James Rogers in 1894, and then independently by
Srinivasa Ramanujan Srinivasa Ramanujan Aiyangar (22 December 188726 April 1920) was an Indian mathematician. Often regarded as one of the greatest mathematicians of all time, though he had almost no formal training in pure mathematics, he made substantial con ...
in 1913 and
Issai Schur Issai Schur (10 January 1875 – 10 January 1941) was a Russian mathematician who worked in Germany for most of his life. He studied at the Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Berlin. He obtained his doctorate in 1901, became lecturer i ...
in 1917, in what are now known as the
Rogers–Ramanujan identities In mathematics, the Rogers–Ramanujan identities are two identities related to basic hypergeometric series and integer partitions. The identities were first discovered and proved by , and were subsequently rediscovered (without a proof) by Srin ...
. They state that: :1) The number of partitions whose parts differ by at least 2 is equal to the number of partitions involving only numbers congruent to 1 or 4 (mod 5). :2) The number of partitions whose parts differ by at least 2 and with the smallest part at least 2 is equal to the number of partitions involving only numbers congruent to 2 or 3 (mod 5).


Example 1

For example, there are only 3 partitions of 7, shown in bold below, into parts differing by at least 2 (note: if a number is repeated in a partition, it means a difference of 0 between two parts, hence the partition is not counted): \mathbf, \mathbf, \mathbf, 5^1 1^2, 4^1 3^1, 4^1 2^1 1^1, 4^1 1^3, 3^2 1^1, 3^1 2^2, 3^1 2^1 1^2, 3^1 1^4, 2^3 1^1, 2^2 1^3, 2^1 1^5, 1^7 And there are also only 3 partitions of 7 involving only the parts 1, 4, 6: 7, \mathbf, 5^1 2^1, 5^1 1^2, 4^1 3^1, 4^1 2^1 1^1, \mathbf, 3^2 1^1, 3^1 2^2, 3^1 2^1 1^2, 3^1 1^4, 2^3 1^1, 2^2 1^3, 2^1 1^5, \mathbf


Example 2

For an example of the second statement of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities, we consider partitions of 7 with the further restriction of the smallest part at least 2, and there are only 2, shown in bold below: \mathbf, 6^1 1^1, \mathbf, 5^1 1^2, 4^1 3^1, 4^1 2^1 1^1, 4^1 1^3, 3^2 1^1, 3^1 2^2, 3^1 2^1 1^2, 3^1 1^4, 2^3 1^1, 2^2 1^3, 2^1 1^5, 1^7 And there are also only 2 partitions of 7 involving only the parts 2, 3, 7: \mathbf, 6^1 1^1, 5^1 2^1, 5^1 1^2, 4^1 3^1, 4^1 2^1 1^1, 4^1 1^3, 3^2 1^1, \mathbf, 3^1 2^1 1^2, 3^1 1^4, 2^3 1^1, 2^2 1^3, 2^1 1^5, 1^7


Notes


References

*{{cite journal , author=D. H. Lehmer , authorlink=Derrick Henry Lehmer , title=Two nonexistence theorems on partitions , journal= Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , volume=52 , issue=6 , year=1946 , pages=538–544 , url=http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bams/1183509416 , doi=10.1090/S0002-9904-1946-08605-X , doi-access=free Theorems in number theory Glaisher family Integer partitions