Early life
Sedley was educated atAcademic career
Since 1976 Sedley has been aHonours
He was elected aPublications
Book
* ''The Hellenistic Philosophers'' (withArticles and Chapters
* ‘The structure of Epicurus’ ''On nature’'' ''Cronache Ercolanesi'' 4 (1974), 89-92 * ‘Epicurus, ''On nature'', Book XI: an argument against Eudoxan astronomy’ in ''Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Papyrology'' (Oxford 1974), 269-75 * ‘Epicurus and his professional rivals’ in J. Bollack, A. Laks (ed.), ''Études sur l’épicurisme antique'' (''Cahiers de Philologie'' I, 1976), 119-59 * ‘Epicurus and the mathematicians of Cyzicus’ ''Cronache Ercolanesi'' 6 (1976), 23-54 * ‘Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic philosophy’ ''Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society'' 203 (1977), 74-120 * ‘The protagonists’ chap. 1 of M. Schofield et al. (ed.), ''Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology'' (Oxford, 1980), 1-19 * ‘The end of the Academy’ ''Phronesis'' 26 (1981), 67-75 * ‘Two conceptions of vacuum’ ''Phronesis'' 27 (1982), 175-93 * ‘On signs’ in J. Barnes et al. (ed.), ''Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice'' (Cambridge 1982), 239-72 * ‘The Stoic criterion of identity’ ''Phronesis'' 27 (1982), 255-75; French version, tr. J. Brunschwig, ‘Le Critère d’identité chez les Stoïciens’, ''Revue de métaphysique et de morale'' 4 (1989), 513-33 * ‘Epicurus’ refutation of determinism’ in ΣΥΖΗΤΗΣΙΣ_: studi sull’ epicureismo greco e romano offerti a Marcello Gigante_ (Naples 1983), 11-51 * ‘The motivation of Greek skepticism’ in M.F. Burnyeat (ed.), ''The Skeptical Tradition'' (Berkeley/Los Angeles 1983), 9-29 * ‘On the Stoic goods in Stobaeus, ''Eclogae'' 2’ in W.W. Fortenbaugh (ed.), ''On Stoic and Peripatetic ethics: the work of Arius Didymus'' (Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, 1; New Brunswick 1983), 85-6 * ‘The character of Epicurus’ ''On nature in ''Atti del XVII congresso internazionale di papirologia'' (Naples 1984), 381-7 * ‘The negated conjunction in Stoicism’ ''Elenchos'' 5 (1984), 311-16 * ‘The Stoic theory of universals’ in ''Southern Journal of Philosophy'' 23, suppl., ‘Spindel Conference 1984: Recovering the Stoics’, 87-92; Chinese translation in ''Tsinghua Studies in Western Philosophy'' 4.2 (2018), 86-92 * ‘Three notes on Theophrastus’ treatment of tastes and smells’ in W.W.Fortenbaugh (ed.), ''Theophrastus of Eresus, on his Life and Work'' (Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, 2; New Brunswick 1985), 205-7 * ‘Philoponus’ conception of space’ in R. Sorabji (ed.), ''Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science'' (London/Ithaca NY 1987), 140-53 * ‘Epicurean anti-reductionism’ in J. Barnes, M. Mignucci (ed.), ''Matter and Metaphysics'' (Naples 1988), 295-327; French version in ''Les Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg'' 15 (2003), 321-59 * ‘Epicurus on the common sensibles’ in P.M. Huby, G.C. Neale (ed.), ''The Criterion of Truth: Studies in Honour of George Kerferd on his 70th birthday'' (Liverpool 1989), 123-36 * ‘Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman world’ in M. Griffin, J. Barnes (ed.), ''Philosophia Togata'' (Oxford 1989), 97-119 * ‘Is the ''Lysis'' a dialogue of definition?’ ''Phronesis'' 34 (1989), 107-8 * ‘The proems of Empedocles and Lucretius’ ''Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies'' 30 (1989), 269-96 * ‘Teleology and myth in the ''Phaedo’'' ''Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy'' 5 (1990), 359-83 * ‘Is Aristotle’s teleology anthropocentric?’ ''Phronesis'' 36 (1991), 179-96 * ‘Empedocles’ theory of vision and Theophrastus ''De sensibus’'' in W.W. Fortenbaugh, D. Gutas (eds.), ''Theophrastus: his Psychological, Doxographical and Scientific Writings'', Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, 5; New Brunswick 1992), 20-31 * ‘Sextus Empiricus and the atomist criteria of truth’ ''Elenchos'' 13 (1992), 19-56 * ‘Chrysippus on psychophysical causality’ in J. Brunschwig, M. Nussbaum (ed.), ''Passions & Perceptions'' (Cambridge 1993), 313-31 * ‘Commentary on Mansfeld’ (on J. Mansfeld, ‘The idea of will in Chrysippus, Posidonius and Galen’) ''Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy'' 7 (1993), 146-52 * ‘A Platonist reading of ''Theaetetus'' 145-147’ ''Aristotelian Society'' suppl. vol. 67 (1993), 125-49 * ‘La causalità psicologica nel ''Fedone’'' in A. Alberti (ed.), ''Realtà e Ragione'' (Florence 1994), 107-22 * ‘The dramatis personae of Plato’s Phaedo’ in T.J. Smiley (ed.), ''Philosophical Dialogues: Plato, Hume and Wittgenstein'' (Oxford 1995), 1-26 * ‘Three Platonist interpretations of the ''Theaetetus’'' in C. Gill, M.M. McCabe (ed.), ''Form and Argument in Late Plato'' (Oxford 1996), 79-103 * ‘Aristotle’s ''De interpretatione'' and ancient semantics’ in G. Manetti (ed.), ''Knowledge through Signs: Ancient Semiotic Theories and Practices'' (Brussels 1996), 87-108; revised version, ‘Aristote et la signification’, ''Philosophie Antique'' 4 (2004), 5-25 * ‘Plato’s ''Phaedo'' in the third century BC’ in M. Serena Funghi (ed.), ΟΔΟΙ ΔΙΖΗΣΙΟΣ_: Le vie della ricerca (Studi in onore di Francesco Adorno)_ (Florence 1996), 447-55 * ‘The inferential foundations of Epicurean ethics’ in G. Giannantoni, M. Gigante (ed.), ''Epicureismo Greco e Romano'' (Naples 1996), 313-39; repr. in S. Everson (ed.), ''Ethics'' (Cambridge 1998), 129-50 * ‘Alcinous’ epistemology’ in K.A. Algra, P.W. van der Horst, D.T. Runia (ed.), ''Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy'' (Leiden 1996), 300-12 * ‘Plato’s ''auctoritas'' and the rebirth of the commentary tradition’ in J. Barnes, M. Griffin (ed.), ''Philosophia Togata II, Plato and Aristotle at Rome'', (Oxford 1997), 110-29 * ‘A new reading in the anonymous ''Theaetetus'' commentary (PBerol. 9782 fragment D)’ in ''Papiri Filosofici: Miscellanea di studi I'' (Florence 1997), 139-44 * ‘“Becoming like god” in the ''Timaeus'' and Aristotle’ in T. Calvo, L. Brisson (ed.) ''Interpreting the Timaeus-Critias'' (Sankt Augustin 1997), 327-39; longer version, entitled ‘The ideal of godlikeness’, in G. Fine (ed.), ''Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion, and the Soul'' (Oxford Readings in Philosophy; Oxford 1999), 309-328 ''Longer version:'' * ‘The ethics of Brutus and Cassius’ ''Journal of Roman Studies'' 87 (1997), 41-53 * ‘How Lucretius composed the ''De rerum natura’'' in K.A. Algra, M.H. Koenen, P.H. Schrijvers (eds.), ''Lucretius and his Intellectual Background'' (Amsterdam 1997), 1-19 * ‘Platonic causes’ ''Phronesis'' 43 (1998), 114-32 * ‘Theophrastus and Epicurean physics’ in J.M. van Ophuijsen, M. van Raalte (ed.), ''Theophrastus: Reappraising the Sources'' (Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, 8; New Brunswick 1998), 331-54 * ‘The sequence of Argument in Lucretius I’ in C. Atherton (ed.), ''Form and Content in Didactic Poetry'', Nottingham Classical Literature Studies 5 (Bari 1998), 37-55 * ‘Le scuole filosofiche e le città’ in S. Settis (ed.), ''I greci'' vol. II.3 (Turin 1998), 467-82 * ‘The etymologies in Plato’s ''Cratylus’'' ''Journal of Hellenic Studies'' 118 (1998), 142-56 * ‘Aristotelian relativities’ in M. Canto Sperber and P. Pellegrin (ed.), ''Le Style de la pensée. Receuil d’hommages à Jacques Brunschwig'' (Paris, 2002), 324-52; already published in Italian under the title ‘Relatività aristoteliche’, in ''Dianoia'' 2 (1997), 11-25, and 3 (1998), 11-23 * ‘Pythagoras the grammar teacher and Didymon the adulterer’ in ''Hyperboreus'' 4/1 (1998), 122-38; shorter version, entitled ‘Pythagoras the grammar teacher (PbrLibr Add MS 37516, 1)’, in ''Papiri filosofici: Miscellanea di studi II'' (Florence 1998), 167-81 * ‘The Stoic-Platonist debate on ''kathêkonta’'' in K. Ierodiakonou (ed.), ΘΕΜΑΤΑ ΣΤΩΙΚΗΣ ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΑΣ (special issue of ''Deukalion'', 1997; in Greek translation), and in K. Ierodiakonou (ed.), ''Topics in Stoic Philosophy'' (Oxford 1999), 128-52 * ‘Lucretius’ use and avoidance of Greek’ in J.N. Adams, R. Mayer (ed.), ''Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry'' (Proceedings of the British Academy, Oxford 1999), 227-46 * ‘Aspasius on ''akrasia’'' in A. Alberti, R.W. Sharples (ed.), ''Aspasius: the Earliest Extant Commentary on Aristotle’s Ethics'' (Berlin 1999), 162-75 * ‘Parmenides and Melissus’ in A.A. Long (ed.), ''The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy'' (Cambridge 1999), 113-33 * ‘Hellenistic physics and metaphysics’ in ''The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy'' (Cambridge 1999), 353-411 * ‘''Metaphysics'' Λ 10’ in M. Frede, D. Charles (ed.), ''Aristotle’s Metaphysics Book Lambda'' (Oxford 2000), 327-50 * ‘Socratic irony in the Platonist commentators’ in J. Annas and C.J. Rowe (ed.), ''New Perspectives on Plato: Modern and Ancient'' (Cambridge, Mass., 2002), 37-57; earlier version, ‘L’ironie dans le dialogue platonicien selon les commentateurs anciens’, in F. Cossuta, M. Narcy (ed.), ''La forme-dialogue chez Platon'' (Grenoble, 2001), 5-19 * ‘Epistemologia e teorie della natura nell’età ellenistica’ in ''Storia della scienza'' I (Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana, Rome 2001), 678-90 * ‘The origins of Stoic god’ in D. Frede, A. Laks (ed.), ''Traditions of Theology'' (Leiden 2002), 41-83 * ‘Diogenes of Oenoanda on Cyrenaic ethics’ in ''Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society'' 228 (2002), 159-74 * ‘The collapse of language? ''Theaetetus'' 179c-183c’ published on line in ''Plato'' 3 (2003) * ‘The school: from Zeno to Arius Didymus’ in B. Inwood (ed.), ''The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics'' (Cambridge 2003), 7-34 * (with Jacques Brunschwig) ‘Hellenistic philosophy’ in D.N. Sedley (ed.), ''The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy'' (Cambridge 2003), 151-83 * ‘Zeno’s definition of ''phantasia kataleptike’'' in T. Scaltsas and A.S. Mason (eds.), ''The Philosophy of Zeno. Zeno of Citium and his Legacy'' (Larnaca 2002), 133-54; also published as ‘La définition de ''phantasia kataleptike'' par Zénon’ in G. Romeyer Dherbey, J.-B. Gourinat (eds.), ''Les Stoïciens'' (Paris 2005), 75-92 * ‘Lucretius and the new Empedocles’ published online in ''Leeds International Classical Studies'' 2 (2003) * ‘A Socratic interpretation of Plato’s ''Theaetetus’'' ''Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy'' 18 (2003), 277-313 * ‘Etymology as a ''techne'' in Plato’s ''Cratylus’'' in C. Nifadopoulos (ed.), ''ETYMOLOGIA: Studies in Ancient Etymology'' (Münster, 2003), 21-32; also ‘La tecnicità del metodo etimologico nel Cratilo’, in M. Migliori (ed.), ''Il problema del metodo in Platone e Aristotele''(forthcoming) * ‘The ''nomothetes'' in Plato’s ''Cratylus’'' ''Studia Philonica Annual'' 15 (2003), 5-16 * ‘Philodemus and the decentralisation of philosophy’ ''Cronache Ercolanesi'' 33 (2003), 31-41 * ‘''On Generation and Corruption'' I 2’ in F.A.J. de Haas, J. Mansfeld (eds.), ''Aristotle, On Generation and Corruption Book 1. Symposium Aristotelicum'' (Oxford 2004), 65-89 * ‘Stoic metaphysics at Rome’ in R. Salles (ed.), ''Metaphysics, Soul and Ethics. Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji'' (Oxford 2005), 117-42 * ‘Empedocles’ life cycles’ in A. Pierris (ed.), ''The Empedoclean Cosmos: Structure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense. 6-13 July 2003'' (Patras 2005), 331-71 * ‘Les origines des preuves stoïciennes de l’existence de dieu’ in ''Revue de métaphysique et de morale'' 4 (2005), 461-87 * ‘Verità futura e causalità nel ''De fato'' di Cicerone’ in C. Natali and S. Maso (ed.) ''La catena delle cause. Determinismo e antideterminismo nel pensiero antico e in quello contemporaneo'' (Amsterdam 2005), 241-54 * ‘The speech of Agathon in Plato’s ''Symposium’'' in B. Reis (ed.), ''The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics'' (Cambridge 2006), 49-67 * ‘Plato’s tsunami’ varying versions in ''THEO DORON'' (private festschrift for T.L. Zinn, 2006), in ''Hyperboreus'' 11. 2 (2005) 205-214, and (as ‘Lo tsunami di Platone’) in proceedings of a conference in honour of Antonio Carlini * ‘Form-particular resemblance in Plato’s ''Phaedo’'' ''Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society'' 106 (3) (2006), 311-27 * ‘Plato on language’ in H. Benson (ed.), ''A Companion to Plato'' (2006), 214-27 * ‘Equal sticks and stones’ in D.J. Scott (ed.), ''Maieusis'' (Oxford 2007), 68-86 * ‘Philosophy, the Forms, and the art of ruling’ in G.R.F. Ferrari (ed.), ''The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic'' (Cambridge 2007), 256-83; earlier version of one part in ''International Symposium: The Ideal and Reality of Ancient Greek Democracy'', Department of History, Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyo, 2004 * ‘Atomism’s Eleatic roots’ in P. Curd, D.W. Graham (ed.), ''The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy'' (Oxford 2008), 305-32 * ‘Socrates’ place in the history of teleology’ ''Elenchos'' 29 (2008), 317-34; revised version, ‘Socrates, Darwin and Teleology’, in J. Rocca (ed.), ''Teleology in the Ancient World'' (Cambridge 2017), 25-42 * ‘Myth, punishment and politics in Plato’s ''Gorgias’'' in C. Partenie (ed.), ''Plato’s myths'' (Cambridge 2009), 51-76 * ‘Presocratic themes: being, not-being and mind’ * in Robin Le Poidevin, Peter Simons, Andrew McGonigal, Ross Cameron (eds.) ''The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics'' (2009), 8-17 * ‘Les dieux et les hommes’ in J. Barnes, J.-B. Gourinat (ed.) ''Lire les stoiciens'' (2009), 79-97 * ‘Epicureanism in the Late Roman Republic’ * in J. Warren (ed.), ''The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism'' (Cambridge 2009), 29-45 * ‘Plato’s ''Timaeus'' and Hesiod’s ''Theogony’'' in J.H. Haubold, G.R. Boys-Stones (ed.), ''Plato and Hesiod'' (Oxford 2009), 246-58 * ‘Three kinds of Platonic immortality’ * in D. Frede and B. Reis (eds.), ''Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy'' (Berlin 2009), 145-61 * ‘Philosophy in the Artemidorus papyrus’ * in C. Gallazzi, B. Kramer, S. Settis (eds.) ''Intorno al Papiro di Artemidoro I. Contesto Culturale, Lingua e Stile. Atti del Convegno di Pisa del 15 novembre 2008'' (Milan 2009), 29-53 * ‘The ''Theaetetus'' as an ethical dialogue’ in A. Havlicek, F. Karfik and S. Spinka (eds.), ''Plato’s Theaetetus. Proceedings of Sixth Symposium Platonicum Pragense'' (2009), 2-13. Revised version, ‘Plato’s ''Theaetetus'' as an ethical dialogue’ in A. Nightingale and D. Sedley (eds.), ''Ancient Models of Mind. Studies in Human and Divine Rationality'' (Cambridge 2010), 64-74 * ‘The status of physics in Lucretius, Philodemus and Cicero’ in A. Antoni, D. Delattre (eds.), ''Miscellanea Papyrologica Herculanensia volumen I'' (Pisa 2010), 63-8 * ‘Teleology, Aristotelian and Platonic’ in J. Lennox, R. Bolton (eds.), ''Being, Nature and Life in Aristotle: Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf'' (Cambridge 2010), 5-29 * ‘Philosophy’ in A. Barchiesi, W. Scheidel (ed.), ''The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies'' (Oxford 2010), 701-12 * ‘Epicurus' theological innatism’ in J. Fish and K. Sanders (eds.), ''Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition'' (Cambridge 2011), 29-52 * * ‘Matter in Hellenistic philosophy’ in D. Giovannozzi and M. Veneziani (eds.) ''Materia'' (Florence 2011), 53-66 * ‘PHibeh 184: Platonist logic in the third century BC?’ in M.S. Funghi (ed.) ''Studi e testi per il Corpus dei papiri filosofici'' (Florence 2011), 227-39 * ‘The ''theoretikos bios'' in Alcinous’ * in T. Bénatouïl and M. Bonazzi (eds.) ''Theoria, Praxis, and the Contemplative Life after Plato and Aristotle'' (Leiden 2012), 163-81 * ‘Marcus Aurelius on physics’ * in M. Van Ackeren (ed.) ''A Companion to Marcus Aurelius'' (Oxford 2012), 396-407 * ‘Antiochus as historian of Philosophy’ in D. Sedley (ed.) ''The Philosophy of Antiochus'' (Cambridge 2012), 80-103 * ‘Aristotle on place’ ''Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy'' XXVII (Leiden 2012), 183-201 * ‘Plato’s theory of change at ''Phaedo'' 70-1’ in ''Presocratics and Plato: A Festschrift in Honor of Charles H. Kahn'' (Las Vegas, forthcoming 2012), 181-97 * * ‘Cicero and the ''Timaeus’'' in M. Schofield (ed.) ''Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC'' (Cambridge 2013), 187-205 * ‘La classification du ''Théétète'' par Thrasylle’ in D. El Murr (ed.), ''La Mesure du savoir. Études sur le Théétète'' (Paris 2013), 295-307 * ‘The atheist underground’ in V. Harte and M. Lane (eds.) ''Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy'' (Cambridge 2013), 329-48 * ‘From the Presocratic to the Hellenistic Age’ in S. Bullivant and M. Ruse (eds.), ''The Oxford Handbook of Atheism'' (Oxford, 2013), 139-51 * ‘Plato and the One-over-Many principle’ in R. Chiaradonna and G. Galluzzo (ed.), ''Universals in Ancient Philosophy'', (Pisa, 2013), 113-37 * ‘Socratic intellectualism in the Republic’s central digression’ * in G. Boys-Stones, D. El Murr, C. Gill (eds.) ''The Platonic Art of Philosophy. Studies in Honour of Christopher Rowe'' (Cambridge 2013), 70-89 * ‘The unity of virtue after the ''Protagoras’'' in B. Collette and S. Delcomminette (eds.), ''Unité et origine des vertus dans la philosophie ancienne'' (2014), 65-90 '' '' * ‘Horace’s ''Socraticae chartae'' (''A. P.'' 295-322)’ ''Materiali e Discussioni'' 72 (2014), 217-41 * ‘Diogenes Laertius on the ten Pyrrhonist modes’ in K.M. Vogt (ed.), ''Pyrrhonian Skepticism in Diogenes Laertius'' (Tübingen 2015), 171-85 * ‘Varieties of definition’ in D. Ebrey (ed.), ''Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy'' (Cambridge 2015), 187-98 * ‘An introduction to Plato’s theory of Forms’ in A. O’Hear (ed.), ''The History of Philosophy'', Royal Institute of Philosophy supplement 78 (Cambridge 2016), 3-22 * ‘Empedoclean superorganisms’ ''Rhizomata'' 4.1 (2016), 111-25 * ‘Epicurean versus Cyrenaic happiness’ in R. Seaford, J. Wilkins, M. Wright (eds.) ''Selfhood and the Soul: Essays on Ancient Thought and Literature in Honour of Christopher Gill'' (Oxford 2017), 89-106 * ‘Divinization' in P. Destrée and G. Giannopoulou (eds.), ''Plato’s Symposium: A Critical Guide'' (Cambridge, 2017), 88-107 * ‘Zenonian strategies’ in ''Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy'' 53 (2017), 1-32 * ‘Becoming godlike’ in C. Bobonich (ed.), ''The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Ethics'' (Cambridge, 2017), 319-37 * ‘The creation of the world in ancient Greek thought’ in ''Eranos Yearbook'' 73, 2015-2016 (Einsiedeln, 2017), 435-84 * ‘The duality of touch’ in A. Purves (ed.) ''Touch and the Ancient Senses'' (London and New York, 2018), 64-74 * ‘L’allusion empédocléenne en Lucrèce II, 1081-1083’ in S. Franchet d’Espèrey and C. Lévy (eds.), ''Les Présocratiques à Rome'' (Paris, 2018), 145-59; English version, ‘An Empedoclean allusion at Lucretius 2.1081-3’, in P. Burian, J. Strauss Clay and G. Davis (eds.), ''Euphrosyne: Studies in Ancient Philosophy, History, and Literature'' (Berlin and Boston, forthcoming), 15-28 * ‘The ''Phaedo''’s final proof of immortality’ in G. Cornelli, T.M. Robinson, F. Bravo (eds.), ''Plato’s Phaedo'' (Sankt Augustin, 2018), 212-22 * ‘Epicurean theories of knowledge from Hermarchus to Lucretius and Philodemus’ in F. Verde and M. Catapano (eds.), “Hellenistic Theories of Knowledge”, ''Lexicon Philosophicum'' nline journal6 (2018), 105-21 * ‘Stoics and their critics on diachronic identity’ in ''Rhizomata'' 6 (2018), 24-39 * ‘Epicurus on dialectic’ in T. Bénatouïl and K. Ierodiakonou (eds.), ''Dialectic after Plato and Aristotle'' (Cambridge, 2019), 82-113 * ‘Self-sufficiency as a divine attribute in Greek philosophy' in A. Hunt and H. Marlow (eds.), ''Ecology and Theology in the Ancient World: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives'' (London, 2019), 41-7 * ‘The ''Timaeus'' as vehicle for Platonic doctrine’ ''Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy'' 56 (2019), 45-71 * ‘The opening lemmas of the Derveni papyrus’ in C. Vassallo (ed.), ''Presocratics and Papyrological Tradition: A Philosophical Reappraisal of the Sources'' (Studia Praesocratica) (Berlin/Boston, 2019), 45-72. Revised version, ‘The opening lemmas’, in G.W. Most (ed.) ''Studies on the Derveni papyrus'' vol. 2 (Oxford, forthcoming). * ‘Énigmes et paradoxes dans la philosophie grecque ancienne’ in B. Collette-Ducic, M.-A. Gavray, J.-M. Narbonne (eds.), ''L’Esprit critique dans l’antiquité: I, Critique et licence dans la Grèce antique'' (Paris, 2019), 217-36 * ‘Etymology in Plato’s ''Sophist''’ ''Hyperboreus'' 25.2 (2019) 290-301 * ‘Plato’s theology’ in G. Fine (ed.), ''The Oxford Handbook of Plato'' (Oxford 2019), 305-32 * ‘Creationism’ in L. Taub (ed.), ''The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Science'' (Cambridge 2020), 121-40 * ‘Carneades’ theological arguments’ in C. Balla, E. Baziotopoulou, P. Kalligas and V. Karasmanis (eds.), ''Plato’s Academy: a History'' (Cambridge, 2020), 220-45 * ‘Lucretian pleasures’ in P. Hardie, V. Prosperi and D. Zucca (eds.), ''Lucretius Poet and Philosopher. Background and Fortunes of De rerum Natura'' (Berlin, 2020), 11-22 * ‘Plato’s self-references’ in B. Bossi and T.M.Robinson (eds.), ''Plato’s Theaetetus revisited'' (Berlin/Boston, 2020), 3-9 * ‘Why aren’t atoms coloured?’ in U. Zilioli (ed.), ''Atomism in Philosophy: a History from Antiquity to the Present'' (Cambridge, 2020), 61-74 * ‘Lucretius on imagination and mental projection’ in D. El Murr (ed.), ''Le De rerum natura de Lucrèce: perspectives philosophiques'', AITIA 10 (2020) nline journal* ‘Socrates’ second voyage (''Phaedo'' 99-101)’ in F. Leigh (ed.), ''BICS'' Supplement 141, ''Themes in Plato, Aristotle, and Hellenistic Philosophy: Keeling Lectures 2011-18'' (2021), 47-62 * ‘Xenocrates’ invention of Platonism’ in M. Erler, J. Hessler and F. Petrucci (eds.), ''Authorities and Authoritative Texts in the Platonist Tradition'' (Cambridge 2021), 1-37 * ‘An iconography of Xenocrates’ Platonism’ in M. Erler, J. Hessler and F. Petrucci (eds.), ''Authorities and Authoritative Texts in the Platonist Tradition'' (Cambridge 2021), 38-63Notes
References