Demotic Egyptian Language

Demotiс Egyptian language was the state of the Egyptian language from the seventh century BC to the fifth century AD. The formation and development of the Demotic language as a separate language from the New Egyptian was strongly influenced by Aramaic and Ancient Greek.

History and periods

As a stage in the continuing evolution of the Egyptian language that would eventually pass into the Coptic language, Bresciani (1986) divides the history of the Demotic language (as well as its script) into three periods:

# Old Demotic, used during the 28th- 30th dynasties,
# Ptolemaic Demotic, used during Ptolemaic rule, and
# Roman Demotic, during the period of Roman rule in Egypt.

Roman Demotic in particular exhibits a number of grammatical innovations that distinguishes it from earlier forms of Demotic, such as:
* the attestation of suffix pronouns on definite articles used alone without a following noun,
* the loss of distinctions in personal endings used with the qualitative verb forms,
* the innovation of the Future I verb tense form in the pattern ,
* the expansion of certain periphrastic verbal constructions from use with specific verbs to general use with all verbs, as with the Positive Aorist , or the Optative , and
* the generalized use of the preposition with nouns that serve as the direct complement of verbs.

Phonology

Like earlier phases of the Egyptian language, Demotic was written with a consonant-based script. These consonant-based graphemes form the basis for the reconstructions of Demotic consonants, as presented in the table below.

Grammar

Articles

Demotic had definite and indefinite articles that exhibited a three-way distinction between gender and number.

Some examples:

In some specific cases, definite nouns could appear with no article, such as in expressions of time, or with body part nouns in a direct genitive construction:

Possessives

The definite article could also combine with and a suffix pronoun to form possessives, which could be followed by a noun or appear alone. Some examples:

Pronouns

As with earlier periods of Egyptian, Demotic had a set of independent pronouns and another of dependent pronouns.

Independent pronouns in Demotic served in nominal sentences and cleft sentences, and had distinctions for person, number, and gender.

Dependent pronouns in Demotic served as pronominal direct objects following imperatives or conjugated verbs.

Demotic also had a set of interrogative pronouns, including and , both of which meant 'who?' or 'what?'.

Prepositions

Demotic had two types of simple prepositions: those that maintained a single form in all environments, and those that changed form if followed by a pronominal object. Those that had a single form included 'with, and', 'between', 'without', 'in', and 'over, upon'. Prepositions that changed form did so as in the table below.

Some examples of simple prepositions with nouns:

Particles

Demotic possessed a system of particles that worked with verbs and clauses in various functions. A table of some of these with their functions appears below.

A special group of particles, termed "sentence markers" or "converters", could appear at the beginning of a clause to modify the clause's function or meaning. These included the circumstantial converter , the relative converter , the second tense converter , and the imperfect converter .

Adverbs

Adverbs in Demotic included adverbs of quality, place, and time. Adverbs composed of a single word include 'here', 'where', and 'tomorrow'. Multiword adverbial expressions included 'outside', 'inside', 'yesterday', 'at night', and 'never'.

Monuments

Among the monuments of a new daily language literature, comparing to the previous stages of the Egyptian language comes fairy genre, a fable. These fables were intimately entwined with the mythology and narrated the adventures of the mythological characters of the Egyptian religion. Leiden papyrus, dating from the I-II centuries BC, contains such fables.Коростовцев. Литература демотическая. — Фундаментальная электронная библиотека.

Notes

:1. This same tripartite historical division is likewise adopted by Johnson (1976), where she adopts the term "Saite and Persian" for Bresciani's "Old Demotic", which Bresciani considers to encompass Saitic, Persian, and Demotic paleographic types.

References

Bibliography

*
*
*
*
*
*{{cite book , last=Simpson , first=R. S. , title=Demotic Grammar in the Ptolemaic Sacerdotal Decrees , publisher=Griffith Institute Monographs, Griffith Institute, Ashmolean Museum , place=Oxford , date=1996 , isbn=0-900416-65-3

Ancient Egyptian language
Languages of Egypt
Egyptian languages
Afroasiatic languages